INTRODUCTION

MATERIALS AND METHODS
Stent preparation
In vitro test
In vivo test

RESULTS
Surface characterization
![]() | Fig. 3.Surface morphology of the stent. Optical (A) and scanning electron microscope (B) images of bare and tantalum (Ta)-implanted poly-L-lactic acid (PLLA) stents. The PLLA stent shows a smooth surface. There is no difference in the surface morphology of the PLLA stent before and after Ta implantation treatment. |
![]() | Fig. 4.Roughness of the stent. A : Surface topography 3D maps of bare and tantalum (Ta)-implanted poly-L-lactic acid (PLLA) stents. B : There is no significant difference in the calculated average roughness on each surface. |
![]() | Fig. 7.Tantalum layer of the poly-L-lactic acid (PLLA) stent. Representative cross-sectional transmission electron microscope (TEM) image and the TEM/energy-dispersive spectroscopy line profile with c, O, and tantalum (Ta) along the white line from points a to b on the (A) luminal surface and (B) the abluminal surface of the Ta-implanted PLLA stent. |
In vitro endothelialization and blood compatibility
![]() | Fig. 8.Endothelialization test. A : confocal laser scanning microscopy images of adhered endothelial cells. Surface coverage of endothelial cells (B) and cell viability (c) on bare and tantalum (Ta)-implanted poly-L-lactic acid (PLLA) surfaces after 1, 4, and 7 days of culturing, respectively. *p<0.05. †p<0.01. |
![]() | Fig. 9.Platelet adhesion test. A : Scanning electron microscope images of the adhered platelet morphology on bare and tantalum-implanted poly-L-lactic acid (PLLA) stents. B : Absorbance difference between 492 nm and 690 nm of a platelet-lysed solution and (c) the number of adhered platelets on each PLLA stent from the lactate dehydrogenase assay. *p<0.05. |
In vivo test
![]() | Fig. 10.Angiographic and histologic results (×40 magnification) 3 months after stent deployment. A : All parent arteries are patent in the angiographic images without in-stent stenosis (right : tantalum-implanted poly-L-lactic acid [PLLA] stent, left : bare PLLA stent). The black arrows indicate the gold marker of the stent. B : After tissue preparation and hematoxylin and eosin staining with identical specimens, many specimens demonstrate what appears to be an arterial lumen collapse despite the lack of evidence of stenosis in the angiographic images. The discrepancy between the angiographic and histological results may be due to issues that arose during the tissue preparation step with paraffin embedding for the immunohistochemical analysis and stent characteristics such as the small diameter and weak radial force (right : tantalum-implanted PLLA stent, left : bare PLLA stent). |
![]() | Fig. 12.
In vivo inflammation. Less of an inflammatory reaction is identified in the tantalum (Ta)-implanted poly-L-lactic acid (PLLA) stent group at 1-month follow-up. The numbers of cD68+ cells/400 HPF are 5.2±7.3 in the Ta-implanted PLLA stent group (A) and 9.0±16.2 in the bare PLLA stent group (B) (×200 magnification). However, these outcomes lack statistical significance (p=0.601). c : The inflammatory response decreases with time. |

DISCUSSION

CONCLUSION
