PDF
Citation
Print
Go to : 
INTRODUCTION
Liver transplantation (LT) prolongs survival and improves quality of life in patients with liver diseases that are not effectively treated by other modalities. Over the past two decades, the long-term outcomes of LT have improved worldwide. The European [1] and American [2] Liver Transplant Registries have reported 10-year survival rates of over 60% each. Less is known, however, about actual 20-year survival data and immunosuppressive regimens in Korea [3-5]. There have been remarkable developments in LT in Korea during the last 20 years, including the introduction of many innovative surgical techniques, especially regarding living donor LT (LDLT), the more frequent performance of deceased donor LT (DDLT), and improvements in immunosuppressive regimens [6-9]. The present study retrospectively analyzed the clinical outcomes and immunosuppressive regimens of LT survivors who have been followed up for 20 years.
Go to :
METHODS
The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Asan Medical Center (IRB No. 2021-0857), which waived the requirement for informed consent due to the retrospective nature of this study. This study was performed in accordance with the ethical guidelines of the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki 2013.
Patients
The primary endpoint of this study was actual 20-year posttransplant survival. The secondary endpoint was the immunosuppressive regimen at 20 years after LT. Thus, longitudinal follow-up data were retrospectively analyzed in 20-year LT survivors. The LT database of our institution was searched to identify patients who underwent primary LT from January 2000 to December 2001. Selected patients were divided into three groups based on graft type and recipient age; adult LDLT, adult DDLT, and pediatric LT (with pediatric patients defined as recipients aged less than 18 years). Clinical follow-up information of these patients was cross-sectionally collected during a 1-month period in August 2021. All patients were followed up until August 2021 or patient death. Institutional medical records were reviewed to determine graft and patient survival, and the database of the National Health Insurance Service of Korea was reviewed to confirm patient survival. The immunosuppressive agent dosage and trough level used for analysis were those recorded from alive patients at their most recent outpatient follow-up visit.
Statistical Analysis
Numerical data are presented as mean±standard deviation or median with range. Continuous variables were compared using the Student t-test. Incidence variables were compared using the chi-square test or the Fisher’s exact test. Survival rates were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. A P-value <0.05 was considered to indicate statistical significance. All statistical analyses were performed using IBM SPSS ver. 22 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA).
Go to :
RESULTS
Patient Profiles
The study cohort consisted of 251 patients who underwent primary LT from January 2000 to December 2001. This cohort was divided into three groups, consisting of 207 patients who underwent adult LDLT, 22 who underwent adult DDLT, and 22 who underwent pediatric LT. The most common primary indications for LT were hepatitis B virus (HBV)-associated liver cirrhosis (n=177, 85.5%) and fulminant hepatic failure (n=14. 6.8%) in the adult LDLT group; HBV-associated liver cirrhosis (n=20, 90.9%) in the adult DDLT group; and biliary atresia (n=16, 72.7%) in the pediatric LT group. The profiles of patients belonging to these three groups are summarized in Table 1. Patient age, pretransplant laboratory profiles, and model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) scores were similar in the adult LDLT and DDLT groups.
Table 1
Demographic and clinical characteristics of patients in the adult LDLT, adult DDLT, and pediatric LT groups
| Variable | Adult LDLT | Adult DDLT | Pediatric LT | P-value (adult LDLT vs. DDLT) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. of patients | 207 | 22 | 22 | |
| Recipient (male:female) | 169:38 | 15:7 | 7:15 | 0.741 |
| Recipient age (yr) | 46.2±8.3 | 44.4±9.9 | 2.2±3.2 | 0.236 |
| Primary disease | 0.483a) | |||
| HBV-LC | 177 (85.5) | 20 (90.9) | ||
| ALF | 14 (6.8) | 3 (13.6) | ||
| HCV-LC | 6 (2.9) | |||
| ALD | 4 (1.9) | |||
| Cryptogenic LC | 2 (1.0) | 1 (4.5) | ||
| Wilson disease | 2 (1.0) | |||
| PSC | 1 (0.5) | 1 (4.5) | ||
| SBC | 1 (0.5) | |||
| BA | 16 (72.7) | |||
| Metabolic disease | 3 (13.6) | |||
| Preoperative laboratory finding | ||||
| Total bilirubin (mg/dL) | 10.6±13.8 | 7.4±7.6 | 15.4±14.7 | 0.276 |
| Serum creatinine (mg/dL) | 1.09±0.91 | 0.91±0.21 | 0.61±0.97 | 0.351 |
| Prothrombin time (INR) | 2.39±1.32 | 2.03±0.78 | 1.51±0.45 | 0.223 |
| Platelet count (×103/mL) | 61.8±44.1 | 44.1±27.7 | 160.7±81.3 | 0.067 |
| MELD/PELD score | 25.5±10.8 | 24.6±9.6 | 12.1±4.7 | 0.693 |
| HCC at explant liver | 48 (23.2) | 3 (13.6) | 0 | 0.569 |
| Donor sex (male:female) | 171:36b) | 15:7 | 8:14 | 0.099 |
| Donor age (yr) | 27.1±7.3 | 23.4±10.4 | 30.7±5.2 | 0.036 |
| Graft type (n) | ||||
| Whole liver | 21 (95.5) | 1 (4.5) | ||
| Right liver | 158 (76.3) | 1 (4.5) | ||
| Left liver | 29 (14.0) | 12 (54.5) | ||
| Left lateral section | 9 (40.9) | |||
| Dual-graft | 20 (9.7) | |||
| Graft weight (g) | 669.3±148.1 | 1215.3±271.6 | 272.5±83.1 | <0.001 |
| Graft-recipient weight ratio | 1.01±0.25 | 1.76±0.34 | 2.61±0.65 | <0.001 |
| Ischemic time (min) | ||||
| Cold | 75.5±86.4 | 352.6±208.9 | 27.1±24.7 | <0.001 |
| Warm | 52.1±110.5 | 138.6±128.8 | 31.2±13.6 | <0.001 |
LDLT, living donor liver transplantation; DDLT, deceased donor liver transplantation; HBV, hepatitis B virus; LC, liver cirrhosis; ALF, acute liver failure; HCV, hepatitis C virus; ALD, alcoholic liver disease; PSC, primary sclerosing cholangitis; SBC, secondary biliary cirrhosis; BA, biliary atresia; INR, international normalized ratio; MELD, model for end-stage liver disease; PELD, pediatric end-stage liver disease; HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma.
Only one adult patient underwent split LT, whereas no patients did so in the pediatric LT group. The graft-to-recipient weight ratios in the adult LDLT and DDLT groups were 1.01±0.25 and 1.76±0.34, respectively (P<0.001). Cold and warm ischemic times were significantly longer in the adult DDLT group than in the adult LDLT group (P<0.001 each).
Posttransplant Graft Survival
The graft survival rates at 3 months and at 1, 3, 5, 10, and 20 years were 91.3%, 86.4%, 79.6%, 77.7%, 71.9%, and 61.2%, respectively, in the adult LDLT group; 95.5%, 86.4%, 72.7%, 72.7%, 72.7%, and 68.2%, respectively, in the adult DDLT group; and 100%, 86.4%, 86.4%, 81.8%, 81.8%, and 72.7%, respectively, in the pediatric group (P=0.732) (Fig. 1).
Retransplantation was performed in seven patients. One DDLT recipient underwent a second DDLT 1 month later due to early allograft dysfunction. Five LDLT recipients underwent DDLT, one due to a biliary complication at 21 months, one due to outflow vein obstruction at 104 months, one due to chronic rejection at 117 months, one due to portal vein thrombosis at 122 months, and one due to liver cirrhosis of unknown cause at 172 months. One pediatric LT recipient underwent LDLT due to graft outflow vein obstruction at 137 months. Of these seven patients, three died within 3 months after retransplantation, and the other four survived for more than 5 years.
Posttransplant Overall Survival
The patient survival rates at 3 months and at 1, 3, 5, 10, and 20 years were 91.3%, 86.4%, 79.6%, 77.7%, 72.8%, and 62.6%, respectively, in the adult LDLT group; 95.5%, 86.4%, 72.7%, 72.7%, 72.7%, and 68.2%, respectively, in the adult DDLT group; and 100%, 86.4%, 86.4%, 81.8%, 81.8%, and 77.3%, respectively, in the pediatric group (P=0.545) (Fig. 2).
Patients’ deaths were divided into perioperative mortality within 3 months after LT (n=22) and late mortality (n=69). The causes of perioperative mortality included primary graft nonfunction and early allograft dysfunction, bleeding, infection, and vascular and biliary complications. The causes of late mortality included pneumonia (n=18), chronic rejection and graft failure (n=11), recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC; n=5), de novo malignancy (n=5), cerebrovascular accident (n=5), ischemic cardiac disease (n=3), HBV recurrence (n=3), hepatitis C virus recurrence (n=3), renal failure (n=1), biliary complication (n=1), abdominal infection (n=1), and unknown cause (n=10).
Immunosuppressive Regimens at 20 Years after LT
The immunosuppressive regimens in 160 alive recipients included tacrolimus (FK) monotherapy in 92 (57.9%); dual therapy with FK and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) in 25 (15.7%); triple therapy with FK, MMF and everolimus in 1 (0.6%); dual therapy with FK and everolimus in 3 (1.9%); cyclosporine monotherapy in 18 (11.3%); dual therapy with cyclosporine and MMF in 1(0.6%); MMF monotherapy in 18 (11.3%); and everolimus monotherapy in 1 (0.6%). Of the 121 patients receiving FK, 16 (13.2%) were treated with prolonged-release FK (Advagraf; Astellas Pharma Inc., Tokyo, Japan).
The median and mean daily dosages of FK in the 92 recipients receiving FK monotherapy were 1.0 mg/day (range, 0.25–3.0 mg/day) and 1.35±0.59 mg/day, respectively; and their median and mean trough FK concentrations were 2.0 ng/mL (range, 1.0–4.6 ng/mL) and 2.22±1.06 ng/mL, respectively (Fig. 2A). The median and mean daily dosage of cyclosporine in the 18 recipients who were administered cyclosporine monotherapy were 50 mg/day (range, 25–100 mg/day) and 59.7±25.9 mg/day, respectively; and their median and mean trough cyclosporine concentrations were 33 ng/mL (range, 25–62 ng/mL) and 35.9±9.9 ng/mL, respectively (Fig. 2B).
Go to :
DISCUSSION
Aside from a brief report regarding initial LT experiences in our institution [4], the present study is the first report of actual 20-year survival data at a Korean high-volume LT center. The graft and patient survival outcomes reflected the early experience of LT in our institution. Our report of the first 1,000 LDLTs performed from December 1994 to June 2005 included 893 adult and 107 pediatric LDLT cases. The most common diagnoses were HBV-associated liver cirrhosis (80%) in adult recipients and biliary atresia in pediatric recipients (63%). Their 5-year patient survival rates were 83.2% in adult recipients and 84.8% in pediatric recipients [10].
The Organ Transplantation Law was enacted in Korea in February 2000, and the Korean Network for Organ Sharing (KONOS) was established at the same time. This law resulted in a dramatic reduction in the number of DDs due to the strictness of the donation process and the lack of publicity [9]. The number of DDs decreased from 162 in 1999 to 52 in 2000, 52 in 2001, and 36 in 2002. Subsequently, the number of donors gradually increased, with 68 in 2003, 86 in 2004, 91 in 2005, 141 in 2006, 148 in 2007, and 256 in 2008. The number of patients on the waiting list for DDLT markedly increased during this time period from 620 in 2000 to 3,000 in 2008, with the majority of DD livers allocated to urgent patients [11]. This extreme donor shortage resulted in a greater acceptance of marginal donor livers and a low likelihood of early retransplantation, thereby reducing the graft survival in adults who underwent DDLT.
To cope with the shortage of DDs, adult LDLT became the main type of LT in our institution in 2000–2001, resulting in a marked increase in the number of adult patients undergoing LDLT. The indications for LT were the same in adult LDLT and DDLT recipients. This is the main background reason why the mean MELD score was quite comparable between the adult LDLT and DDLT groups. The mean MELD score in adult LDLT patients at that time was much higher than that in recent years [12].
Concomitantly with the increased demand for LDLT, various standardized techniques of LDLT were also established for the implantation of right liver grafts [6,13]. Many innovative surgical techniques were developed, including middle hepatic vein reconstruction using vascular conduit interposition (modified right liver graft), duct-to-duct anastomosis, intraoperative interruption of venous collateral veins, and dual-graft implantation [6,10,13]. The development of these techniques, which required trial-and-error processes, might be reflected in the incidence of perioperative mortality in the adult LDLT group. The 3-month patient mortality rate was 4.5% in the present study, and their causes included early allograft dysfunction, bleeding, infection, and vascular and biliary complications. These outcomes appear to have significantly improved in comparison with the initial experience of LDLT in our institution [14]. Twenty years ago, the surgical techniques for adult LDLT had not matured, but those for DDLT were already established. Consequently, the incidence of surgical complications was higher following LDLT than following DDLT, which was reflected in the 1-year patient survival rates in the present study [10].
Compared with the recent results of adult LDLT, the incidence of HCC recurrence-associated patient mortality was noticeably low, likely because the proportion of LDLT patients with HCC was correspondingly low [8]. The proportion of patients with HCC has been gradually increasing over time, and HCC has been one of the main indications for adult LDLT at our institution during the last 10 years. Another noticeable difference is the lower proportion of patients with alcoholic liver disease [15], as alcoholic liver disease was not regarded as an ethically eligible indication for LDLT in 2000–2001.
In our previous analysis of the indications of 3,145 LDLTs during a 10-year period from January 2008 to December 2017, common diseases in adult recipients were HBV-associated liver cirrhosis (62.9%), alcoholic liver disease (16.0%), hepatitis C virus-associated cirrhosis (6.7%), acute liver failure (4.2%), and other diseases (5.2%). The proportion of patients with HBV-associated liver disease gradually decreased, but the proportion of those with alcoholic liver disease increased. HCC was diagnosed in 48.6% of patients. The mean proportion of patients with HCC was 63.1% among those with HBV-associated liver disease. In 126 pediatric recipients, the primary diagnoses were biliary atresia (40.5%), liver failure of various causes (29.4%), metabolic disease (17.5%), hepatoblastoma (9.5%), and infectious diseases (3.2%) [15].
HBV-associated liver cirrhosis was the most common indication of LT in adult patients; thus, posttransplant HBV prophylaxis was an important concern in posttransplant management. Twenty years ago, high-dose hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) was the choice of HBV prophylaxis in Korea because of absence of effective antiviral agents [16,17]. With the development of high-genetic barrier antiviral agents, such as entecavir and tenofovir, combination therapy of low-dose HBIG and an antiviral agent has been the preferred regimen for posttransplant HBV prophylaxis at many institutions in Korea, including our institution [18,19].
The causes of late patient mortality of adult LDLT recipients in the present study were comparable to those of DDLT recipients in Western countries [1-3]. This indicates that the long-term postoperative management should be very similar in adult LDLT and DDLT recipients. However, there were some LDLT recipients who died or underwent retransplantation due to vascular complications, which may be unusual in recipients who have undergone whole-liver DDLT. Life-long surveillance should be recommended for LDLT recipients who undergo endovascular stenting at the hepatic or portal vein [7,10].
Of the 22 patients who underwent pediatric LT, 21 underwent pediatric LDLT and only one underwent DDLT using a whole liver. The marked decrease in the number of DDs during 2000–2001 and the lack of regulations encompassing split LT meant that no patients in the present study underwent pediatric split LT and only one underwent adult split LT [9]. The liver graft allocation policy for pediatric patients changed after the alleviation of strict restrictions for pediatric split LT in 2013 [20]. Although pediatric LDLT was performed earlier than adult LDLT in our institution, the early posttransplant survival outcomes of pediatric LDLT were not superior to those of adult LDLT because many technical factors limited successful pediatric LDLT [21,22]. Our recent study presented the long-term outcomes of pediatric LDLT [23]. The 1-year and 5-year patient survival rates were 90.1% and 81.5%, respectively, in 81 patients who underwent LT between 1994 and 2002; 92.9% and 92.0%, respectively, in 113 patients who underwent LT between 2003 to 2011; and 100% and 98.6%, respectively, in 93 patients who underwent LT between 2012 to 2020. Multivariate analyses revealed that a primary diagnosis of acute liver failure, bloodstream infection, posttransplant lymphoproliferative disease, and chronic rejection were negative prognostic indicators for patient survival [23]. Recent technical advances in pediatric LT have led to near-zero perioperative mortality at our institution.
The immunosuppressive regimen and the target trough concentration of immunosuppressive agents at posttransplant 10 or 20 years are matters of concern because of the risk of de novo malignancy and adverse side effects [24-26]. Various immunosuppressive regimens have been used during the 20-year period after LT [27], with FK monotherapy, FK-MMF dual therapy, cyclosporine monotherapy, and MMF monotherapy being the most frequent in the present study. In more recent years, everolimus has replaced calcineurin inhibitors or MMF in a small number of our study patients [28]. There is no consensus on the target trough concentration of immunosuppressive agents at posttransplant 10 or 20 years. It is generally recommended to adjust the target trough concentration on a case-by-case basis. We believe that our results regarding the dosage and target trough concentration in patients administrating tacrolimus or cyclosporine monotherapy over 20 years will be used as reference values for personalized adjustment of immunosuppressive agents [27,28].
This study has several limitations. It is a retrospective, single-center study, with small numbers of patients in adult DDLT and pediatric LT groups. This study did not include detailed risk factor analyses for graft and patient survival. Further high-volume multicenter studies are necessary to validate the results of this study.
In conclusion, the present study is the first report of actual 20-year survival data at a Korean high-volume LT center. The graft and patient survival outcomes reflected early experiences with LT at our institution, with long-term outcomes being similar regardless of graft type and patient age. Our results regarding the immunosuppressant dosage and target trough concentration will be used as reference values for personalized adjustment of immunosuppressive agents. High-volume multicenter studies are necessary to assess the long-term outcomes of LT.
Go to :
XML Download