Evaluation of periodontal parameters and gingival crevicular fluid cytokines in children with anterior open bite receiving passive orthodontic treatment with a spur

Gabriel Antônio dos Anjos Tou; Ivana Márcia Alves Diniz; Marcus Vinicius Lucas Ferreira; Ricardo Alves Mesquita; Mônica Yamauti; Tarcília Aparecida Silva; Soraia Macari

doi:10.4041/kjod.2022.52.2.142

Journal List > Korean J Orthod > v.52(2) > 1160452

Go to TopGo to Top Go to BottomGo to Bottom

TOOLS

Tou, Diniz, Ferreira, Mesquita, Yamauti, Silva, and Macari: Evaluation of periodontal parameters and gingival crevicular fluid cytokines in children with anterior open bite receiving passive orthodontic treatment with a spur

Original Article

Korean J Orthod 2022;52(2):142-149.

Published online: 25 March 2022

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2022.52.2.142

Evaluation of periodontal parameters and gingival crevicular fluid cytokines in children with anterior open bite receiving passive orthodontic treatment with a spur

Gabriel Antônio dos Anjos Tou^a

, Ivana Márcia Alves Diniz^a, Marcus Vinicius Lucas Ferreira^a, Ricardo Alves Mesquita^b, Mônica Yamauti^c, Tarcília Aparecida Silva^b, Soraia Macari^a,

^aDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil

^bDepartment of Oral Pathology and Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil

^cDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, Division of Oral Health Science, Graduate School and Faculty of Dental Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan

Corresponding author: Soraia Macari. Professor, Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Av. Presidente Antônio Carlos 6627, CEP 31.270-901, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil., Tel +55-31-34092478 e-mail soraiamacari@gmail.com

How to cite this article: Tou GAA, Diniz IMA, Ferreira MVL, Mesquita RA, Yamauti M, Silva TA, Macari S. Evaluation of periodontal parameters and gingival crevicular fluid cytokines in children with anterior open bite receiving passive orthodontic treatment with a spur. Korean J Orthod 2022;52:142-149.

Received 4 June 2021 Revised 1 September 2021 Accepted 22 October 2021

(open-access):

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate clinical parameters and gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) cytokines in children with anterior open bite receiving passive orthodontic treatment with spurs.

Methods

Twenty children with indications for interceptive orthodontic treatment, an anterior open bite, and good oral hygiene and periodontal health were included in this study. GCF samples were collected from the mandibular and maxillary central incisors before (baseline) and 24 hours and 7 days after spur bonding. Clinical and periodontal examinations and cytokine analyses were performed.

Results

At 7 days after spur attachment, gingival bleeding in the mandibular group was increased relative to that in the maxillary group. Visible plaque was correlated with gingival bleeding at 7 days and the GCF volume at 24 hours after spur attachment. Compared with those at baseline, interleukin (IL)-8 levels in the maxillary group and IL-1β levels in both tooth groups increased at both 24 hours and 7 days and at 7 days, respectively. At 24 hours, IL-8, IL-1β, and IL-6 levels were higher in the maxillary group than in the mandibular group. Cytokine production was positively correlated with increased GCF volume, but not with gingival bleeding, visible plaque, or probing depth.

Conclusions

Although orthodontic treatment with spurs in children resulted in increased gingival bleeding around the mandibular incisors, IL levels were higher around the maxillary incisors and not correlated with periodontal parameters. Increased cytokine levels in GCF may be associated with the initial tooth movement during open bite correction with a passive orthodontic appliance in children.

Open bite

Keywords: Passive orthodontic treatment, Cytokines, Gingival crevicular fluid,

INTRODUCTION

Anterior open bite is a malocclusion characterized by the lack of contact between the dental arches in the anterior region.¹ This condition harms the oral health-related quality of life of children,² unbalances the stomatognathic system,³ and has a multifactorial origin involving a combination of skeletal, dental, and soft tissue factors.⁴

Open bite can be associated with the breakdown of the peribuccal and intraoral muscle balance caused by deleterious oral habits such as prolonged digital and pacifier sucking, which results in tongue thrusting at rest and during swallowing^1,4,5 From the age of 5 years, orthodontic interception is necessary because lingual interposition between the incisors is a harmful factor that prolongs malocclusion.^4,6-8 The treatment primarily targets elimination of the harmful habit and lingual interposition.⁴ There are different ways to perform such interventions; one of them involves the use of an orthodontic accessory called a spur, which is a passive orthodontic appliance. The primary purpose of spurs is backward repositioning of the tongue, thus avoiding tongue interposition between the mandibular and maxillary incisors.⁹

Interleukins (ILs) mediate the mechanical effect of orthodontic movement in the periodontal ligament (PDL). These biological markers produced by inflammatory, bone, and PDL cells can be measured in the gingival crevicular fluid (GCF).^10,11 The presence of ILs in GCF is a valuable marker for monitoring the response of teeth to orthodontic treatment, because it reflects the microenvironment where forces are exerted.^12,13

Studies have observed differences in the concentration of ILs such as IL-1β, IL-6, and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) in GCF during active orthodontic movement.^12-19 However, there is scarce information concerning the presence of biological markers during the initial periods of movement with passive orthodontic treatment. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the periodontal conditions and the response of GCF cytokine markers during passive orthodontic treatment with spurs in children with anterior open bite. The hypothesis was that passive appliances could interfere with clinical and periodontal parameters and increase biomarker expression.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This longitudinal clinical trial research was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the institution (CAAE: 87714218.0.0000.5149) with a duration of two-year period. All subjects provided written informed consent to participate in the study. The study was a group comprised 20 patients selected according to the following inclusion criteria: indications for interceptive orthodontic treatment, presence of anterior open bite, and good oral hygiene and periodontal health. Patients with systemic diseases, those who received treatment with antibiotics and anti-inflammatory drugs in the past 3 months, those with bleeding during GCF collection, and those with any orthodontic accessory were excluded.

Periodontal parameters, namely the probing depth, the percentage of visible plaque, and gingival bleeding, were recorded.¹³ Clinical examination and device bonding were performed by a single trained and calibrated researcher (interexaminer kappa = 0.91 and intraexaminer kappa = 0.83). Seven days before the first day of sample collection, the participants received hygiene instructions and underwent cleaning of the dental and oral environment. Cumulative data indicate that there is an increase in GCF cytokines as early as 1 minute to 1 hour after device bonding, reaching a peak at 24 hours; this is followed by a decrease, with a new peak at day 7.²⁰ Thus, according to the procedures used in previous studies,^13,16,18,20 periodontal evaluation and GCF collection were performed before placement of the appliance (baseline) and within 24 hours and 7 days after the device was bonded.

Relative isolation was performed, phosphoric acid (Fusion-Duralink; Angelus, Londrina, Brazil) was applied for 30 seconds to the enamel surface, and the Transbond XT adhesive system kit (3M Unitek, Monrovia, CA, USA) was applied according to the manufacturer’s recommendations. Bonded spurs with a 2.8-mm-wide base (ref. number 30.60.002; Morelli, Sorocaba, SP, Brazil)²¹ were installed in the central region of the lingual surface of the mandibular incisor; pressure was applied to the center of the accessory so that the excess composite resin could leak out from the sides of the spurs and be removed. Two 40-second photoactivation cycles, one on the lingual side and one on the incisal side, were performed with an LED lamp (1,000 mW/cm², Bluephase N; Ivoclar Vivadent Inc., Amherst, NY, USA) (Figure 1).

Figure 1

A, Representative image of an 8-year-old boy with anterior open bite. B, Removal of tongue interposition after spur bonding allowed teeth eruption and bone remodeling with an increase in cytokine levels. The same participant shows some correction of the malocclusion at 1 year after attachment of the spur. C, The spurs are attached to the central regions of the lingual surfaces of the mandibular incisors (white arrows indicate the cervical regions of the mandibular incisors).

GCF samples were collected from the four mandibular and maxillary central incisors. Before fluid collection, all clinically detectable biofilm was removed without touching the gingiva in order to minimize contamination of the absorbent paper filters with blood. Following isolation with a cotton roll, the gingiva was gently air-dried and GCF was collected using Periopaper^® strips (gingival fluid collection strips, ref. number 593520, Periopaper^®; Oraflow, Hewlett, NY, USA).¹³ The tape was introduced into the gingival sulcus from the lingual side until it found tissue resistance, and it was held in place for 30 seconds. Samples visibly contaminated with blood were discarded. For better accuracy, GCF was quantified on the Periotron^® 8000 apparatus (Oraflow) immediately after each collection. The Periopaper^® strips were inserted into sterile vials, which were immersed in ice and stored at −80°C until further analysis. Periotron^® 8000 readings were converted to volume measurements in microliters using a standard human serum curve.

GCF samples were extracted in two steps. First, 25 µL of cytokine extraction solution (phosphate-buffered saline [0.4 mM NaCl, 10 mM NaPO₄]) containing protease inhibitors (0.1 mM phenylmethylsulfonylfluoride, 0.1 mM hydrochloric benzethonium, 10 mM ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, and 0.01 mg/mL aprotinin A; pH 7.4) and Tween 20 (0.05%) was added to each Eppendorf tube containing the Periopaper^® strip. The tubes were shaken for 30 seconds and centrifuged for 10 minutes at 10,000 RPM at 4°C. The supernatant was removed and stored in a new Eppendorf tube, and the same process was repeated one more time. At the end, a total of 50 µL was obtained from each Periopaper^® strip. The supernatants were mixed in a single Eppendorf tube and shaken. The material of the maxillary and mandibular incisor groups was pooled for each collection time, and 50 µL of the supernatant was separated for cytometric bead array (CBA). The other samples were stored at −80°C.¹³

GCF analysis was performed using a BD^TM CBA Human Inflammatory Cytokines Human Kit (reference number 551811; BD Biosciences, San Diego, CA, USA) and a BD FACSCalibur^TM flow cytometer (Becton Dickinson, San Jose, CA, USA) according to manufacturer’s guidelines. This kit can measure IL-8, IL-1β, IL-6, IL-10, TNF-α, and IL-12p70 in a single human sample. The cytokine concentrations in GCF were corrected by the total volume of fluid obtained, and the values were recorded in pg/mL.

Statistical analysis

The data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation. The datasets showed non-normal distribution when analyzed by the D'Agostino & Pearson omnibus normality test and the Shapiro–Wilk normality test. Differences between groups were analyzed using the nonparametric Wilcoxon test at each time point, and the difference between the mandibular and maxillary incisor groups was determined by the Mann–Whitney U test. Correlations were determined by Pearson’s correlation test. The level of significance was set at P < 0.05 in all analyses.

RESULTS

Gingival bleeding after spur attachment

The appliances were well tolerated by the 20 children included in this study (7 boys and 13 girls; mean age of 8.85 ± 1.19 years). Spur attachment did not cause changes in the probing depth, visible plaque, or GFC volume at the different time points (24 hours and 7 days) (Table 1). On the other hand, at 7 days, the mandibular incisors exhibited increased gingival bleeding relative to that at baseline, with enhanced GCF levels relative to those in the maxillary group (Table 1). Gingival bleeding was positively correlated with visible plaque in the mandibular group at 7 days (Supplementary Table 1). Visible plaque was also correlated with the GCF volume in the maxillary and mandibular groups at 24 hours (Supplementary Table 1).

Table 1

Demographic distribution and clinical data for 20 children with anterior open bite scheduled for passive orthodontic treatment with a spur

Time point	Probing depth (mm)		Gingival bleeding (%)		Visible plaque (%)		GCF volume (µL)
Time point	Mandibular incisor	Maxillary incisor	Mandibular incisor	Maxillary incisor	Mandibular incisor	Maxillary incisor	Mandibular incisor	Maxillary incisor
Baseline	1.29 ± 0.24	1.48 ± 0.28	0 ± 0^a	0 ± 0	33.1 ± 0.34	17.5 ± 0.28	0.13 ± 0.21	0.14 ± 0.17
24 hr	1.3 ± 0.23	1.51 ± 0.29	1.2 ± 0.03^ab	0.6 ± 0.02	28.7 ± 0.36	17.5 ± 0.28	0.19 ± 0.22	0.15 ± 0.18
7 d	1.35 ± 0.21	1.55 ± 0.34	2.2 ± 0.04^b	0 ± 0*	33.7 ± 0.36	18.7 ± 0.29	0.26 ± 0.24	0.18 ± 0.17

Values are presented as mean ± standard deviation.

The nonparametric Wilcoxon test was used at each time point.

GCF, gingival crevicular fluid.

p < 0.05.

Different letters mean difference among time-points; Asterisk (*) means different from lower incisors.

Supplementary data is available at https://doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2022.52.2.142.

Cytokine levels after spur attachment

Cytokine levels in the mandibular and maxillary groups were analyzed to gain a better understanding of the effects of spur attachment on GCF during the orthodontic treatment of children with open bite. At 24 hours after spur attachment, IL-8, IL-1β, and IL-6 levels in GCF of the maxillary incisors were increased relative to those in GCF of the mandibular incisors. However, there was no difference between groups at 7 days (Figure 2).

Figure 2

Cytokine levels in the gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) collected from mandibular and maxillary incisors (n = 20 patients per time point) at baseline (before spur bonding) and 24 hours and 7 days after spur attachment for anterior open bite correction in children. The data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation. Different letters indicate a difference between time points. Asterisks (*) indicate the difference between the maxillary and mandibular incisors. The nonparametric Wilcoxon test was used at each time point, and the Mann–Whitney test was used to compare differences between the mandibular and maxillary incisors. p < 0.05.

IL, interleukin; B, baseline.

In addition, IL-8 levels in the maxillary group were enhanced at 24 hours after spur attachment, and they were similar to the 7-day levels (Figure 2). At 7 days, both IL-8 and IL-1β levels in both groups were increased relative to those at baseline (Figure 2). IL-6 levels in the maxillary group were significantly lower at 7 days than at 24 hours, with no difference between the levels at 24 hours and those at baseline (Figure 2). IL-6 levels in the mandibular group and IL-12p70 levels in both tooth groups showed no differences among time points (Figure 2). IL-10 and TNF-α were not detected at any time point in either group (data not shown).

Correlation between GCF cytokines and periodontal parameters

In view of the significant differences in gingival bleeding in the mandibular group, a possible correlation between clinical periodontal parameters and ILs was determined. No correlation was found between ILs and the probing depth, gingival bleeding, and the visible plaque measurements in the mandibular and maxillary groups (Table 2). On the other hand, IL-8, IL-1β, and IL-6 levels were positively correlated with the GCF volume (Table 2).

Table 2

Correlations between cytokine levels and clinical data at 7 days after spur attachment for anterior open bite correction in children

Cytokine (pg/mL)	Probing depth (mm)				Gingival bleeding (%)				Visible plaque (%)				GCF volume (µL)
	Mandibular incisor		Maxillary incisor		Mandibular incisor		Maxillary incisor		Mandibular incisor		Maxillary incisor		Mandibular incisor		Maxillary incisor
	r²	p	r²	p	r²	p	r²	p	r²	p	r²	p	r²	p	r²	p
IL-8	0.03142	0.496	0.0132	0.6829	0.0285	0.5175	0.0208	0.6083	0.0745	0.289	0.186	0.109	0.7572	< 0.0001***	0.7193	< 0.0001***
IL-1β	0.03141	0.496	0.00006	0.9774	0.012	0.6752	0.0014	0.8901	0.1016	0.212	0.036	0.5	0.8017	< 0.0001***	0.3654	0.017*
IL-6	0.02907	0.472	0.0915	0.1948	0.0246	0.5087	0.0063	0.7402	0.0036	0.801	0.523	0.023	0.3368	0.0068*	0.1291	0.0096**
IL-12p70	0.04539	0.367	0.1785	0.0635	0.034	0.4363	0.0861	0.9283	0.0983	0.178	0.023	0.525	0.0414	0.3898	0.0031	0.8157

Pearson’s correlation test was performed.

GCF, gingival crevicular fluid; IL, interleukin.

*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.

DISCUSSION

Studies demonstrating the effects of passive orthodontic appliances for open bite correction in children are lacking. In the present study, we analyzed the clinical, periodontal, and molecular effects of a passive orthodontic appliance on the mandibular and maxillary incisors at 24 hours and 7 days after bonding. The major findings included increased gingival bleeding after spur attachment and time point fluctuations in the production of IL-8, IL-1β, and IL-6. Cytokine levels in GCF were higher in the maxillary group. Other than the GCF volume, none of the clinical data were correlated with the levels of the analyzed ILs.

The use of orthodontic appliances attached to the teeth is associated with changes in clinical parameters; therefore, periodontal inflammation should be considered during treatment.^15,17,22 Our findings showed that the increase in gingival bleeding at 7 days after orthodontic spur bonding to the mandibular incisors was correlated with an increased dental plaque percentage. This result is consistent with that in the study conducted by Pejda et al.,²³ who reported a significant increase in gingival bleeding in patients treated with a fixed appliance after bracket bonding. Another study also agrees with these findings by demonstrating that the presence of orthodontic accessories contributes to the worsening of periodontal clinical parameters, such as the plaque percentage, thus resulting in increased inflammation and gingival bleeding.²⁴ These changes are directly related to difficulties in cleaning and consequent accumulation of a dental biofilm,^17,22 and they may persist until the end of orthodontic treatment, when the accessories are removed.²² Moreover, in the present study, an increased dental plaque percentage was correlated with an increased GCF volume at 24 hours after spur attachment. Similar results have been reported by Grant et al.,¹⁷ who demonstrated a positive correlation between plaque accumulation and the GCF volume at sites of orthodontic force application.^15,24

The release of pro-inflammatory markers may be associated with an increase in dental plaque in patients with orthodontic appliances.¹⁷ An increase in the GCF volume has also been considered an indicator of periodontal inflammation and is related to an increase in IL levels.²⁵ However, no correlation was detected between clinical data other than the GCF volume and the GCF cytokine levels analyzed in this study. First, IL was not correlated with periodontal parameters; this indicates that IL expression in the maxillary and mandibular groups was associated with tooth movement and open bite correction. Second, IL was significantly higher for the maxillary than for the mandibular teeth, which were the sites of spur attachment. Therefore, we can conclude that the increased cytokine levels in GCF were not a result of spur-induced gingival/periodontal inflammation; rather, they were associated with tooth movement during open bite correction with the passive orthodontic appliance.

Anterior open bite correction with spurs is considered to involve passive movement,⁹ and the elimination of harmful oral habits allows correct positioning of the tongue and permits the peribuccal muscles to exert force on the teeth,^4,6 with induction of bone remodeling and cytokine release.²⁵ While most investigators focus on active treatments, in the present study, we evaluated the production of biomarkers in GCF during the early periods of passive orthodontic tooth movement.

Various types of inflammatory mediators are involved in the cascade of biological events. Biomarkers are present in GCF during orthodontic tooth movement because of induction of bone remodeling caused by the forces applied to the teeth.^11,12,18 The decision to study the cytokines reported in the present study was based on literature data showing the kinetics of these molecules in GCF after mechanical force application.^11,12,18 GCF analysis was performed using the BD^TM CBA Human Inflammatory Cytokines Kit, which can measure bone remodeling markers such as IL-8,¹² IL-1β,^16,17 IL-6,^13,18 IL-10,²⁰ TNF-α,^17,26 and IL-12p70²⁶ in a single human sample.

Biomarkers are present in GCF during active orthodontic movement due to the forces applied to the teeth.^11,12,18 Teixeira et al.¹⁹ identified an increase in the levels of 32 different types of cytokines/cytokine receptors in an animal model over a 24-hour period of orthodontic force application; among these cytokines, IL-3, IL-18, TNF-a, IL-1β, and IL-6 showed remarkable increases. Similar results were obtained by Tuncer et al.,¹² who reported that active orthodontic movement induced an increase in the release of IL-8 in GCF at 24 hours and 6 days in adults. In the present study, a passive orthodontic model was used, and likewise, it was possible to identify a significant increase in IL-8, IL-6, and IL-1β. Of note, although greater exudation of GCF is related to clinical and periodontal parameters, it does not explain the increase in IL levels after passive appliance bonding, when the cytokine levels are normalized by the amount of GCF volume in each sample.

In this investigation, IL-6 was increased only in the maxillary incisor group at 24 hours after spur bonding, with a remarkable decrease at 7 days. This result is probably related to the role of IL-6 in the initial moments of orthodontic tooth movement.¹⁸ Other studies with force application through active movement have also detected the presence of IL-1β during the initial phase of orthodontic treatment.^{16,17,19,27,28} In the present study, IL-1β values were significant only at the 7-day time point in both the mandibular and maxillary groups, with higher levels in the maxillary than in the mandibular group at 24 hours after spur attachment. However, it is necessary to consider that the amount of force applied to the teeth and the speed of tooth movement are directly related to the amount of ILs released,^17,27,28 and a passive appliance was used in the present study. The elimination of tongue interposition after spur bonding might facilitate tooth eruption and bone remodeling via these molecules for the correction of open bite in children.²⁹

In contrast to the approach used in other studies,^14,15 a lingual approach was used for GCF sample collection in the present study for two main reasons. First, the lingual area was the area closest to the site of spur attachment, so sampling from this site would allow accurate analysis of clinical parameters and biomarkers in GCF. Second, in a manner analogous to that in the study of Uematsu et al.,¹⁸ wherein the canines were moved in the distal direction and GCF was collected from the distal side of the teeth, spur attachment was supposed to move the maxillary and mandibular incisors in the lingual direction in the present study.^21,30 Moreover, Aliaga-Del Castillo et al.²¹ and Canuto et al.³⁰ used superimposition of cephalometric tracings to demonstrate reduced labial tipping and protrusion of the maxillary incisors and increased labial inclination of the mandibular incisors after orthodontic treatment with a spur. In summary, these findings indicate that the maxillary and mandibular central incisors are the teeth affected after spur bonding; this justifies the selection of the 4 maxillary and mandibular central incisors for GCF sample collection in the present study.

Different devices can be used for early anterior open bite correction, and most of them promote dental changes, especially in the anterior region, and contribute to anterior bite reduction.²¹ In the present study, lingual spurs were used,⁸ and it was well accepted by the children. Without the presence of harmful habits and tongue interposition, the musculature of the lips exerts a force on the vestibular surface of the incisors, stimulating bone remodeling and tooth eruption for open bite correction.^3,5,6 After spur attachment, the interposed tongue placed in an interdental resting posture (Figure 3A) is forced to a backward position (Figure 3B).²⁹ Generally, patients with open bite also exhibit open lip relationships and impaired tongue positions.^4,8 In subjects with an open lip and open bite, the lip pressure is lower than the tongue interposition pressure.⁴ The present study demonstrated that spur bonding prevented lingual interposition, possibly resulting in increased lip pressure on the maxillary incisors in the initial period and thus activating alveolar bone remodeling and incisor eruption with an increase in GCF IL levels at 24 hours and 7 days.

Figure 3

A, Representative image of tongue interposition between the mandibular and maxillary incisors in a child with anterior open bite. B, After spur attachment (black triangles bonded to the lingual surface of the mandibular incisors), the tongue moved backward, and the upper lip exerted pressure on the central incisors with effects on alveolar bone remodeling and tooth eruption at 24 hours after the attachment.

Most clinical studies involving the analysis of IL levels in GCF have been conducted on teenagers or adults receiving treatment with fixed orthodontic appliances.^{12,15,16,18,27,28} To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to demonstrate the molecular mechanisms involved in open bite correction using spur attachment in children. The data suggest that GCF ILs play a role in tooth eruption and bone remodeling after the attachment of passive orthodontic appliances in children with open bite. However, the study was limited by the fact that the analysis of GCF cytokines was limited to the maxillary and mandibular central incisors. In further studies, additional analysis of the maxillary and mandibular lateral incisors would provide important information. Moreover, GCF collection from different sites such as the buccal surface of the maxillary and mandibular central incisors should be implemented in future studies.

CONCLUSION

Spur attachment for the treatment of anterior open bite in children caused increased gingival bleeding around the mandibular incisors. This finding suggests that children with such passive attachments must improve their oral hygiene. We also found that cytokine levels in GCF were not related to periodontal parameters; therefore, increased expression of IL-8, IL-1β, and IL-6 in GCF around the maxillary and mandibular incisors may have been related to the effects of lip pressure/perioral musculature during tooth movement and open bite correction, not to an inflammatory process resulting from poor hygiene.

SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIALS

kjod-52-2-142-supple.pdf

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The authors thank the Program for Technological Development in Tools for Health-RPT-FIOCRUZ for permitting the use of its facilities, with special thanks to Elaine Speziali de Faria e Dayane Andriotti Otta for the helpful assistance with CBA analysis.

This study was supported by Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES) and Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq).

Notes

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

References

1. Rosa M, Quinzi V, Marzo G. 2019; Paediatric orthodontics part 1: anterior open bite in the mixed dentition. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 20:80–2. DOI: 10.23804/ejpd.2019.20.01.15. PMID: 30919650. PMID: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85062957150&origin=inward.

2. Pithon MM, Magno MB, da Silva Coqueiro R, de Paiva SM, Marques LS, Paranhus LR, et al. 2019; Oral health-related quality of life of children before, during, and after anterior open bite correction: a single-blinded randomized controlled trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 156:303–11. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2019.04.022. PMID: 31474260. PMID: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85071466832&origin=inward.

3. Regalo SCH, de Lima Lucas B, Díaz-Serrano KV, Frota NPR, Regalo IH, Nassar MSP, et al. 2018; Analysis of the stomatognathic system of children according orthodontic treatment needs. J Orofac Orthop. 79:39–47. DOI: 10.1007/s00056-017-0117-x. PMID: 29330612. PMID: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85041836010&origin=inward.

4. Lambrechts H, De Baets E, Fieuws S, Willems G. 2010; Lip and tongue pressure in orthodontic patients. Eur J Orthod. 32:466–71. DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cjp137. PMID: 20089572. PMID: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=77954981291&origin=inward.

5. Ling HTB, Sum FHKMH, Zhang L, Yeung CPW, Li KY, Wong HM, et al. 2018; The association between nutritive, non-nutritive sucking habits and primary dental occlusion. BMC Oral Health. 18:145. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-018-0610-7. PMID: 30134878. PMCID: PMC6106723. PMID: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85052086101&origin=inward.

6. Ruan WH, Chen MD, Gu ZY, Lu Y, Su JM, Guo Q. 2005; Muscular forces exerted on the normal deciduous dentition. Angle Orthod. 75:785–90. DOI: 10.1043/0003-3219(2005)75[785:MFEOTN]2.0.CO;2. PMID: 16279824.

7. Valentim AF, Furlan RM, Perilo TV, Motta AR, Casas EB. 2016; Relationship between perception of tongue position and measures of tongue force on the teeth. Codas. 28:546–50. DOI: 10.1590/2317-1782/20162015256. PMID: 27683827. PMID: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84999106784&origin=inward.

8. Gonzalez P, MartInez MB, Sierra V, Rueda ZV, Botero-Mariaca P. 2019; Tongue position assessment during oral phase deglutition in children with anterior open bite and normal vertical overbite. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 37:167–71. DOI: 10.4103/JISPPD.JISPPD_333_18. PMID: 31249181.

9. Dias FA, Assis Urnau FD, Pedron Oltramari PV, Lupion Poleti M, Freire Fernandes TM, Rodrigues de Almeida M. 2019; Stability of early treatment of anterior open bite: clinical performance of bonded lingual spurs. J Orthod. 46:68–73. DOI: 10.1177/1465312519827601. PMID: 31056074. PMID: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85061177326&origin=inward.

10. Brylka LJ, Schinke T. 2019; Chemokines in physiological and pathological bone remodeling. Front Immunol. 10:2182. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.02182. PMID: 31572390. PMCID: PMC6753917. PMID: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85072784254&origin=inward.

11. Ren Y, Vissink A. 2008; Cytokines in crevicular fluid and orthodontic tooth movement. Eur J Oral Sci. 116:89–97. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.2007.00511.x. PMID: 18353001. PMID: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=40849140978&origin=inward.

12. Tuncer BB, Ozmeriç N, Tuncer C, Teoman I, Cakilci B, Yücel A, et al. 2005; Levels of interleukin-8 during tooth movement. Angle Orthod. 75:631–6. DOI: 10.1043/0003-3219(2005)75[631:LOIDTM]2.0.CO;2. PMID: 16097233.

13. Madureira DF, da Silva JM, Teixeira AL, Abreu MH, Pretti H, Lages EM, et al. 2015; Cytokine measurements in gingival crevicular fluid and periodontal ligament: are they correlated? Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 148:293–301. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.03.030. PMID: 26232838. PMID: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84938341563&origin=inward.

14. Başaran G, Ozer T, Kaya FA, Hamamci O. 2006; Interleukins 2, 6, and 8 levels in human gingival sulcus during orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 130:7.e1–6. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.12.027. PMID: 16849065. PMID: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=33745837459&origin=inward.

15. Bergamo AZ, Nelson-Filho P, Romano FL, da Silva RA, Saraiva MC, da Silva LA, et al. 2016; Gingival crevicular fluid volume and periodontal parameters alterations after use of conventional and self-ligating brackets. J Orthod. 43:260–7. DOI: 10.1080/14653125.2016.1221214. PMID: 27607519. PMID: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84986222574&origin=inward.

16. Dudic A, Kiliaridis S, Mombelli A, Giannopoulou C. 2006; Composition changes in gingival crevicular fluid during orthodontic tooth movement: comparisons between tension and compression sides. Eur J Oral Sci. 114:416–22. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.2006.00387.x. PMID: 17026508. PMID: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=33749518682&origin=inward.

17. Grant M, Wilson J, Rock P, Chapple I. 2013; Induction of cytokines, MMP9, TIMPs, RANKL and OPG during orthodontic tooth movement. Eur J Orthod. 35:644–51. DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cjs057. PMID: 22987319.

18. Uematsu S, Mogi M, Deguchi T. 1996; Interleukin (IL)-1 beta, IL-6, tumor necrosis factor-alpha, epidermal growth factor, and beta 2-microglobulin levels are elevated in gingival crevicular fluid during human orthodontic tooth movement. J Dent Res. 75:562–7. DOI: 10.1177/00220345960750010801. PMID: 8655760.

19. Teixeira CC, Khoo E, Tran J, Chartres I, Liu Y, Thant LM, et al. 2010; Cytokine expression and accelerated tooth movement. J Dent Res. 89:1135–41. DOI: 10.1177/0022034510373764. PMID: 20639508. PMCID: PMC3318047.

20. Kapoor P, Kharbanda OP, Monga N, Miglani R, Kapila S. 2014; Effect of orthodontic forces on cytokine and receptor levels in gingival crevicular fluid: a systematic review. Prog Orthod. 15:65. DOI: 10.1186/s40510-014-0065-6. PMID: 25487828. PMCID: PMC4259981.

21. Aliaga-Del Castillo A, Vilanova L, Miranda F, Arriola-Guillén LE, Garib D, Janson G. 2021; Dentoskeletal changes in open bite treatment using spurs and posterior build-ups: a randomized clinical trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 159:10–20. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2020.06.031. PMID: 33221096.

22. van Gastel J, Quirynen M, Teughels W, Coucke W, Carels C. 2011; Longitudinal changes in microbiology and clinical periodontal parameters after removal of fixed orthodontic appliances. Eur J Orthod. 33:15–21. DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cjq032. PMID: 20671070.

23. Pejda S, Varga ML, Milosevic SA, Mestrovic S, Slaj M, Repic D, et al. 2013; Clinical and microbiological parameters in patients with self-ligating and conventional brackets during early phase of orthodontic treatment. Angle Orthod. 83:133–9. DOI: 10.2319/010412-8.1. PMID: 22765511. PMCID: PMC8805529.

24. Naranjo AA, Triviño ML, Jaramillo A, Betancourth M, Botero JE. 2006; Changes in the subgingival microbiota and periodontal parameters before and 3 months after bracket placement. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 130:275.e17–22. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.10.022. PMID: 16979483.

25. Ren Y, Hazemeijer H, de Haan B, Qu N, de Vos P. 2007; Cytokine profiles in crevicular fluid during orthodontic tooth movement of short and long durations. J Periodontol. 78:453–8. DOI: 10.1902/jop.2007.060261. PMID: 17335368.

26. Nunes L, Quintanilha L, Perinetti G, Capelli J G Junior. 2017; Effect of orthodontic force on expression levels of ten cytokines in gingival crevicular fluid. Arch Oral Biol. 76:70–5. DOI: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2017.01.016. PMID: 28131911.

27. Motyl S, Manfredini D, Oruba Z, Bugajska J, Sztefko K, Stós W, et al. 2021; Evaluation of interleukin-1 beta and the ratio of interleukin-1 beta to interleukin-1 receptor antagonist in gingival crevicular fluid during orthodontic canine retraction. Dent Med Probl. 58:47–54. DOI: 10.17219/dmp/132954. PMID: 33756073.

28. Kaya Y, Alkan Ö, Kömüroglu AU, Keskin S. 2021; Effects of ibuprofen and low-level laser therapy on orthodontic pain by means of the analysis of interleukin 1-beta and substance P levels in the gingival crevicular fluid. J Orofac Orthop. 82:143–52. DOI: 10.1007/s00056-020-00254-2. PMID: 33097977.

29. Meyer-Marcotty P, Kochel J, Stellzig-Eisenhauer A. 2013; The impact of spur therapy in dentoalveolar open bite. Aust Orthod J. 29:145–52. PMID: 24380133.

30. Canuto LF, Janson G, de Lima NS, de Almeida RR, Cançado RH. 2016; Anterior open-bite treatment with bonded vs conventional lingual spurs: a comparative study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 149:847–55. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.11.026. PMID: 27241995.

TOOLS

Similar articles