DISCUSSION
Caudal epidural block is a procedure commonly performed in children for surgeries or pain control in the low extremities. In most cases, caudal epidural block is simply performed with a blind method, often palpating the sacral hiatus and perforating the sacrococcygeal ligament covering the sacral hiatus [
12]. It was reported that the apex of sacral hiatus is at the S4 level in 68.42% of adults and at the S3 level in 97.36% of adults [
4].
The anatomical structure of the lumbosacral epidural canal in children is quite different from that of adults. In the early postnatal period, the sacrum consists of five vertebrae. In this period, the sacrum has a shape similar to that of the lumbar spine, and the fusion of the sacrum is complete at an age between 25 and 30 [
10]. In other words, ossification is not complete in the sacrum even at a level higher than the S3/4 level; thus, there is a space through which the sacral canal may be accessed. Therefore, when a needle is inserted through the space, the distance between the needle and the dural sac becomes shorter than the distance when the needle is inserted through the sacral hiatus. Moreover, the distance between the dural sac and the sacrococcygeal ligament is shorter in children than in adults, and the risk of dural puncture is higher when a needle is inserted at a high level.
Aggarwal et al. [
5] reported in a study conducted with 39 fetal cadavers that the terminal of the dural sac was most frequently at the S2 level (58.97%), followed by the S3 level (12.82%). In addition, they reported that the apex of sacral hiatus was observed most frequently at the S3 level, indicating that the distance between the apex of the hiatus and the dura was only 3 to 13 mm. Shin et al. [
13] conducted a study with 317 young patients under anesthesia with ultrasonography and reported that the dural sac level was at the upper S2 level on average and at a level below the S2 and S3 levels in 7.57% of the young patients. Therefore, it may be presumed that fusion of the vertebral arch at the S3 level has a significant effect on the risk of inadvertent dural puncture caused by the cephalad insertion of a needle.
In this study, the sacral hiatus types were classified with reference to the potential risk of dural puncture which may take place during caudal epidural block. Group I included the patients who had the fusion of the S3 or S4 vertebral arch and thus the lowest possibility of inadvertent dural puncture because the needling point is determined at the level of the S3 level or lower. Group II included the patients whose sacral hiatus apex was open. Although dural puncture may take place if a needle is inserted through the opened sacral hiatus apex, the distance between the vertebral arches of S3 or S4 is shorter than that of Group III. Hence, the possibility of a needle insertion through the opened sacral hiatus apex was relatively low, and the distance between the vertebral arches becomes shorter, moving to the cephalad. Therefore, Group II has a lower risk in comparison to Group III in that those who perform the procedure may predict the position of the sacral hiatus apex. Group III included patients whose distance between the vertebral arches of S3 or S4 was longer than that of Group II, and thus, a needle may be inserted into the space more easily, and the precise position of the sacral hiatus apex may not be easily identified by those who perform the procedure. Therefore, Group III has the highest risk of inadvertent dural puncture. In this study, the number of patients in Group III was 31 (21.7%). Even among the patients without cerebral palsy, the number of patients in Group III was 15 (18.3%). As mentioned above, because the sacral bone ossification progresses over age, the number of patients in Group I increased as the age increased.
In their study using 114 dry sacral bones, Aggarwal et al. [
4] measured the position of the sacral hiatus apex and reported that the position was at S4 in 68.42% of the subjects, at S3 in 14.03%, and at S2 in 2.64%. Sekiguchi et al. [
6] also conducted a similar study and reported that the position of the sacral hiatus was at S4 in 65% of the subjects, S3 in 15%, S2 in 4%, and S1 in 1%. In our study, the proportion of patients who showed fusion of the S4 vertebral arch (which forms the apex of the sacral hiatus later at the S4 level) was 28%. The result was different from that of Aggarwal et al. because the ossification of the young aged patients was incomplete; and thus, the sacral hiatus formation was not complete in our study. In other words, the rate of ossification was different from patient to patient in our study: one 3-year old patient showed fusion of all the vertebral arches and complete formation of the sacral hiatus while a 16-year old patient showed no fusion of any vertebral arches.
Busoni and Sarti [
10] firstly introduced epidural block through the sacral intervertebral space of the sacrum before fusion, and a couple of studies were conducted in this regard [
14,
15]. In this method, a line connecting the posterior superior iliac spine on both sides is drawn to identify the S2 vertebral arch, and then a needle is inserted through the S2/3 intervertebral space. However, complete fusion of the S2/3 space was found in 49 young patients (34.3%), the youngest among whom was 4 years old. Moreover, 21 patients (14.7%) among the 49 young patients showed no fusion of the S1/2 space. Therefore, when the method described above is used, the needle may be inserted to the S1/2 level, which is more risky. In addition, 91 patients (63.6%) out of the 94 patients (65.7%) who showed no fusion of the S2/3 intervertebral space still have the risk of inserting the needle to the more risky S1/2 level.
In this study, the sacral cornu could be identified on none of the two sides in 5 patients (3.5%), and on only one side in 6 patients (4.2%). This result is greatly different from the result of Sekiguchi et al. [
6] (absent cornu 54% and unilateral cornu 25%) and the result of Aggarwal et al. [
7] (no palpable cornu 14.3% and unilateral palpable cornu 24.5%). In a study conducted by Sekiguchi et al., the height of the bony protrusion was directly measured, and a protrusion longer than 3 mm was defined as a cornu. On the other hand, two authors identified the cornu by direct palpation in the study conducted by Aggarwal et al. In our study, the cornu could not be directly palpated because the cornu was indirectly identified with 3D images. In addition, it was difficult to set the standard for protrusion because the age of the patients varied. Therefore, we defined a cornu as the S5 articular process identified in the sagittal view of the 3D-CT images, which was the limitation of our study.
On the other hand, Griffiths et al. [
11] conducted a study with 79 cerebral palsy patients from the age of 5 to 16 with radiography and reported that spina bifida occulta was found in 32% of the patients. Ozaras et al. [
16] analyzed 28 spina bifida patients and stated that those patients had a high possibility of accompanying cerebral palsy. In this study, however, there was no significant difference in the distribution of the sacral hiatus types between the patients with and without cerebral palsy. Even when the patients with cerebral palsy were excluded to consider the previous results, the number of patients in Group II was 10 (12.2%) and 15 in Group III (18.3%), indicating that the anatomical variations that increase the risk of caudal epidural block still exist.
The weak point of this study is that the study was conducted in an indirect way with 3D-CT images, not in a direct way with cadavers. Therefore, as described above, the frequency of cornua anomaly was significantly lower than that of previous studies. In addition, the subjects of this study included not normal young children but the young patients with various congenital disorders at the hip and pelvis, and thus, the sacral canal development process of the subjects may be different from that of normal young children. The common congenital disorders were cerebral palsy, Legg-Calve-Pertes disease, developmental dislocation of hip, and arthrogryposis. Except for cerebral palsy, however, none of the congenital disorders have been reported to have an effect on the formation of the sacral canal.
This study was conducted to analyze the sacral hiatus of children with 3D-CT images. While the purpose of previous studies was to find an efficient method for approaching the sacral canal, our study was the first one in which the risk of caudal epidural block was assessed in children. In conclusion, degree of sacral fusion is less in children than in adults, and the exact location of the sacral hiatus is more difficult to be identified in children. Therefore, great efforts should be made to understand the process of sacral vertebra development and to investigate anatomical structures with imaging instruments such as ultrasonography to identify the anatomical structure precisely.
Go to :
