Ten years after the WHO issued its final guidelines for the control of cancer pain with opioids in 1986, it was reported that 69%–100% of cancer pain was properly controlled [2]. The WHO’s guidelines later provided a platform allowing opioids in the treatment of cancer pain, thus enhancing the quality of life for patients. Opioids have also started being used for chronic non-cancer pain, with clinical reports that opioids are effective and less likely to become addictive in patients with no history of mental disease, or alcohol or drug abuse [3]. Several published guidelines and consensus statements recommend judicious use of opioids in appropriately selected patients with chronic non-cancer pain who have not responded to other treatments and analgesic medications [4].

Nonetheless, there remains uncertainty about the optimal use of opioids. Some patients do not experience significant improvements in pain or function even on high doses of opioids and long-term use may lead to side effects. Besides serious issues such as addiction and abuse, the most common side effects are predictable consequences of opioid pharmacological actions, and include nausea, vomiting, constipation, pruritus, dizziness, dry mouth, and sedation in daily use. Guidelines for the responsible use of opioids in chronic non-cancer pain also reflect concern over these problems [5].

The utility value of opioids has not yet been fully realized due to public bias or a lack of clinical experience in drug therapy. Differences were also noted by region, specialty, and the requirement for the use of multiple prescriptions of opioids. It is estimated that this is based on differences in individual physicians’ clinical experience in regards to various side effects [6].

Chronic pain, unlike acute pain, should itself be recognized as a disease entity. It is a bio-psychosocial state that requires a comprehensive and multidisciplinary approach to its assessment and treatment [7]. Therefore, the most basic and important principle is that improved quality of life, such as pain reduction and functional recovery, which can be achieved by taking opioids, should outweigh the side effects. Proper selection and use of opioids is very important, even in order to improve the patient’s quality of life and to advance the completion of treatment. Between 50% and 80% of patients in clinical trials experience at least one side effect from opioid therapy, however in everyday use the incidence may be even higher [8].

Opioid induced constipation (OIC) is one of the most common side effects, which is another obstacle to overcome. Although not fatal, frequent constipation is pointed out as an important cause of drug discontinuation. It will have a serious impact on the effectiveness of opioid use, and can be an important reason for physicians’ reluctance to use opioids in clinical practice.

In this issue of the Korean Journal of Pain (KJP), Bornemann-Cimenti [9] reviews OIC, and proposes a new strategy for better use of opioids in the management of pain. A review of OIC through the diagnosis, traditional treatment, and introduction of newer treatment options is provided. The suggested algorithm for clinical management of OIC will be a useful reference for clinical application based on the guidelines provided in the KJP [10]. Successful management of side effects will initiate a new look at the value of opioid use.