PDF
Citation
Print
Introduction
Pulpitis and periapical periodontitis are the most frequently diagnosed dental diseases (1, 2). Affected by the special histo-physiological characteristics of pulp, it is difficult for the pulp to recover after being damaged (3). At present, root canal treatment is the main strategy for treating pulpitis and periapical periodontitis by applying artificial materials, such as glue tip and paste, to fill the empty root canal for replacing the damaged pulp tissues after cleaning and disinfecting the root canal (1, 4). Loss of pulp will reduce blood vessels and nerves, nutrition of the teeth and stress sensing ability. Moreover, teeth losing protection from immune system will increase dentin fragility and tooth fracture (5, 6). Therefore, new strategies should be developed to regenerate the original tissues and restore the dental pulp properties.
Human dental pulp stem cells (hDPSCs), a type of fibroblast and derived from mesenchymal tissue, are regarded to be ideal seed cells for the therapy of pulp regeneration owing to their multidirectional differentiation potential (7, 8). hDPSCs could differentiate into osteoblasts, nerve cells, adipocytes, and odontoblasts with great ability to proliferate and differentiate (3, 6, 9, 10). However, the regulatory mechanism of hDPSCs differentiation is still unclear and needs more exploration, which limits the clinical application of hDPSCs.
MicroRNAs (miRNA) play crucial roles in many biological processes (11). Increasing research and evidence have proved that anomalous levels of miRNAs are closely associated with the genesis and progression of different types of diseases, and they further regulate the biological function of various cells, including hDPSCs (11, 12). For example, miR-125a-3p is found to have the ability to regulate the odontoblastic differentiation of hDPSCs by targeting Fyn (13). Low-expression of miR-224-5p could enhance the migration and proliferation of hDPSCs (14). miR-224-5p could protect hDPSCs from apoptosis through targeting Rac1 (5). miR-140-5p also regulates the differentiation of hDPSCs into the odontoblasts (2). Abnormal expression of miR-148a-3p is also widely discovered to be existed in various disease and cancer, such as ovarian cancer, acute pancreatitis, and gastric cancer (15-17). MiR-148a-3p also regulates the capacities of different kinds of cells to proliferate, invade, and differentiate (15, 16). What’s more, it has been confirmed in an existing research that miR-148a-3p can modulate the osteoblast differentiation of marrow stromal cells (18), which makes us wonder whether miR-148a-3p also modulates the differentiation ability of hDPSCs to odontoblasts.
Therefore, the purpose of the current study was to explore the role of miR-148a-3p in odontoblastic differentiation of hDPSCs.
Materials and Methods
Tissue samples and ethics statement
The third molars were gathered from 10 patients (14∼22 years old) who underwent tooth extraction at Jingmen NO.1 People’s Hospital between March 2019 and May 2019. The study had been approved by the Ethics Committee of Jingmen NO.1 People’s Hospital (Z20190223Y) and all patients had signed a written informed consent and agreed that their tissues would be used for clinical research.
hDPSCs isolation and culture
hDPSCs were isolated from the collected third molars. In brief, pulp was firstly taken out and digested by collagenase type I (17100-017, Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) for 1 hour (h) at 37℃. Then, after the digestion, the solution was centrifuged (900×g) for 5 minutes (min) and the sediment was seen as hDPSCs. Finally, hDPSCs were grown in DMEM (11995065, Gibco, Waltham, MA, USA) with the supplementation of 10% (v/v) FBS (16140071, Gibco, USA), 10 U/ml penicillin (DEPENE01, Demeditec, Germany), and 1% penicillin-streptomycin (P/S; 15070063, Gibco) at a 37℃ atmosphere with 5% CO2. The medium of hDPSCs was changed every three days (d) and the morphology of hDPSCs was observed under an optical microscope (DM4M, Leica, Solms, Germany) every day.
Flow cytometry
Flow cytometry were used for identification of phenotype of the hDPSCs. In brief, the cells were harvested and re-suspended in FACS buffer (MB-089-0500, Dickinson Biosciences, Philadelphia, PA, USA) and incubated with primary antibodies for 25 min at 4℃: CD44 (ab6124, Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA), CD73 (ab202122, Abcam, USA), CD29 (MAB17781, R&D System, Minneapolis, MN, USA), CD31 (ab9498, Abcam, USA), CD34 (ab81289, Abcam, USA), and CD45 (ab10558, Abcam, USA). The cells were then incubated with goat anti-rabbit IgG (ab102291, Abcam, USA) for 15 min. Finally, the cells were analyzed using a FACSCaliburTM flow cytometer which was brought from the BD Biosciences (San Jose, CA, USA).
Odontoblastic differentiation of hDPSCs
From the fourth passages, hDPSCs were grown in the differentiation medium (19) (DMEM medium with FBS (15%), β-glycerophosphate (10 mmol/l; 13408-09-08, APExBIO, Houston, TX, USA), α-ascorbic acid (50 mg/ml; 89924-69-6, APExBIO, USA), dexamethasone (10 nmol/l; 50-02-2, APExBIO, USA), glutamine (0.292 mg/ml; 5959-95-5, APExBIO, USA), and 1% P/S) for 14 d.
Culture of HEK 293T
HEK 293T cells (CRL-11268) were brought from ATCC (Rockville, MD, USA) and grown in DMEM containing 10% FBS at a 37℃ atmosphere with 5% CO2. 293T cells were only used for the construction of lentivirus.
Lentivirus construction
The primer for Wnt1 overexpression sequence was listed: F: 5’-AGGTTCCATCGAATCCTGCAC-3’, R: 5’-CAT CTCGGAGAATACGGTCGT-3’. The primer to get siRNA target for Wnt1 (siWnt1, 5’-GTCGAGAAACGGCGTTTA TCTTC-3’). The Wnt1 overexpression sequence was ligated into pLJM1 plasmid vector (60908-4538, TIANDZ, Beijing, China) by 2×EasyTaq SuperMix (AS111-11, TRANS, Beijing, China) respectively. siWnt1 sequence was ligated into pLKO.1-TRC plasmid vector (Biovector-LKO.1-TRC, Biovector NTCC Inc., Beijing, China, http://www.googbio.com/product/127.html) by 2×EasyTaq SuperMix respectively. Then these ligated-vectors (10 μl) were mixed with 50 μl competent cells and uniformly coated on the LB medium (SJH0116, REGAL, Shanghai, China) and incubated together for 16 h at 37℃. After the colonies on the medium were selected, the TIANprep Mini Plasmid Kit (DP103-03, TIANGEN, Beijing, China) was applied for the extraction of plasmids (The pLJM1 plasmid vector and pLKO.1-TRC plasmid vector without any target sequence was used as negative control).
After we collected the target plasmids, 293T cells were placed into a 15 cm dish (1.2×107 cells in 20 ml complete medium) and grown to a 70% confluence. Then the target plasmids and viral packaging plasmids (psPAX2 (VT1444, YouBio, Changsha, China) and pMD2.G (VT1443, YouBio, China) were co-transfected into the 293T cells through Lipofectamine 2000 reagent (11668-019, Invitrogen, USA). After the incubation for 8 h, the medium contained overexpression plasmids and viral packaging plasmids were replaced with the fresh complete medium and cells were cultured for another 48 h. Then the supernatant of culture medium was filtered with 0.45 filter (342414, Beckman, CA, USA), the lentiviral solution was centrifuged for 15 min at 4℃ (4,000×g) to concentrate the lentivirus, followed by the collection.
Lentivirus infection
Before the infection, 2 ml complete medium with 1.0×106 hDPSCs were added into each well of 6-well plates and hDPSCs were grown to a 70% confluence. The complete medium was replaced with the one containing DMEM with FBS, and the cells were further incubated for 4 h. Then the lentivirus was used to infect the cells for 6 h. Finally, the medium contained lentivirus was changed with complete medium for cell culture, and the cells were further cultured for further 48 h.
Liposomes transfection
The miR-148a-3p mimic (miR1150109120446-1-5), mimic control (miR1N0000001-1-5), miR-148a-3p inhibitor (miR20000243-1-5), and inhibitor control (miR2N0000001-1-5) were obtained from RIBOBIO (Guangzhou, China). Before the infection, 2 ml complete medium with 1.0×106 hDPSCs were added into each well of 6-well plates and grown to a 70% confluence. Then the complete medium was replaced with the one containing DMEM with FBS, and the cells were further incubated for 4 h. Besides, 2 μg of mimic or inhibitor were diluted with 100 μl Opti-MEM (11058021, Gibco, USA) were incubated with 100 μl Opti-MEM which containing 3 μl Lipofectamine 2000 reagent (11668-019, Invitrogen, USA). Then the incubated buffer was added into the 6-well plates to incubate the cells for another 6 h. Then the medium in the 6-well plates was refreshed with DMEM medium for the final 48 h of culture. Finally, the transfected-cells were harvested for later use.
Bioinformatics and dual-luciferase reporter assay
TargetScan 7.2 was applied to predict the target gene of miR-148a-3p, and dual luciferase reporter gene system was used to verify the target relation. The wide-type sequence of Wnt1 (Wnt1-WT) (5’-CGGGAGACCCCTTGTT GCACTGC-3’) and mutant sequence (Wnt1-MUT) (5’-CGGGAGACCCCTTGTACACTACA-3’) were cloned into the luciferase Vectors (E1330) which were brought from the Promega (Madison, WI, USA). 300 μl medium with 3.0×104 293T cell were placed into 48-well plates and cells were grown overnight. Then the 293T cells were transfected with the vectors of Wnt1-WT and Wnt1-MUT and miR-148a-3p mimic or inhibitor by Lipofectamine 2000 reagent for 48 h. After being administrated with the working kit (ab228530, Abcam, USA), the cells were added into the SpectraMax reader (Molecular Devices, Shanghai, China) for the measurement on the luciferase activity.
MTT assays
MTT (B7777, APExBIO) was used to test the cell viability. After infection or transfection, the concentration of hDPSCs was adjusted to 1.0×104 cells/ml, and then 100 μl cell suspensions were added into 96-well plates (103 cells/well). After growing for 24 h, MTT reagent (0.5 mg/ml) (B7777, APExBIO, USA) was used to further incubate the cell for 4 h. Then, the MTT solution was discarded and 100 μl DMSO (ST038, Beyotime, Shanghai, China) was added to each well. Finally, the 96-well plates were placed into a microplate reader (imark, Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) to read the cells absorbance in each well under 570 nm.
Transwell assays
Transwell chambers (354234) which used for invasion detection were bought from Corning Life Sciences (NY, USA). In brief, after infection or transfection, 0.2 ml non-serum medium with hDPSCs (1.5×105) were placed into the chambers which were embedded into the well of 24-well plates. After each well of the 24-well plates was added with completely medium and the cells were incubated for 48 h, the inner layer of the chambers was wiped. Finally, the cells in outer layer of the chamber were stained with crystal violet (C110704, Aladdin, Shanghai, China) at room temperature for 15 min. The areas on each outer layer of the chamber were observed under an optical microscope (DM4M, Leica, Solms, Germany). Image J 1.8.0 software was used to count the number of the cells invaded from inner layer to outer layer of the chamber.
Alizarin red staining
Alizarin red staining was performed by the alizarin red S staining kit (0223, ScienCell, Carlsbad, CA, USA). After the infection or transfection and being washed with PBS, hDPSCs were fixed with 97% ethanol (E111992-12X, Aladdin, Shanghai, China) for 10 min. Finally, the fixed cells were further dyed with Alizarin red for 30 min at 37℃ and observed under an optical microscope (DM4M, Leica, Solms, Germany).
RNA extraction and RT-qPCR
TRIzol reagent (15596, Invitrogen, USA) was applied to extract the total RNA following the instructions. In brief, after infection, TRIzol was used to lyse the hDPSCs. The lysis was then mixed with chloroform (C805077, Macklin, Shanghai, China) in a centrifugal tube (615001, Nest, Wuxi, China) and centrifuged (14,000×g) for 20 min. After the collection of the supernatant, the same volume of isopropanol (H822173, Macklin, China) was mixed with the supernatant, followed by the centrifugation for 5 min (14,000×g). RNA sediment was then collected. For miRNA, it was extracted using EasyPure miRNA Kit (ER601-01, TransGen Biotech, Beijing, China) (https://www.transgen.com.cn/rna/372.html?renqun_youhua=1844663). In brief, after infection, the hDPSCs were lysed by lysis buffer which was contained in the kit. 200 μl chloroform was added into the cells, followed by the process of 1-min severe shaking and 5-min resting. Then the hDPSCs were centrifuged (13,400×g) for 20 min and the supernatant was collected and mixed with ethanol for further centrifugation (15 min, 13,400×g). Finally, the miRNA sediment was collected.
Then, the total RNAs and miRNAs were synthesized into the cDNA using the cDNA Synthesis kit (AE301-02, TransGen Biotech) in light of instructions. The last step was to amplify the cDNAs using PerfectStart Green qPCR SuperMix (AQ601-01, TransGen Biotech) in QuantStudio6 system (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA), and the program was set at 94℃ for 30 seconds (s), 94℃ for 30 s for 40 cycles, 60℃ for 30 s for 40 cycles. RNA was quantified by 2−ΔΔCT method. The primers involved in this research were exhibited in Table 1.
Western blot assays
NP-40 buffer (P0013F, Beyotime, China) was first used to lyse hDPSCs to obtain the total protein. Then BCA kit (P0009, Beyotime, China) was used to detect the concentrations of total protein. 30 µg protein was separated inside the SDS-PAGE gels (P0052A, Beyotime, China) and transferred to the surface of the NC membranes (HTS112M, MilLipore, St Louis, MO, USA), followed by the membranes were blocked with no-fat milk at a concentration of 5%. Then the membrane was incubated with first antibodies for 16 h: Wnt1 (1：1,000, 41kD, ab15251, Abcam, US), β-catenin (1：1,000, 95kD, ab16051, Abcam, USA), DSPP (1：1,000, 131kD, SAB1304988, Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, MO, USA), DMP-1 (1：1,000, 55kD, ab103203, Abcam, US), OCN (1：1,000, 11kD, ab93876, Abcam, USA), RUNX2 (1：1,000, 60kD, ab23981, Abcam, USA), Smad4 (1：1,000, 60kD, ab40759, Abcam, USA), and GAPDH (1：1,000, 36kD, ab181602, Abcam, USA). Then the membranes were incubated with the matching goat anti-rabbit IgG (1：5,000, ab205718, Abcam, USA) or goat anti-mouse IgG (1：5,000, ab205719, Abcam, USA) for 2 h at room temperature. The membranes were incubated with developer solution (P0019, Beyotime, China) for 1 min at normal room temperature. Last, the signal of the membranes and the densitometric analysis of the protein were detected under the Image LabTM Software 3.0 (Bio-Rad, USA).
Results
hDPSCs was isolated and identified
We firstly isolated hDPSCs from the normal human third molars, which were further expanded and passaged. As shown in Fig. 1A, on the day 7, the primary cells adhered to each other and exhibited long spindle shape, showing the characteristics of hDPSCs (2). Then, the hDPSCs were identified by flow cytometry for cell surface markers (20, 21), and 96.77% of the cells were CD44-positive, 98.74% were CD73-positive, and 90.19% were CD29-positive; whereas 0.11% of the cells were CD31-negative, 0.13% were CD34-negative, and 0.44% were CD45-negative (Fig. 1B). Therefore, hDPSCs were successfully isolated, identified and cultured.
MiR-148a-3p expression was decreased and that of Wnt1 was increased in hDPSCs after the differentiation of hDPSCs
After cells were cultured in odontogenic differentiation medium for 14 d, the formation of calcium nodules of hDPSCs was increased, which indicated that the odontogenic differentiation in hDPSCs was increased (Fig. 2A). The results also revealed that miR-148a-3p expression was down-regulated (Fig. 2B) and that of Wnt1 was up-regulated (Fig. 2C) in hDPSCs after the differentiation. All the results indicated that miR-148a-3p and Wnt1 might play important roles in the differentiation of hDPSCs.
MiR-148a-3p mimic inhibited the viability, invasion, and differentiation of hDPSCs by down-regulating the expressions of DSPP, DMP-1, RUNX2, OCN, and Smad4
We then transfected miR-148a-3p mimic into hDPSCs (Fig. 3A) to make the role of miR-148a-3p on hDPSCs clear. MTT assay was used to evaluate the effect of miR-148a-3p on the viability of hDPSCs. As shown in Fig. 3B, the cell viabilities of hDPSCs after being cultured for 3 d, 7 d, and 14 d were significantly decreased by miR-148a-3p mimic. Next, we detected the changes of invasion ability of hDPSCs (Fig. 3C and 3E), the results of which revealed that miR-148a-3p mimic inhibited the invasion rate of hDPSCs. Similarly, the differentiation of hDPSCs was also inhibited by miR-148a-3p mimic (Fig. 3D). DSPP is mainly expressed in odontoblast and closely related to tooth development and biomineralization, and DMP-1 is a non-collagenous extracellular matrix protein of dentin. Therefore, DSPP and DMP-1 are usually used as the markers of odontoblastic differentiation (19, 22, 23). OCN is one of the differentiation markers from osteoblasts to mineralization stage, and RUNX2 is the key transcription factor for osteogenic differentiation at early stage (24, 25). To further verify these results in the molecular level, we detected the expression change of related-factors (Fig. 3F∼H), from which we found that the transcription and translation levels of differentiation and invasion key factors (DSPP, DMP-1, RUNX2, OCN, and Smad4) were both suppressed by miR-148a-3p mimic.
MiR-148a-3p specifically targeted Wnt1
From the bioinformatics, Wnt1 might be targeted by miR-148a-3p (Fig. 4A). Hence, dual-luciferase reporter assays were then performed. As exhibited in Fig. 4B, the luciferase activity was reduced in hDPSCs transfected with miR-148a-3p mimic and Wnt1-WT together. However, after the transfection with miR-148a-3p mimic and PTEN-MUT together, no difference in the luciferase activities was found. Therefore, Wnt1 could be targeted by miR-148a-3p.
MiR-148a-3p reversed the regulatory effect of Wnt1 on the cell viability, invasion, and differentiation of hDPSCs
Then we further infected or transfected Wnt1 overexpression plasmid, siWnt1, miR-148a-3p mimic or inhibitor into hDPSCs (Fig. 5A and 5B) to investigate the effect of Wnt1 on hDPSCs and the interaction between Wnt1 and miR-148a-3p. As depicted in Fig. 5C and 5D, the cell viability was inhibited by miR-148a-3p mimic and siWnt1, while it was enhanced by miR-148a-3p inhibitor and Wnt1 overexpression. In addition, the effects of siWnt1 and Wnt1 overexpression on cell viability could be reversed by miR-148a-3p inhibitor and miR-148a-3p mimic, respectively. Similarly, the invasion (Fig. 5E∼H) and differentiation (Fig. 5I and 5J) of hDPSCs were also inhibited by miR-148a-3p mimic and siWnt1, whereas they were promoted by miR-148a-3p inhibitor and Wnt1 overexpression. The effects of siWnt1 and Wnt1 overexpression were further reversed by miR-148a-3p inhibitor and miR-148a-3p mimic, respectively.
MiR-148a-3p reversed the regulatory effect of Wnt1 on the activation of Wnt1/β-catenin and the expressions of DSPP, DMP-1, RUNX2, OCN, and Smad4
We finally detected the expression changes of Wnt1, β-catenin, DSPP, DMP-1, RUNX2, OCN, and Smad4. As exhibited in Fig. 6A and 6B, the genes expressions of Wnt1, β-catenin, DSPP, DMP-1, RUNX2, OCN, and Smad4 were inhibited by miR-148a-3p mimic and siWnt1, which were increased by miR-148a-3p inhibitor and Wnt1 overexpression. In addition, the regulatory effects of Wnt1 overexpression and siWnt1 were reversed by miR-148a-3p mimic and inhibitor respectively. As for the protein expressions of these factors (Fig. 6C∼F), miR-148a-3p mimic and siWnt1 down-regulated the expressions of Wnt1, β-catenin, DSPP, DMP-1, RUNX2, OCN, and Smad4, while miR-148a-3p inhibitor and Wnt1 overexpression up-regulated the expressions of these factors. In addition, the regulatory effects of Wnt1 overexpression and siWnt1 were offset by miR-148a-3p mimic and inhibitor respectively.
Discussion
In this study, we firstly found that miR-148a-3p expression level was decreased with the odontoblastic differentiation of hDPSCs. Based on this finding, we further found that the up-regulation of miR-148a-3p suppressed the cell viability, invasion, odontoblastic differentiation of hDPSCs by regulating the expressions of related-factors. Then, Wnt1 was verified as a target gene of miR-148a-3p. In addition, Wnt1 expression level was increased with the odontoblastic differentiation of hDPSCs, and Wnt1 knockdown had the regulatory effect similar to miR-148a-3p. What’s more, the effect of Wnt1 could be offset by miR-148a-3p. Our study revealed that miR-148a-3p regulated the invasion and odontoblastic differentiation of hDPSCs.
hDPSCs is capable to be strongly proliferated and differentiated (6). In addition, their clinical application can be attributed to their simple and convenient isolation and culture, lack of ethical controversy and low immuno-genicity, which therefore make them as the therapeutic target for the application as autogenous transplantation for pulp and periodontal tissue regeneration (7, 8). However, the regulation mechanism of hDPSCs differentiation is still unclear and needed more researches. MiR-148a-3p, a number of the miR-148 family, is located in humans on chromosome 7 and in mouse on chromosome 6, and increasing researches have reported the abnormal expression of miR-148a-3p in different types of diseases (15, 26-28). In this study, we found that the expression of miR-148a-3p was significantly decreased with the odontoblastic differentiation of hDPSCs. It was also reported that miR-148a-3p was involved in the cell proliferation, apoptosis, invasion of a series of cells in many diseases (15, 17, 26-28). In addition, miR-148a-3p regulates the differentiation of the marrow stromal cells into osteoblast (18). In consistent with the previously studies, we found that up-regulated miR-148a-3p suppressed the cell viability, invasion, and odontoblastic differentiation of hDPSCs, and miR-148a-3p knockdown did the opposite. Considering the regulation on the invasion and differentiation of cells was directly regulated by the invasion-related and differentiation-related factors, and the invasion and differentiation level could be indirectly showed in the expressions of related makers (2, 29, 30). In order to further verify the results in the molecular level in our current study, we further detected the markers of differentiation and invasion, and discovered that miR-148a-3p overexpression down-regulated the expressions of DSPP, DMP-1, RUNX2, OCN, and Smad4, whereas miR-148a-3p knockdown up-regulated the expressions of these factors, which further proved that miR-148a-3p had the capacity to regulate the invasion and odontoblastic differentiation of hDPSCs.
Accumulating evidence had confirmed that miRNAs could target some certain mRNA and further regulate the development of a variety of diseases (5, 13, 30). Many mRNAs could be targeted by miR-148a-3p during the regulation of miR-148a-3p on biological functions of different types of cells. For example, miR-148a-3p targeted c-Met to inhibit the progression of epithelial ovarian cancer (31). KLF6 was targeted by miR-148a-3p to regulate the proliferation of bovine muscle cells (32). Wnt/β-catenin axis was modulated by miR-148a-3p to promote the proliferation and invasion of ovarian cells (16). In addition, Wnt1 was also reported to be involved in the odontoblastic differentiation of hDPSCs (2). The Wnt1/β-catenin signaling pathway is involved in regulating the physiological process of hDPSCs, but the role of miRNAs in regulating the physiological process of hDPSCs via Wnt1/β-catenin signaling pathway is rarely studied. Therefore, we wonder whether Wnt1 could be targeted by miR-148a-3p in the odontoblastic differentiation of hDPSCs. To our delight, the results in this study not only showed that the expression of Wnt1 was increased with the odontoblastic differentiation of hDPSCs but also verified that Wnt1 could be targeted by miR-148a-3p in hDPSCs. In addition, the cell viability, invasion and odontoblastic differentiation could be promoted by Wnt1 overexpression and inhibited by Wnt1 knockdown. In addition, the regulatory effect of Wnt1 on hDPSCs could be reversed by miR-148a-3p, which confirmed that miR-148a-3p regulated the invasion and odontoblastic differentiation by targeting Wnt1. Wnt1 belongs to the Wnt family, and the classical Wnt/β-catenin pathway plays an important role in the organ formation, tissue regeneration, and other physiological processes (2, 33). Furthermore, Wnt1/β-catenin pathway was widely reported to be involved in many physiological processes, including cell proliferation, fibrosis, and differentiation (34-37). Furthermore, a research had reported Wnt1/β-catenin pathway was involved in the odontoblastic differentiation of hDPSCs and could be regulated by miR-140-5p (2). Similarly, our results exhibited that the expression of β-catenin in hDPSCs was up-regulated by Wnt1 overexpression and miR-148a-3p knockdown, while it was down-regulated by Wnt1 knockdown and miR-148a-3p overexpression, suggesting that the effect of Wnt1 on the expression of β-catenin was further reversed by miR-148a-3p. All these results revealed that the effect of miR-148a-3p on invasion and odontoblastic differentiation of hDPSCs was mediated by targeting Wnt1/β-catenin pathway. It has been reported that stathmin promotes the proliferation and odontoblastic/osteogenic differentiation of hDPSCs through activating the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway (38). The activation of Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway promotes the odontogenic differentiation of dental pulp stem cells (21, 39). However, Scheller et al. (40) reported that Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway inhibits the differentiation of DPSCs. The Wnt/β-catenin pathway has different effects on the differentiation of hDPSCs, and the causes for these differences need to be further investigated.
In a word, the results in this study revealed that miR-148a-3p regulated the viability, invasion and odontoblastic differentiation of hDPSCs via regulating Wnt1/β-catenin pathway.
XML Download