PDF
Citation
Print
Introduction
Mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) have been extensively explored for cardiac regeneration because of their potential to differentiate into cardiomyocytes in vitro and in vivo (1, 2). They can be derived from almost all adult tissues of the body, the common sources being bone marrow, adipose tissue and dental tissues. MSC can also be obtained from fetal tissues such as amniotic fluid, umbilical cord blood and Wharton’s jelly (3). Of these, the bone marrow (BM) derived MSC (BM-MSC) have been most commonly studied for myocardial regeneration in several pre-clinical and clinical studies but the therapeutic outcome has been variable, which may be because of their limited cardiomyogenic potential (4–6). The collection of MSC from BM entails an invasive procedure and it is difficult to get MSC from healthy individuals. Moreover, the frequency of MSC in the BM is very low (0.001 to 0.01%) and their numbers and functionality decreases with the donor’s age (7, 8).
Amniotic fluid (AF) is a novel source of stem cells derived from all the three germ layers (9). The AF derived MSC (AF-MSC) are primitive mesodermal progenitors with extended self-renewal properties and multi-lineage differentiation potential. AF is obtained via amniocentesis for pre-natal diagnosis of genetic disorders and contains a higher frequency of MSC (0.9 to 1.5%) than in the BM. In addition to prototype mesenchymal markers, AF-MSC express several pluripotency related markers and transcription factors including Oct-4, Sox2, c-Kit, TRA-1-60 and TRA-1-80 highlighting that they are intermediate between embryonic and adult stem cells (10, 11). A comparison of molecular and proteomic characterization of AF-MSC and BM-MSC has revealed that AF-MSC express a number of unique proteins related to self renewal and primitive stemness making them distinct from BM-MSC (12). They have also been demonstrated to have a greater hepatogenic and neural differentiation potential than BM-MSC (13, 14). In addition, AF-MSC are immunologically privileged stem cells with higher immunomodulatory characteristics than BM-MSC and they can be used for translational purpose under allogenic conditions (15, 16). Thus overall AF-MSC may be a more suitable source than BM-MSC for regenerative therapies. There are sporadic studies showing differentiation of AF-MSC into cardiac lineage (17) but a comparative analysis of cardiomyogenic potency of AF- and BM-MSC has not yet been carried out.
Therefore, the goal of this study was to compare the expression of cardiac transcription factors and cardiomyogenic differentiation markers between AF-MSC and BM-MSC, in order to ascertain whether AF-MSC have a superior cardiac potency than BM-MSC.
Materials and Methods
Isolation and culture of human AF-MSC and BM-MSC
Approximately 5 ml of AF from healthy pregnant females (n=10) of gestation week 12~18 were collected during routine amniocentesis after informed consent. The AF cells obtained after centrifugation were resuspended in MSC growth medium (MSCGM) consisting of α-MEM supplemented with 16.5% fetal bovine serum, 1% glutamax and 1% bacteriostatic levels of penicillin-streptomycin (Gibco, MD, USA). The cells were seeded in T-25 cm2 flasks (BD Falcon) and incubated at 37°C under 5% CO2. The medium containing non-adherent cells was changed on every 3rd day. The primary cultures of AF-MSC with semi-confluent growth were passaged by trypsinization and further expanded under the same culture conditions. The BM samples of patients with nutritional anemia or immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) (n=10) undergoing routine marrow examination were collected after informed consent and the BM-MSC were isolated and cultured using a protocol previously published by our laboratory (18). The cells of the 3rd passage were used in the experiments.
Growth kinetics
The 3rd passage MSC were seeded in triplicate at the concentration of 1×104 cells per well in a six well plate. The cells were harvested and counted at 24, 48, 72, 96 and 120 hours. The growth curves were plotted using Graph-Pad Prism. The population doubling time was calculated according to the following formula.
Where: Nt=ultimate cell number; No=primary cell number; t=termination incubation time.
Flow cytometry
The cells were stained with following pre-conjugated monoclonal antibodies: CD73-Phycoerythrin (PE), CD90-PE, CD105-PE, CD34-fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) CD45-FITC, HLA-DR-FITC. After 30 minutes of incubation at room temperature, the cells were acquired in FACS-calibur flow cytometer (BD Biosciences) and the data was analysed using FCS Express software.
Adipogenic, osteogenic and chondrogenic differentiation
Adipogenic, osteogenic and chondrogenic differentiation of AF-MSC and BM-MSC were determined by Oil-Red O, Alizarin Red and Alcian blue staining respectively, using the StemPro kits (Gibco) according to manufacturer’s instruction as described previously (18).
Cardiomyogenic induction of AF-MSC and BM-MSC
Cells were induced into cardiomyogenic lineage by treating with MSCGM containing 10 μM 5-Azacytidine (5-aza; Sigma-Aldrich MO, USA) (20). After 24 hrs, cells were washed and further incubated in MSCGM alone up to four weeks with the change of medium twice a week. These cells were analyzed for expression of cardiac transcription factors using real-time qPCR and western blot respectively and the expression of cardiac structural markers were determined by immunocytochemistry.
Real-time qPCR
Total RNA was isolated from control and 5-aza treated cells using the Trizol Reagent (Invitrogen, Waltham Massachusetts, USA). The mRNA was reverse transcribed to cDNA using high capacity cDNA reverse transcription kit (Applied Biosystem). Real-Time analysis of GATA-4, NKx2.5 ISL-1 and GAPDH expression was performed using SYBR Green PCR MASTER mix assay (Takara Clontech). The relative expression level for each target gene was normalized by the Ct value of the housekeeping gene and determined by using the ΔΔCt method. The fold change in gene expression was calculated using 2−ΔΔCTmethod as reported previously (18). Primers used for quantitative real-time PCR are shown in Table 1.
Western blotting
Approximately 20 μg of nuclear extract prepared from 5-aza treated and untreated cells was loaded and separated by 12% sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. The separated proteins were transferred to nitrocellulose membranes and blocked with 5% nonfat milk for 1 hour at room temperature. The membrane then incubated at 4°C overnight against primary antibodies viz. GATA-4 (1:500 dilution), NKx2.5 (1:500 dilution), and ISL-1 (1:300 dilution). Primary antibodies were detected by corresponding horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated secondary antibodies using super signal west picochemiluminescent substrate (Bio-Rad, USA). Images were developed using chemi-doc system (Biorad). The bands were quantified by densitometry using the Image-J software.
Immunocytochemistry
The 5-aza treated cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde (Sigma) for 1 hr at room temperature. After washing, cells were permeabilized with 0.5% triton X- for 10 minutes and non-specific protein binding was blocked by incubating the cells with 5% normal sheep serum. The fixed cells were incubated overnight at 4°C with 1:200 diluted cTNT (cardiac Toponin T), ASA (Alpha Sarcomeric Actinin), βMHC (Beta myosin heavy chain) (abcam) antibodies. After wash, the cells were incubated with 1:200 diluted FITC labeled anti-mouse and anti-rabbit secondary antibody (abcam). The cells were then stained with 500 μl of Hoechst and images were taken using Fluorescent microscope (Olympus BX61). The fluorescence intensity was quantified by Image-J software.
Results
Characterization of AF-MSC and BM-MSC
The AF-MSC exhibited spindle shaped morphology while BM-MSC exhibited elliptical fibroblastoid morphology (Fig. 1a). The BM-MSC had a significantly higher population doubling time (PDT) in comparison to AF-MSC (18.32±0.5 vs.14.17±0.24; p<0.01). Both MSC types had a comparable expression of mesenchymal markers CD73, CD90 and were negative for CD34, CD45 and HLA-DR. However, AF-MSC had markedly lower expression of CD105 (49.1%±23.8 vs 99.7%±3.2) as compared to BM-MSC (Fig. 1d). The AF-MSC exhibited low adipogenic, osteogenic and chondrogenic differentiation in comparison to a robust differentiation BM-MSC into these lineages (Fig. 2).
Expression of cardiac transcription factors by AF-MSC and BM-MSC
There was no difference between AF-MSC and BM-MSC in the constitutive expression of GATA-4 (1.1±0.23 vs 1.02±0.15, p>0.05), Nkx2.5 (1.01±0.22 vs 1.17±0.11, p> 0.05) and Isl1 (0.9±0.03 vs 1.01±0.12, p>0.05) transcripts. However, after 5-Aza treatment, AF-MSC as compared to BM-MSC had significantly higher expression of GATA-4 (183.06±29.85 vs. 9.80±0.05; p<0.01), Nkx2.5 (8.3±1.4 vs. 1.82±0.32; p<0.05), and ISL-1 (39.59±4.05 vs. 4.36±0.39; p<0.01) transcripts (Fig. 3a).
We further confirmed expression of these cardiac transcription factors at protein level in 5-Aza treated MSC using western blot and observed that similar to transcripts, the expression of GATA-4 (2.01±0.5 vs 0.6±0.1; p<0.05), NKx2.5 (1.9±0.14 vs 0.8±0.2; p<0.01) and ISL-1 (1.7±0.3 vs 0.9±0.1; p<0.05) proteins were significantly higher in AF-MSC as compared to BM-MSC (Fig. 3b and 3c).
Expression of cardiomyogenic markers by AF-MSC and BM-MSC;
The expression of cardiomyogenic differentiation markers cTNT, βMHC and ASA by 5-aza treated cells was analyzed by fluorescent immunocytochemistry. Quantitative analysis of immunoflorescent images revealed that as compared to BM-MSC, AF-MSC had significantly higher expression of cTNT (5.0×104±0.6×104 vs 3.5×104±0.8×104; p<0.01), βMHC (15.7×104±0.9×104 vs 8.2×104±0.6×104; p<0.01) and ASA (18.6×104±4.9×104 vs 13.1×104± 3.0×104; p<0.05) (Fig. 4).
Discussion
Our study shows that AF-MSC are the population of stem cells distinct from BM-MSC, and following cardiomyogenic induction with 5-aza they exhibited a higher expression of GATA-4, Nkx-2.5 and ISL-1 transcripts and proteins as well as cardiomyogenic structural markers cTNT, βMHC and ASA as compared to BM-MSC. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study on a comparative analysis of cardiomyogenic potency of AF-MSC and BM-MSC.
The AF-MSC had a higher proliferative potential than BM-MSC, as reported previously (12). Both MSC types showed comparable expression of mesenchymal markers CD73 and CD90 and were negative for hematopoietic markers and HLA-DR. However, the expression of CD105 (the transforming growth factor-beta receptor endoglin) was seen in 99.7% of BM-MSC, whereas only in 49.1% of AF-MSC. It has been previously reported too, that AF-MSC express low levels of CD105 (11). Using standard induction methods, AF-MSC exhibited lower adipogenic and osteogenic differentiation in comparison to BM-MSC. Although, not reported for AF-MSC, but similar to our observation fetal MSC derived from Wharton’s jelly, have recently been shown to have a lower potential to differentiate into adipogenic and osteogenic lineages as compared to BM-MSC (19). Thus there was a difference in the phenotypic marker profile and in the adipogenic and osteogenic and chondrogenic differentiation potential of AF-MSC and BM-MSC.
Though under undifferentiated conditions both MSC types had a comparable expression of cardiac transcription factors GATA-4, Nkx2.5 and ISL-1 genes but after 5-Aza induction, AF-MSC exhibited a significantly higher expression of these transcription factors at gene as well as protein levels. These transcription factors are key regulators of the expression of cardiac structural genes in MSC as well as in other stem cells and promote their differentiation into cardiomyocytes (20, 21). Among these, ISL-1 is of particular importance as it is the earliest transcription factor having a crucial role in cardiogenesis during embryonic development and cardiomyocyte differentiation following cardiac injury in adults (22) and we have observed 40% of AF-MSC to express ISL-1. Similar to the expression of cardiac transcription factors, we observed that 5-aza induced AF-MSC had a significantly higher expression of cTNT, βMHC and ASA as compared to BM-MSC. Thus our data collectively suggests that AF-MSC have superior cardiomyogenic potency as compared to BM-MSC. Although, there is no previous report comparing the cardiomyogenic potential of human AF-MSC and BM-MSC, but several studies have also reported a limited cardiomyogenic potential of BM-MSC (6). We have previously shown that BM-MSC exhibit clonal heterogeneity and only 1 out of 4 clones possessed cardiomyogenic potential, highlighting a low frequency of cardiomyogenic cells in BM-MSC (17). It has also been previously shown that AF-MSC have superior neural and hepatic potency in comparison to BM-MSC (13, 14).
In conclusion, our data on cardiac transcription factors and cardiomyogenic differentiation markers in 5-aza treated cells together highlights that AF-MSC have greater cardiomyogenic potency than BM-MSC. Further studies on the cardiomyogenic secretory factors of AF-MSC, functional characteristics of the AF-MSC derived cardiomyocytes and therapeutic efficacy of AF-MSC in experimental models of cardiovascular diseases are required for establishing the role of AF-MSC in cardiac regeneration.
XML Download