PDF
Citation
Print
Introduction
The pathogenetic development of type 2 diabetes is characterized by a hereditary β-cell dysfunction, associated with a major hormonal activity of the visceral lipid tissue and a resulting chronic systemic inflammation and insulin resistance, which in turn increases the demand for insulin from the β-cells (1, 2). During a year-long development of the disease, there is a progredient decrease in β-cell cleavage and processing capacity, and as consequence immature precursor proteins including uncleaved intact proinsulin are secreted, which can be used for differential diagnosis and to describe the stage of β -cell dysfunction and insulin resistance in the individual patient (3, 4). In the attempt to keep and maintain a normal blood glucose control while patients gain weight and experience an increasing insulin resistance, the β-cells are forced to secrete consistently higher amounts of their secretion product. From past clinical trials with s.c. administration of intact proinsulin, it has become evident that proinsulin has only 10~20% of the glucose lowering effect of insulin (5, 6). The requirement to produce and secrete more of this less effective protein may be one of the key contributors to a final complete β-cell exhaustion, which clinically leads to insulin-dependency of the patient.
Insulin is the only hormone known to date that is capable to induce differentiation and growth of lipid tissue. Untreated, the absolute lack of insulin in type 1 diabetes results in major weight loss, cachexia and diabetic ketoacidosis, while the same is usually not observed in patients with a relative lack of insulin during the later development of type 2 diabetes (7). In contrary, it is well known that patient have a major tendency to gain further weight. Diet and exercise have become key pillars of an effective treatment of diabetes mellitus since decades (7–9). It is tempting to speculate that the increasing amounts of proinsulin, while having only a modest blood glucose-lowering effect, might at the same time drive differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells to become pre-adipocytes with the same lipogenic activity as completely processed insulin.
Human mesenchymal stem cells (hMSCs) isolated from liposuction material have been described as a convenient model for the study of human adipogenesis, including the early stages of the differentiation process (10). By employing a standardized protocol for isolation and purification of human mesenchymal stem cells derived from liposuction material with a consecutive attempt to induce differentiation through appropriate media, we investigated the potential impact of proinsulin to drive differentiation of stem cells into pre-adipocytes, and compared it to the in-vitro effect of insulin under the same laboratory conditions.
Materials and Methods
This work was performed in accordance with applicable ethical standards and German legal regulations, and the responsible ethical review committee approved the use of the liposuction material for this laboratory study.
Isolation and differentiation of adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells
Human adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells were obtained from raw human lipoaspirates from two donors (a 53 yr. old female subject and a 64 yr. old male subject, both non-diabetic) and cultured as previously described by Zuk et al. (11) and Zhu et al. (12). The hMSCs were isolated by their ability of adherence to the culture flask. The first medium change removed the non-adherent cells after three days. Briefly, raw liposuction material with diluted with 1× sterile phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) in a ratio of 1:2 at room temperature for 30 minutes in order to obtain a separation into a lower blood and an upper fat phase followed by centrifugation at 200×g for 10 minutes at room temperature. The pellets were washed with 1× PBS. Remaining red blood cells were destroyed by incubation with erythrolysis buffer (1×10−4 M EDTA [pH 8.0], 0.154 M NH4Cl, 1×10−2 M KHCO3) for 10 minutes at room temperature. The upper phase was treated with 0.075% collagenase (type I; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) in PBS for 30 min at 37°C with gentle agitation. The collagenase was inactivated with an equal volume of DMEM/10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) and the infranatant centrifuged for 10 min at 200×g. The cellular pellet was re-suspended in DMEM/10% FBS and filtered through a 100 μm mesh filter to remove debris. The filtrate was centrifuged as detailed above and plated onto conventional tissue culture plates in control medium (500 ml DMEM [4.5 g/L glucose, with L-glutamine], 50 ml fetal bovine serum [heat inactivated], 5 ml penicillin/streptomycin, [10,000 IU penicillin, 10,000 μg/ml streptomycin], 5 ml amphotericin B [250 μg/ml amphotericin B], sterile filtered and incubated at 37°C for 30 min prior to use).
The mesenchymal stem cells were induced with differentiation media (control medium with addition of dexamethasone [1.0 μm final], 3-isobutyl-1-methylxanthine [IBMX 0.5 mm final], indomethacin [0.2 mm final] and insulin [10.0 μm final], intact proinsulin, or the combination of both [5 μmol final each]). The same medium without addition of insulin or proinsulin served for the negative control experiments. The cells were incubated at 37°C with twice-daily renewal of the medium and cell culture supernatants were taken from these experiments and an untreated control after 8 days, 17 days, and 23 days, respectively. They were stored at −80°C until analysis. Cell differentiation to the adipogenic lineage was microscopically supervised and confirmed by Oil Red O staining and determination of adiponectin in the supernatant. All experiments were carried out in triplicate and with cells derived from each donor.
Oil Red O Staining
Media was removed, and cells were fixed for 60 min using a 10% formal calcium fixative (1.0 g of CaCl2, 25.0 ml 16% paraformaldehyde (4.0% final) and 75.0 ml distilled water, all Sigma Aldrich). Thereafter, cells were washed two times with PBS, followed by another washing step with 70% ethanol, and 5 min incubation at room temperature with Oil Red O solution (2.0 g Oil Red O powder in 50.0 ml 70% ethanol and 50.0 ml acetone, all SIGMA Aldrich). Cells were washed with 70% ethanol and tap water and visually analyzed within 10~15 min. A semi-quantitative rank scale was used for this analysis (0=no staining, 1=few individual cells with visible lipid granules, 2=less than 50% of visible cells with lipid granules, 3=majority of the visible cells have lipid granules).
Measurement of total adiponectin in the supernatant
Adiponectin concentrations were measured in the supernatant after 8 days, 17 days, and 23 days of incubation with daily renewal of the differentiation medium as protein secretion marker for differentiation into mature lipid cells by means of a sensitive radioimmunoassay (Adiponectin RIA, Linco, St. Charles, MO). The measurements were performed in triplicate with 100 μl of supernatant taken 12 h after the last renewal of the differentiation medium.
Statistical analysis
The adiponectin results are presented as mean±STD and data were analysed by methods of descriptive statistics and interpreted in exploratory sense. Appropriate parametric and non-parametric methods were applied for comparison between day 7 and day 23. p-values<0.05 were considered statistically significant.
Results
All experiments were carried out as planned and without deviation from the protocol. Viable cells in an amount of 11.3×105 out of 13.0×105 were determined (87% viably). The microscopy surveillance of the cell morphology revealed that no growth of lipid cells occurred in the control experiment. Also no secretion of adiponectin was observed in the negative control experiments or could be seen at any of the the test days (adiponectin concentrations on day 8: 3.2±0.5 ng/ml, day 17: 3.3±0.1 ng/ml, and day 23: 4.4±0.5 ng/ml).
The experiments conducted with addition of insulin or proinsulin resulted in differentiation of the cells into (pre−)adipocytes as proved by Oil Red O staining. Fig. 1 shows a typical example of the microscopic appearance of the cells when induced by insulin at the different analysis days of the experiment. As can be seen, a continuous differentiation towards mature adipocytes was observed, which was confirmed by a corresponding increase in adiponectin values at the end of the experiment at day 23. With the standard insulin-containing differentiation medium adiponectin levels were 3.6±1.9 ng/ml on day 8, 5.1±1.4 ng/ml on day 17, and 13.3±1.5 ng/ml on day 23 (p<0.05 vs. day 8 and day 17).
A comparable differentiation pattern was seen when insulin was replaced with an equimolar amount of proinsulin (day 8: 3.3±1.2 ng/ml, day 17: 3.5±0.3 ng/ml, and day 23: 12.2±1.2 ng/ml; p<0.05 vs. day 8 and 17) or with the equimolar 50:50 mixture of insulin and proinsulin (day 8: 3.5±0.7 ng/ml, day 17: 4.0±0.2 ng/ml, and day 23: 14.6±3.0 ng/ml; p<0.05 vs. day 8 and 17). The comparison of these results with the results derived from the control experiment are shown in Fig 2.
All differentiation experiments with media containing insulin and/or proinsulin resulted in similar numbers of differentiated cells as confirmed by cell count and Oil Red O staining (~1,500 cells/cm2 with stained lipid granules), with a typical ranking of “3” in all cases on day 23 (see Fig. 1). In previous experiments, we have shown the reliability of this protocol to result in adipocyte differentiation also with other biomarkers not tested here (termination of the differentiation process usually occurs at around day 20) (13).
Discussion
In this study, we used human adipose tissue derived mesenchymal stem cells and their differentiation pattern as an in vitro model for obesity-associated cell differentiation to identify the lipogenic potential of proinsulin in comparison to insulin. We assessed morphological changes and Oil Red O staining and measured adiponectin secretion into the supernatant as indication for the differentiation of the stem cells towards mature adipocytes. Our adiponectin concentrations measured after three weeks of cultivation with normal insulin-containing adipogenic differentiation medium (~12 ng/ml/12 h) were in line with previously published results regarding the secretion of adiponectin by mature adipocytes in vitro (14, 15). A similar adiponectin secretion was observed when adding proinsulin or a 50/50 insulin/proinsulin mixture in equimolar concentrations instead of insulin to the differentiation medium, while no differentiation to adipocytes occurred without addition of insulin or proinsulin.
As of today, insulin has been considered the only physiological hormone in the human body that is capable to built-up visceral and subcutaneous lipid tissue (16). Alternatively, the influence of pharmaceutical drugs (dexamethason and rosiglitazone) may also drive stem cell differentiation into the adipogenic lineage in a laboratory setting (17). Because of the established minor but notable glucose-lowering effect of unprocessed proinsulin, we speculated that proinsulin may also have some impact on lipid tissue generation. By using an established in-vitro model of adipose tissue differentiation with mesenchymal stem cells derived from liposuction material, we confirmed a lipogenic action of proinsulin in vitro, which was equal to the effect observed with regular human insulin.
Our study has several limitations, which need to be considered before interpreting the relevance of our findings for clinical practice. First, the experiment was a pilot experiment and only performed with mesenchymal stem cells derived from two donors. It will be important to confirm our findings with stem cells derived from multiple donors to exclude that they are only valid for individual subgroups. Second, we repeated the experiment only three times to be able to perform at least descriptive statistics.
However, the observed effects between weeks two and three of our experiments were so pronounced and homogeneous that we do not believe that a larger number of measurements would have change the outcome. Third and final, translation and interpretation of in-vitro results for clinical practice recommendations should only be performed with uppermost caution and only if other indications vote for justification of such an approach.
However, even with all limitations mentioned above, our results might explain several well-known findings in patients with type 2 diabetes and prediabetes:
During the development of type 2 diabetes, increased concentrations of fasting and postprandial intact proinsulin levels can occur as consequence of late stage β-cell dysfunction (stage III) (3, 4). Intact proinsulin has a moderate but notable glucose lowering effect, which may even mask or delay the glucose-based diagnosis of the disease (5, 6). Proinsulin lowers glucose only with 10% to 20% of the efficacy of insulin itself, when injected subcutanelously. So five proinsulin molecules are required to replace the action of one insulin molecule (6). As a logical consequence, determination of postprandial proinsulin in non-diabetic subjects was found to predict the development of glucose-defined type 2 diabetes or macrovascular events up to five years in advance in a pilot study (18). In addition, this diagnostic value of intact proinsulin when determined in fasting or postprandial blood samples for prediction of diabetes (19–22) but also of macrovascular events (23–25) has been confirmed in numerous well-documented prospective long-term epidemiological studies in small and large patient populations during the last decades.
This β-cell dysfunction-defined “prediabetes” stage is not characterized by glucose abnormalities, but by normal glucose levels and by elevated proinsulin levels as the only indicative parameter. As mentioned above, the blood glucose lowering potency of proinsulin is much lower than that of insulin and five to ten times more proinsulin needs to be secreted to control blood glucose in vivo. In consequence, there is an increased tendency for adipocyte differentiation. The enhanced number of differentiated pre-adipocytes results in an increased hormonal activity of the visceral adipose tissue with secretion of proinflammatory hormones and cytokines (26), which consecutively decrease plasma adiponectin levels and increase chronic systemic inflammation and insulin resistance (4, 27–29).
A main feature of this condition is insulin and leptin resistance as well as the production of inflammatory cytokines: TNF and IL 6 and monocyte chemoattractant protein. It has been shown that about 30% of circulating IL 6 comes from adipose tissue (30). IL-6 causes insulin resistance by decreasing the expression of insulin receptors, decreases adipogenesis and adiponectin, and stimulates hepatic gluconeogenesis (26, 30). This means that excess of visceral adipose tissue results in the development of a chronic systemic inflammatory condition, which favors the development of insulin resistance and Type 2 diabetes.
Insulin resistance increases the pressure on the β-cells to produce more secretion product for glucose control (for a schematic representation see Fig. 3). Still patients will only gain weight with a positive caloric balance, i.e. if they eat more than what they metabolically burn. In any case, it can be speculated that the adipogenic potential of proinsulin may be a large contributor to the increased body weight problems, the observed chronic systemic inflammation (31) and associated risks in patients with type 2 diabetes and advanced β-cell dysfunction.
In conclusion, our pilot study has shown that proinsulin has a similar potential like insulin to drive mesenchymal stem cells into the adipogenic lineage. While this finding has to be confirmed in further studies, it may be indicative for an important role of proinsulin in the pathophysiology of weight gain, chronic systemic inflammation, and macrovascular disease in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
XML Download