Extratympanic Observation of Middle and Inner Ear Structures in Rodents Using Optical Coherence Tomography

Se-Joon Oh; Il-Woo Lee; Soo-Geun Wang; Soo-Keun Kong; Hong-Ki Kim; Eui-Kyung Goh

doi:10.21053/ceo.2019.00766

Journal List > Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol > v.13(2) > 1157791

Go to TopGo to Top Go to BottomGo to Bottom

TOOLS

Oh, Lee, Wang, Kong, Kim, and Goh: Extratympanic Observation of Middle and Inner Ear Structures in Rodents Using Optical Coherence Tomography

Original Article

Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol 2020;13(2):106-112.

Published online: 1 November 2019

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21053/ceo.2019.00766

Extratympanic Observation of Middle and Inner Ear Structures in Rodents Using Optical Coherence Tomography

Se-Joon Oh¹

, Il-Woo Lee²

, Soo-Geun Wang¹

, Soo-Keun Kong¹

, Hong-Ki Kim³

, Eui-Kyung Goh¹

¹Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Pusan National University Hospital, Pusan National University School of Medicine and Medical Research Institute, Busan, Korea

²Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Yangsan, Seoul, Korea

³Koh Young Technology Inc., Seoul, Korea

Corresponding author: Eui-Kyung Goh Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Pusan National University Hospital, Pusan National University School of Medicine, 179 Gudeok-ro, Seo-gu, Busan 49241, Korea Tel: +82-51-240-7335, Fax: +82-51-246-8668 E-mail: gohek@pusan.ac.kr

Received 24 May 2019 Revised 24 July 2019 Accepted 6 September 2019

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Objectives

This study aimed to investigate whether optical coherence tomography (OCT) provides useful information about the microstructures of the middle and inner ear via extratympanic approach and thereby could be utilized as an alternative diagnostic technology in ear imaging.

Methods

Five rats and mice were included, and the swept-source OCT system was applied to confirm the extent of visibility of the middle and inner ear and measure the length or thickness of the microstructures in the ear. The cochlea was subsequently dissected following OCT and histologically evaluated to compare with the OCT images.

Results

The middle ear microstructures such as ossicles, stapedial artery and oval window through the tympanic membrane with the OCT could be confirmed in both rats and mice. It was also possible to obtain the inner ear images such as each compartment of the cochlea in the mice, but the bone covering bulla needed to be removed to visualize the inner ear structures in the rats which had thicker bulla. The bony thickness covering the cochlea could be measured, which showed no significant differences between OCT and histologic image at all turns of cochlea.

Conclusion

OCT has been shown a promising technology to assess real-time middle and inner ear microstructures noninvasively with a high-resolution in the animal model. Therefore, OCT could be utilized to provide additional diagnostic information about the diseases of the middle and inner ear.

Keywords: Optical Coherence Tomography, Otolaryngology, Optical Imaging, Cochlea, Middle Ear

INTRODUCTION

Minimally invasive imaging techniques, such as computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), positron emission tomography, and ultrasound scan, have revolutionized diagnostics during the past decades. Some of these techniques enable three-dimensional (3D) visualization; however, their axial resolution is typically limited to a few millimeters in standard clinical applications [1,2]. Although these imaging techniques are useful diagnostic modalities, they have some limitations such as insufficient resolution for visualizing the details of ear microstructures and pathologies, radiation exposure in CT, and high cost in MRI [3]. Optical coherence tomography (OCT), which is a relatively new medical diagnostic imaging modality in otologic fields, provides noninvasive two-dimensional (2D) and 3D cross-sectional images of internal structures with a spatial resolution of 1 to 15 µm, higher than that of CT and MRI [4]. In addition, it can be operated safely, in vivo, and provide real time imaging with low cost.

Application of OCT to otologic field has become mainstream research over the past decades. People have used OCT to look at not only the morphological information of the middle and inner ear, but also their dynamic vibrations, and explored clinical applications of the OCT for diagnosis of middle ear diseases [5-9]. For practical clinical adjustment, it is important to be able to observe the middle and inner ear by transmitting the tympanic membrane (TM) from the outside the TM using OCT. Although several studies have revealed OCT to show middle and inner ear structures, researches about the anatomical accuracy of OCT is still lacking [10].

Therefore, in the present study, we presented in vivo images about the middle and inner ear taken outside TM in rats and mice to illustrate the feasibility of using OCT to image various microstructures involving the ossicular chain and cochlea, and compared the structures observed in histologic findings and OCT images to reveal the reliability and accuracy of OCT.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

OCT system and instrumentation

Fig. 1 shows a schematic of the experimental setup using the OCT system (KY-OCT-100; Koh Young Technology, Seoul, Korea), which was equipped with a swept-source light source with a central wavelength of 1,310 nm, a spectral bandwidth of 105 nm, and average output power of 6 mW. The axial scan rate was 100 kHz, axial resolution was 7 µm, lateral resolution was 13 µm, and signal to noise ratio was 100 dB. Two-dimensional images were obtained at a 4 mm×4 mm (600×800 pixels) size in real-time, and 3D images were also reconstructed based on the 2D images in a 4 mm×4 mm×4 mm (600×800×800 pixels) size. The light coming from the light source divides at the coupler: one goes to the reference mirror and the other goes to the tissue sample. The two reflected beams combine and interfered at a coupler. The photodiode detector (PDB 470C; Thorlabs, Newton, NJ, USA) converts the light into an analogue electrical signal, which is then digitized, and Fourier transformed into cross-section images. The synchronization of triggered signals from the light source and the output signals of a data acquisition board (NI PXI-6115; National Instruments, Austin, TX, USA) enabled the production of 2D and 3D images.

Animal preparation

The surgical procedure for rats and mice were conducted in accordance with the guidelines of the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Pusan National University (No. PNUH-2016-075). A total of five live male BALB/c mice (24–28 days old, 15–30 g) and five live male Sprague-Dawley rats (10–12 weeks old, 240–260 g) were used. Animal preparation procedures were similar for mice and rats although detailed structures were different. Before surgery, the mice and rats were anesthetized with a mixture of 30 mg/kg Zoletil (Virbac, Carros, France) and xylazine hydrochloride (0.7 mg/100 g). Following local injection of 2% lidocaine HCL and epinephrine (1:200,000) around the auricle, the auricle and cartilaginous external auditory canal were removed to expose the whole TM. A holder that could fix the head was invented in order to get a clear visualization of the structures, because the fine movement due to breathing could blur the OCT images (Fig. 2). Two-dimensional images were confirmed on the screen where the middle ear structures were well observed, and the 3D image was successively obtained using the program, which took about 20 to 30 seconds. After obtaining the images taken outside the TM, in order to obtain images that were not observed from outside the TM, the TM was gently removed with the ossicles intact, and the bony rim of the external auditory canal and bulla were drilled until the entire cochlea was visible by OCT (Fig. 3).

Histologic assessment

After obtaining the OCT imaging, mice and rats were sacrificed with carbon dioxide. And the temporal bones were directly excised, and removed the tympanic bulla bone. Then exposed cochlea was perilymphatically perfused with 4% paraformaldehyde, and immersed in 4% PFA at 4°C for overnight. Next, the specimens were decalcified with 10% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (17385-0401; Junsei, Tokyo, Japan) for 10 days. The samples were embedded, frozen, and thereafter midmodiolar cryosectioned in a thickness of 8 µm using Cryocut microstome (CM1510S; Leica, Wetzlar, Germany). The cryosections were then stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E; Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) and viewed with an optical microscope (Eclipse 80i; Nikon, Shinagawa, Japan).

Statistical analysis

IBM SPSS ver. 22.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) was used for statistical analyses. Data such as nonparametric variables between the OCT imaging and histologic results were evaluated using a Mann-Whitney U-test. Statistical significance was defined as a value of P<0.05.

RESULTS

Mouse

The 2D and 3D structures of middle and inner ear were visualized via the extratympanic approach. We were able to obtain the desired image by turning the head of the mouse in various directions. The cochlea, which consists of the scala media, scala tympani, scala vestibuli, basilar membrane, and Reissner’s membrane, could be observed via OCT (Fig. 4A). However, we could not confirm every turn of the cochlea in the mouse except the apical turn of cochlea. Therefore, the bony thickness covering the cochlea could be measured only at the apical turn, 16±3 µm. In the H&E stain, the same anatomic site was measured as 23± 4.0 µm, which showed no significant difference compared to OCT image (P=0.488). The 3D reconstructed image using the 2D OCT images enabled confirmation of the TM and its internal structures more clearly (Fig. 4B). The middle ear structures involving the ossicles (malleus, incus, and stapes), could be visualized (Fig. 4C).

Rat

Fig. 5A shows the 2D tomographic images of middle ear morphologies including the TM and the handle of malleus, which connects the TM and the ossicles to the top part of the TM and middle ear. Although some parts of the cochlea were seen via the extratympanic approach, there were restrictions for visualizing the whole middle and inner ear structures due to the bony part of external auditory canal. We could identify these structures after bulla removal (Fig. 5A). Although the inner fine structures of the cochlea, such as the Reissner’s membrane and basilar membrane were not shown as clearly as in the mice, each of the cochlear turns and compartments, such as the scala tympani, scala vestibuli, and scala media, were visible (Fig. 5B). The bony thickness covering the cochlea could be measured by OCT from the apical turn, middle turn, and basal turn, and they were 34.9±9.5 µm, 120±23.8 µm, 179.8±17.6 µm, respectively (Fig. 6A). In the H&E stain, the thickness of the apical, middle and basal turn of cochlea were measured as 27.5±7.0 µm, 100.0± 25.6 µm, 160.1±22.6 µm, respectively, which showed no significant statistical difference compared to OCT image (P=0.652) (Fig. 6B and C). Besides that, the stapedial artery, measuring 260± 31 µm, passes through the footplate of the stapes (Fig. 5C). Fig. 5D shows cochlear cross sectional images with microstructures such as the scala media, scala tympani, scala vestibuli, basilar membrane and round window niche lateral to the central axis.

DISCUSSION

OCT could be a useful imaging tool in otology for its unique characteristics of tissue penetrability, which may give additional diagnostic or therapeutic information [11,12]. Thereby, OCT could reduce unnecessary ear surgeries being performed. Namely, an explorative operation is still frequently needed to confirm the state of middle ear, and this might be replaced by OCT, which can be used to visualize the structures inside the TM. Moreover, OCT will provide better imaging for postoperative follow-up that is more difficult to identify the changes beneath the TM [13]. Drawback of OCT is that the depth of the image it produces is limited to a few millimeters due to its low permeability to tissues. Moreover, optical components and image processing techniques need to be more developed for a 3D real imaging system. The images produced also had some limitations such as post shadow imaging distortions [14].

In the present study, to assess the usefulness of OCT, we analyzed two aspects: (1) the extent of visualization of middle and inner ear viewed from outside the TM and (2) accuracy in measuring the length of each structures. Most of the structures of the middle and inner ear were clearly visualized with OCT in both mice and rats. For the mice, all the structures from beneath the TM to the cochlea were visualized clearly. The structural images of the cochlea and middle ear in mice were more detailed compared to those in rats, which might be due to relatively thicker bone of the rats. Therefore, partial removal of the bulla in rats was needed for visualization of cochlea inner structures. Although the otic capsule covering the cochlea of the rats was thicker than that of the mice, we could visualize three compartments of the cochlear microstructures from base to apex. When OCT images were compared with the histologic images in measuring length at the bones covering the cochlea, there were no significant differences between two modalities, which means that OCT is effective for measuring lengths of around 100 µm. Therefore, these results showed the accuracy of OCT images and the possibility of utilizing the OCT as measuring the middle and inner ear structures.

Utility of OCT have been reported to have the ability to show the structures of the inner ear in the mice [15]. Tona et al. [16] reported that OCT could evaluate the gross anatomy of mouse cochlea, including the Reissner’s membrane and basilar membrane, with results demonstrating endolymphatic hydrops. Cho et al. [5] demonstrated in vivo visualization of middle and inner ear structures using OCT system which was integrated to microscope. Although these studies showed noninvasive high resolution ear images, only mouse was used in the experiment. Most animal studies usually included mice as subjects because their thin cochlear bony capsules enable OCT application in vivo as a cochlear imaging modality. In the current study, we conducted various experiments using rats and mice to determine whether OCT could be utilized in diagnosing middle and inner ear diseases. We additionally included rats for further possibility that OCT could still produce images even with a thicker bony capsule covering the cochlea.

OCT in otology is expected to assist in surgery or diagnosis of middle or inner ear diseases, such as the ossicular state, middle ear effusion, otitis media infection, cochlear anomaly, and endolymphatic hydrops. Current research is going in that direction. However, there are several practical considerations that need to be overcome from a clinical perspective. Because the light used in OCT should pass through the curvature of the external canal, the OCT system combined with a surgical microscope or endoscope was developed for this purpose [5,16-19]. Microscope-integrated intraoperative OCT is already commercially available for imaging of ophthalmic surgical maneuvers [15,16,20]. Garcia et al. [21] introduced an intraoperative OCT probe used for vocal fold imaging, which could also be applied to ear imaging if modified. The working distance of the objective lens is also an important consideration for clinical application. The working distance of the OCT instrument used in this experiment was approximately 7.5 mm, which was sufficient for observing the middle and inner ear structures in mice and rats, however, the distance from the ear canal entrance to the distal side of the middle ear cavity in humans is about 40 mm. Thus, the working distance should be extended to 40 mm for clinical application. Recently, Lee et al. [18] have developed the OCT/microscope system with an extended working distance of 280 mm, which could give enough space for intraoperative manipulation, and this will be helpful for further application of OCT to human.

Unlike more commonplace retinal and skin OCT, the microstructures of interest in otology are millimeter sized and the needs for exceedingly high resolution to visualize are less than retina and skin [13]. However, the following must be considered: first, the important structures are located behind the TM; second, they are distributed throughout approximately two cubic centimeters of air-filled middle ear space; and finally, if they are to be imaged from the external auditory canal, the numerical aperture (NA) of the objective lens will need to be low to create a new set of requirements unlike other OCT applications. The NA is a dimensionless acceptance angle that characterizes the range of angles over which the system can accept light. The depth of focus is inversely dependent on the NA of imaging optics. Therefore, increasing the NA increases the resolution but decreases the depth of focus quadratically, which means we need to choose the appropriate lens according to the target [22]. Therefore, in order to extend the depth of the field, the typical NA of lenses in surgical microscope used in the middle ear should be less than 0.02 [15]. Although the NA of the lens used in this study was 0.056, which was enough for visualizing the middle, inner ears of rodents, the NA of the lens for the application to humans should be considered lessening according to the situation of the combination of the OCT system with the microscope or endoscope.

In summary, we have demonstrated that OCT could be utilized as a real time, nondestructive, noninvasive tool for visualizing the morphology of middle and inner ear of rats and mice. It is worth studying its application for humans. Thus, OCT may become a useful tool in evaluating and treating middle and inner ear structures.

HIGHLIGHTS

▪ Optical coherence tomography (OCT) could visualize the structures of the middle and inner ear from the outside of the tympanic membrane.

▪ Measuring the middle and inner ear structures by the OCT was comparable to the histologic finding, which shows the accuracy of OCT images.

▪ Rats with a thicker bone had a limitation in the visualization of the middle and inner ear compared to the mouse.

Notes

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

Conceptualization: EKG. Data curation: SJO, IWL, SKK. Formal analysis: all authors. Funding acquisition: SJO. Methodology: SKK. Project administration: HKK. Visualization: HKK. Writing - original draft: SJO. Writing - review & editing: all authors.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was supported by the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education (No. 2016R1D1A 1B03932026).

This work was presented as an abstract/oral presentation at the SPIE BiOS, 2017 and was published as a proceedings of the conference, http://spie.org/Publications/Proceedings/Paper/10.1117/12.2249026.

REFERENCES

1. Monroy GL, Shelton RL, Nolan RM, Nguyen CT, Novak MA, Hill MC, et al. Noninvasive depth-resolved optical measurements of the tympanic membrane and middle ear for differentiating otitis media. Laryngoscope. 2015; Aug. 125(8):E276–82.

2. Rainsbury JW, Landry TG, Brown JA, Adamson RA, Bance M. High frequency ex vivo ultrasound imaging of the middle ear to show simulated ossicular pathology. Otol Neurotol. 2016; Jun. 37(5):586–92.

3. Sennaroglu L, Saatci I, Aralasmak A, Gursel B, Turan E. Magnetic resonance imaging versus computed tomography in pre-operative evaluation of cochlear implant candidates with congenital hearing loss. J Laryngol Otol. 2002; Oct. 116(10):804–10.

4. Fujimoto JG, Farkas D. Biomedical optical imaging. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press;2009.

5. Cho NH, Jang JH, Jung W, Kim J. In vivo imaging of middle-ear and inner-ear microstructures of a mouse guided by SD-OCT combined with a surgical microscope. Opt Express. 2014; Apr. 22(8):8985–95.

6. Just T, Lankenau E, Hüttmann G, Pau HW. Optical coherence tomography of the oval window niche. J Laryngol Otol. 2009; Jun. 123(6):603–8.

7. Chang EW, Cheng JT, Roosli C, Kobler JB, Rosowski JJ, Yun SH. Simultaneous 3D imaging of sound-induced motions of the tympanic membrane and middle ear ossicles. Hear Res. 2013; Oct. 304:49–56.

8. Gao SS, Raphael PD, Wang R, Park J, Xia A, Applegate BE, et al. In vivo vibrometry inside the apex of the mouse cochlea using spectral domain optical coherence tomography. Biomed Opt Express. 2013; Feb. 4(2):230–40.

9. Subhash HM, Choudhury N, Chen F, Wang RK, Jacques SL, Nuttall AL. Depth-resolved dual-beamlet vibrometry based on Fourier domain low coherence interferometry. J Biomed Opt. 2013; Mar. 18(3):036003.

10. Tan HE, Santa Maria PL, Wijesinghe P, Francis Kennedy B, Allardyce BJ, Eikelboom RH, et al. Optical coherence tomography of the tympanic membrane and middle ear: a review. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2018; Sep. 159(3):424–38.

11. Jungheim M, Donner S, Bleeker S, Ripken T, Krueger A, Ptok M. Effect of saline inhalation on vocal fold epithelial morphology evaluated by optical coherence tomography. Laryngoscope. 2016; Oct. 126(10):E332–6.

12. Pitris C, Saunders KT, Fujimoto JG, Brezinski ME. High-resolution imaging of the middle ear with optical coherence tomography: a feasibility study. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2001; Jun. 127(6):637–42.

13. Ruah CB, Schachern PA, Zelterman D, Paparella MM, Yoon TH. Age-related morphologic changes in the human tympanic membrane: a light and electron microscopic study. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1991; Jun. 117(6):627–34.

14. Djalilian HR, Ridgway J, Tam M, Sepehr A, Chen Z, Wong BJ. Imaging the human tympanic membrane using optical coherence tomography in vivo. Otol Neurotol. 2008; Dec. 29(8):1091–4.

15. MacDougall D, Rainsbury J, Brown J, Bance M, Adamson R. Optical coherence tomography system requirements for clinical diagnostic middle ear imaging. J Biomed Opt. 2015; May. 20(5):56008.

16. Tona Y, Sakamoto T, Nakagawa T, Adachi T, Taniguchi M, Torii H, et al. In vivo imaging of mouse cochlea by optical coherence tomography. Otol Neurotol. 2014; Feb. 35(2):e84–9.

17. Pawlowski ME, Shrestha S, Park J, Applegate BE, Oghalai JS, Tkaczyk TS. Miniature, minimally invasive, tunable endoscope for investigation of the middle ear. Biomed Opt Express. 2015; May. 6(6):2246–57.

18. Lee J, Wijesinghe RE, Jeon D, Kim P, Choung YH, Jang JH, et al. Clinical utility of intraoperative tympanomastoidectomy assessment using a surgical microscope integrated with an optical coherence tomography. Sci Rep. 2018; Nov. 8(1):17432.

19. Kirsten L, Schindler M, Morgenstern J, Erkkila MT, Golde J, Walther J, et al. Endoscopic optical coherence tomography with wide field-of-view for the morphological and functional assessment of the human tympanic membrane. J Biomed Opt. 2018; Dec. 24(3):1–11.

20. Tao YK, Srivastava SK, Ehlers JP. Microscope-integrated intraoperative OCT with electrically tunable focus and heads-up display for imaging of ophthalmic surgical maneuvers. Biomed Opt Express. 2014; May. 5(6):1877–85.

21. Garcia JA, Benboujja F, Beaudette K, Guo R, Boudoux C, Hartnick CJ. Using attenuation coefficients from optical coherence tomography as markers of vocal fold maturation. Laryngoscope. 2016; Jun. 126(6):E218–23.

22. Drexler W, Liu M, Kumar A, Kamali T, Unterhuber A, Leitgeb RA. Optical coherence tomography today: speed, contrast, and multimodality. J Biomed Opt. 2014; 19(7):071412.

Fig. 1.

Schematic diagram of the real-time swept-source optical coherence tomography (OCT) imaging system. PD, photodiode; DAQ, data acquisition board.

Fig. 2.

Swept-source optical coherence tomography (OCT) system that was used in this experiment. The objective lens had an outer diameter of 34 mm and a working distance of 7.5 mm. A mouse is placed on the scanning stage of the OCT system. The head of the mouse is grasped by the holder to keep it steady. The white arrow indicates the head holder.

Fig. 3.

Endoscopic findings in the right ear of the mouse. (A) Tympanic membrane (TM) viewed extra-tympanically. (B) Middle ear of mouse after removal of the TM and the cartilaginous and bony external auditory canal. M, malleus; I, incus; S, stapes; SA, stapedial artery; R, round window; P, promontory.

Fig. 4.

In vivo middle ear and inner ear structure images of a mouse using optical coherence tomography. (A) Two-dimensional image at the apex of the cochlear structures. (B) Three-dimensional image of the same structure in (A). (C) Two-dimensional image of the ossicles in the middle ear cavity. Scale bars (white) represent 500 μm in length. TM, tympanic membrane; M, manubrium of malleus; BM, basilar membrane; SM, scala media; RM, Reissner's membrane; SV, scala vestibuli; ST, scala tympani; P, promontory; I, incus; S, stapes; TC, tympanic cavity; C, cochlea.

Fig. 5.

Two-dimensional (2D) images of rat TM, middle ear, and inner ear structures. (A) TM and M with the bulla removed. (B) Apical, middle, basal turn of C and round window with TM with the bulla removed. (C) SA passing on the C and OW. The white arrow indicates the diameter of the SA. (D) Two-dimensional en face image at the apex of the cochlear structures. Scale bars (white) represent 500 μm in length. TM, tympanic membrane; M, malleus; P, promontory; C, cochlea; MO, modiolus; RW, round window; OW, oval window; HS, head of stapes; SA, stapedial artery; ST, scala tympani; SM, scala media; SV, scala vestibuli; BM, basilar membrane; RWN, round window niche.

Fig. 6.

The comparison between the optical coherence tomography (OCT) image and histologic view in rats. (A) Apical, middle, basal turn of cochlea and round window with tympanic membrane with the bulla removed. The white arrows indicate the thickness of the bone at each turn of cochlea. Scale bars represent 500 μm in length. (B) Histology of the cochlea, sections were stained with H&E (×40). (C) The comparison of bony thickness covering the cochlea measured by OCT and histology, which shows no significant differences between two methods. MO, modiolus; RW, round window.

TOOLS

Similar articles