Abstract
Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) has an important role during congenital heart surgery. TEE in small infants is associated with complications, including an inability to pass the TEE probe, esophageal trauma, airway compression, aortic compression, and interference with ventilation. Recently, a monoplane intravascular ultrasound catheter (IVUC) has been developed for intracardiac echocardiography. The efficacy of IVUC for transesophageal use has been shown in numerous animal studies and several human studies, but there have been few reports involving small infants using an IVUC probe. We examined 15 pediatric patients undergoing congenital cardiac surgery using an 8-Fr AcuNav IVUC probe. We checked the cardiac anatomy, cardiac function pre-operatively and de-aeration before weaning from CPB; the surgical repairs were evaluated post-operatively. Although the IVUC probe has limitations associated with the monoplane, we found the IVUC probe to be useful in small infants and safer than the TEE.
Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) during cardiac surgery permits cardiac assessment and provides the surgeon with information about the adequacy of surgical repair immediately after the procedure. However, even a pediatric omniplane TEE probe is too large for use in small infants. Indeed, TEE is limited in infants weighing under 5 kg (Fig. 1). A pediatric omniplane TEE probe will not pass the esophagus in neonates or very small infants. Even though a TEE probe can pass the esophagus in small infants, the probe compresses the endotracheal tube and surrounding structures, such as the distal trachea, mainstem bronchi, heart, and aorta [1,2].
Recently, a monoplane intravascular ultrasound catheter (IVUC, AcuNav™; SIEMENS Medical, CA, USA) has been developed. The IVUC was originally used for intravascular or intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) during cardiac catheterization; the IVUC has been proposed in several studies for use during TEE in small animals or infants [3,4]. The IVUC probe is available in an 8 Fr size (2.5 mm; Fig. 1). This is a 64-element vector, phased array transducer, which is multifrequency (5.5-10 MHz) with a maneuverable four-way head articulation to allow multiple angle imaging. There is a steering lock to maintain angulation of the catheter. The probe is capable of high-resolution two-dimensional and full Doppler imaging (pulsed, continuous wave, and tissue Doppler). The longitudinal plane provides a 90-degree sector image with tissue penetration of 2-12 cm.
In this study, we had 15 cases for TEE using an IVUC probe in small infants under 5 kg and determined its efficacy and safety.
We examined 15 consecutive neonates and infants who were undergoing congenital cardiac surgery between 1 May 2009 and 31 October 2009 using an 8-Fr AcuNav IVUC probe. Infants weighing 2-5 kg undergoing congenital heart surgery were studied. The characteristics of the patients, including the type of surgery, are presented in Table 1.
Anesthesia was induced with midazolam (0.2 mg/kg), fentanyl (10 µg/kg), and sevoflurane. For maintenance of anesthesia, all patients were administered sevoflurane and fentanyl with controlled ventilation. Electrocardiography, invasive arterial blood pressure, central venous pressure, pulse oximetry, temperature, capnography, and cerebral oximetry were monitored throughout the operation.
With the patient in the supine position, a lubricated IVUC probe was inserted through the mouth and passed into the esophagus without any complications. Because the probe does not have scale marks, the depth of placement was guided by echocardiography imaging.
TEE using an IVUC probe was able to detect atrial septal defects (ASDs; n = 2) or ventricular septal defects (VSDs; n = 11), and immediately after surgical repair (ASD, direct closure; VSD, patch closure), we confirmed if there was leakage from the direct or patch closure site and evaluated de-aeration in the cardiac chamber (Fig. 2).
After total correction for tetralogy of Fallot (TOF), it is important to examine the right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT), including blood flow to the pulmonary artery, pressure gradient, velocity, and VSD [5]. Fig. 3 shows how to check the postoperative pulmonary artery pressure gradient and velocity using an ICE probe. In this patient, we clearly evaluated the RVOT, leakage of the patch closure site, the main pulmonary artery, and the pressure gradient between the pulmonary valves.
During the period of study, there was a patient with hypoplastic left heart syndrome (HLHS) who underwent a Norwood procedure. We evaluated the neoaorta (conduit from the right ventricle to the pulmonary artery) after completion of the procedure [6]; blood flow through the neoaorta was measured, as shown in Fig. 4.
There were no patients with complications related to introduction of the probe or its use during the surgical procedure.
Heart surgery for congenital heart disease in very small infants is often carried out, but it has been difficult to use conventional pediatric omniplane TEE probes in such patients. As a result, we could not previously assess the information about the anatomy, surgical repair, and heart function in patients weighing under 5 kg. Recently, the IVUC probe has been applied to animals and neonates as a TEE, proving it useful and safe. We also experienced the feasibility and usefulness of the IVUC probe based on 15 cases in our hospital.
The AcuNav IVUC probe is reasonable in small infants weighing under 5 kg, but it has several limitations. Because the AcuNav IVUC probe has monoplane features, it is difficult to fully appreciate the three-dimensional nature of the complex cardiac anatomy and the IVUC probe requires significant manipulation, which can be challenging in small patients. In cases involving simple VSD, ASD, and TOF, the defects and the surgical repairs were easily demonstrated. However, more complex congenital diseases, like anomalous origins of the right pulmonary artery (RPA; Table 1), could not be easily assessed.
The probe utilized in this study is not steerable and has only one imaging plane. Even though the probe has a four-way head articulation, it was difficult to obtain standard long-axis two- or four-chamber images of the heart on a case-by-case, and it was not easy to gain transgastric images comparable to TEE with a conventional probe. Moreover, the current study did not include patients with oropharyngeal anomalies in whom the conventional TEE probe could not be passed and for which the IVUC probe may be a useful tool.
Mart et al. [7] reported successful TEE evaluation in a 1.4 kg infant with complex congenital heart disease. They dilated the esophagus prior to inserting the TEE probe. Although intraoperative TEE can be safely performed, even in small infants, it frequently causes mild mucosal injuries to the esophagus [8]. The TEE probe can cause vascular compression or ventilatory compromise [1,2]. We suggest that an IVUC for TEE in small infants eliminates any complications in patients previously thought to be too small for intra-operative TEE.
The IVUC probe is designed for single use when it is applicated to intravascular access. IVUC costs about three million won per probe, it is very expensive for single use. But in the case of transesophageal use, it can be reusable like other conventional TEE probe. Considering that IVUC has the term of validity (2 months), we could use 2 probes for 15 cases with sterilization. We obtained good image quality at every case and its cost per patient was similar as conventional TEE.
Finally, as though it is difficult to get obvious images in some cases, anyone who is familiar with conventional TEE can use this IVUC with only several attempts.
In conclusion, although the IVUC probe is disadvantageous based on its monoplane features and not being steerable, we found the IVUC probe useful for TEE in small infants and safe without any complications, such as hemodynamic instability, difficulty in ventilation, or esophageal injury.
References
1. Andropoulos DB, Ayres NA, Stayer SA, Bent ST, Campos CJ, Fraser CD. The effect of transesophageal echocardiography on ventilation in small infants undergoing cardiac surgery. Anesth Analg. 2000; 90:47–49. PMID: 10624975.
2. Andropoulos DB, Stayer SA, Bent ST, Campos CJ, Fraser CD. The effects of transesophageal echocardiography on hemodynamic variables in small infants undergoing cardiac surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2000; 14:133–135. PMID: 10794329.
3. Drinker LR, Camitta MG, Herlong JR, Miller S, Lodge AJ, Jaggers J, et al. Use of the monoplane intracardiac imaging probe in high-risk infants during congenital heart surgery. Echocardiography. 2008; 25:999–1003. PMID: 18771552.
4. Lu L, Ko E, Schwartz GG, Chou TM. Transesophageal echocardiography in rats using an intravascular ultrasound catheter. Am J Physiol. 1997; 273:H2078–H2082. PMID: 9362279.
5. Pongiglione G, Freedom RM, Cook D, Rowe RD. Mechanism of acquired right ventricular outflow tract obstruction in patients with ventricular septal defect: an angiocardiographic study. Am J Cardiol. 1982; 50:776–780. PMID: 6214942.
6. Cardis BM, Fyfe DA, Ketchum D, Mahle WT. Echocardiographic features and complications of the modified norwood operation using the right ventricle to pulmonary artery conduit. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2005; 18:660–665. PMID: 15947770.
7. Mart CR, Fehr DM, Myers JL, Rosen KL. Intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography in a 1.4-kg infant with complex congenital heart disease. Pediatr Cardiol. 2003; 24:84–85. PMID: 12574985.
8. Greene MA, Alexander JA, Knauf DG, Talbert J, Langham M, Kays D, et al. Endoscopic evaluation of the esophagus in infants and children immediately following intraoperative use of transesophageal echocardiography. Chest. 1999; 116:1247–1250. PMID: 10559082.