Abstract
Purpose
Materials and Methods
Results
Conclusion
Notes
Ethical Statement
All of data collection and analysis were performed after approval from the institutional review board (IRB No. 1904-010-1023) in accordance with the declaration of Helsinki. The written informed consent was waived in this retrospective study.
Author Contributions
Conceived and designed the analysis: Wang KC, Kim IH.
Collected the data: Lee JH, Eom KY, Phi JH, Park CK, Kim SK, Cho BK, Kim TM, Heo DS, Hong KT, Choi JY, Kang HJ, Shin HY, Choi SH, Lee ST, Park SH, Wang KC, Kim IH.
Contributed data or analysis tools: Lee JH, Kim IH.
Performed the analysis: Lee JH, Eom KY, Wang KC, Kim IH.
Wrote the paper: Lee JH, Wang KC, Kim IH.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
References
Table 1
Factor | Value |
---|---|
Age (yr) | 15 (4–47) |
Sex | |
Male | 151 (79.9) |
Female | 38 (20.1) |
ECOG PS | |
0–1 | 156 (82.6) |
2 | 22 (11.6) |
3–4 | 11 (5.8) |
Tumor site | |
Solitary | |
Suprasellar | 41 (21.7) |
Pineal | 46 (24.3) |
BG/Thalamus | 29 (15.3) |
Othersa) | 3 (1.6) |
Bifocal | |
Suprasellar and pineal | 15 (7.9) |
Suprasellar and other | 5 (2.6) |
Pineal and other | 2 (1.1) |
Othersb) | 3 (1.6) |
Seeding (+) | |
CSF cytology (+) | 10 (5.3) |
Multiple lesions in MRI (+) | 22 (11.6) |
CSF cytology and MRI (+) | 13 (6.9) |
Table 2
Tumor site | CTx | RT field | No. | Recurrence | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Intracranial | Spinal | |||||
In-field | Out-field | |||||
Solitary/Bifocal | (−) | WB | 5 | 1 | - | 2 |
CSA | 36 | 2 | - | - | ||
(+) | IF only | 25 | 1a) | 4+1a) | - | |
WV | 54 | - | - | 1 | ||
WB | 3 | - | - | - | ||
CSA | 21 | - | - | - | ||
Multifocal/Seeding | (−) | CSA | 9 | - | - | - |
(+) | IF only | 3 | - | 2 | - | |
WV | 2 | - | - | - | ||
WB | 1 | - | - | - | ||
CSA | 30 | - | - | - |
Table 3
Dose, median (range) | No.a) |
---|---|
Cranial field (WB/WV) | |
18 Gy (16–19) | 0/34 |
23 Gy (20–27) | 0/60 |
36 Gy (30–39) | 0/16 |
Spinal field to positive seeding | |
9 Gy (9) | 0/1 |
23 Gy (19–24) | 0/24 |
36 Gy (30–36) | 0/5 |
Involved field | |
Complete response | |
30 Gy (26–30) | 0/9 |
39 Gy (36–43) | 0/18 |
45 Gy (45–46) | 0/31 |
50 Gy (46–50) | 0/16 |
Not complete response | |
45 Gy (45–49) | 1/19 |
54 Gy (50–60) | 0/46 |
Table 4
Factor | Hormone-replacement therapya) | Back to school (%)b) | NCF (%)c) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
||||
Positive | p-valued) | Yes | p-valued) | Declined | p-valued) | |
Treatment | ||||||
|
||||||
RT | 10/19 (52.6) | 0.011 | 25/31 (80.7) | 0.022 | 8/29 (27.6) | 0.002 |
|
||||||
CRT | 22/93 (23.7) | 84/89 (94.4) | 9/121 (7.4) | |||
|
||||||
RT, total dose (Gy) | ||||||
|
||||||
≤ 50 | 13/57 (22.8) | 0.169 | 47/51 (92.0) | 0.670 | 4/69 (6.0) | 0.051 |
|
||||||
> 50 | 19/55 (34.6) | 62/69 (90.0) | 13/81 (16.0) | |||
|
||||||
WB RT | ||||||
|
||||||
WBRT | 22/52 (42.3) | 0.003 | 56/65 (86.2) | 0.053 | 12/79 (15.2) | 0.116 |
|
||||||
WVRT or IFRT only | 10/60 (16.7) | 53/55 (96.4) | 5/71 (7.0) | |||
|
||||||
WB/WV dose (Gy) | ||||||
|
||||||
≤ 30 | 12/85 (44.4) | 0.036 | 75/80 (94.0) | 0.120 | 8/111 (7.2) | 0.007 |
|
||||||
> 30 | 20/27 (23.5) | 34/40 (85.0) | 9/39 (23.1) |
Table 5
Factor | Total | Event (%) | Incidence ratea) | Incidence rate ratio (95% CI) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Treatment | ||||
CRT | 135 | 3 (2.2) | 1.6 | 0.163 (0.027–0.715) |
RT | 44 | 7 (15.9) | 10.0 | |
WB RT | ||||
WBRT | 96 | 9 (9.4) | 6.4 | 7.208 (0.999–315.915) |
WVRT or IFRT only | 83 | 1 (1.2) | 0.9 | |
Total dose (Gy) | ||||
> 50 | 105 | 9 (8.6) | 6.3 | 7.001 (0.970–306.874) |
≤ 50 | 74 | 1 (1.3) | 0.1 | |
WB/WV RT dose (Gy) | ||||
> 30 | 58 | 8 (13.8) | 9.0 | 7.375 (1.472–71.294) |
≤ 30 | 121 | 2 (1.6) | 0.1 |