Journal List > Cancer Res Treat > v.53(3) > 1154568

TOOLS
Kim, Kim, Park, Cho, Lee, Yoon, Park, Lim, Yu, and Kim: ERRATUM: Prognostic Implications of Extranodal Extension in Relation to Colorectal Cancer Location
Erratum

Cancer Res Treat 2021;53(3):893-893.

Published online: 8 June 2021

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2018.392.E

ERRATUM: Prognostic Implications of Extranodal Extension in Relation to Colorectal Cancer Location

Chan Wook Kim1, Jihun Kim2, Yangsoon Park2, Dong-Hyung Cho3, Jong Lyul Lee1, Yong Sik Yoon1, In Ja Park1, Seok-Byung Lim1, Chang Sik Yu1, Jin Cheon Kim1

1Department of Surgery, Institute of Innovative Cancer Research, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea

2Department of Pathology, Institute of Innovative Cancer Research, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea

3School of Life Science, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Korea

Copyright © 2021 by the Korean Cancer Association

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
While revising our manuscript according to the reviewers’ comments, we changed the data of five cells in Table 3. Among these, three changes were made correctly, while two were by our careless mistake. The correct numbers should have been 14 (8.7%) instead of 14 (5.4%) in the cell of “multiple route” and “ENE(+)”, and 0.031 instead of 0.168 in the of “multiple route” and “p-value”, respectively. Based on this, one sentence at the end of “Results” section (5. Recurrence patterns according to tumor location and ENE status) needs to be rephrased as below.
Original: “In rectal cancer patients, however, LN and multiple route recurrences (e.g., hematogenous and LN, or hematogenous and peritoneal seeding) were significantly more frequent in ENE-positive than in ENE-negative patients (Table 3).”
Corrected: “In rectal cancer patients, however, multiple route recurrence (e.g., hematogenous and LN, or hematogenous and peritoneal seeding) was significantly more frequent in ENE-positive than in ENE-negative patients (Table 3).”
We deeply apologize for our careless mistakes that have caused confusion to the readers of this article. Furthermore, we sincerely appreciate Professor Jeonghyun Kang (Department of Surgery, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine), who pointed out our mistakes to the editors of Cancer Research and Treatment.
*DOI of original article: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2018.392
TOOLS
Similar articles