Abstract
Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) of the intradiverticular papilla with its invisible orifice remains challenging. Several techniques have been introduced to evert the papillary opening to facilitate cannulation. A 79-year-old woman with bile duct stones underwent ERCP, which revealed that the papilla was located inside a large diverticulum and tended to rotate inward with a trial of papillary cannulation. Submucosal papillary injection of 3 cc of normal saline was performed at 3 and 9 o’clock. Eversion and fixation of a papilla in the diverticulum with this technique allowed selective cannulation of the biliary tree. Stones were retrieved after endoscopic papillary balloon dilation without complications. She had an uneventful post-procedural course. Our findings suggest that submucosal saline injection technique is safe and effective for selective cannulation and can be recommended when cannulation is very difficult because of an intradiverticular papilla.
Periampullary diverticula (PAD) are present in 7.5%−20% of all endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) cases [1,2] and are classified by the position of the major papilla as inside, marginal to, or near the duodenal diverticulum within a 2-cm radius [3]. Recent studies reported that the technical success or complication rates of ERCP did not increase in patients with PAD [4]. However, ERCP through an intradiverticular papilla, especially one with an invisible orifice, remains difficult, and success rates are lower with an invisible orifice [5]. Several techniques have been introduced to evert the papillary opening to facilitate cannulation [1,6-15]. Submucosal injection [6], endoscopic clipping [9], and two-devices-in-one-channel [10], have been introduced. The submucosal injection method involves lifting of the mucosa to enable eversion and fixing of a papilla in the diverticulum and allows selective cannulation of the biliary tree [6]. This may be a safe and convenient technique and is easily performed in ordinary ERCP settings.
We report a case of cholelithiasis with an intradiverticular papilla treated using the submucosal saline injection method, and also provide a literature review.
A-79-year-old-woman was admitted to our hospital with a 1-week history of epigastric pain but no fever or jaundice. Physical examination on admission revealed mild epigastric tenderness. Laboratory data showed a white blood cell count of 6,120/mm3, hemoglobin of 11.0 g/dL, hematocrit of 33.9%, platelet count of 189×103/mm3, total protein of 6.8 g/dL, albumin of 4.3 g/dL, aspartate aminotransferase of 32 U/L, alanine aminotransferase of 33 U/L, alkaline phosphatase of 34 U/L, total bilirubin of 0.39 mg/dL, amylase of 25 U/L, and lipase of 27 U/L. Abdominal computed tomography revealed a round stone in the dilated common bile duct and presence of a periampullary diverticulum (Fig. 1). ERCP revealed that the papilla was at the inferior border of a large duodenal diverticulum (Fig. 2A), and the papilla could not be cannulated with a usual method because of inward rotation. We tried cannulation by entering the duodenal diverticulum [14], and a double-catheter method [15], but failed. We chose the submucosal saline injection method to enable eversion and fixation of the papilla in the diverticulum. The submucosal injection of 3 cc of saline at 3 and 9 o’clock on the papilla enabled eversion and fixation in the diverticulum and the ability to performed selective cannulation of the biliary tree (Fig. 2B). After endoscopic papillary balloon dilation (EPBD, 10 mm for 60 s), the stones were extracted (Fig. 1C) and a Zimmon single pigtailed biliary stent (7 F, 5 cm) (Cook Medical, Bloomington, IN, USA) was placed. The patient had an uneventful post-procedural course and has been asymptomatic for 2 years.
ERCP in patients with PAD is not difficult when performed by experienced endoscopists using specialized techniques and devices [7,8]. Endoscopists must be aware of available cannulation techniques in specific conditions of the papilla. Several techniques have been introduced to facilitate cannulation in the setting of intradiverticular papilla (Table 1) [1,6,9-18]. To enable informed decisions and ensure the best outcomes, endoscopists should be aware of differences in technical feasibility and safety of each technique. The best method depends on the endoscopist’s preference and patient conditions. The main goal of various techniques involves bringing the papilla into a better orientation by grasping, pushing, or lifting, or by performing pancreatic duct stenting [7]. Several different methods, such as submucosal injection [6], endoscopic clipping [9], two-devices-in-one-channel [10], reverse guidewire anchoring [11], double endoscopy [12], cap-assisted with forward viewing endoscopy [13], entering the duodenal diverticulum with the distal tip of the duodenoscope [14], and pre-cut biliary sphincterotomy after pancreatic duct stent placement1 have been introduced.
Endoscopic clips are used to evert and stabilize the papillary opening [9]. Deployment of endoscopic clips at the proper positions could be improved using rotatable devices. The twodevices-through-one-channel method exposes the papilla using different devices: grasping by biopsy forceps [10] or pushing by a catheter [15] or reverse guidewire [11]. The reverse guidewire method involves pushing the adjacent mucosa of the papilla toward the duodenal lumen and straightening the folds using the stiff reverse end of the guidewire [11]. Because the two devices work in the same direction, coordination of the two instruments is sometimes difficult. The double endoscope method involves grasping the tissue just beside the papilla with foreign body forceps through the attached clear gastroscope cap and insertion of the duodenoscope alongside the gastroscope for cannulation [12]. Direct visualization of the papillary orifice using cap-assisted forward viewing endoscopy [13] or entering the duodenal diverticulum with the distal tip of the duodenoscope [14] can be effective in some conditions. If the pancreatic duct is cannulated, stent placement aims to keep the papilla out of the diverticulum, and a pre-cut biliary sphincterotomy is performed, which can be helpful for selective biliary cannulation [1]. For patients with a narrow-necked diverticulum, balloon dilation inside the diverticulum allows papillary eversion [16].
When ERCP fails, alternative methods, such as percutaneous ultrasound-guided [17] or endoscopic ultrasound-guided [18] rendezvous technique can be attempted. After percutaneous ultrasound-guided transhepatic biliary puncture or endoscopic ultrasound-guided bile duct puncture, a guidewire is inserted into the bile duct and across the papilla under fluoroscopic guidance to enable deep bile duct cannulation.
Here we used the submucosal saline injection method to lift the papilla into the diverticulum. The submucosal injection of 2–4 mL of normal saline at single or multiple points enables intradiverticular papillary eversion. The important step is selecting the best inflation point to preserve the bile duct opening and to maintain papillary eversion. To prolong the submucosal indwelling time, a hyperviscous fluid, such as sodium hyaluronate, can be used. Harada et al. used sodium hyaluronate as an injection fluid for lifting of an intradiverticular papilla and successfully performed ERCP in five cases [6]. They performed endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) and pancreatic stent placement to prevent post-ERCP pancreatitis. We preferred normal saline as the lifting material because papillary cannulation can be performed within several minutes before normal saline absorption. The absorption of normal saline within several minutes may have an advantage of preventing pancreatitis. We did not perform any procedure to prevent pancreatitis. This method is safe as well as convenient as it requires neither endoscopy changes nor specialized equipment. The injection needle is easily available in ordinary ERCP rooms.
We performed EPBD because of an undefined upper margin due to the saline injection and retrieved bile duct stones. When a large EST is technically difficult in patients with a PAD, EPBD alone or EPBD combined with small EST are alternatives [19].
For patients with PAD, papillary identification is sometimes difficult. Papillae are usually located on the lower margin of or just inside the diverticulum, somewhere between the 4 and 8 o’clock positions [7]. Cannulation is more difficult when a papilla is positioned at the 1 o’clock position in the diverticulum [2]. In the present case, the papilla was located at the 5 o’clock position, and so it could be easily detected. One study reported that an ultrathin gastroscope was used to locate a papilla hidden within a duodenal diverticulum [20].
In conclusion, the submucosal saline injection method may be a safe and convenient technique for biliary cannulation and may be recommended when selective cannulation is difficult in patients with an intradiverticular papilla.
REFERENCES
1. Fogel EL, Sherman S, Lehman GA. Increased selective biliary cannulation rates in the setting of periampullary diverticula: main pancreatic duct stent placement followed by pre-cut biliary sphincterotomy. Gastrointest Endosc. 1998; 47:396–400.
2. Parlak E, Suna N, Kuzu UB, et al. Diverticulum with papillae: does position of papilla affect technical success? Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2015; 25:395–398.
3. Boix J, Lorenzo-Zúñiga V, Añaños F, Domènech E, Morillas RM, Gassull MA. Impact of periampullary duodenal diverticula at endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a proposed classification of periampullary duodenal diverticula. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2006; 16:208–211.
4. Chen L, Xia L, Lu Y, Bie L, Gong B. Influence of periampullary diverticulum on the occurrence of pancreaticobiliary diseases and outcomes of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017; 29:105–111.
5. Güitrón-Cantú A, Adalid-Martínez R, Gutiérrez-Bermudez JA, Segura-López FK, García-Vázquez A. [Difficulty to cannulate papilla of Vater in the presence of periampullary duodenal diverticulum]. Rev Gastroenterol Mex. 2010; 75:273–280.
6. Harada H, Suehiro S, Shimizu T, Katsuyama Y, Hayasaka K. Submucosal injection can facilitate biliary access in patients with periampullary diverticula. Gastrointest Endosc. 2016; 84:185–186.
7. Altonbary AY, Bahgat MH. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in periampullary diverticulum: the challenge of cannulation. World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2016; 8:282–287.
8. Parlak E, Köksal AS, Dişibeyaz S, et al. Additional biliary cannulation methods in patients with juxtapapillary duodenal diverticula. Dig Dis Sci. 2012; 57:2982–2987.
9. Cappell MS, Mogrovejo E, Manickam P, Batke M. Endoclips to facilitate cannulation and sphincterotomy during ERCP in a patient with an ampulla within a large duodenal diverticulum: case report and literature review. Dig Dis Sci. 2015; 60:168–173.
10. Fujita N, Noda Y, Kobayashi G, Kimura K, Yago A. ERCP for intradiverticular papilla: two-devices-in-one-channel method. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Gastrointest Endosc. 1998; 48:517–520.
11. Elmunzer BJ, Boetticher NC. Reverse guidewire anchoring of the papilla for difficult cannulation due to a periampullary diverticulum. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015; 82:957.
12. Külling D, Haskell E. Double endoscope method to access intradiverticular papilla. Gastrointest Endosc. 2005; 62:811–812.
13. Myung DS, Park CH, Koh HR, et al. Cap-assisted ERCP in patients with difficult cannulation due to periampullary diverticulum. Endoscopy. 2014; 46:352–355.
14. Wang BC, Shi WB, Zhang WJ, et al. Entering the duodenal diverticulum: a method for cannulation of the intradiverticular papilla. World J Gastroenterol. 2012; 18:7394–7396.
15. Kim HJ, Kim YS, Myung SJ, et al. A novel approach for cannulation to the ampulla within the diverticulum: double-catheter method. Endoscopy. 1998; 30:S103–S104.
16. Tóth E, Lindström E, Fork FT. An alternative approach to the inaccessible intradiverticular papilla. Endoscopy. 1999; 31:554–556.
17. Calvo MM, Bujanda L, Heras I, et al. The rendezvous technique for the treatment of choledocholithiasis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2001; 54:511–513.
18. Tarantino I, Barresi L, Fabbri C, Traina M. Endoscopic ultrasound guided biliary drainage. World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2012; 4:306–311.
Table 1.
Techniques | Scopes | Devices |
---|---|---|
Pancreatic duct stent placement followed by pre-cut biliary sphincterotomy [1] | Duodenoscope | Pancreatic duct stent, pre-cut needle knife |
Submucosal saline injection [6] | Duodenoscope | Saline injector |
Endoclip-assisted cannulation [9] | Duodenoscope | One or more endoclips |
Two-devices in one-channel method [10,15] | Duodenoscope | Biopsy forceps, catheter |
Reversed guidewire method [11] | Duodenoscope | Reversed guidewire (stiff end forward) |
Double endoscope method [12] | Duodenoscope, Gastroscope | Foreign body forceps |
Cap-assisted cannulation [13] | Gastroscope | Transparent cap, needle papillotome |
Entering the duodenal diverticulum [14] | Duodenoscope | None |
Balloon dilation of the narrow diverticular neck [16] | Duodenoscope | Stone retrieval balloon |
Percutaneous ultrasound-guided rendezvous technique [17] | Duodenoscope | Abdominal ultrasound |
EUS-guided rendezvous technique [18] | Duodenoscope | Endoscopic ultrasound |