PDF
Citation
Print
INTRODUCTION
Recently, mechanical endovascular thrombectomy (MET)’s efficacy for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) with large vessel occlusion (LVO) in the anterior circulation has been demonstrated [1-5]. Moreover, earlier reperfusion has been associated with lower degrees of disability [6]. In the posterior circulation, the efficacy of MET for AIS remains uncertain; however, it has been suggested that earlier reperfusion is important for a good outcome [7]. Although MET is frequently performed in the elderly, placement of a guide catheter via a transfemoral route, particularly into the posterior circulation, may be difficult due to the significant tortuosity of arteries [8] and may delay reperfusion. The transbrachial approach is an alternative technique for the posterior circulation [9] because the brachial artery is near the ipsilateral vertebral artery (VA), making manipulation of catheter easier.
To shorten the time for guide catheter placement during MET for acute basilar artery occlusion (ABAO), all METs for ABAO have been performed via the transbrachial approach with a largebore aspiration catheter without using a guide catheter since August 2017. In this technique, which we called the direct brachial approach (DiBA), we used the Penumbra 5MAX ACE reperfusion catheter (Penumbra Inc., Alameda, CA, USA) as a guide catheter. Herein, we reported our preliminary clinical experience with this technique.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
We retrospectively analyzed the data of 4 consecutive patients who underwent MET for ABAO using the DiBA technique between August 2017 and December 2018. Patient characteristics, endovascular procedure details, technical complications, and angiographic and clinical outcomes were analyzed. Particularly, the technical complications of the transbrachial approach included spasm, occlusion, and pseudoaneurysm of the brachial artery and median nerve palsy. The outcome variables of interest included puncture to guide (PTG) time, which was defined as the duration from puncture to guide catheter placement in the appropriate position, and puncture to recanalization (PTR) time. The other outcomes analyzed included thrombolysis in cerebral infarction (TICI) grade, score on the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at 90 days, death due to any cause, and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, which was defined as an exacerbation based on the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score. All procedures were performed by board-certified neurosurgeons (T.S., Y.N., and M.M.) or an interventional neurologist (M.O.) of the Japanese Society of Neuroendovascular Therapy. The Institutional Review Board approval was obtained at the Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences in Nagoya, Japan.
The DiBA technique
On admission, the patients underwent brain computed tomography (CT) and CT angiography (CTA). CTA was performed from the aortic arch to the cerebral vertex to assess the presence of LVO and the access route in case MET was necessary. If AIS in the posterior circulation was confirmed, brain magnetic resonance imaging was performed to exclude any large brainstem infarction. Subsequently, the DiBA technique was performed (Fig. 1).
First, the diameter of the bilateral VA was confirmed on CTA. MET was performed via the right brachial artery as long as the diameter of the right VA was large enough to accommodate the 5MAX ACE, irrespective of dominancy. If the right VA was hypoplastic or aplastic, MET was performed via the left brachial artery. A 6-F introducer sheath measuring 25 cm was inserted in a brachial artery. The 5MAX ACE was directly inserted into this introducer sheath with a 0.035-inch guidewire, and navigated from the subclavian artery to the VA at the V2 position. Alternatively, a 4-F catheter was positioned at the VA, and then the 5MAX ACE was navigated into the VA using a catheter exchange technique. A combination of stent retriever (Solitaire FR, Medtronic Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA) and aspiration techniques were performed [10]. Under roadmap guidance, the microcatheter and microwire that the operator chose were navigated past the thrombus; the most commonly used were the Marksman microcatheter (Medtronic Inc.) and the 0.014-inch ASAHI CHIKAI guidewire (ASAHI INTEC CO., Aichi, Japan). At the same time, the 5MAX ACE was delivered and positioned just proximal to the thrombus. If this was difficult, the 5MAX ACE was delivered after deploying the stent retriever, which was used as an anchor. After deploying the stent retriever to the site of occlusion, the microcatheter was removed and the stent retriever was withdrawn into the 5MAX ACE, which was aspirated with the Penumbra aspiration pump. After the MET, hemostasis at the brachial puncture site was achieved by using manual compression.
RESULTS
Four patients were included in our study. The patient characteristics are summarized in Table 1. In only 1 out of 4 patients, MET was performed via the left brachial artery because the right VA was hypoplastic (case 3). The mean PTG and PTR times were 25 minutes (range, 10–36) and 59 minutes (range, 49–87), respectively. Although in case 3, MET was performed via the left brachial artery, the PTG and PTR times did not significantly differ compared with the other 3 patients. For all patients, MET achieved TICI 2B or 3 recanalization, but the mRS at 90 days was ≥4. There was no symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, but there were 2 deaths; 1 patient died because of large brainstem infarction (case 2), and the other developed ABAO during hospitalization for pneumonia and died due to worsening pneumonia (case 3). In all procedures, vasodilators were not used and no technical complications occurred, including complications of the transbrachial approach.
DISCUSSION
In this study, we analyzed the efficacy and feasibility of the DiBA technique in patients with ABAO. In all patients, TICI 2B or 3 recanalization was achieved and there were no technical difficulties or complications. The PTR time has been recommended to be within 30 minutes [11]; however, in this study, we averaged 59 minutes before reperfusion was obtained. The longer PTR time was considered to be attributable to the operator skills and patients’ high age rather than to the procedure itself. Therefore, improvement of operator skills would be necessary for further reduction in time to reperfusion. Additionally, a recent study has reported that in MET for ABAO, the rate of poor outcome (mRS, 4–6) was 45.8% [12]. In our study, all patients had poor outcomes. However, it was thought that older patients with a high National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) were associated with poor outcomes, as has been previously reported [12].
In an era of MET where effective devices are available, the time from puncture to placement of a guide catheter should be crucial to achieving a rapid recanalization. Anatomical configuration can cause difficulty in manipulation of catheters. It is quite apparent that placement of a guide catheter to the right VA through a type III aorta via the femoral artery is more difficult compared with an approach via the ipsilateral brachial artery. In this study, the DiBA technique was successfully used to navigate a guide catheter to a targeted vessel in all 4 patients. Lee et al. [13] reported their clinical experience of neurointerventional procedures via the transbrachial and transradial approaches. They mentioned the superiority of transbrachial or transradial approach to bypass the tortuosity of the aorta and the iliac artery [13].
In 2018, Ishikawa et al. [14] previously reported a technique that was similar to the DiBA technique. In that approach, ADAPT (a direct aspiration first pass technique) [15] was initially performed on both the anterior and posterior circulation. On the other hand, the DiBA technique initially used a combination of stent retriever and aspiration for the ABAO; therefore, replacing the 5MAX ACE via the brachial artery would not be necessary in case of MET failure.
Using a balloon guide catheter (BGC) with a stent retriever had been reported to improve revascularization and clinical outcomes [16]. However, in MET for ABAO, BGC placement is often difficult because of the small caliber of the VA. Moreover, a BGC would not be useful for proximal flow control when the contralateral VA is patent. With the DiBA technique, the stent retriever can be withdrawn into the 5MAX ACE that is placed at a basilar artery and aspirated, thereby preventing embolization to new territories (ENT) [10].
For this reason, to prevent ENT, the use of the Penumbra system is recommended during MET for ABAO. In case of using both a guide catheter and the 5MAX ACE, an 8-F or larger guide catheter (or a 6-F or larger guide sheath) is needed, but such a large profile guide catheter can be wedged in the VA. When the wedge of the VA and flow restriction occur, brainstem infarction in patients with hypoplasia of the contralateral VA or spinal cord infarction may occur [17]. The DiBA technique is considered to reduce these complications because it does not use a large-bore catheter.
Atherosclerotic plaque is abundant in the infrarenal abdominal arota, iliac and femoral bifurcations, and carotid bifurcations; the routes from radial or brachial artery are considered to elicit less mechanical irritations of the aforementioned atherosclerotic plaques compared with the transfemoral route, resulting in a lower risk of cholesterol embolization [18,19]. Particularly in the elderly, not only significant tortuosity but also atherosclerotic changes of arteries are frequently observed. Therefore, the DiBA technique should be useful for the elderly to reduce the incidence of cholesterol embolization, although it is infrequently encountered.
Iwata et al. [9] reported that a transbrachial approach using a 6-F guide catheter to the VA was feasible when the angle formed by the VA and the subclavian artery (AVS) was 45° or larger. In this study, even for a case with an AVS of 43°, which was sharpest, navigation of the 5MAX ACE to the VA was possible with a catheter exchange technique. This reason was considered to be attributable to the flexibility of the 5MAX ACE. However, if the AVS is too narrow, a transfemoral approach may be appropriate.
Some points need careful consideration when performing the DiBA technique. The soft tip of the 5MAX ACE could make insertion into an introducer sheath difficult. In such a case, using an attached inserter would facilitate smooth insertion of the 5MAX ACE into the introducer sheath.
When the 5MAX ACE becomes clogged with thrombus or when the techniques such as CAPTIVE [20], wherein the 5MAX ACE and stent retriever are removed as a single unit, are performed, the 5MAX ACE needs to be removed and again navigated to the BA. In that aspect, the DiBA technique, compared with the conventional guide catheter placement at the VA, would be disadvantageous. However, replacing the 5MAX ACE via the brachial artery appears to be easy.
In this study, the mean PTR time was longer and the rate of poor outcome was higher compared with the recommended PTR time [11] and a recent report [12]. One of these reasons could be that MET was performed for elderly patients with a high NIHSS. However, in all patients, the 5MAX ACE could be placed in the VA without difficulty, even via the left transbrachial approach. Additionally, TICI 2B or 3 recanalization was achieved, and there were no technical complications. It was considered that this technique would be useful especially for tortuous arteries in the elderly.
CONCLUSION
We described the DiBA technique, in which the Penumbra 5MAX ACE reperfusion catheter was used via the brachial artery as a guide catheter. In all patients, the 5MAX ACE could be easily navigated into the VA, and TICI 2B or 3 recanalization was achieved with no technical complications. It was considered to be useful, especially for tortuous arteries in the elderly. Further studies on the DiBA technique are needed.
XML Download