PDF
Citation
Print
INTRODUCTION
Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is increasingly occurring in the industrialized world [1]. Additionally, with the growing elderly population, the incidence of geriatric TBI has also been increasing [2]. A recent study reported that the incidence of TBI has increased from 47.3 to 849 per 100,000 population per year [3]. Although TBI is a leading cause of disability, trials of neuroprotective treatments in the early injury period are very rare [4].
It has been shown that exercise has beneficial effects on behavior and memory in the healthy brain [5,6]. Previous studies have also reported that exercise enhances neural plasticity and elicits plasticity-associated molecules including glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) [7-9]. The injured brain, however, may be vulnerable to excitation during the acute stage of TBI. Some reports have demonstrated that early exercise after TBI exacerbated brain damage and interfered with functional recovery [10,11]. Although many studies have reported that exercise could ameliorate the disabilities after TBI, the therapeutic time window for exercise during the early period of TBI remains controversial [12].
The benefit of regular exercise is usually derived from the accumulative effects of repeated sessions of a single exercise. However, identifying the immediate effect of a single session of exercise might provide basic neurophysiologic information, which will then help in the development of new treatment strategies for the early stage of TBI. In other studies, a single session of exercise in healthy persons was reported to promote motor performance and improve cognition [13,14]. However, no report has been presented on the effect of a single exercise on the behavior and memory recovery of an injured brain.
Therefore, the aim of the current study was to demonstrate the immediate effect of a single session of exercise on physical performance and memory function in the early stage of TBI.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
TBI model
Male Sprague-Dawley rats (250–300 g) were housed in cages under a controlled environment (22.0°C–24.0°C), and maintained in a 12:12-hour light-dark cycle. All rats had free access to food and water. All experiments in this study were approved by the Asan Institute for Life Sciences, Asan Medical Center (No. 2010-14-203). The lateral fluid percussion method was used for generating the TBI model [15]. Rats were anesthetized with isoflurane (2% isoflurane in a 1:2 mixture of O2/N2O) via mask. A heating pad was applied to keep the body temperature at 37°C±0.5°C. The skull was prepared with a topical depilatory agent and betadine solution. A 3-mm craniectomy was created on the right side, 1.5 mm from the bregma, over the M1 position [16]. A modified Luer-Lock (model 211 B4; Kistler Instrumental Corp., Amherst, NY, USA) was positioned in the craniectomy site with methyl methacrylate. The saline-filled device was attached to the skull via the Luer-Lock, and a single moderate severity pulse (3.5–4.0 atm pressure) was applied with rapid injection of saline onto the craniectomized brain site.
Treadmill exercise
All rats were pretrained on a motorized treadmill at a speed of 5–15 m/min for 10–20 minutes, three times prior to the TBI operation. Rats of the exercise group ran on the treadmill with a 0° inclination at a speed of 10 m/min (T10) or 20 m/min (T20) for 30 minutes on day 3 (D3), D7, and D14 after TBI. Rats of the sedentary group (T0) were placed on a stationary treadmill (without running) at the same time points.
Behavioral and memory tests
The rotarod (RR) test was performed to assess motor coordination. The rats were placed on a RR, rotating at an initial speed of 4 rpm. The speed was accelerated to 40 rpm over 4 minutes. The time taken for the rats to fall over was measured three times and averaged by a researcher blinded to the objective of the experiment. The Barnes maze (BM) test was applied to assess the spatial memory functions of the rats, which has a white circular platform (diameter, 120 cm) containing 18 holes of 10-cm diameter in the periphery. A 20×15×20 cm3 black goal box was set below one of these 18 holes to test whether the rats can remember the position of the black goal box and avoid the 1,000 lx lightened platform. The rats were placed at the center of the platform and allowed to enter the goal box. They were pretrained three times before the TBI operation. The time taken to find the goal box was recorded three times and averaged in a blinded manner.
Brain MRI and MR spectroscopy
Anesthesia induction was performed with an intraperitoneal injection of 1.0% ketamine in all TBI rats. The rats were then set in a 4.7-T Bruke r BioSpec Imager (Bruker Medical System, Karlsruhe, Germany). Brain MRI and MR spectroscopy were applied by a blinded researcher according to a previously described method [17]. Briefly, a T2-weighted image (T2WI) sequence with 4,500 repetition times (ms) and 80 echo times (ms) was applied. The slice thickness was 1.5 mm. The cross-sectional area was measured with ParaVision 3.0 software (Bruker Medical System). The lesion volume was calculated from the cross-sectional area and slice thickness.
To measure the metabolites with MR spectroscopy, the volume of interest was selected over the perilesional area with a cubic volume of 2×2×2 mm3 in the injured hemisphere in T2WI. Bruker’s XWIN-NMR software was used to process all raw spectroscopic data. The metabolites were identified according to their chemical shift, as observed in the MR spectroscopy, in parts per million values: choline (Cho), 3.2; creatine (Cr), 3.03; N-acetylaspartate (NAA), 2.0; and lactate (Lac), 1.3; 0.9. The Cho, NAA, Lac, and 0.9 peak areas were quantitated as relative ratios to Cr, which was the internal reference for each rat, to allow the comparison of metabolite levels over time and between different animals [18].
Immunohistochemistry
The rats were anesthetized with 1.0% ketamine via intraperitoneal injection and sacrificed with intracardiac perfusion with phosphate-buffered saline and 4.0% paraformaldehyde. The brains were sliced coronally at a 1.0-mm thickness. The sliced brains were fixed with 10% formalin and embedded in paraffin wax for immunohistochemistry. A paraffin block was acquired from the perilesional area and ipsilesional hippocampus. Each block was sliced into 4-μm-thick sections and mounted on poly-L-lysine-coated slides. These slides were serially processed, including deparaffinization with xylene, dehydration with ethanol, saline washing, and microwaving in citrate buffer for 10 minutes. A 3% hydrogen peroxide solution was used to block endogenous peroxidase activity for 30 minutes and reduce nonspecific immunoreactivity. Primary antibodies against heat shock protein 70 (Hsp70; Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA) and GFAP (Abcam) were used to investigate the effects on neural plasticity. The expression of Hsp70 and GFAP could be detected around the perilesional area from 4 hours after injury [19]. The secondary antibody used was an anti-mouse horseradish peroxidase/3,3’-diaminobenzidine system (Labvision, Fremont, CA, USA). Six views of the perilesional area and the ipsilesional hippocampus (CA1, CA3, and dentate gyrus) were assessed and averaged in a blinded manner by a pathologist who counted the stained cells under a light microscope.
Experimental design
The TBI rats were randomly assigned to the T0, T10, and T20 groups (10 rats per group) on D3, D7, and D14 after TBI, respectively (a total of 90 rats). The TBI rats of each group were kept in cages until treadmill training. The rats in the T10 group performed a single session of treadmill exercise at a speed of 10 m/min for 30 minutes in 1 day. Those in the T20 group performed a single session of treadmill exercise at a speed of 20 m/min for 30 minutes. The rats in the T0 group were placed on a stationary treadmill for 30 minutes.
RR and BM tests were performed before treadmill exercise and 6 hours after the exercise in all rats. The ratios of RR and BM were calculated as follows:
Brain MRI and MR spectroscopy were performed immediately before treadmill exercise and 6 hours after exercise in all rats. The ratios of lesion volume and metabolites were obtained as follows:
After all evaluations, the rats were sacrificed on the day of each evaluation for immunohistochemistry.
Statistical analysis
PASW version 24.0 software was used for all statistical analyses. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) or the Kruskal-Wallis test was performed to evaluate the differences between groups (T0, T10, and T20) for each period after TBI (D3, D7, and D14) for the RR, BM, lesion volume, MR spectroscopy metabolites, and immunohistochemistry data (Hsp70 and GFAP). A p-value less than 0.05 was considered significant in one-way ANOVA. If a significant difference was found among groups in a one-way ANOVA, further analyses were conducted using the Scheffe post-hoc test and Bonferroni correction to evaluate the differences among the three groups, whereby a pvalue less than 0.0167 was considered significant.
RESULTS
Behavior and memory
The baseline results of the RR and BM tests were not significantly different among the three groups on D3, D7, and D14 (p>0.05) (Table 1). Among the D3 groups, T10 and T20 showed significant benefit in the RR ratio (p<0.05) (Fig. 1A). On D7, however, only T20 showed significantly higher RR ratios than the other D7 groups (p<0.05) (Fig. 1A). No significant difference was found among the three groups on D14 (p>0.05). In the BM test, the T20 group showed significantly higher BM ratios than the other groups on D3, which indicates deterioration (p<0.05) (Fig. 1B). On D7 and D14, no significant differences in the BM ratios were found among the three groups (p>0.05).
Lesion volume and brain metabolites
The baseline results of the volume of injured brain showed no significant difference among the three groups on D3, D7, and D14 (p>0.05) (Table 1). The ratios of volume of injured brain were not significantly different among the groups on D3, D7, and D14 (p>0.05) (Fig. 2A).
The baseline data of Cho/Cr, NAA/Cr, Lac/Cr, and 0.9/Cr were not significantly different among the three groups on D3, D7, and D14 (p>0.05) (Table 1). Among the D3 groups, a significant increase in Cho/Cr and 0.9/Cr at 6-hour post-exercise was only shown in the T20 group (p<0.05) (Fig. 2B, 2C). No significant difference was shown among the three groups on D7 and D14 (p>0.05).
Immunohistochemistry
DISCUSSION
The present results showed that a single session of exercise with a high intensity (T20) had an immediate effect on behavioral function in the earlier period of TBI (D3). However, cognitive deterioration was also observed in the T20 group. Interestingly, low-intensity exercise (T10) in the same period (D3) had a benefit on behavioral performance without inducing cognitive deficits. In addition, the high-intensity exercise group (T20) also showed motor improvement on D7 without cognitive exacerbation. However, a delayed single exercise (D14) did not have any immediate effect on motor and memory function. These findings suggest that a single session of exercise has different effects on behavior and memory according to the intensity of the exercise and the time window after TBI.
After TBI, the surviving cells are in a state of energy crisis and are vulnerable to secondary stimulation [20]. Therefore, premature exercise after TBI may reduce the capacity for plasticity of the brain [10,11]. In previous studies, however, the exercise intervention consisted of repeated sessions of a single exercise. No study has evaluated the effect of a single session of exercise on the injured brain. In this study, we showed that low- and high-intensity exercise at 3 days after TBI (D3) can help motor recovery from an induced TBI. However, the rats subjected to high-intensity exercise had more cognitive impairment than the control and the low-intensity exercise groups.
The mechanism of this different effects is unclear. Since increased body temperature can cause neurological injury [21], we suggest that increases in body temperature induced by intense exercise may adversely affect the recovery from TBI through a similar mechanism. At the cellular level, intense stress and exercise are known to activate the secretion of glucocorticoids [22], and endogenous glucocorticoid contributes to the basal level of brain injury resulting from cerebral ischemia [23]. This may underlie the adverse effects of intense exercise observed in this study.
Intense exercise also inhibits the expression of Bcl-2, and this may have a role in cognitive impairment after intense exercise [24]. In the early phase of TBI, cells around the injured area tend to react more sensitively to excitatory transmitters. Thus, early induction of intense exercise after brain injury may cause excessive secretion of excitatory neurotransmitters including glutamate or catecholamine [25], increased nerve impulses induced by the N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor, and fewer gammaaminobutyric acid-induced inhibitive reactions [26].
Our results demonstrated that high-intensity exercise on a treadmill at 7 days after TBI (D7) does not attenuate cognitive deficits. This result suggested that high-intensity treadmill exercise is not harmful for cognitive function around that period after TBI. Previous research, however, has shown that wheel running resulted in impaired cognitive performance in the early phase after TBI [27]. That result suggested that the intensity of exercise is a crucial factor in the early phase after TBI. Treadmill exercise has been suggested to affect multiple aspects of the physiological system, including the endocrine and immune systems, with elevated corticosterone, altered inflammatory cytokine expression, or immunosuppression [28]. Elevated levels of corticosterone have been demonstrated to negatively affect hippocampal plasticity [29]. Brainderived neurotrophic factor expression can be downregulated by circulating glucocorticoids at the mRNA and protein levels [30]. Based on these studies, it is possible that high-intensity treadmill exercise after the early phase of TBI may have been implemented as a stressor. Regardless of exercise intensity, treadmill exercise at 14 days after TBI (D14) does not affect motor recovery and cognitive function. These results suggested that the optimal timing of rehabilitation is important in motor recovery and cognition. However, the application of two different intensities is insufficient to firmly establish the optimal beginning of exercise after TBI; it is therefore difficult to conclude that cognitive deficits cannot be attenuated after the early phase in TBI. Further studies that include variable intensities after TBI will allow a more accurate and reliable assessment.
Cho and NAA measured by 1H MR spectroscopy are the structural component of cellular membrane and a predecessor of brain lipids, respectively. In states of neuronal damage, including TBI, the Cho level is expected to increase with a decrease of the NAA level. In this study, only T20 had significantly increased Cho/Cr. Moreover, astrocyte reactions accelerate the secretion of glutamate, which causes scarring around the cerebral infarction regions, resulting in adverse neurological effects. In the perilesional and ipsilesional hippocampal areas on D3, only T20 had significantly higher GFAP than T0. These findings meant that high intensity exercise has a neutral effect on cognitive deterioration in the early stage of TBI.
However, considering the role of Hsp70 on the protective effects against TBI, high expression of Hsp70 in the perilesional and ipsilesional hippocampal areas on D3 by high intensity exercise is difficult to interpret. It is possible that Hsp70 affects the motor recovery of TBI.
Our study has several limitations. First, we determined exercise intensity by calculating the percentage of maximum exercise velocity tolerated by rats. Our study would have been strengthened by using objective measures to quantify the varying degrees of exercise intensity, such as oxygen consumption and heart rate. Second, an important limitation of this study was the small sample size. Nevertheless, we were able to show the different effects of treadmill exercise after TBI in terms of intensity and start of exercise. The trend of the changes we observed warrants further study with a larger sample size to allow for a more discerning statistical analysis. Third, the rats were not familiarized with treadmill training before TBI induction. They only performed familiarized exercise 24 hours after TBI. Fourth, we could not include normal rats without TBI. The change in terms of exercise intensity and timing should have been compared. The immediate effects of treadmill exercise with a single intervention might not coincide with the effects of longer treadmill training. A longer exercise protocol needs to be applied to observe the changes.
In conclusion, low-intensity exercise in the early period of TBI enhanced behavioral performance without inducing cognitive deficits. A single session of exercise with high intensity in the early period after TBI could exacerbate cognitive function despite improvement in motor recovery. On the contrary, high-intensity exercise in the immediate period after TBI might be effective in motor recovery without cognitive decline. However, late treadmill training does not improve motor function. Our study suggests that exercise intensity and the optimal beginning of rehabilitation after TBI are crucial factors in motor recovery.
XML Download