Regional Gray Matter Volume Related to High Occupational Stress in Firefighters

Deokjong Lee; Woojin Kim; Jung Eun Lee; Junghan Lee; Seung-Koo Lee; Sei-Jin Chang; Da Yee Jeung; Dae-Sung Hyun; Hye-Yoon Ryu; Changsoo Kim; Young-Chul Jung

doi:10.3346/jkms.2021.36.e335

Journal List > J Korean Med Sci > v.36(50) > 1148740

Go to TopGo to Top Go to BottomGo to Bottom

TOOLS

Lee, Kim, Lee, Lee, Lee, Chang, Jeung, Hyun, Ryu, Kim, and Jung: Regional Gray Matter Volume Related to High Occupational Stress in Firefighters

Original Article

Preventive & Social Medicine

Journal of Korean Medical Science 2021; 36(50): e335.

Published online: 23 November 2021

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2021.36.e335

Regional Gray Matter Volume Related to High Occupational Stress in Firefighters

Deokjong Lee^1,^2,^*

, Woojin Kim^3,^*

, Jung Eun Lee²

, Junghan Lee^2,⁴

, Seung-Koo Lee⁵

, Sei-Jin Chang⁶

, Da Yee Jeung⁷

, Dae-Sung Hyun⁸

, Hye-Yoon Ryu⁹

, Changsoo Kim³

, Young-Chul Jung^2,⁴

¹Department of Psychiatry, Yongin Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Yongin, Korea.

²Institute of Behavioral Science in Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

³Department of Preventive Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

⁴Department of Psychiatry, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

⁵Department of Radiology, Yonsei University Medical College, Seoul, Korea.

⁶Department of Preventive Medicine and Institute of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Wonju College of Medicine, Yonsei University, Wonju, Korea.

⁷Department of Dental Hygiene, Hanyang Women’s University, Seoul, Korea.

⁸Health Insurance Research Institute, National Health Insurance Service, Wonju, Korea.

⁹Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Wonju Severance Christian Hospital, Wonju, Korea.

Address for Correspondence: Young-Chul Jung, MD, PhD, Department of Psychiatry, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50-1 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul 03722, Korea, E-mail: eugenejung@yuhs.ac.

Equal contributor:

^*Deokjong Lee and Woojin Kim contributed equally to this work.

Received 13 May 2021 Accepted 19 November 2021

The Korean Academy of Medical Sciences

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Background

Firefighters inevitably encounter emotionally and physically stressful situations at work. Even firefighters without diagnosed post-traumatic stress disorder receive clinical attention because the nature of the profession exposes them to repetitive trauma and high occupational stress. This study investigated gray matter abnormalities related to high occupational stress in firefighters using voxel-based morphometry (VBM) and surface-based morphometry (SBM).

Methods

We assessed 115 subjects (112 males and 3 females) using magnetic resonance imaging and evaluated occupational stress by the Korean Occupational Stress Scale-26 (KOSS-26). Subjects were classified into highly or lowly stressed groups based on the median value of the KOSS-26.

Results

In VBM analysis, we found that firefighters with high occupational stress had lower gray matter volume (GMV) in both sides of the insula, the left amygdala, the right medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC), and the anterior cingulate cortex than firefighters with low occupational stress. In SBM analysis based on regions of interest, the GMV of the bilateral insula and right mPFC were also lower in the highly stressed group. Within the highly stressed group, low GMV of the insula was significantly correlated with the length of service (left: r = −0.347, P = 0.009; right: r = −0.333, P = 0.012).

Conclusion

Our findings suggest that regional GMV abnormalities are related to occupational stress. Regional gray matter abnormalities and related emotional dysregulation may contribute to firefighter susceptibility to burnout.

Graphical Abstract

Keywords: Firefighters, Neuropsychology, Stress, Gray Matter Volume

INTRODUCTION

Occupational stress is an important health issue closely related to mental health.1 2 High occupational stress can influence emotional disorders such as depression and anxiety3 as well as cognitive functions such as attention and working memory.4 Firefighters often encounter highly stressful dangerous situations in their work environment. Previous studies identified a close relationship between job stress and mental health issues, such as depression, alcohol use, and sleep quality, in firefighters.5 6 Therefore, there is much interest in identifying and managing occupational stress of firefighters.

High stress levels are associated with structural changes in regions of the brain.7 8 Cumulative adversity and stress are associated with gray matter volume (GMV) in the medial prefrontal, anterior cingulate, and insular regions.9 Neuroanatomic differences in several brain regions, such as basal ganglia, cingulate cortex, and hippocampus are related to stress vulnerability and resilience.10 Taken together, these findings suggest that the close association between stress and mental health is mediated by properties of brain structures. Several previous studies analyzed the relationship between occupational stress and gray matter characteristics. A magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) study demonstrated that highly stressed subjects had reduced cortical thickness in the mesial frontal cortex, low GMV in the caudate, and high GMV in the amygdala.11 Another MRI study showed that highly stressed subjects had low GMV in the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, the caudate, and the putamen.12

This study evaluated the occupational stress of firefighters and analyzed the relationship between their occupational stress and regional GMV properties. We assessed job stress, categorized firefighters into highly and lowly stressed groups, and compared GMVs between the two groups. Initially, we conducted whole-brain voxel-based morphometry (VBM) to investigate brain regions that have regional GMV differences between highly and lowly stressed groups. Then, we selected brain regions based on VBM results and calculated GMVs at manually delineated region of interest (ROI) to compare groups. We also evaluated correlations between clinical variables and GMV values.

METHODS

Participants

We recruited 1,022 participants from the Firefighter Research on Enhancement of Safety & Health (FRESH) cohort,13 including firefighters and rescue workers, assessed at three university hospitals between 2016 and 2017: Severance Hospital recruited firefighters from Seoul, Gyeonggi, Chungcheongnam-do, Daejeon, and Jeollabuk-do regions; Wonju Severance Christian Hospital recruited firefighters from Gangwon and Chungcheongbuk-do regions; and Gyeongsang National University Hospital recruited firefighters from Gyeongsangbuk-do, Gyeongsangnam-do, and Jeollanam-do regions. To assess psychological characteristics, we conducted several self-reporting questionnaire. All participants completed the Korean version of the posttraumatic diagnostic scale (PDS) for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms.14 We administered the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) to assess depressive symptoms,15 the Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) to assess anxiety symptoms,16 the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) to assess alcohol-related symptoms,17 and the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) to assess sleep difficulty.18 Among these participants, 352 participants (aged > 40 years or new hires with less than 1 year of service) were included in neuroimaging sub-study who underwent 3-Tesla (3T) brain MRI to investigate structural changes in the brain.

Additionally, we assessed occupational stress using the short form of the Korean Occupational Stress Scale-26 (KOSS-26).19 The KOSS-26 was conducted through a web-based survey “Job Contents And Health Survey of Firefighters.” The scale comprises 26 items across 8 categories: physical environment, job demand, insufficient job control, interpersonal conflict, job insecurity, organizational system, lack of reward, and occupational climate. Briefly, each item is rated on a 4-point Likert scale, with higher scores indicating higher occupational stress. The score for each category is then converted to a value between 0 to 100 points. The total KOSS-26 score is calculated by averaging the scores of the categories. In our study, each of the 121 subjects (117 males and 4 females) completed both a brain MRI and KOSS-26 questionnaire. We excluded participants with severe depression and anxiety (cutoff: CES-D 23 points, BAI 25 points) from the study based on their answers to the psychological questionnaires. As a result, 115 subjects (112 males and 3 females) were included in the study. To obtain a possible number of samples per group with a model power of 0.8 or greater in group differences (t-test or analysis of variance) and relationship (correlation or regression) measures, we divided all subjects into two groups and compared them.20 21 The median value of the KOSS-26 score of 115 firefighters and rescue workers was 44.8. The Cronbach's α value for KOSS-26 was 0.878. We classified participants into the highly stressed group (n = 58) or lowly stressed group (n = 57) based on whether they scored above or below the median value.

Brain MRI preprocessing

We conducted brain MRIs using a 32-channel 3T MRI scanner (Achieva; Philips Healthcare, Best, the Netherlands or Ingenia CX; Philips Healthcare). A 3D T1-turbo field echo sequence was obtained according to the following parameters: repetition time = 9.9 ms, echo time = 4.6 ms, fiel of view = 220 × 220 mm², section gap = 0 mm, voxel size = 0.859 × 0.859 × 1.0 mm³, flip angle = 15°, total acquisition time = 5 minutes 29 seconds. All three institutions participating in this study acquired MRI data using the same protocol. We analyzed brain images using MATLAB 8.5 (MathWorks, Natick, MA, USA) and SPM12 (Wellcome Department of Imaging Neuroscience, London, UK). With the same protocol described in our previous VBM study for firefighters,22 standardized diffeomorphic anatomical registration with an exponentiated Lie algebra algorithm (DARTEL) preprocessing steps for VBM was performed.23

After VBM analysis, we performed an ROI-wise surface-based morphometry (SBM) analysis by setting the brain regions where the group difference was significant in the VBM as the ROIs. The FreeSurfer 6.0 (http://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/) was utilized for SBM analysis. The preprocessing steps included skull stripping using a hybrid approach,24 correction of intensity non-uniformity,25 segmentation and surface reconstruction,26 topology-correction of cortical surfaces using non-separating loops,27 surface inflation and flattening,28 and automatically parcellating the human cerebral cortex.29 Afterwards, we extracted mean values of GMV within each ROI. ROIs were derived from the Desikan-Killiany cortical atlas.30

Statistical analysis

We performed statistical analyses for demographic and clinical characteristics using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 24.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA), and designated P value <0.05 to be statistically significant. To compare demographic data (clinical characteristics of highly and lowly stressed groups), we used independent t-tests and χ² tests.

We explored for the region with GMV differences using VBM analysis of the whole brain. To find group differences in GMV, we used an analysis of covariance model at each voxel. Age, sex, and intracranial volume (ICV) of each subject were chosen as covariates because of their known impacts on gray matter properties.31 ICV was calculated for each subject by summing the gray matter, white matter and cerebrospinal fluid volumes. Statistical inferences were set at P < 0.005 uncorrected and an extent threshold of 10 contiguous voxels. Albeit a relatively liberal threshold, this threshold has often been applied in exploratory whole-brain VBM studies.32 33 In the ROI-wise SBM analysis, group differences were assessed by using an analysis of covariance for the extracted GMV value of each ROI. Age, sex, and ICV of each subject were entered as covariates.

To assess brain-behavior relationships, we performed a partial correlation analysis for GMV, KOSS-26 scores, and the length of services. We extracted mean GMV of clusters with group differences using the MarsBaR toolbox (http://marsbar.sourceforge.net/) and considered age, sex, and ICV of each subject as covariates. In subsequent correlation analyses, we added parameters related to comorbid conditions (CES-D, BAI, AUDIT) as covariates.

Ethics statement

The current study's protocols were approved by the Institutional Review Boards of Severance Hospital, Yonsei University Health System in Seoul, Korea (4-2016-0187), Wonju Severance Christian Hospital in Wonju, Korea (CR316014 and CR318335), and Gyeongsang National University Hospital in Jinju, Korea (GNUH 2016-04-015-006). All participants provided informed consent.

RESULTS

Demographic and clinical characteristics of study subjects

The mean ± standard deviation ages of the two groups classified by occupational stress scores were 49.9 ± 6.5 and 49.2 ± 6.7 years, respectively (Table 1). The highly stressed group scored significantly higher on KOSS-26, PDS, and PSQI measures (KOSS-26: P < 0.001; PDS: P = 0.005; PSQI: P = 0.003). However, highly and lowly stressed groups had no significant difference for CES-D, BAI, and AUDIT scores.

Table 1

Demographic and clinical variables of subjects

Variables	Lowly stressed group (n = 57)	Highly stressed group (n = 58)	Test	P values
Age, yr	49.9 ± 6.5	49.2 ± 6.7	t = 0.573	0.567
Years of service, yr	21.6 ± 8.2	21.0 ± 7.1	t = 0.435	0.664
Sex, female	2 (3.5)	1 (1.7)	χ² = 0.360	0.548
KOSS-26	37.8 ± 5.2	54.2 ± 7.7	t = −13.333	< 0.001
CES-D	4.6 ± 4.4	5.9 ± 4.9	t = −1.514	0.133
BAI	2.8 ± 3.1	4.0 ± 4.3	t = −1.767	0.080
AUDIT	7.2 ± 5.8	7.7 ± 5.7	t = −0.461	0.645
PDS	2.8 ± 4.0	5.5 ± 5.9	t = −2.877	0.005
PSQI	4.5 ± 1.7	5.5 ± 1.9	t = −3.037	0.003

Data are shown as mean ± standard deviation or number (%).

KOSS-26 = Korean Occupational Stress Scale-26, CES-D = Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale, BAI = Beck Anxiety Inventory, AUDIT = alcohol use disorders identification test, PDS = Post-traumatic Diagnostic Scale, PSQI = Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index.

Exploratory VBM results

The highly stressed group had lower GMVs than the lowly stressed group on both sides of the insula, the left amygdala, right medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC), and ACC (Table 2, Fig. 1). The highly stressed group had higher GMVs in the right temporal pole than the lowly stressed group.

Table 2

Exploratory whole-brain VBM analysis

Region	Side	k_E	T_max	x	y	z	Group comparison
Insula	Right	98	3.19	26	17	−11	Highly stress < Lowly stress
Insula	Left	126	3.11	−35	21	−8	Highly stress < Lowly stress
Amygdala	Left	48	2.83	−17	3	−15	Highly stress < Lowly stress
Temporal pole	Right	40	3.33	30	6	−39	Highly stress > Lowly stress
Medial prefrontal cortex	Right	12	2.77	15	69	2	Highly stress < Lowly stress
Anterior cingulate cortex	Left	11	2.69	−3	54	3	Highly stress < Lowly stress

Brain regions in which voxels had significant group gray matter volume differences between highly and lowly stressed groups (height threshold of uncorrected P values < 0.005, extent threshold of contiguous k_E: 10 voxels).

VBM = voxel-based morphometry, k_E = number of cluster voxels.

Fig. 1

Brain regions in which voxels had lower gray matter volume in the highly stressed group than the lowly stressed group. Statistical inference thresholds determined by uncorrected P values height threshold of 0.005, with an extent threshold of contiguous 10 voxels. Coordinates indicate locations of brain slices according to the Montreal Neurological Institute system. (A) Amygdala; (B) both sides of insula; (C) medial prefrontal cortex and anterior cingulate cortex.

ROI-based SBM results

Based on results from the VBM analysis, we identified both sides of the insula, the temporal pole, and the amygdala as ROIs. Because clusters of the mPFC and ACC were on the rostral side, we also identified the rostral mPFC and ACC on both sides as ROIs. As a result, the highly stressed group had lower GMVs in both sides of the insula (left insula: P = 0.010; right insula: P = 0.018) and right rostral mPFC (P = 0.008). In other ROIs, we saw no significant difference in GMV between the two groups.

Correlation analysis results

We determined GMV values of the insula and the mPFC for correlation analysis. Within the highly stressed group, low GMV of the insula significantly correlated with length of service (left insula: r = −0.347, P = 0.009; right insula: r = −0.333, P = 0.012; Fig. 2). These correlations remained significant when controlling for other covariates (CES-D, BAI, and AUDIT) (left insula: r = −0.391, P = 0.004; right insula: r = −0.394, P = 0.003). Other correlation analyses were not significant. In particular, within the lowly stressed group, the correlation between GMV of the insula and length of service was not significant (P > 0.05).

Fig. 2

Correlation analysis of mean GMV values for clusters in the bilateral insula and the length of service for firefighters under high stress (n = 58). To depict partial correlation, we used linear regression to regress variables onto covariates. To generate scatter plots, we used calculated non-standardized residuals. (A) Smaller GMV in the left insula significantly correlated with longer years of service (r = −0.347, P = 0.009). (B) Smaller GMV in the right insula significantly correlated with longer years of service (r = −0.333, P = 0.012).

GMV = gray matter volume.

DISCUSSION

This study identified gray matter abnormalities related to occupational stress in firefighters. In VBM analysis, firefighters with high occupational stress had lower GMVs than those with low occupational stress in both sides of the insula, the left amygdala, right mPFC, and ACC. These results were consistent with previous findings that these brain regions have GMV changes in response to cumulative adversity.9 We confirmed the low GMV of the bilateral insula and right mPFC in the highly stressed group in ROI-based SBM analysis. Within the highly stressed group, lower GMV of the insula significantly correlated with the length of service. By contrast, the highly stressed group had higher GMVs than the lowly stressed group in the right temporal pole. Firefighters in this study had no comorbid psychiatric problems such as depression or anxiety, no history of psychiatric medications, and normal working functions. Our results suggest that regional GMV abnormalities are related to occupational stress.

Both the insula and amygdala are closely associated with emotional regulation. The insula plays a crucial role in body/emotional awareness, and the GMV of the insula is related to emotional regulation.34 The left amygdala is closely related to automatic responses to emotional stimuli.35 36 Chronic occupational stress is suggested to affect emotional processing, such as emotion recognition and regulation of emotional stimuli.37 Functional activity and connectivity of brain regions related to emotional processing may be affected by burnout.38 The temporal pole, which had a larger GMV in the highly stressed group, is related to retrieving affective autobiographic memories.39 Considering this information together, it is possible that GMV changes in brain regions, including the insula and the amygdala, mediate difficulties in emotional processing related to occupational stress. In particular, lower GMV of the insula correlated with longer length of service in the highly stressed group, suggesting that changes in the insular gray matter are related to firefighters' accumulated occupational stress.

We found that firefighters under high occupational stress had lower GMV in the ACC and the mPFC. The ACC is a crucial area for self-regulation, and alterations in its function and structure are frequently associated with occupational stress.12 38 The rostral part of the ACC and mPFC are closely related to self-referential processing of negative emotional stimuli.40 Brain regions related to self-referential processing are part of the neuro-circuit responsible for resilience to stress.41 42 Considering the small size of the brain cluster in this study and that participants did not perform behavioral tasks to evaluate self-referential thinking, additional studies are needed to a draw a more definitive conclusion.

The most interesting finding in this study is that the GMV of the amygdala was lower in the high occupational stress group. This is in contrast to a previous VBM study that reported an association between occupational stress and increased volume of the amygdala.11 Several possibilities can be considered for the reasons for these conflicting findings. First, neurobiological responses to stress on the left and right sides of the amygdala are different, and the relationship between stress and increases in amygdala volume has been suggested to be more prominent on the right side.43 Second, this study targeted firefighters, a group at high risk for PTSD, and research has indicated that reductions in GMV of the amygdala appear in PTSD.44 Brain regions identified in this study were similar to areas of interest in brain imaging studies of PTSD patients.45 While the subjects in our study had never been diagnosed with PTSD or taken psychiatric medications, firefighters are often exposed to stressful situations due to the nature of their occupation, and in this study, the highly stressed group had higher scores for PTSD-related symptoms than the lowly stressed group. Many studies have reported structural and functional brain alterations associated with trauma exposure without PTSD.46 It is important to consider whether our findings reflect the effects of accumulated traumatic exposures during firefighters' duties.

There were some limitations in this study. First, we did not include people suffering from major illnesses, which may have affected grouping criteria. KOSS-26 is a psychometric tool that comprehensively and reliably quantifies occupational stress and has been used in work-related studies of firefighters.47 48 However, because KOSS-26 does not assign cut-off values, we classified groups based on the median value of firefighter scores. Second, we conducted this study with a cross-sectional design. Therefore, it is difficult to identify causal relationships between occupational stress and brain imaging results. Third, firefighter duties are varied, and individuals have different experiences. Further analysis that considers specific work-related factors in a larger participant sample would be helpful to understand the effects of stress and resilience on the brain.

In conclusion, we analyzed changes in regional GMV related to occupational stress in firefighters. Firefighters under high stress tended to have had lower GMV than those under low stress in brain regions associated with emotional processing. In particular, low GMV of the insula in firefighters under high stress significantly correlated with the length of service. These findings are important to consider because regional gray matter abnormalities and associated emotional dysregulation may be related to firefighter susceptibility to burnout.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors thank all the FRESH cohort participants, without whom this study would not be possible.

Notes

Funding: This research was supported by the Fire Fighting Safety & 119 Rescue Technology Research and Development Program, funded by the National Fire Agency (MPSS-Firesafety-2015-80).

Disclosure: The authors have no potential conflicts of interest to disclose.

Author Contributions:

Conceptualization: Lee D, Jung YC.
Data curation: Kim W, Lee J, Hyun DS.
Formal analysis: Lee D, Kim W, Lee JE, Lee J.
Funding acquisition: Kim C.
Investigation: Kim W, Lee JE, Lee J, Lee SK, Chang SJ, Jeung DY, Hyun DS, Ryu HY, Kim C.
Methodology: Lee D, Kim W.
Project administration: Chang SJ, Kim C.
Resources: Kim W, Lee SK, Chang SJ, Jeung DY, Hyun DS, Ryu HY, Kim C.
Software: Lee D, Lee J.
Supervision: Chang SJ, Kim C, Jung YC.
Visualization: Lee D.
Writing - original draft: Lee D.
Writing - review & editing: Kim C, Jung YC.

References

1. Mark G, Smith AP. Occupational stress, job characteristics, coping, and the mental health of nurses. Br J Health Psychol. 2012; 17(3):505–521. PMID: 22107162.

2. Choi KS, Kang SK. Occupational psychiatric disorders in Korea. J Korean Med Sci. 2010; 25:S87–S93. PMID: 21258596.

3. Cho JJ, Kim JY, Chang SJ, Fiedler N, Koh SB, Crabtree BF, et al. Occupational stress and depression in Korean employees. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2008; 82(1):47–57. PMID: 18301911.

4. Gutshall CL, Hampton DP Jr, Sebetan IM, Stein PC, Broxtermann TJ. The effects of occupational stress on cognitive performance in police officers. Police Pract Res. 2017; 18(5):463–477.

5. Kang KH, Lee KS, Kim SI, Meng KH, Hong HS, Jeong CH. The relationship between alcohol use and job stress among firemen. Korean J Occup Environ Med. 2001; 13(4):401–412.

6. Yook YS. Firefighters' occupational stress and its correlations with cardiorespiratory fitness, arterial stiffness, heart rate variability, and sleep quality. PLoS One. 2019; 14(12):e0226739. PMID: 31869395.

7. Hölzel BK, Carmody J, Evans KC, Hoge EA, Dusek JA, Morgan L, et al. Stress reduction correlates with structural changes in the amygdala. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2010; 5(1):11–17. PMID: 19776221.

8. Kokubun K, Nemoto K, Oka H, Fukuda H, Yamakawa Y, Watanabe Y. Association of fatigue and stress with gray matter volume. Front Behav Neurosci. 2018; 12:154. PMID: 30087602.

9. Ansell EB, Rando K, Tuit K, Guarnaccia J, Sinha R. Cumulative adversity and smaller gray matter volume in medial prefrontal, anterior cingulate, and insula regions. Biol Psychiatry. 2012; 72(1):57–64. PMID: 22218286.

10. Anacker C, Scholz J, O’Donnell KJ, Allemang-Grand R, Diorio J, Bagot RC, et al. Neuroanatomic differences associated with stress susceptibility and resilience. Biol Psychiatry. 2016; 79(10):840–849. PMID: 26422005.

11. Savic I. Structural changes of the brain in relation to occupational stress. Cereb Cortex. 2015; 25(6):1554–1564. PMID: 24352030.

12. Blix E, Perski A, Berglund H, Savic I. Long-term occupational stress is associated with regional reductions in brain tissue volumes. PLoS One. 2013; 8(6):e64065. PMID: 23776438.

13. Kim YT, Kim WJ, Choi JE, Bae MJ, Jang H, Lee CJ, et al. Cohort profile: Firefighter Research on the Enhancement of Safety and Health (FRESH), a prospective cohort study on Korean firefighters. Yonsei Med J. 2020; 61(1):103–109. PMID: 31887807.

14. McCarthy S. Post-traumatic stress diagnostic scale (PDS). Occup Med (Lond). 2008; 58(5):379. PMID: 18676430.

15. Radloff LS. The CES-D scale: a self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Appl Psychol Meas. 1977; 1(3):385–401.

16. Beck AT, Epstein N, Brown G, Steer RA. An inventory for measuring clinical anxiety: psychometric properties. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1988; 56(6):893–897. PMID: 3204199.

17. Saunders JB, Aasland OG, Babor TF, de la Fuente JR, Grant M. Development of the alcohol use disorders identification test (AUDIT): WHO collaborative project on early detection of persons with harmful alcohol consumption--II. Addiction. 1993; 88(6):791–804. PMID: 8329970.

18. Carpenter JS, Andrykowski MA. Psychometric evaluation of the Pittsburgh sleep quality index. J Psychosom Res. 1998; 45(1):5–13. PMID: 9720850.

19. Chang S, Kang D, Kang M, Koh S, Kim S, Kim S. Standardization of Job Stress Measurement Scale for Korean Employee. Incheon, Korea: Korea Occupational Safety and Health Agency;2004. p. 17–41.

20. VanVoorhis CW, Morgan BL. Understanding power and rules of thumb for determining sample sizes. Tutor Quant Methods Psychol. 2007; 3(2):43–50.

21. Weathington BL, Cunningham CJ, Pittenger DJ. Understanding Business Research. New York, NY, USA: John Wiley & Sons;2012.

22. Ashburner J. VBM Tutorial. London, UK: Tech. rep. Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging;2010.

23. Ashburner J. A fast diffeomorphic image registration algorithm. Neuroimage. 2007; 38(1):95–113. PMID: 17761438.

24. Ségonne F, Dale AM, Busa E, Glessner M, Salat D, Hahn HK, et al. A hybrid approach to the skull stripping problem in MRI. Neuroimage. 2004; 22(3):1060–1075. PMID: 15219578.

25. Sled JG, Zijdenbos AP, Evans AC. A nonparametric method for automatic correction of intensity nonuniformity in MRI data. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 1998; 17(1):87–97. PMID: 9617910.

26. Dale AM, Fischl B, Sereno MI. Cortical surface-based analysis. I. Segmentation and surface reconstruction. Neuroimage. 1999; 9(2):179–194. PMID: 9931268.

27. Ségonne F, Pacheco J, Fischl B. Geometrically accurate topology-correction of cortical surfaces using nonseparating loops. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2007; 26(4):518–529. PMID: 17427739.

28. Fischl B, Sereno MI, Dale AM. Cortical surface-based analysis. II: Inflation, flattening, and a surface-based coordinate system. Neuroimage. 1999; 9(2):195–207. PMID: 9931269.

29. Fischl B, van der Kouwe A, Destrieux C, Halgren E, Ségonne F, Salat DH, et al. Automatically parcellating the human cerebral cortex. Cereb Cortex. 2004; 14(1):11–22. PMID: 14654453.

30. Desikan RS, Ségonne F, Fischl B, Quinn BT, Dickerson BC, Blacker D, et al. An automated labeling system for subdividing the human cerebral cortex on MRI scans into gyral based regions of interest. Neuroimage. 2006; 31(3):968–980. PMID: 16530430.

31. Barnes J, Ridgway GR, Bartlett J, Henley SM, Lehmann M, Hobbs N, et al. Head size, age and gender adjustment in MRI studies: a necessary nuisance? Neuroimage. 2010; 53(4):1244–1255. PMID: 20600995.

32. Yao L, Li W, Dai Z, Dong C. Eating behavior associated with gray matter volume alternations: a voxel based morphometry study. Appetite. 2016; 96:572–579. PMID: 26494522.

33. Hong YJ, Yoon B, Shim YS, Ahn KJ, Yang DW, Lee JH. Gray and white matter degenerations in subjective memory impairment: comparisons with normal controls and mild cognitive impairment. J Korean Med Sci. 2015; 30(11):1652–1658. PMID: 26539011.

34. Giuliani NR, Drabant EM, Bhatnagar R, Gross JJ. Emotion regulation and brain plasticity: expressive suppression use predicts anterior insula volume. Neuroimage. 2011; 58(1):10–15. PMID: 21704173.

35. Dolan RJ, Vuilleumier P. Amygdala automaticity in emotional processing. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2003; 985(1):348–355. PMID: 12724170.

36. Sergerie K, Chochol C, Armony JL. The role of the amygdala in emotional processing: a quantitative meta-analysis of functional neuroimaging studies. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2008; 32(4):811–830. PMID: 18316124.

37. Golkar A, Johansson E, Kasahara M, Osika W, Perski A, Savic I. The influence of work-related chronic stress on the regulation of emotion and on functional connectivity in the brain. PLoS One. 2014; 9(9):e104550. PMID: 25184294.

38. Tei S, Becker C, Kawada R, Fujino J, Jankowski KF, Sugihara G, et al. Can we predict burnout severity from empathy-related brain activity? Transl Psychiatry. 2014; 4(6):e393. PMID: 24893064.

39. Fink GR, Markowitsch HJ, Reinkemeier M, Bruckbauer T, Kessler J, Heiss WD. Cerebral representation of one's own past: neural networks involved in autobiographical memory. J Neurosci. 1996; 16(13):4275–4282. PMID: 8753888.

40. Yoshimura S, Okamoto Y, Onoda K, Matsunaga M, Ueda K, Suzuki S, et al. Rostral anterior cingulate cortex activity mediates the relationship between the depressive symptoms and the medial prefrontal cortex activity. J Affect Disord. 2010; 122(1-2):76–85. PMID: 19589603.

41. Franklin TB, Saab BJ, Mansuy IM. Neural mechanisms of stress resilience and vulnerability. Neuron. 2012; 75(5):747–761. PMID: 22958817.

42. van der Werff SJ, van den Berg SM, Pannekoek JN, Elzinga BM, van der Wee NJ. Neuroimaging resilience to stress: a review. Front Behav Neurosci. 2013; 7:39. PMID: 23675330.

43. Caetano I, Amorim L, Soares JM, Ferreira S, Coelho A, Reis J, et al. Amygdala size varies with stress perception. Neurobiol Stress. 2021; 14:100334. PMID: 34013000.

44. Morey RA, Gold AL, LaBar KS, Beall SK, Brown VM, Haswell CC, et al. Amygdala volume changes in posttraumatic stress disorder in a large case-controlled veterans group. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2012; 69(11):1169–1178. PMID: 23117638.

45. Garfinkel SN, Liberzon I. Neurobiology of PTSD: a review of neuroimaging findings. Psychiatr Ann. 2009; 39(6):370–381.

46. Stark EA, Parsons CE, Van Hartevelt TJ, Charquero-Ballester M, McManners H, Ehlers A, et al. Post-traumatic stress influences the brain even in the absence of symptoms: a systematic, quantitative meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2015; 56:207–221. PMID: 26192104.

47. Chung IS, Lee MY, Jung SW, Nam CW. Minnesota multiphasic personality inventory as related factor for post traumatic stress disorder symptoms according to job stress level in experienced firefighters: 5-year study. Ann Occup Environ Med. 2015; 27(1):16. PMID: 26137313.

48. Kim MG, Kim KS, Ryoo JH, Yoo SW. Relationship between occupational stress and work-related musculoskeletal disorders in Korean male firefighters. Ann Occup Environ Med. 2013; 25(1):9. PMID: 24472292.

TOOLS

Similar articles