PDF
Citation
Print
I. Introduction
The radial forearm free flap (RFFF) is the most popular flap for intraoral reconstruction. The technique was first described in 19811. Many methods have been reported for skin coverage of the donor-site defect, including split-thickness skin graft (STSG), full-thickness skin graft (FTSG), meshed FTSG, acellular dermal matrix, and porcine collagen membrane2-4.
Several researchers have described local FTSG techniques for repair of RFFF defects and have demonstrated their usefulness5-8. If too much skin is taken from the forearm site, it can lead to failure of primary closure. Because the forearm gradually narrows from the cephalad to the caudad region, full thickness skin is harvested more readily from the cephalad area.
Considering the esthetics when using FTSG, it is important to collect only the necessary amount of skin and to achieve primary closure after full-thickness skin harvesting. We describe a simple and convenient new technique using local FTSG based on the proportional geometric concept.
II. Patients and Methods
In the period between April 2016 and April 2021, five patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma underwent mass resection combined with RFFF reconstruction at the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, SMG-SNU Boramae Medical Center (Seoul, Korea). After RFFF harvesting, donor-site defects were restored by FTSG. The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the SMG-SNU Boramae Medical Center (IRB No. 07-2017-19). The present study was designed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.
1. Surgical technique
The RFFF is designed by outlining the path of the radial artery and cephalic vein. Before elevating the RFFF, the local FTSG is designed according to the long axis of the pedicle. Two oval skin islands (S1 and S2) are marked, and the distant one (S2) is divided into two semilunar skin islands (S2a and S2b).(Fig. 1. A) The RFFF and each skin island are equal in horizontal length (B), while the vertical width of the skin islands is proportional to the width of the forearm at the central point of each skin island (α2 and α2). The vertical width of the RFFF (A) is equal to the sum of the vertical widths of the skin islands (a1 and a2).(Fig. 1. B)
Formulas:
After harvesting the RFFF, S1 is grafted onto the central area of the donor-site defect, while S2a and S2b are grafted onto the upper and lower sides of S1.(Fig. 1. C)
2. Clinical case
A 58-year-old male complained of a large mass in the mouth, for which multiple biopsies were performed. The diagnosis was squamous cell carcinoma of the palatoglossal arch. Mass removal and reconstruction surgery using RFFF were conducted under general anesthesia. The size of the RFFF was 75 (B) mm×55 (A) mm. The width of the forearm at the center of each skin island was 65 (α1) mm and 85 (α2) mm, respectively. According to the formula, a1 and a2 were 23.8 mm and 31.2 mm, respectively. One oval skin island (75 mm×24 mm) and two semicircular skin islands (75 mm×15.5 mm) were harvested for FTSG.(Fig. 2)
III. Results
Donor-site defects in four consecutive patients (three male patients) who underwent reconstruction with the RFFF were covered with a proportional local FTSG.(Table 1) The mean age of the study group was 69.2 years. The donor-site defects ranged in size from 24 to 41.25 cm2, with a mean of 33.05 cm2 (60 mm×40 mm; 75 mm×55 mm; 70 mm×50 mm; 70 mm×50 mm; and 60 mm×50 mm). Good or acceptable esthetic outcomes were obtained in all five patients. There was no dehiscence, skin necrosis, wound infection, or severe scarring at the graft site at the end of the postoperative follow-up period, and no patient had any specific functional complaint.
IV. Discussion
RFFF is a very useful flap for reconstruction of head and neck defects by virtue of its advantages including relative ease of harvesting, adequate bulkiness, good pliability, and long vascular pedicle9. Despite the reputation of the flap itself, there has been a lack of consensus with regard to the method of restoring RFFF donor sites. As such, the method has depended on the preference and experience of individual surgeons, and various methods have been introduced10. Among these, STSGs have been used most commonly due to the strengths of simple harvesting methods and acceptable functional outcomes3. However, there are functional problems, such as delayed healing, partial graft loss, exposure of flexor tendon, persistent wrist stiffness, cold intolerance or reduced hand strength associated with STSG, as well as esthetic problems related to scar infection, skin tension, or hypertrophic scar formation11,12. In contrast, FTSG is known to supply a thicker base than STSG, averting wound breakdown and facilitating superior cosmetic results13,14. In this report, we propose a new method for repairing the RFFF donor site using FTSG from adjacent skin.
There have been several studies in which FTSG has been performed with the abdomen or opposite forearm as the donor site. However, this method requires a second surgical site, which is a disadvantage9. Therefore, Kaltman et al.10 have reported FTSG from the ipsilateral upper inner arm, eliminating the requirement for a second surgical site. These authors have reported good outcomes in terms of color match and inconspicuous scar. Our technique also eliminates the need for additional wound formation using the skin area that is to be dissected for harvest of the vascular pedicle of the RFFF and showed good aesthetic outcomes. There have also been reports of good results in terms of skin quality, rapid healing, and good functional outcomes when using local fasciocutaneous transposition flaps as an alternative to nonvascularized free flaps14. However, these flaps required extensive dissection, leading to sensory loss and chronic lymphedema3.
Shiba et al.15 devised a larger FTSG that could cover not only the RFFF donor site, but also the distal portion of the FTSG donor site16. They executed a V-Y primary closure at the proximal portion of the FTSG donor site. However, since the triangular FTSG replaced the (essentially) rectangular RFFF donor site, excessive traction at the edges of the middle portion of the repair became a concern, and multiple small slits were needed to distribute tension in the FTSG and prevent fluid collection under the graft due to the relatively large area. Furthermore, the area for tie-over dressing became wider than with the normal FTSG, which could have increased the risk of wound breakdown. Our FTSG replicates the size of the RFFF size, and the design is less complex. Finally, González-García et al.13 have reported an FTSG using four separate skin triangles adjacent to the RFFF donor site, which is similar to our technique. However, because it considers the difference in distal and proximal forearm widths, our design might be more favorable for distributing the tension of primary closure at the distal side of the donor site. In fact, our patients have shown good healing without compartment syndrome, wound dehiscence, necrosis, or hypertrophic scarring.
In this study, we introduced a new method for repair of the RFFF donor site using an adjacent local FTSG designed with proportional geometric parameters. This method was relatively simple in construction and eliminated the need for additional donor sites such as the abdomen, groin, or thigh, and the advantageous tension distribution led to good healing without major scarring or complications.
V. Conclusion
The present study shows successful skin graft of a forearm defect while reducing donor site morbidity. By achieving appropriate skin color, texture, and high patient satisfaction, this new technique is concluded to be a viable option to replace STSG. Although the number of patients is small, these preliminary results are satisfying and additional studies should be completed with a greater number of cases.
XML Download