Application of carbon dioxide as a novel approach to eradicate poultry red mites

JeongWoo Kang; Md Akil Hossain; Jiyeon Jeong; Haechul Park; Jin-Hyun Kim; Min-Su Kang; Yong-Kuk Kwon; Yong-Sang Kim; Sung-Won Park

doi:10.4142/jvs.2020.21.e37

Journal List > J Vet Sci > v.21(2) > 1148355

Go to TopGo to Top Go to BottomGo to Bottom

TOOLS

Kang, Hossain, Jeong, Park, Kim, Kang, Kwon, Kim, and Park: Application of carbon dioxide as a novel approach to eradicate poultry red mites

Rapid Communication

J Vet Sci 2020;21(2):e37.

Published online: 4 March 2020

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4142/jvs.2020.21.e37

Application of carbon dioxide as a novel approach to eradicate poultry red mites

JeongWoo Kang¹, Md Akil Hossain¹, Jiyeon Jeong², Haechul Park¹, Jin-Hyun Kim², Min-Su Kang², Yong-Kuk Kwon², Yong-Sang Kim¹, Sung-Won Park^1,^*

¹Veterinary Drugs & Biologics Division, Animal and Plant Quarantine Agency (APQA), Gimcheon 39660, Korea

²Avian Disease Research Division, Animal and Plant Quarantine Agency (APQA), Gimcheon 39660, Korea

^*Corresponding author: Sung-Won Park Veterinary Drugs & Biologics Division, Animal and Plant Quarantine Agency (APQA), 177 Hyeoksin 8-ro, Gimcheon 39660, Korea. E-mail: pasawa@korea.kr

Conflict of Interest The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Received 4 September 2019 Revised 28 February 2020 Accepted 2 March 2020

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Poultry red mites (PRMs), Dermanyssus gallinae, are one of the most harmful ectoparasites of laying hens. Because of their public health impact, safe, effective methods to eradicate PRMs are greatly needed. Carbon dioxide (CO₂) was shown to eradicate phytophagous mites; however, there is no evidence that PRMs can be eradicated by CO₂. Thus, the efficacy of CO₂, applied by direct-spraying and dry ice-generated exposure, for eradicating PRMs was investigated. Both treatments eradicated > 85% of PRMs within 24 h and 100% of PRMs by 120 h of post-treatment. Therefore, these novel approaches may be useful for eradicating PRMs in clinical settings.

Keywords: Acaricides, asphyxiator, carbon dioxide, Dermanyssus gallinae

References

1. Kirkwood AC. Anaemia in poultry infested with the red mite Dermanyssus gallinae. Vet Rec. 1967; 80(17):514–516.

2. Sikes RK, Chamberlain RW. Laboratory observations on three species of bird mites. J Parasitol. 1954; 40(6):691–697.

3. Sparagano OA, George DR, Harrington DW, Giangaspero A. Significance and control of the poultry red mite, Dermanyssus gallinae. Annu Rev Entomol. 2014; 59(1):447–466.

4. Zeman P, Stika V, Skalka B, Bártík M, Dusbábek F, Lávicková M. Potential role of Dermanyssus gallinae De Geer, 1778 in the circulation of the agent of pullurosis-typhus in hens. Folia Parasitol (Praha). 1982; 29(4):371–374.

5. Hungerford TG, Hart L. Fowl tick fever. Agric Gaz. 1937; 48:591–592.

6. Beugnet F, Chauve C, Gauthey M, Beert L. Resistance of the red poultry mite to pyrethroids in France. Vet Rec. 1997; 140(22):577–579.

7. Marangi M, Cafiero MA, Capelli G, Camarda A, Sparagano OA, Giangaspero A. Evaluation of the poultry red mite, Dermanyssus gallinae (Acari: Dermanyssidae) susceptibility to some acaricides in field populations from Italy. Exp Appl Acarol. 2009; 48(1-2):11–18.

8. Zeman P. Encounter the poultry red mite resistance to acaricides in Czechoslovak poultry-farming. Folia Parasitol (Praha). 1987; 34(4):369–373.

9. European Food Safety Authority (EFSA). Occurrence of residues of fipronil and other acaricides in chicken eggs and poultry muscle/fat. EFSA J. 2018; 16(5):5164.

10. Mullens BA, Murillo AC. Parasites in laying hen housing systems. Hester PY, editor. editor.Egg Innovations and Strategies for Improvements. London, United Kingdom: Elsevier;2017. 597-605.

11. White NDG, Jayas DS. Control of insects and mites with carbon dioxide in wheat stored at cool temperatures in nonairtight bins. J Econ Entomol. 1991; 84(6):1933–1942.

12. Chirico J, Tauson R. Traps containing acaricides for the control of Dermanyssus gallinae. Vet Parasitol. 2002; 110(1-2):109–116.

13. Pavlićević A, Ratajac R, Dotlić M, Stojanov I, Pavlović I. An innovative formulation of paraffin and silicone oils for the control of the red poultry mite (Dermanyssus gallinae) – examination of the efficiency under laboratory conditions. Arh Vet Med. 2017; 10(2):63–79.

14. Hamscher G, Priess B, Harting J, Nogossek MI, Gluender G, Nau II. Determination of propoxur residues in eggs by liquid chromatography–diode array detection after treatment of stocked housing facilities for the poultry red mite (Dermanyssus gallinae). Anal Chim Acta. 2003; 483(1-2):19–26.

15. Ministry of Food and Drug safety. Guideline for testing efficacy of insecticide for prevention of infectious diseases [Internet]. Cheongju: Ministry of Food and Drug safety;. https://www.mfds.go.kr/brd/m_218/view.do?seq=1119&srchFr=&srchTo=&srchWord=%EC%82%B4%EC%B6%A9%EC%A0%9C&srchT-p=0&itm_seq_1=0&itm_seq_2=0&multi_itm_seq=0&company_cd=&company_nm=&Data_stts_gu-bun=C9999&page=1. Accessed 2020 Feb 26.

Fig. 1.

Schematic representations of CO₂ treatment methods to eradicate PRMs in this study. (A) Direct spraying of CO₂. (B) Exposure to dry ice-generated CO₂ in a closed chamber. CO₂, carbon dioxide; PRM, poultry red mite.

Table 1.

Efficacy of CO₂ treatment for the eradication of poultry red mites using different application methods

CO₂ treatment method	Eradication rate (%) at different time intervals after CO₂ treatment
	2 h			24 h			48 h			120 h
	833 ppm	2,500 ppm	4,167 ppm	833 ppm	2,500 ppm	4,167 ppm	833 ppm	2,500 ppm	4,167 ppm	833ppm	2,500 ppm	4,167 ppm
Control		0.0 ± 0.0			0.0 ± 0.0			0.0 ± 0.0			1.7 ± 2.0
Exposure (1 min)	25.8 ± 5.6	34.5 ± 6.5	42.5 ± 4.8	35.2 ± 5.4	41.0 ± 4.3	48.7 ± 10.1	50.5 ± 6.7	55.4 ± 4.3	60.2 ± 9.4	72.6 ± 8.5	92.5 ± 3.2	95.2 ± 5.5
Exposure (2 min)	31.5 ± 9.9	48.7 ± 4.6	50.2 ± 5.8	35.6 ± 4.3	55.5 ± 5.7	59.5 ± 6.7	59.5 ± 10.0	68.7 ± 6.8	69.2 ± 5.6	73.7 ± 6.7	89.2 ± 9.5	97.7 ± 9.0
Exposure (5 min)	45.4 ± 5.7	72.2 ± 5.4	70.7 ± 6.7	55.8 ± 2.6	76.7 ± 6.8	75.5 ± 6.0	57.4 ± 9.7	85.5 ± 7.4	80.6 ± 7.2	85.3 ± 8.4	92.2 ± 8.7	99.5 ± 8.5
Exposure (10 min)	59.7 ± 7.1	77.5 ± 4.3	76.6 ± 4.3	64.5 ± 9.3	80.6 ± 5.4	82.8 ± 4.6	69.5 ± 2.7	85.6 ± 8.1	88.4 ± 11.2	84.2 ± 12.5	5 95.7 ± 7.5	97.5 ± 8.7
Exposure (30 min)	62.5 ± 5.7	77.8 ± 5.8	77.2 ± 7.3	72.8 ± 10.0	82.2 ± 9.8	85.5 ± 6.3	78.5 ± 6.9	89.8 ± 3.5	91.5 ± 9.7	85.4 ± 11.7	96.2 ± 5.4	99.0 ± 2.0
Spray (10 sec)		74.6 ± 15.2			89.4 ± 11.5			96.8 ± 12.8			100.0 ± 0.0

Data represent the mean ± SD of 3 replicate analyses. The eradication rates of poultry red mites in CO₂ treatment groups (both CO₂ exposure and spraying) are significantly (p < 0.05) different than the control group at each observation time (2, 24, 48, and 129 h). CO, carbon dioxide.

TOOLS

Similar articles