A 58-year-old woman presented with progressive dyspnea. When she was 8 years old, a surgical ligation of her hypertensive patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) was performed by left lateral thoracotomy in the 4th intercostal space under general anesthesia. On this admission, 2-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography/transesophageal echocardiography (TTE/TEE) color Doppler showed dilated left atrium, mildly hypertrophied left ventricle with an ejection fraction of 58% with impaired relaxation; parasternal short axis and suprasternal views showed an enlarged main pulmonary artery and a mild left-to-right shunt via a distorted PDA. Right heart catheterization demonstrated a systolic pulmonary artery pressure of 35 mmHg and a pulmonary flow/systemic flow of 1.1:1. After heart team discussion, a catheter-based treatment was confirmed. Percutaneous closure was performed under local anesthesia and fluoroscopic guidance. Aortic arch angiograms showed an elongated ductus with constriction on the left pulmonary artery opening (type E according to classification of Krichenko) (Figure 1, Supplementary Video 1).1) A retrograde approach for crossing the residual PDA was chosen. A 4-Fr compatible 6-mm vascular plug system (Cera; Lifetech Scientific, Shenzhen, China) (Figure 2) was selected for implantation and successfully deployed with abolition of residual shunting (Supplementary Videos 2, 3). The patient was discharged without complications the following day. At 1-month follow-up she remained symptom free and TTE did not demonstrate any residual shunt flow.
Purse-string sutures, PDA ligation and clip, double clip application or ligation and division are safe and more effective procedures than PDA ligation only. Actually, recanalization after simple ligation may cause residual shunts, whose reported frequency is not negligible and varies from 6% to 23%.2)3)4)5) In summary, routine transcatheter closure of any residual PDA appears to be the most reasonable choice, given the great feasibility and very low morbidity of this standard of care treatment.
Written informed consent was obtained from the patient.
Notes
Funding: The authors received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
References
1. Krichenko A, Benson LN, Burrows P, Möes CA, McLaughlin P, Freedom RM. Angiographic classification of the isolated, persistently patent ductus arteriosus and implications for percutaneous catheter occlusion. Am J Cardiol. 1989; 63:877–880. PMID: 2929450.
2. Jung JW. Do we have to close residual patent ductus arteriosus after surgery or transcatheter intervention? Korean Circ J. 2011; 41:639–640. PMID: 22194757.
3. Baspinar O, Kilinc M, Kervancioglu M, Irdem A. Transcatheter closure of a residual patent ductus arteriosus after surgical ligation in children. Korean Circ J. 2011; 41:654–657. PMID: 22194760.
4. Chuang YC, Yin WH, Hsiung MC, et al. Successful transcatheter closure of a residual patent ductus arteriosus with complex anatomy after surgical ligation using an amplatzer ductal occluder guided by live three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography. Echocardiography. 2011; 28:E101–E103. PMID: 21395670.
5. Fortescue EB, Lock JE, Galvin T, McElhinney DB. To close or not to close: the very small patent ductus arteriosus. Congenit Heart Dis. 2010; 5:354–365. PMID: 20653702.