Journal List > Korean J Transplant > v.35(2) > 1147281

Park, Jung, Oh, Lee, and Lee: Organ donation after controlled circulatory death (Maastricht classification III) following the withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment in Korea: a suggested guideline

Abstract

The “Act on hospice and palliative care and decisions on life-sustaining treatment for patients at the end of life” was enacted in February 2018 in Korea. Therefore, we suggest a Korean guideline for organ donation after circulatory death (DCD) category III after the withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment (WLST). Implementation of WLST includes stopping ventilation, extubation, discontinuation of inotropics and vasoconstrictors, cessation of continuous renal replacement therapy, and cessation of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Medical staff involved in organ procurement or transplantation surgery cannot participate in the WLST process. Following cardiac arrest, 5 minutes of “no touch time” should pass, after which circulatory death can be declared. The procurement team can enter the room after the declaration of death. The final procurement decision is made after the surgeon visually checks the organ condition. DCD category III activation in Korea will help increase organ donation and reduce the demand-supply mismatch of organ transplantation.

HIGHLIGHTS
  • Donation after circulatory death category III activation in Korea will help increase organ donation and reduce the demand-supply mismatch of organ transplantation.

INTRODUCTION

Organ transplantation is an effective treatment for prolonging the life of patients with end-stage organ failure and improving their quality of life [1]. There are two types of organ donations: living donation and cadaveric donation. Due to the “dead donor rule,” organ procurement must be done after a person has been declared dead in cadaveric donation [2]. For this reason, the concept of brain death was introduced.
Because of the increasing number of patients on the transplant waiting list, more donors are required [3]. Therefore, the concept of donation after circulatory death (DCD) has emerged to increase the number of donors [1]. The United States and European countries, including Spain and the United Kingdom, have been implementing DCD since 1980–2000. According to a report published in 2019, DCD is being implemented in 18 of 37 European countries [3]. In 2018, the proportion of DCD against overall donors increased by 28%, 19.9%, and 38.8% in Spain, the United States, and the United Kingdom, respectively [4].
As of December 2019, there were 40,253 people on the transplant waiting list in South Korea, but only 450 brain dead donors [5]. Due to this demand-supply mismatch, more attention is being given to DCD in South Korea. In South Korea, DCD could only be implemented in Maastricht classification IV (cardiac arrest in a brain-dead donor) [6]. There were only 34 cases of DCD in 2006–2015. Presently, organ donation involves only donors who have a cardiac arrest after the withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment (WLST), also known as Maastricht classification III [7,8], based on the “Act on hospice and palliative care and decisions on life-sustaining treatment for patients at the end of life,” that came into force in February 2018. Since then, the implementation rate of WLST has increased, with 30,000 patients in February 2019. Respiratory, cardiac, and brain diseases accounted for 26.5% of the patients [9]. Therefore, we can predict the possibility of DCD after WLST by analyzing patients whose families want to donate.
Moreover, if we create a paradigm shift in which WLST and subsequent organ donation are an option at the end of life, DCD in South Korea could be stimulated. Recently, South Korea has made efforts to incorporate DCD in organ donation and transplantation (Maastricht classification III), particularly after WLST. This would expand people’s options regarding donation and contribute towards organ donation and transplantation by increasing the number of DCD donors. In this review article, the authors suggest a Korean guideline for donor management of circulatory death after WLST, corresponding to DCD category III.

CONCEPT OF DCD

Definition

The ethical premise of organ donation, which is not a living donation, is the principle that organ procurement must be done after the declaration of death [2]. Determination of death is decided by neurologic or circulatory criteria: irreversible cessation of brain function or irreversible cessation of circulation or respiration. The determination of death is a process, and tests are required to diagnose death in accordance with established criteria (Table 1) [10]. DCD is procuring organs after a declaration of death is made based on circulatory criteria.

Classification

Maastricht classification of DCD

The Maastricht classification defines DCD categories according to the circumstances of the donor’s death. It was released in 1995 and revised in 2013. The details are listed in Table 2 [7,8,11]. There are debates on uncontrolled and controlled classifications in the Maastricht classification. However, in this guideline, uncontrolled DCD is defined as classes I, II, IV, and V, and controlled DCD as class III.

Controlled DCD (Maastricht Classification III)

Controlled DCD (Maastricht classification III) includes patients who cannot be resuscitated and undergo WLST following cardiac arrest, determination of death, and organ donation. The donation programs are well-developed in the United States, Canada, and the United Kingdom [8,11,12]. Since the “Act on hospice and palliative care and decisions on life-sustaining treatment for patients at the end of life” was enacted in February 2018, the number of patients undergoing WLST has steadily increased in 189 tertiary general and semi-general hospitals across South Korea [9,13].Among potential brain-death donors reported in 2019 (2,484 cases), only 15% (376 cases) families consented to WLST [14]. Therefore, there appears to be a potential to increase the number of donors. The process of DCD after WLSTs is summarized in Fig. 1.

Definition of Terms

The Korean DCD research group was established in 2020 and consists of 20 members from several Korean hospitals. The definitions of these terms were determined by the voting of the members (Table 3) [15].

WLSTs for Organ Donation

Confirm the WLST implementation, explain the requirements listed below, and implement WLST: (1) stop the ventilator, (2) extubation, (3) discontinue inotropics and vasoconstrictors, (4) cease continuous renal replacement therapy, and (5) cease extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Every step in DCD category III after the WLST must be based on the “Act on hospice and palliative care and decisions on life-sustaining treatment for patients at the end of life.” To decrease the warm ischemic period, we recommend executing (1) to (5) simultaneously.
WLST can be implemented in an intensive care unit (ICU) or operating room (OR). However, where possible, we recommend implementing WLST in an OR for rapid organ procurement. Before implementation, the operative field must be sterilized and draped. For anticoagulation, 20,000–30,000 IU (400 IU/kg) IV heparin need to be infused. After WLST implementation, the patients’ clinical status should be checked, including heart rate, blood pressure, respiratory rate, and oxygen saturation per minute (Fig. 2) [16]. If cardiac arrest does not occur within 90 minutes of WLST implementation, the donation process is halted, and the patient is transferred to the ICU to wait until cardiac arrest occurs [12,17].

Declaration of Death

Medical staff involved in organ procurement or transplantation surgery cannot participate in the WLST decision-making process and declaration of death. From the cardiac arrest (systole), 5 minutes of “no touch time” should pass, after which death can be declared. As mentioned in the definition of asystole, the start of the “no touch time” is when the pulse wave is lost under invasive arterial blood pressure monitoring. Alternatively, if invasive arterial blood pressure monitoring is unavailable, the first time when the heart rate shows “zero” on an electrocardiogram can be used.

Organ Procurement Surgery

The organ procurement team should wait in a place other than where the WLST implementation is taking place while wearing surgical attire. A coordinator should provide the organ procurement team with the following information per minute: (1) implementation time of WLST, (2) functional warm ischemic time, (3) time of cardiac arrest (asystole), (4) “no touch time,” (5) time of death declaration, (6) asystolic warm period (primary warm ischemic time), and (7) total warm ischemic time (withdrawal period and asystolic warm period).
The procurement team should enter the OR after the declaration of death. The final procurement decision is made after a surgeon visually checks the condition of the organs. The functional warm ischemic time at which organic transplantation is possible is as follows: (1) lung: within 60 minutes, (2) liver: within 30 minutes, (3) pancreas: within 30 minutes, and (4) kidney: within 60 minutes.

CONCLUSION

The first case of organ transplantation from a controlled DCD after WLST was performed at the Korea University Anam Hospital in July 2020. The guidelines for DCD were drafted. This paper is a suggested guideline and a proposal. Based on this proposal, we need to determine the Korean DCD protocol. DCD category III activation in Korea will help increase organ donation and reduce the demand-supply mismatch of organ transplantation.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

Conflict of Interest
No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.
Funding/Support
This study was supported by research grant from the Korean Society for Transplantation (2021-00-02001-011).
Author Contributions
Conceptualization: JML. Data curation: ESJ, JSO, YML. Formal analysis: JML. Funding acquisition: JML. Methodology: JML. Project administration: JML. Visualization: JML, HSP. Writing–original draft: HSP. Writing–review & editing: JML, ESJ, HSP.

REFERENCES

1. Manara AR, Murphy PG, O'Callaghan G. 2012; Donation after circulatory death. Br J Anaesth. 108 Suppl 1:i108–21. DOI: 10.1093/bja/aer357. PMID: 22194426.
crossref
2. Truog RD, Miller FG, Halpern SD. 2013; The dead-donor rule and the future of organ donation. N Engl J Med. 369:1287–9. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMp1307220. PMID: 24088088.
crossref
3. Lomero M, Gardiner D, Coll E, Haase-Kromwijk B, Procaccio F, Immer F, et al. 2020; Donation after circulatory death today: an updated overview of the European landscape. Transpl Int. 33:76–88. DOI: 10.1111/tri.13506. PMID: 31482628.
crossref
4. International Registry in Organ Donation and Transplantation. 2019. International Registry in Organ Donation and Transplantation (IRODaT) newsletter 2019 [Internet]. IRODaT-DTI Foundation;Barcelona: Available from: https://www.irodat.org/img/database/pdf/NEWSLETTER2019-June.pdf. cited 2021 May 7.
5. Korean Network for Organ Sharing. 2020. Korean Network for Organ Sharing (KONOS) quarterly statistics data [Internet]. Korean Network for Organ Sharing; 2020;Seoul: Available from: https://www.konos.go.kr/konosis/common/bizlogic.jsp. cited 2021 May 7.
6. Kim JM, Kim SJ. 2010; The use of non-heart beating donors to expand the donor pool. J Korean Soc Transplant. 24:165–72. DOI: 10.4285/jkstn.2010.24.3.165.
crossref
7. Morrissey PE, Monaco AP. 2014; Donation after circulatory death: current practices, ongoing challenges, and potential improvements. Transplantation. 97:258–64. DOI: 10.1097/01.TP.0000437178.48174.db. PMID: 24492420.
8. American Society of Anesthesiologists. 2017. Statement on controlled organ donation after circulatory death. Committees of origin: critical care medicine, ethics and transplant anesthesia [Internet]. American Society of Anesthesiologists;Schaumburg (IL): Available from: https://www.asahq.org/standards-and-guidelines/statement-on-controlled-organ-donation-after-circulatory-death. cited 2021 May 7.
9. Korea National Institute For Bioethics Policy. 2019. 1st Annual report of decisions on life-sustaining treatment [Internet]. Korea National Institute for Bioethics Policy;Seoul: Available from: https://www.lst.go.kr/comm/referenceDetail.do?pgNo=1&cate=&searchOption=0&searchText=&bno=946. cited 2021 May 7.
10. World Health Organization. 2012. International guidelines for the determination of death: phase I. May 30-31, 2012 Montreal forum report [Internet]. World Health Organization;Geneva: Available from: https://www.who.int/patientsafety/montreal-forum-report.pdf. cited 2021 May 7.
11. Thuong M, Ruiz A, Evrard P, Kuiper M, Boffa C, Akhtar MZ, et al. 2016; New classification of donation after circulatory death donors definitions and terminology. Transpl Int. 29:749–59. DOI: 10.1111/tri.12776. PMID: 26991858.
crossref
12. Shemie SD, Baker AJ, Knoll G, Wall W, Rocker G, Howes D, et al. 2006; National recommendations for donation after cardiocirculatory death in Canada: donation after cardiocirculatory death in Canada. CMAJ. 175:S1. DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.060895. PMID: 17124739. PMCID: PMC1635157.
13. Korea National Institute for Bioethics Policy. Registration status of medical institution ethics committee [Internet]. Korea National Institute for Bioethics Policy; 2021;Seoul: Available from: https://www.lst.go.kr/comm/monthlyStatistics.do. cited 2021 May 7.
14. Korea Organ Donation Agency. 2019. Korea Organ Donation Agency (KODA) 2019 annual report [Internet]. Korea Organ Donation Agency;Seoul: Available from: https://www.koda1458.kr/newPr/eBook.do?num=24&idx=13. cited 2021 May 7.
15. Intensive Care Society; NHS Blood and Transplant; British Transplantation Society. 2010. Organ donation after circulatory death: report of a consensus meeting, 2010 London [Internet]. Available from: https://nhsbtdbe.blob.core.windows.net/umbraco-assets-corp/1360/donation-after-circulatory-death-dcd_consensus_2010.pdf. cited 2021 May 7.
16. Gift of Life Donor Program. 2009. Operating room donation after cardiac death flow sheet translated and revised by KONOS. Gift of Life Donor Program;Philadelphia (PA):
17. Australian Organ and Tissue Donation and Transplantation Authority. 2010. National protocol for donation after cardiac death [Internet]. Australian Organ and Tissue Donation and Transplantation Authority;Canberra: Available from: https://donatelife.gov.au/resources/clinical-guidelines-and-protocols/national-protocol-donation-after-cardiac-death-2010. cited 2021 May 7.

Fig. 1
The process of controlled donation after circulatory death. SBP, systolic blood pressure; SpO2, peripheral oxygen saturation; hRP, hypothermic regional perfusion; nRP, normothermic regional perfusion; WLST, withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment.
kjt-35-2-71-f1.tif
Fig. 2
Records of the clinical status of donors after circulatory death [16]. KONOS, Korean Network for Organ Sharing; DCD, donation after circulatory death; DNR, do-not-resuscitate order; HR, heart rate; SBP, systolic blood pressure; RR, respiration rate; SpO2, peripheral oxygen saturation.
kjt-35-2-71-f2.tif
Table 1
Two criteria in the determination of death
Criteria Determination of death
Neurologic Diagnosis and confirmation of death based on the irreversible cessation of functioning in the entire brain, including the brainstem
Circulatory Diagnosis and confirmation of death based on the irreversible cessation of circulation followed by cardiac arrest, cardiocirculatory arrest, and respiratory arrest
Table 2
Maastricht classification of DCD
Category Definition Type of DCD
I Dead on arrival
(1) Cardiocirculatory death outside hospital with no witnesses. Totally uncontrolled
(2) Cardiocirculatory death outside hospital with witnesses and rapid resuscitation attempt. Uncontrolled
Uncontrolled
II Unsuccessful cardiopulmonary resuscitation : witnessed cardiac arrest outside the hospital with unsuccessful cardiopulmonary resuscitation Uncontrolled
III Cardiac arrest following the withdrawal of life‐sustaining treatments but not considered to be brain dead Controlled
IV Cardiac arrest in the process of the determination of death by neurological criteria after brain death or after such determination has been performed, but before being transferred to an operating room Uncontrolled
V Cardiac arrest in hospital patients Uncontrolled

DCD, donation after circulatory death.

Table 3
Definitions of terms in the process of controlled DCD
Definition
1. No flow time
: time from cardiac arrest to start of cardiopulmonary resuscitation
2. Total warm ischemic time
Uncontrolled: from the time of the cardiac arrest to the start of preservation for sustaining organ function. Within a maximum of 150 minutes
Controlled: from the time of WLST to the start of perfusion (withdrawal period+asystolic warm period)
3. Withdrawal period, agonal period
: from the time of WLST to asystole
4. Functional (true) warm ischemic period [15]
:after the implementation of WLST, from the time that one of the two conditions below is met to asystole.
(1) systolic blood pressure <50 mmHg
(2) peripheral oxygen saturation <70%
5. Asystole
: under invasive arterial blood pressure monitoring, the time that the pulse wave was lost. If invasive arterial blood pressure monitoring is unavailable, the first time that the heart rate shows “zero” on an electrocardiogram can be used.
6. No touch timea)
: from asystole, the time to observe self-resuscitation of the heart without any treatment for 5 minutes
7. Asystolic warm period, primary warm ischemic time
: time from asystole to the start of perfusion
8. Declaration of death
: take 5 minutes of no touch time after asystole. Then, a declaration of death can be made.
9. Preservation time
9. Preservation time: from the time when preservation was started to sustain organ function until organ procurement.

DCD, donation after circulatory death; WLST, withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment.

a)“Five minutes of no touch time” is consented unanimously by Korean DCD research group members.

TOOLS
Similar articles