Journal List > Lab Med Online > v.11(3) > 1147222

A Case of Therapy-related Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia Lacking t(15;17) on Karyotype
Dear Editor,
Acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) comprises 5−8% of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) [1]. The t(15;17)(q22;q12) with PML-RARA fusion transcript is reported in 90–95% of APL cases, while other structural rearrangements, including submicroscopic translocation, have been noted in the remaining cases [2]. Therapy-related myeloid neoplasms (t-MNs) comprising therapy-related AML, myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), and myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasms (MDS/MPNs) account for 10−20% of all cases of AML, MDS, and MDS/MPNs. Approximately 8–21% APL cases are therapy-related APL (t-APL), and cryptic PML-RARA rearrangement in t-APL has been rarely reported [3, 4]. Here, we report a case of cryptic t-APL patient.
A 66-year-old female patient was admitted to hospital for oral bleeding. In 2016, she was diagnosed with triple-negative breast cancer, left (stage 3, pT2N3M0, P53: 90%, Ki-67: 60%, estrogen receptor: negative, progesterone receptor: negative, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2: negative) and underwent breast conserving surgery with axillary lymph node dissection. After surgery, the patient was treated with six cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy (docetaxel, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide) for 3 months with radiation therapy.
The result of initial complete blood count revealed a hemoglobin level of 9.7 g/dL, white blood cell (WBC) count of 48.2×109/L (segmented neutrophils, 5%; band form neutrophils, 0%; lymphocytes, 3%; monocytes, 2%; eosinophils, 1%; and blast, 86%), and platelet count of 48×109/L. The bone marrow aspirate was filled with morphologically abnormal myeloblasts/promyelocytes, which accounted for 93% of all nucleated cells. These cells had azurophilic granulation and ovoid nuclei; a few of them had Auer rods (Fig. 1A). Bone marrow biopsy demonstrated a hypercellular marrow approaching 95% cellularity. Flow cytometry analysis showed that the blasts were positive for CD13 (bright); CD33, CD117, CD2, CD56 (intermediate); CD54, CD41, and CD7 (dim); and negative for CD34, TdT, HLA-DR, CD15, CD14, CD19, CD19, cCD22, CD3, cCD3, and myeloperoxidase (MPO). The karyotype of this patient was 46,XX in all 20 metaphase cells analyzed (Fig. 1B). Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis using a dual-color dual-fusion PML/RARA probe revealed two fusion signals in 496 out of 500 interphase cells; nuc ish (PML,RARA)×3 (RARA con PML×2)[496/500] (Fig. 1C). Next-generation-sequencing screening for 49 genes related to AML identified internal tandem repeats of the FLT3 gene (FLT3-ITD); the variant allele frequency (VAF) was 39% at diagnosis, as confirmed by fragment analysis. Reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) for PML-RARA rearrangement showed positive result for a fusion transcript (short form, bcr3) (Fig. 1D). Therefore, the patient was diagnosed with t-APL. Treatment with all-trans-retinoic acid (ATRA) was initiated. On the 6th day of admission, pulmonary hemorrhage and pneumonia worsened, which led to pneumonic septic shock and multi-organ failure. The patient died at day 35 after hospitalization.
To reduce life-threatening complications such as disseminated intravascular coagulation and improve treatment results, accurate and rapid diagnosis of APL is imperative and arsenic trioxide and ATRA and arsenic trioxide (ATO)-based therapies must be initiated. Chromosome analysis can detect PML-RARA fusion in about 90% of APL cases but not in cryptic APL [5], necessitating FISH or PCR to detect the abnormality of the fusion transcript. Further, APL that is PML-RAR negative in FISH is rare but does exist [6]. It seems important to perform RT-PCR test as well as chromosome analysis and FISH for clinical assessment of PML-RARA.
Mutations involving FLT3, including internal tandem duplication (ITD) and tyrosine kinase domain (TKD) mutations, occur in 35−40% of APL. The FLT3-ITD mutation is the most common and associated with higher WBC counts, microgranular granulocytes, and bcr3 breakpoint in PML [7].
The difference in survival outcomes in de novo APL or t-APL patients is controversial. In a previous study, the outcome of t-APL was similar to that of de novo APL [4]. Nevertheless, for all subtypes of AML, clinical outcomes were worse for patients with therapy-related disease [8]. Elevated WBC counts predict worse prognosis, but the FLT3-ITD mutation of APL has no significant effect on prognosis. However, a higher FLT3-ITD mutation/wild-type ratio (≥0.5%) indicated adverse prognosis [9].
To our knowledge, this is the first report of cryptic t-APL in Korea. Further study is warranted to estimate the prevalence of cryptic t-APL and to evaluate response to treatment and prognosis in t-APL patients.

Notes

Conflicts of Interest

None declared.

REFERENCES

1. Swerdlow SH, Campo E, editors. 2017. WHO classification of tumours of haematopoietic and lymphoid tissues. Revised 4th edition. International Agency for Research on Cancer;Lyon, France: p. 134–55.
2. Burns TF, Loo EY, Bengtson EM, Bao L. 2019; Cytogenetically cryptic insertion of PML segment into RARA on chromosome 17q resulting PML-RARA fusion in acute promyelocytic leukemia. Ann Hematol. 98:211–3. DOI: 10.1007/s00277-018-3399-1. PMID: 30030569.
crossref
3. Kayser S, Krzykalla J, Elliott MA, Norsworthy K, Gonzales P, Hills RK, et al. 2017; Characteristics and outcome of patients with therapy-related acute promyelocytic leukemia front-line treated with or without arsenic trioxide. Leukemia. 31:2347–54. DOI: 10.1038/leu.2017.92. PMID: 28322237. PMCID: PMC6037311.
crossref
4. Beaumont M, Sanz M, Carli PM, Maloisel F, Thomas X, Detourmignies L, et al. 2003; Therapy-related acute promyelocytic leukemia. J Clin Oncol. 21:2123–37. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2003.09.072. PMID: 12775738.
crossref
5. Kim KE, Woo KS, Kim SH, Han JY. 2009; Detection of PML/RARA rearrangement by reverse transcriptase-PCR and sequencing in a case of microgranular acute promyelocytic leukemia lacking t(15;17) on karyotype and FISH. Korean J Lab Med. 29:379–83. DOI: 10.3343/kjlm.2009.29.5.379. PMID: 19893344.
crossref
6. Kim MJ, Cho SY, Kim MH, Lee JJ, Kang SY, Cho EH, et al. 2010; FISH-negative cryptic PML-RARA rearrangement detected by long-distance polymerase chain reaction and sequencing analyses: a case study and review of the literature. Cancer Genet Cytogenet. 203:278–83. DOI: 10.1016/j.cancergencyto.2010.08.026. PMID: 21156244.
crossref
7. Breccia M, Loglisci G, Loglisci MG, Ricci R, Diverio D, Latagliata R, et al. 2013; FLT3-ITD confers poor prognosis in patients with acute promyelocytic leukemia treated with AIDA protocols: long-term follow-up analysis. Haematologica. 98:e161–3. DOI: 10.3324/haematol.2013.095380. PMID: 24323990. PMCID: PMC3856980.
crossref
8. Kayser S, Döhner K, Krauter J, Köhne CH, Horst HA, Held G, et al. 2011; The impact of therapy-related acute myeloid leukemia (AML) on outcome in 2853 adult patients with newly diagnosed AML. Blood. 117:2137–45. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2010-08-301713. PMID: 21127174.
crossref
9. Schnittger S, Bacher U, Haferlach C, Kern W, Alpermann T, Haferlach T. 2011; Clinical impact of FLT3 mutation load in acute promyelocytic leukemia with t(15;17)/PML-RARA. Haematologica. 96:1799–807. DOI: 10.3324/haematol.2011.049007. PMID: 21859732. PMCID: PMC3232262.
crossref

Fig. 1
(A) Granular promyelocytes from bone marrow aspiration smear (Wright-Giemsa stain, ×1,000). (B) Giemsa-banding karyotyping of the bone marrow cells at diagnosis reveals the karyotype 46,XX. (C) Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) study using a PML/RARA dual-color, dual-fusion translocation probe at diagnosis. Fusion signals were observed. (D) RT-PCR for PML/RARA fusion transcripts. S-form (325 bp) PML/RARA chimeric transcripts were amplified.
Abbreviation: RT-PCR, reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction.
lmo-11-3-211-f1.tif
TOOLS
Similar articles