Journal List > J Korean Med Sci > v.36(20) > 1146997

Choi, Yi, Kim, Kang, Choe, Lee, Lee, Lee, Jang, Choi, and Kim: Severe Phenotype of Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease in Pediatric Patients with Subclinical Hypothyroidism: a Retrospective Multicenter Study from Korea

Abstract

Background

It is uncertain whether non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is associated with subclinical hypothyroidism (SH) in pediatric patients. The purpose of this study was to investigated the prevalence and related factors of SH in pediatric patients with NAFLD. We also evaluate the association between liver fibrosis and SH.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed medical records for patients aged 4 to 18 years who were diagnosed with NAFLD and tested for thyroid function from January 2015 to December 2019 at 10 hospitals in Korea.

Results

The study included 428 patients with NAFLD. The prevalence of SH in pediatric NAFLD patients was 13.6%. In multivariate logistic regression, higher levels of steatosis on ultrasound and higher aspartate aminotransferase to platelet count ratio index (APRI) score were associated with increased risk of SH. Using receiver operating characteristic curves, the optimal cutoff value of the APRI score for predicting SH was 0.6012 (area under the curve, 0.67; P < 0.001; sensitivity 72.4%, specificity 61.9%, positive predictive value 23%, and negative predictive value 93.5%).

Conclusion

SH was often observed in patients with NAFLD, more frequently in patients with more severe liver damage. Thyroid function tests should be performed on pediatric NAFLD patients, especially those with higher grades of liver steatosis and fibrosis.

Graphical Abstract

jkms-36-e137-abf001.jpg

INTRODUCTION

The prevalence of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is significantly increasing in direct relation with the incidence of obesity. One study reported that nearly 30% of children with obesity had NAFLD.1 NAFLD is diagnosed when hepatic steatosis is present in imaging or histology, while excluding secondary causes of hepatic fat accumulation.2
Thyroid hormones are known to play an important role in regulating insulin resistance and lipid metabolism, which are known to affect the pathogenesis of NAFLD.3 Impaired thyroid hormone signaling reduces fatty acid utilization and the glucose-sensing machinery of β-cells in the liver, which contributes to hepatic insulin resistance.4 Other factors, such as oxidative stress, lipid peroxidation, and triglyceride accumulation, are caused by excessive thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) and induce liver damage.56 In addition, elevated TSH has a positive association with obesity through the mechanism of increasing the number of adipocytes; one study reported visceral adipose mass was the best predictor for TSH elevation.789 Thus, thyroid hormones may have a close relationship with liver disease, especially the pathogenesis of NAFLD and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH).10 In adults, subclinical hypothyroidism (SH) has been considered as a risk factor for metabolic syndrome and NAFLD. Furthermore, the possibility of liver steatosis improvement through SH treatment is also raised.1112 However, the current findings regarding the association of NAFLD with thyroid function remain controversial in children.1314
When treating NAFLD, detecting disease stage is important. In children, invasive methods such as liver biopsy can be difficult to perform. Scoring systems such as the fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) index and the aspartate aminotransferase to platelet count ratio index (APRI) can detect advanced fibrosis and disease progression more easily in patients with NAFLD.15 The clinical value of these markers is useful, so if any association were identified between these markers and SH, then TSH level could be used as a new biomarker for disease severity. A previous study reported a close relationship between thyroid function and NAFLD severity; specifically that advanced fibrosis was significantly higher in subjects with low to normal thyroid function and SH than in those with normal thyroid function.16
Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the prevalence of SH in NAFLD patients, and the association between NAFLD and SH in children. The second aim of the study was to assess the relationship between TSH elevation and liver disease severity in pediatric NAFLD patients.

METHODS

Patients and study design

Between January 2015 and December 2019, patients aged 4 to 18 years who had been diagnosed with NAFLD were included in this multicenter retrospective study, which was conducted at the pediatrics departments of 10 centers in Korea: Chungnam National University Hospital, Inje University Haeundae Paik Hospital, Chung-Ang University Hospital, Jeonbuk National University Hospital, Kyungpook National University Children's Hospital, Korea University Anam Hospital, Soonchunhyang University Bucheon Hospital, Nowon Eulji Medical Center, Keimyung University Dongsan Medical Center, and Inje University Ilsan Paik Hospital. The exclusion criteria were as follows: use of medications such as thyroid hormone and antithyroid drugs, or laboratory or clinical evidence suggesting or confirming an underlying chronic liver disease (e.g., viral hepatitis, autoimmune hepatitis, Wilson disease, or other liver disease).

Clinical and laboratory assessments

Body weight and height were measured by a trained technician, and the body mass index (BMI) was calculated by dividing the weight in kilograms by the square of the height in meters. Laboratory tests included the following: TSH, free thyroxine (FT4), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), gamma-glutamyl transferase (GTP), total cholesterol, triglyceride, low-density lipoprotein and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, and fasting glucose.
The APRI score for noninvasive markers of liver fibrosis was calculated as follows: APRI score = AST level (IU/L)/AST upper limit of normal (IU/L)/platelet count (109/L).1718

Definitions

NAFLD was diagnosed on the basis of bright or hyperechoic lesions on liver imaging and ALT level ≥ 30 IU/L.19 The degree of steatosis was classified as “mild” (grade I), “moderate” (grade II) and “severe” (grade III).20 After repeated thyroid function test, SH was defined as a serum TSH level of > 5.00 μU/L with an FT4 level between 0.90 and 1.80 ng/Dl.212223 Diabetes mellitus (DM) was defined as a fasting plasma glucose level of ≥ 126 mg/dL or a 2-hour oral glucose tolerance test result of ≥ 200 mg/dL.2425 Hypertension was defined as repeated blood pressure values at three separate visits greater than the 95th percentile for the age, sex, and height of the patient.2627
For detection of cirrhosis, using an APRI cutoff score of 2.0 was more specific (91%) but less sensitive (46%). APRI values of ≤ 0.3 and ≤ 0.5 rule out significant fibrosis and cirrhosis, respectively, and a value of ≥ 1.5 rules in significant fibrosis.1828

Statistical analysis

The data are presented as frequency and percentage for categorical variables and as the mean ± standard deviation for continuous variables. Differences in the study participants' characteristics were compared across subgroups using the χ2 test or Fisher's exact test for categorical variables and the independent t-test or Mann-Whitney's U test for continuous variables as appropriate. Differences in the study participants' characteristics were also compared across subgroups using the analysis of variance with Scheffe's post hoc test or the Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn's post hoc test as appropriate. To check if the distribution was normal, we used Shapiro-Wilk's test. Univariate and multivariate analyses using logistic regression were performed to identify prognostic factors that are independently related to SH. For the prevalence of SH in pediatric NAFLD patients, the percentage and its Blyth-Still-Casella 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to assess the sensitivity and specificity of APRI for predicting SH. All statistical analyses were carried out using SPSS 24.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA), and P values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Ethical statement

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Boards (IRB) of Inje University Haeundae Paik Hospital and all other participating centers, and informed consent was waived due to the retrospective nature of this study (IRB number 2019-12-027).

RESULTS

Prevalence of SH in pediatric NAFLD patients and Baseline characteristics

A total of 428 patients were included, of which 29.4% were female, and the overall mean age was 12.18 ± 3.14 years. The prevalence of SH in pediatric NAFLD patients was 13.6%. The prevalences of SH according to the steatosis grade of liver sonography were 1.1%, 11.0%, and 55.4% in mild, moderate, and severe, respectively.
The characteristics of the study subjects according to TSH status are shown in Table 1. In comparison by TSH status, AST and ALT levels were higher in patients with SH than in those with euthyroidism. Although there was no short stature in both groups, significantly lower height z-score was observed in the SH group. The steatosis grade of liver sonography and the APRI score, a noninvasive marker of liver fibrosis, were also significantly higher in patients with SH than in those with euthyroidism (Fig. 1). However, total cholesterol, triglyceride, HDL-cholesterol, and presence of comorbidities were not different between patients with SH and those with euthyroidism.
Table 1

Patient characteristics according to TSH levels

jkms-36-e137-i001
Variables Euthyroidism (n = 370) SH (n = 58) P value
Age, yr 12.16 ± 2.97 12.19 ± 3.31 0.761a
Female 110 (29.7) 16 (27.6) 0.739b
BMI 28.04 ± 5.00 28.40 ± 4.84 0.645a
Height for age z-score 0.83 ± 1.63 0.45 ± 1.25 0.013a
ALT, IU/L 107.56 ± 79.64 155.14 ± 132.99 0.003a
AST, U/L 61.67 ± 43.39 88.34 ± 75.15 < 0.001a
GTP, IU/L 55.71 ± 38.92 67.00 ± 37.26 0.076a
Total cholesterol, mg/dL 182.12 ± 35.64 184.25 ± 39.12 0.790a
Triglyceride, mg/dL 145.11 ± 78.80 164.13 ± 91.96 0.176a
HDL-cholesterol, mg/dL 45.39 ± 9.53 44.76 ± 9.66 0.758a
LDL-cholesterol, mg/dL 117.70 ± 31.90 116.99 ± 30.45 0.991a
Fasting glucose, mg/dL 101.08 ± 37.03 108.70 ± 54.09 0.588a
DM 40 (10.8) 9 (15.5) 0.295b
Hypertension 21 (5.7) 3 (5.2) 1.000b
Liver ultrasonography grade < 0.001b
Mild 186 (50.3) 2 (3.4)
Moderate 154 (41.6) 21 (36.2)
Severe 30 (8.1) 35 (60.3)
APRI score 0.67 ± 0.50 1.06 ± 0.89 < 0.001a
Values are displayed as either frequency with percentage in parentheses or the mean ± standard deviation. Shapiro-Wilk's test was employed to test the assumption of normality.
TSH = thyroid-stimulating hormone, SH = subclinical hypothyroidism, BMI = body mass index, ALT = alanine aminotransferase, AST = aspartate aminotransferase, GTP = gamma-glutamyl transferase, HDL = high-density lipoprotein, LDL = low-density lipoprotein, DM = diabetes mellitus, APRI = aspartate aminotransferase to platelet count ratio index.
aP values were derived from Mann-Whitney's U test; bP values were derived by Fisher's exact test.
Fig. 1

APRI score, a noninvasive marker of liver fibrosis, was significantly higher in patients with SH than in those with euthyroidism.

APRI = aspartate aminotransferase to platelet count ratio index, SH = subclinical hypothyroidism.
jkms-36-e137-g001
A comparison of parameters according to the steatosis grade as measured by ultrasonography is shown in Supplementary Table 1. Higher grades of steatosis confirmed by liver ultrasound were associated with higher levels of TSH, AST, ALT and prevalence of SH. In addition, in patients with moderate to severe grades of steatosis, BMI and GTP levels were higher than in those with mild severity, and the rate of diabetes increased.

Related factors of SH in pediatric NAFLD patients

A univariate analysis of factors associated with SH in pediatric NAFLD patients found that SH was associated with AST, ALT, steatosis grade by liver ultrasonography, and the APRI score. In multivariate analysis, SH was positively correlated with steatosis grade by liver ultrasonography and with the APRI score (Table 2). Compared to patients with euthyroidism, the proportion of APRI scores > 1.5 was significantly higher and the proportion of APRI scores < 0.5 was lower in patients with SH (Supplementary Table 2, Supplementary Fig. 1).
Table 2

Factors associated with subclinical hypothyroidism in pediatric NAFLD patients by univariate and multivariate analyses

jkms-36-e137-i002
Variables Univariate model Multivariate model
OR 95% CI P value OR 95% CI P value
Age, yr 1.03 0.91–1.10 0.940
Female 0.90 0.48–1.67 0.739
BMI 1.015 0.96–1.07 0.609
ALT, IU/L 1.05 1.02–1.10 < 0.001
AST, IU/L 1.08 1.03–1.13 < 0.001
GTP, IU/L 1.07 0.99–1.16 0.185
Total cholesterol, mg/dL 1.02 0.99–1.10 0.678
Triglyceride, mg/dL 1.03 0.99–1.06 0.117
HDL-cholesterol, mg/dL 0.99 0.95–1.03 0.684
LDL-cholesterol, mg/dL 0.99 0.99–1.01 0.881
Fasting glucose, mg/dL 1.04 0.99–1.10 0.188
DM 1.52 0.693–3.32 0.298
Hypertension 0.91 0.262–3.14 0.877
Liver ultrasonography
Grade
Mild Ref. Ref.
Moderate 12.68 2.92–54.93 < 0.001 11.72 2.69–50.90 < 0.001
Severe 108.50 24.79–474.83 < 0.001 98.35 22.4–431.9 < 0.001
APRI score 2.34 1.58–3.48 < 0.001 2.34 1.57–3.47 < 0.001
NAFLD = non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, OR = odds ratio, CI = confidence interval, BMI = body mass index, ALT = alanine aminotransferase, AST = aspartate aminotransferase, GTP = gamma-glutamyl transferase, HDL = high-density lipoprotein, LDL = low-density lipoprotein, DM = diabetes mellitus, APRI = aspartate aminotransferase to platelet count ratio index.

Cutoff value of APRI score for predicting SH

To evaluate the predictive accuracy of SH using the APRI score, area under the curve (AUC) values were calculated using an ROC curve. As a result, the APRI score was found to be significant as a predictor of SH when it was 0.6012 or higher (AUC, 0.670; P < 0.001) (Fig. 2). Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 72.4%, 61.9%, 23.0% and 93.5%, respectively (Table 3).
Fig. 2

Receiver operating characteristic curves of APRI to predict subclinical hypothyroidism.

APRI = aspartate aminotransferase to platelet count ratio index.
jkms-36-e137-g002
Table 3

Cutoff value of APRI score for predicting SH

jkms-36-e137-i003
Variables Cut-point value Group Cut-point value AUC (P value) Sensitivity, % Specificity, %
SH Euthyroidism
APRI score ≥ 0.6012 42 141 ≥ 0.6012 0.670 (< 0.001) 72.4 61.9
< 0.6012 16 229
APRI = aspartate aminotransferase to platelet count ratio index, AUC = area under the curve, SH = subclinical hypothyroidism.

DISCUSSION

In this study, SH was often shown in pediatric patients with NAFLD, and these subjects had more severe steatosis in ultrasonography and higher liver fibrosis scores.
The liver plays an important role in the metabolism of thyroid hormones, and the thyroid hormones are also important to normal hepatic function.29 Previous studies suggested that SH have been thought to be important risk factors for NAFLD.30 Thyroid hormones stimulate lipolysis to generate circulating free fatty acids, and these are the major source of lipids for the liver.31 Elevated TSH stimulates TSH receptors, which are expressed in hepatocytes and which leads to hepatosteatosis via sterol regulatory element-binding protein-1c.32
A previous study reported a higher incidence of hypothyroidism among patients with NAFLD compared to controls (21% vs. 9.5%, P < 0.01) and especially among patients with NASH (25% vs. 12.8%, P = 0.03).33 A study of Korean adults3435 found the incidence of SH to be 3.7–5.4% in the general population. Our study showed a higher prevalence of 13.6%, and the higher the steatosis grade, the higher the prevalence of SH was statistically significant.
Recent studies reported a difference by gender in the risk of NAFLD among patients with SH. The Korean adult study found males with SH to have a higher risk of NAFLD (odds ratio [OR], 2.37; 95% CI, 1.09–5.12; P = 0.029),35 while another study reported that males had a 2.8-fold increased risk of NAFLD compared with females (OR, 2.836; 95% CI, 2.177–3.694).12 However, our study showed no gender difference in the association between euthyroidism and SH.
The most important finding of our study was that SH was related to the severity of NAFLD in children. Punekar et al.36 demonstrated that there were significant correlations between the levels of TSH and the severity of liver disease. In that study, patients with liver cirrhosis had significantly higher levels of TSH, compared with the controls. TSH might influence the progression of liver fibrosis, therefore the FIB‐4 index was higher in patients with SH than in those with euthyroidism.37
Similar to these studies, SH patients had more severe fatty infiltration in ultrasonography, and an APRI score greater than 0.6012 showed increased possibility of having SH. This finding suggests more severe liver damage is seen in patients with SH and NAFLD.
Thyroid dysfunction can cause metabolic changes by altering glucose and lipid metabolism. This finding is also evident in SH.38 Higher insulin levels and insulin resistance were positively correlated with TSH levels,39 and levels of common cholesterol and triglycerides were higher in cases of NAFLD with SH or overt hypothyroidism than in those with euthyroidism.40 In our study, metabolic profiles such as triglyceride and fasting glucose and comorbid metabolic syndromes such as DM were more frequent in patients with SH than in those with euthyroidism; however, the difference was not significant. Patients with a moderate or severe degree of hepatic steatosis were more likely to have DM.
The present study has several limitations. First, the retrospective study design may have affected the analysis variables. Second, liver biopsy was not performed in this study; however, most parents refuse this invasive procedure. Third, due to multicenter retrospective study design, sonography was not performed by a single radiologist, but the degree of steatosis was classified according to the reference guideline, and SH was also defined according to the references in the same unit. Fourth, changes in the sonographic or laboratory findings of NAFLD patients related to the therapeutic effect of SH and follow-up data of thyroid function test were not studied in this study. Further well-designed studies are needed to solve these limitations. Despite these limitations, our study is valuable because, we conducted study with relatively large-scale of pediatric patients and observed significant association between SH and severe steatosis of NAFLD.
In conclusion, this multicenter pediatric study showed a close association between NALFD and SH and between more severe hepatic steatosis and the liver fibrosis score in SH. TSH elevation can be taken as a predictor of a severe NAFLD. It is important to perform a thyroid function test in patients with NAFLD and follow-up periodically.

Notes

Disclosure: The authors have no potential conflicts of interest to disclose.

Author Contributions:

  • Conceptualization: Kim HJ, Choi SY, Yi DY.

  • Data curation: Kim SC, Kang B, Lee Y, Choe BH.

  • Formal analysis: Choi SY, Lee YM, Lee EH.

  • Investigation: Choi YJ.

  • Methodology: Yi DY, Kim SC, Kang B, Jang HJ.

  • Software: Lee YM, Lee EH.

  • Validation: Choi YJ, Jang HJ, Choe BH.

  • Writing - original draft: Kim HJ, Choi SY.

  • Writing - review & editing: Kim HJ, Choi SY.

References

1. Yu EL, Golshan S, Harlow KE, Angeles JE, Durelle J, Goyal NP, et al. Prevalence of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in children with obesity. J Pediatr. 2019; 207:64–70. PMID: 30559024.
crossref
2. Chalasani N, Younossi Z, Lavine JE, Charlton M, Cusi K, Rinella M, et al. The diagnosis and management of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: practice guidance from the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases. Hepatology. 2018; 67(1):328–357. PMID: 28714183.
crossref
3. Kaltenbach TE, Graeter T, Oeztuerk S, Holzner D, Kratzer W, Wabitsch M, et al. Thyroid dysfunction and hepatic steatosis in overweight children and adolescents. Pediatr Obes. 2017; 12(1):67–74. PMID: 26877190.
crossref
4. Ferrandino G, Kaspari RR, Spadaro O, Reyna-Neyra A, Perry RJ, Cardone R, et al. Pathogenesis of hypothyroidism-induced NAFLD is driven by intra- and extrahepatic mechanisms. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017; 114(43):E9172–E9180. PMID: 29073114.
crossref
5. Ma S, Jing F, Xu C, Zhou L, Song Y, Yu C, et al. Thyrotropin and obesity: increased adipose triglyceride content through glycerol-3-phosphate acyltransferase 3. Sci Rep. 2015; 5(1):7633. PMID: 25559747.
crossref
6. Dardano A, Ghiadoni L, Plantinga Y, Caraccio N, Bemi A, Duranti E, et al. Recombinant human thyrotropin reduces endothelium-dependent vasodilation in patients monitored for differentiated thyroid carcinoma. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2006; 91(10):4175–4178. PMID: 16868055.
crossref
7. de Moura Souza A, Sichieri R. Association between serum TSH concentration within the normal range and adiposity. Eur J Endocrinol. 2011; 165(1):11–15. PMID: 21543376.
8. Muscogiuri G, Sorice GP, Mezza T, Prioletta A, Lassandro AP, Pirronti T, et al. High-normal TSH values in obesity: Is it insulin resistance or adipose tissue's guilt? Obesity (Silver Spring). 2013; 21(1):101–106. PMID: 23505173.
crossref
9. Lu S, Guan Q, Liu Y, Wang H, Xu W, Li X, et al. Role of extrathyroidal TSHR expression in adipocyte differentiation and its association with obesity. Lipids Health Dis. 2012; 11(1):17. PMID: 22289392.
crossref
10. Guo Z, Li M, Han B, Qi X. Association of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease with thyroid function: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Dig Liver Dis. 2018; 50(11):1153–1162. PMID: 30224316.
crossref
11. Yang L, Lv X, Yue F, Wei D, Liu W, Zhang T. Subclinical hypothyroidism and the risk of metabolic syndrome: a meta-analysis of observational studies. Endocr Res. 2016; 41(2):158–165. PMID: 26934475.
crossref
12. Ludwig U, Holzner D, Denzer C, Greinert A, Haenle MM, Oeztuerk S, et al. Subclinical and clinical hypothyroidism and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: a cross-sectional study of a random population sample aged 18 to 65 years. BMC Endocr Disord. 2015; 15(1):41. PMID: 26276551.
crossref
13. Eshraghian A, Hamidian Jahromi A. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and thyroid dysfunction: a systematic review. World J Gastroenterol. 2014; 20(25):8102–8109. PMID: 25009382.
crossref
14. Torun E, Özgen İT, Gökçe S, Aydın S, Cesur Y. Thyroid hormone levels in obese children and adolescents with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. J Clin Res Pediatr Endocrinol. 2014; 6(1):34–39. PMID: 24637308.
crossref
15. Siddiqui MS, Yamada G, Vuppalanchi R, Van Natta M, Loomba R, Guy C, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive fibrosis models to detect change in fibrosis stage. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019; 17(9):1877–1885.e5. PMID: 30616027.
crossref
16. Kim D, Yoo ER, Li AA, Fernandes CT, Tighe SP, Cholankeril G, et al. Low-normal thyroid function is associated with advanced fibrosis among adults in the United States. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019; 17(11):2379–2381. PMID: 30458247.
crossref
17. Wai CT, Greenson JK, Fontana RJ, Kalbfleisch JD, Marrero JA, Conjeevaram HS, et al. A simple noninvasive index can predict both significant fibrosis and cirrhosis in patients with chronic hepatitis C. Hepatology. 2003; 38(2):518–526. PMID: 12883497.
crossref
18. Loaeza-del-Castillo A, Paz-Pineda F, Oviedo-Cárdenas E, Sánchez-Avila F, Vargas-Vorácková F. AST to platelet ratio index (APRI) for the noninvasive evaluation of liver fibrosis. Ann Hepatol. 2008; 7(4):350–357. PMID: 19034235.
crossref
19. Vos MB, Abrams SH, Barlow SE, Caprio S, Daniels SR, Kohli R, et al. NASPGHAN clinical practice guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in children: recommendations from the Expert Committee on NAFLD (ECON) and the North American Society of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition (NASPGHAN). J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2017; 64(2):319–334. PMID: 28107283.
crossref
20. Brunt EM, Janney CG, Di Bisceglie AM, Neuschwander-Tetri BA, Bacon BR. Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis: a proposal for grading and staging the histological lesions. Am J Gastroenterol. 1999; 94(9):2467–2474. PMID: 10484010.
crossref
21. Brabant G, Beck-Peccoz P, Jarzab B, Laurberg P, Orgiazzi J, Szabolcs I, et al. Is there a need to redefine the upper normal limit of TSH? Eur J Endocrinol. 2006; 154(5):633–637. PMID: 16645008.
crossref
22. Kaplowitz PB. Subclinical hypothyroidism in children: normal variation or sign of a failing thyroid gland? Int J Pediatr Endocrinol. 2010; 2010:281453. PMID: 20628588.
crossref
23. Karmisholt J, Andersen S, Laurberg P. Variation in thyroid function in subclinical hypothyroidism: importance of clinical follow-up and therapy. Eur J Endocrinol. 2011; 164(3):317–323. PMID: 21208994.
crossref
24. American Diabetes Association. Diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care. 2008; 31(Suppl 1):S55–S60. PMID: 18165338.
25. American Diabetes Association. Screening for type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2004; 27(Suppl 1):S11–S14. PMID: 14693922.
26. Falkner B, Gidding SS, Portman R, Rosner B. Blood pressure variability and classification of prehypertension and hypertension in adolescence. Pediatrics. 2008; 122(2):238–242. PMID: 18676538.
crossref
27. Flynn JT, Kaelber DC, Baker-Smith CM, Blowey D, Carroll AE, Daniels SR, et al. Clinical practice guideline for screening and management of high blood pressure in children and adolescents. Pediatrics. 2017; 140(3):e20171904. PMID: 28827377.
28. Chou R, Wasson N. Blood tests to diagnose fibrosis or cirrhosis in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus infection: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med. 2013; 158(11):807–820. PMID: 23732714.
29. Huang MJ, Liaw YF. Clinical associations between thyroid and liver diseases. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1995; 10(3):344–350. PMID: 7548816.
crossref
30. He W, An X, Li L, Shao X, Li Q, Yao Q, et al. Relationship between hypothyroidism and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2017; 8:335. PMID: 29238323.
crossref
31. Sinha RA, Singh BK, Yen PM. Direct effects of thyroid hormones on hepatic lipid metabolism. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2018; 14(5):259–269. PMID: 29472712.
crossref
32. Yan F, Wang Q, Lu M, Chen W, Song Y, Jing F, et al. Thyrotropin increases hepatic triglyceride content through upregulation of SREBP-1c activity. J Hepatol. 2014; 61(6):1358–1364. PMID: 25016220.
crossref
33. Pagadala MR, Zein CO, Dasarathy S, Yerian LM, Lopez R, McCullough AJ. Prevalence of hypothyroidism in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Dig Dis Sci. 2012; 57(2):528–534. PMID: 22183820.
crossref
34. Kim TH, Kim KW, Ahn HY, Choi HS, Won H, Choi Y, et al. Effect of seasonal changes on the transition between subclinical hypothyroid and euthyroid status. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2013; 98(8):3420–3429. PMID: 23771919.
crossref
35. Lee J, Ha J, Jo K, Lim DJ, Lee JM, Chang SA, et al. Male-specific association between subclinical hypothyroidism and the risk of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease estimated by hepatic steatosis index: Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2013 to 2015. Sci Rep. 2018; 8(1):15145. PMID: 30310098.
crossref
36. Punekar P, Sharma AK, Jain A. A study of thyroid dysfunction in cirrhosis of liver and correlation with severity of liver disease. Indian J Endocrinol Metab. 2018; 22(5):645–650. PMID: 30294575.
37. Tahara K, Akahane T, Namisaki T, Moriya K, Kawaratani H, Kaji K, et al. Thyroid-stimulating hormone is an independent risk factor of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. JGH Open. 2019; 4(3):400–404. PMID: 32514444.
crossref
38. Pearce EN. Update in lipid alterations in subclinical hypothyroidism. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2012; 97(2):326–333. PMID: 22205712.
crossref
39. Vyakaranam S, Vanaparthy S, Nori S, Palarapu S, Bhongir AV. Study of insulin resistance in subclinical hypothyroidism. Int J Health Sci Res. 2014; 4(9):147–153. PMID: 25580384.
40. Feisa SV, Chopei IV. Subclinical hypothyroidism in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease at the background of carbohydrate metabolism disorders. Wiad Lek. 2018; 71(2 pt 1):261–264.

SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIALS

Supplementary Table 1

Comparison of parameters according to severity grade of steatosis measured by liver ultrasonography
jkms-36-e137-s001.doc

Supplementary Table 2

Comparison of parameters according to APRI score
jkms-36-e137-s002.doc

Supplementary Fig. 1

The proportion of patients in each category of APRI score.
jkms-36-e137-s003.doc
TOOLS
Similar articles