Journal List > J Korean Med Sci > v.36(16) > 1146956

Kim, Cho, Park, Ahn, Park, Jang, Choi, Lee, Yang, Song, Choi, Choi, Gwon, Lee, and Hahn: Long-term Outcomes of Clopidogrel Monotherapy versus Prolonged Dual Antiplatelet Therapy beyond 12 Months after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in High-risk Patients

Abstract

Background

There are no data on comparison between clopidogrel monotherapy and prolonged dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in patients at high-risk undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

Methods

Of 2,082 consecutive patients undergoing PCI using second-generation drug-eluting stent (DES), we studied 637 patients at high-risk either angiographically or clinically who received clopidogrel longer than 24 months and were event-free at 12 months after index PCI. Patients were divided into 2 groups: the clopidogrel monotherapy group and the prolonged DAPT group. The primary outcome was a composite of all-cause death, non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI), definite or probable stent thrombosis, or stroke between 12 months and 36 months after the index PCI.

Results

In propensity score-matched population (246 pairs), the cumulative rate of primary outcome was 4.5% in the clopidogrel monotherapy group and 4.9% in the prolonged DAPT group (hazard ratio, 1.21; 95% confidence interval, 0.54–2.75; P = 0.643). There was no significant difference in all-cause death, MI, stent thrombosis, stroke between the clopidogrel monotherapy group and the prolonged DAPT group.

Conclusion

Compared with prolonged DAPT, clopidogrel monotherapy showed similar long-term outcomes in patients at high-risk after second-generation DES implantation.

Graphical Abstract

jkms-36-e106-abf001.jpg

INTRODUCTION

Current major guidelines recommend dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) for 6 months in stable ischemic heart disease and 12 months in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) after drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation.123 Nevertheless, the optimal duration of DAPT is still under debate. Prolonged DAPT beyond 12 months significantly reduces ischemic events, but increases the risk of bleeding and does not reduce mortality compared with aspirin monotherapy in the previous studies.45 There is a growing interest in P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy to mitigate both ischemic and bleeding risks and several randomized trials demonstrated that P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy following shorter duration DAPT was comparable to standard DAPT in terms of preventing ischemic events.67 However, patients undergoing complex percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or those at clinically high-risk such as myocardial infarction (MI) or diabetes may have benefit from DAPT longer than 12 months.8910 In the Ticagrelor with Aspirin or Alone in High-Risk Patients after Coronary Intervention (TWILIGHT) trial, ticagrelor monotherapy was associated with a lower incidence of clinically relevant bleeding than ticagrelor plus aspirin, with no higher risk of death, MI, or stroke in high-risk patients.11 Yet, prolonged use of ticagrelor is indicated in highly selected population.5 In real world practice, clopidogrel is the most frequently prescribed P2Y12 inhibitor, especially beyond 1 year after PCI.12 Up to the present, evidences are scanty regarding treatment effects of clopidogrel monotherapy, compared with prolonged DAPT, after PCI for high-risk patients. In the present study, we investigated long-term outcomes of high-risk patients receiving clopidogrel monotherapy versus prolonged DAPT after implantation of second-generation DES.

METHODS

Study population

Consecutive patients who underwent PCI with at least one second-generation DES for stable angina or ACS between April 2006 and December 2010 were enrolled.
Of these, patients at high-risk who were alive and did not have MI, repeat revascularization, stroke, or major bleeding at the 12-month follow-up after the index procedure were included. High-risk patients required at least one of adverse clinical factors or one of angiographic characteristics as described in previous studies.111314 Clinical high-risk criteria were an age of at least 65 years, female sex, ACS, established vascular disease, diabetes mellitus on medication, and chronic kidney disease.13 Angiographic high-risk criteria included multivessel coronary artery disease, a total stent length of more than 30 mm, a thrombotic target lesion, a bifurcation lesion treated with two stents, an obstructive left main or proximal left anterior descending (LAD) lesion, chronic total occlusion, in-stent restenosis and a calcified target lesion treated with atherectomy.81115 Patients were excluded if they received vitamin K antagonist or antiplatelet agents other than aspirin or clopidogrel. Second-generation DESs were defined as the Biomatrix (Biosensors Europe, Morges, Switzerland), Endeavor, Endeavor Resolute, Endeavor Sprint (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA), Nobori (Terumo Corporation, Tokyo, Japan), Promus, Promus Element (Boston Scientific, Natick, MA, USA), Xience, or Xience Prime (Abbott Vascular, Abbott Park, IL, USA), PICO Elite (AMG vascular product S.R.L, Winsen, Germany).

Data collection

Data in regard to clinical outcome and PCI procedure were collected from the prospective PCI registry of Samsung Medical Center. Patients were routinely followed up at 1, 6, and 12 months after the index procedure and every year afterwards. Additional telephone contact or reviewing medical records were done to determine antiplatelet therapy duration and compliance of antiplatelet therapy, if necessary. Mortality data were confirmed by the National Population Registry of the Korea National Statistical Office.

Treatment group

Patients were categorized into two groups according to anti-platelet treatment status at 24 months after index PCI: the clopidogrel group (aspirin discontinued within 24 months) and the prolonged DAPT group (prolonged DAPT more than 24 months). Decisions on the discontinuation of aspirin after 12 month-DAPT following the index PCI were at the attending physicians' discretion. During this study, clopidogrel was the only P2Y12 inhibitor available in Korea.

Outcomes and definitions

The primary outcome was a major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular event (MACCE), a composite of all-cause death, non-fatal MI, definite or probable stent thrombosis, or stroke over 24 months after landmark analysis (12–36 months after the index PCI). Secondary outcomes were the individual components of the MACCE, target vessel revascularization (TVR), target lesion revascularization (TLR), major bleeding and the composite of MACCE and major bleeding.
Cause of deaths were assumed to be cardiac unless an explicit non-cardiac cause was found. MI was defined as elevated cardiac enzyme (troponin I or MB fraction of creatine kinase) level, greater than the upper normal limit with ischemic symptoms or electrocardiographic changes suggesting myocardial ischemia or, MI that required hospitalization with a chief diagnosis of MI.16 Stent thrombosis was defined as the Academic Research Consortium (ARC) criteria.17 Stroke was defined as neurological deficit requiring hospitalization with clinically relevant lesions on brain imaging. TVR was defined as any repeat PCI in the target vessel, while TLR was defined as repeat PCI in the previous stent or occurring within 5 mm of the stent.18 Major bleeding was defined as Bleeding ARC (BARC) criteria type 3 or 5 bleeding. Minor bleeding was defined as BARC type 2 bleeding.19

Statistical analysis

Categorical variables were expressed as number and percentage and compared using χ2 test. Normally distributed continuous variables were presented as mean and standard deviation and compared using unpaired t-test. Non-normally distributed continuous variables were presented as median and interquartile range (IQR) and compared by Wilcoxon rank sum test. Survival curves were drawn between groups using Kaplan-Meier model, and significant differences were calculated using log-rank tests. The Cox proportional hazard model was used to test whether prolonged DAPT was an independent predictor of clinical outcomes. To reduce treatment-selection bias for DAPT and potential confounding factors, we performed propensity score (PS) matching analysis. PSs were obtained by multiple logistic regression in which the antiplatelet regimen is used as the outcome variable, and the selected covariates as predictors. Co-variates which were used for propensity matching are following: age, sex, diabetes, hypertension, current smoking, chronic kidney disease, dyslipidemia, presentation as ACS on the index procedure, history of previous PCI, history of MI, history of previous stroke, PCI on left main artery or LAD artery, 2 or more target vessels, complex PCI, number of stent used, total stent length, stent diameter, use of statin, beta-blockers, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers, and calcium channel blockers. The propensity matching was considered to be adequate when overall balance was achieved, indicated by having a standardized mean difference < 0.2. The clopidogrel group and the DAPT group were matched by 1:1 nearest neighbor algorithm. The matched data set was compared by Cox regression model for clinical outcomes. Subgroup analyses were done to assess the treatment effects of prolonged DAPT on the primary end point, compared with clopidogrel monotherapy. The subgroups were age, ACS, ST-segment elevation MI, diabetes, chronic kidney disease, total stent length 28 mm or longer, 2 or more target vessels, and types of DES.
All P values were two-tailed, and P values < 0.05 were considered significant. All data were analyzed using the SPSS version 25 (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA) and R 3.3.3 (R foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria) through SPSS custom dialogue.

Ethics statement

The Samsung Medical Center Institutional Review Board approved this study and waived the requirement for written informed consent for access to an institutional PCI registry (reference number 2013-12-031). The study procedures followed the Declaration of Helsinki and the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation.

RESULTS

Patient characteristics

2,082 patients had PCI with at least one second-generation DES during the study period. Of these, 62 were excluded because of receiving vitamin K antagonist or antiplatelet agents other than aspirin or clopidogrel after index PCI. 308 patients with ischemic or bleeding events and 1,005 patients who stopped clopidogrel within 12 months after the index procedure were excluded. Seventy patients who did not meet the criteria for high-risk PCI at the index procedure were excluded. Finally, 637 patients were included in the present study. Patients were divided into the two groups according to antiplatelet regimens: the clopidogrel monotherapy group and the prolonged DAPT group (Fig. 1). Using the PS matching method, we created 246 matched pairs of patients.
Fig. 1

Study design and population.

PCI = percutaneous coronary intervention, DAPT = dual antiplatelet therapy.
jkms-36-e106-g001
Baseline clinical characteristics are presented in Table 1. There was no significant difference in baseline clinical characteristics, except stent type. Zotarolimus eluting stents were more frequently used in the prolonged DAPT group in the overall population. In the PS-matched population, no significant differences were observed in baseline characteristics between the clopidogrel monotherapy group and the prolonged DAPT group. Angiographic and procedural characteristics are presented in Table 2. In the overall population, multivessel PCI was performed more frequently in the clopidogrel monotherapy group compared with the prolonged DAPT group. The number of stents which were used at the index PCI were significantly greater in the clopidogrel monotherapy group. In the PS-matched population, no significant differences were observed in the angiographic or procedural data between the two groups. Median DAPT duration was 14.7 months (IQR, 5.5) in the clopidogrel monotherapy group and 36.0 months (IQR, 7.5) in the prolonged DAPT group (P < 0.0001) (Table 3).
Table 1

Baseline characteristics

jkms-36-e106-i001
Variables Overall population (n = 637) Propensity score-matched population (n = 492)
Clopidogrel (n = 266) DAPT (n = 371) P value Clopidogrel (n = 246) DAPT (n = 246) P value
Age, yr 63.51 ± 11.26 62.71 ± 11.02 0.370 63.19 ± 11.30 63.30 ± 10.98 0.913
Sex, male 203 (76.3) 266 (71.7) 0.192 185 (75.2) 187 (76.0) 0.834
Diagnosis at index PCI 0.556 0.658
Stable angina 135 (50.8) 193 (52.0) 125 (50.8) 128 (50.0)
Unstable angina 68 (25.6) 65 (17.5) 54 (22.0) 48 (19.5)
NSTEMI 34 (12.8) 55 (14.8) 30 (12.2) 39 (15.9)
STEMI 39 (14.7) 58 (15.6) 37 (15.0) 38 (15.4)
ACS at index PCI 131 (49.2) 178 (48.0) 0.752 121 (49.1) 125 (50.8) 0.718
Stent type 0.001 0.343
Everolimus eluting stent 168 (63.2) 170 (45.8) 150 (61.0) 134 (54.5)
Zotarolimus eluting stent 92 (34.6) 191 (51.5) 91 (3.7) 103 (4.2)
Other stents 6 (2.3) 10 (2.7) 5 (2.0) 9 (3.7)
Hypertension 179 (67.3) 221 (59.6) 0.047 164 (66.7) 162 (65.9) 0.849
Diabetes mellitus 130 (48.9) 177 (47.7) 0.772 118 (48.0) 120 (48.8) 0.857
Current smoker 68 (25.6) 82 (22.1) 0.310 62 (25.2) 53 (21.5) 0.338
Chronic kidney diseasea 24 (9.0) 35 (9.4) 0.860 21 (8.5) 24 (9.8) 0.639
Dyslipidemia 107 (40.2) 141 (38.0) 0.571 98 (39.8) 96 (39.0) 0.854
History of PCI 34 (12.8) 65 (17.5) 0.104 32 (13.0) 30 (12.2) 0.786
History of MI 54 (20.3) 80 (21.6) 0.700 48 (19.5) 51 (20.7) 0.736
History of stroke 19 (7.1) 17 (4.6) 0.168 17 (6.9) 12 (4.9) 0.339
Statin 203 (76.3) 289 (77.9) 0.639 189 (76.8) 187 (76.0) 0.832
Beta blocker 154 (57.9) 207 (55.8) 0.598 139 (56.5) 143(58.1) 0.715
RAS blockade 162 (60.9) 248 (66.8) 0.122 153 (62.2) 162 (65.9) 0.453
Calcium channel blocker 57 (21.4) 89 (24.0) 0.448 51 (20.7) 64 (26.0) 0.513
Values are presented as mean ± standard deviation or number of patient (%).
PCI = percutaneous coronary intervention, NSTEMI = non-ST elevation myocardial infarct, STEMI = ST elevation myocardial infarct, ACS = acute coronary syndrome, MI = myocardial infarction, RAS = renin-angiotensin system, DAPT = dual anti-platelet therapy.
aChronic kidney disease was defined if an estimated glomerular filtration rate is below 40 mL/min/1.73 m2 before procedure or a patient was on maintenance dialysis.
Table 2

Angiographic and procedural characteristics

jkms-36-e106-i002
Variables Overall population (n = 637) Propensity score-matched population (n = 492)
Clopidogrel (n = 266) DAPT (n = 371) P value Clopidogrel (n = 246) DAPT (n = 246) P value
LM or LAD PCI 173 (65.0) 212 (57.1) 0.044** 156 (63.4) 153 (62.2) 0.780
Multi-vessel PCI 96 (36.1) 104 (28.0) 0.031** 83 (33.7) 84 (34.1) 0.924
Complex PCIa 148 (55.6) 218 (58.8) 0.432 135 (54.9) 146 (59.3) 0.316
Total stent numbers 1.71 ± 0.91 1.55 ± 0.89 0.027** 1.68 ± 0.90 1.68 ± 1.00 1.000
Total stent length, mm 39.17 ± 22.61 35.28 ± 23.30 0.036** 38.55 ± 22.56 38.87 ± 25.92 0.885
Average stent diameter, mm 3.11 ± 0.42 3.10 ± 0.44 0.735 3.11 ± 0.42 3.08 ± 0.45 0.502
Values are presented as mean ± standard deviation or number of patient (%).
LM = left main, LAD = left anterior descending, PCI = percutaneous coronary intervention, DAPT = dual anti-platelet therapy.
aComplex PCI: chronic total occlusion, bifurcation, thrombotic occlusion, and in stent restenosis PCI.
**P < 0.05.
Table 3

Adherence to antiplatelet regimen in the study population

jkms-36-e106-i003
Clopidogrel (n = 266) DAPT (n = 371) P value
Duration of DAPT, median in mon. 14.7 (5.5) 36.0 (7.5) < 0.001**
At 24 months after index PCI Clopidogrel monotherapy 261 (100.0) Clopidogrel monotherapy 0 (0.0) < 0.001**
Aspirin monotherapy 0 (0.0) Aspirin monotherapy 0 (0.0)
DAPT 0 (0.0) DAPT 366 (100.0)
Total No. = 261 Total No. = 366
At 30 months after index PCI Clopidogrel monotherapy 251 (97.3) Clopidogrel monotherapy 62 (17.2) < 0.001**
Aspirin monotherapy 7 (2.7) Aspirin monotherapy 24 (6.7)
DAPT 0 (0.0) DAPT 273 (76.0)
Total No. = 258 Total No. = 359
Values are presented as median (interquartile range) or number of patient (%).
DAPT = dual anti-platelet therapy, PCI = percutaneous coronary intervention.
**P < 0.001.

Long-term outcomes of the overall and PS-matched populations

In the overall population, the risk of MACCE was not significantly different between the clopidogrel monotherapy and prolonged DAPT groups (4.5% versus 4.6%; adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 0.87; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.40–1.87; P = 0.714) (Fig. 2A and Table 4). In addition, no significant differences were also observed in all-cause death, cardiovascular death, non-fatal MI, stent thrombosis, stroke. There was no significant difference in terms of major bleeding events between the two groups, either (clopidogrel versus DAPT: 1.1% versus 0.3%, P = 0.353), while minor bleeding (BARC type 2) events were reported more frequently in the clopidogrel group (5.6% versus 1.1%; HR, 0.17; 95% CI, 0.05–0.55; P = 0.003) (Table 4).
Fig. 2

Kaplan-Meier survival curves of the (A) overall population and (B) PS-matched population. Analyses starting 12 months after the index percutaneous coronary intervention show event rates of MACCEs.

MACCE = major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular event, DAPT = dual antiplatelet therapy, PS = propensity score.
jkms-36-e106-g002
Table 4

Landmark analysis of Cox regression model for survival and risk of clinical outcomes over 3 years after index percutaneous coronary intervention

jkms-36-e106-i004
Adverse events Overall population (n = 637) Propensity score-matched population (n = 492)
Clopidogrel (n = 266) DAPT (n = 371) Adjusted HRa (95% CI) P value Clopidogrel (n = 246) DAPT (n = 246) HR (95% CI) P value
MACCEb 12 (4.5) 17 (4.6) 0.87 (0.40–1.87) 0.714 11 (4.5) 12 (4.9) 1.21 (0.54–2.75) 0.643
All-cause death 8 (3.0) 6 (1.6) 0.47 (0.15–1.49) 0.202 7 (2.8) 5 (2.0) 0.81 (0.26–2.54) 0.714
All-cause death or non-fatal MI 10 (3.8) 12 (3.2) 0.81 (0.33–1.97) 0.645 9 (3.7) 10 (4.1) 1.25 (0.51–3.07) 0.631
Cardiovascular death 1 (0.4) 2 (0.5) 0.599 1 (0.4) 2 (0.8) 0.498
Non-fatal MI 2 (0.8) 6 (1.6) 0.361 2 (0.8) 2 (0.8) 0.919
Probable/definite stent thrombosis 1 (0.4) 1 (0.3) 0.673 1 (0.4) 0 (0.0) 0.610
Stroke 2 (0.8) 2 (0.5) 0.860 2 (0.8) 2 (0.8) 0.938
BARC type 3 or 5 bleeding 3 (1.1) 1 (0.3) 0.353 3 (1.2) 1 (0.4) 0.341
BARC type 2 15 (5.6) 4 (1.1) 0.17 (0.05–0.55) 0.003 15 (6.1) 3 (1.2) 0.19 (0.06–0.66) 0.009
TVR 12 (4.5) 21 (5.7) 1.14 (0.55–2.38) 0.727 11 (4.5) 12 (4.9) 1.10 (0.49–2.49) 0.820
TLR 3 (1.1) 15 (4.0) 2.91 (0.81–10.52) 0.092 2 (0.8) 8 (3.3) 4.05 (0.86–19.07) 0.077
MACCE plus BARC type 3 or 5 bleeding 12 (4.5) 18 (4.9) 1.02 (0.47–2.19) 0.968 11 (4.5) 12 (4.9) 1.14 (0.50–2.58) 0.760
Values are presented as number of patient (%).
MACCE = major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular event, MI = myocardial infarction, DAPT = dual anti-platelet therapy, HR = hazard ratio, CI = confidence interval, BARC = Bleeding Academic Research Consortium, TVR = target vessel revascularization, TLR = target lesion revascularization; PCI = percutaneous coronary intervention.
aAdjusted for age, sex, acute coronary syndrome during index admission, hypertension, diabetes, current smoker, chronic kidney disease, dyslipidemia, previous PCI, left main or left anterior descending artery as treated vessel, multi-vessel PCI, complex PCI, total stent numbers, and total stent length; bA composite of all-cause death, non-fatal MI, or stroke.
In the PS-matched population, the risk of MACCE (4.5% versus 4.9%; HR, 1.21; 95% CI, 0.54–2.75; P = 0.643) was not significantly different between the two groups. All-cause mortality, cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarct, stent thrombosis, stroke, major bleeding, and the composite of MACCE and major bleeding were not significantly different between the two groups, although minor bleeding events were more frequently observed in the clopidogrel group (Fig. 2B and Table 4)
In subgroup analyses, prolonged DAPT did not show significant treatment effect in each subgroup, compared with clopidogrel monotherapy (Supplementary Table 1).

DISCUSSION

In the present study, we investigated the long-term outcomes of patients receiving clopidogrel monotherapy versus prolonged DAPT after PCI. Clopidogrel monotherapy and prolonged DAPT more than 12 months had similar long-term risk of MACCE in patients at high-risk undergoing PCI with second-generation DESs. This result was consistent after PS-matching.
Several studies reported the benefit of prolonged DAPT with regard to reduction of recurrent ischemic events among patients at high-risk such as those undergoing complex PCI or with ACS or diabetes.910152021 However, the risk reduction of ischemic events was not translated into mortality benefit, and an increased risk of bleeding is observed with prolonged DAPT.451021
To overcome this dilemma, P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy after short duration of DAPT has recently been considered as a new alternative strategy of antiplatelet therapy after PCI with newer generation DES.6711 Several randomized trials demonstrated that P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy after shorter DAPT had superior outcomes by means of reducing bleeding complication without increasing ischemic events.7 However, the implication of the SMART-CHOICE and STOPDAPT2 trial for high-risk group is limited, as patients with relatively low risk were included in those studies despite enrollment criteria for broad spectrum of patients.67 Although the TWILIGHT trial demonstrated that the high-risk patients treated with ticagrelor monotherapy had less bleeding events than those treated with ticagrelor and aspirin, with similar adverse ischemic events, long-term outcomes of ticagrelor monotherapy beyond 1 years after the index PCI is lacking.11 Above all, potent P2Y12 inhibitors such as ticagrelor and prasugrel are rarely used beyond 1 year after PCI and clopidogrel is the most frequently prescribed P2Y12 inhibitor in real world practice.12 Therefore, we compared the long-term outcomes of clopidogrel monotherapy with prolonged DAPT for high-risk patients after implantation of second-generation DES. Our study adds valuable information on appropriate long-term antiplatelet strategy for high-risk patients after PCI.
In the present study, clopidogrel monotherapy after standard 12-month DAPT, compared with prolonged DAPT longer than 12 months, did not increase ischemic events among high-risk patients. There are several possible explanations for this observation. First, excellent performance of the second-generation DES might lessen the benefit of prolonged DAPT, even among patients at high-risk. The risk of very late stent thrombosis after implantation of the second-generation DES was remarkably low in patients with ACS during long-term follow-up.22 Therefore, clopidogrel monotherapy might suffice even for high-risk patients. Second, patients who had adverse events within 1 year after the index PCI were excluded in our study. Those who did not have ischemic events during first 12 months after PCI might be good responders to clopidogrel therapy and aspirin might have provided little additional inhibition of platelet aggregation for our patients.23 Third, the anti-ischemic efficacy of clopidogrel might be superior to that of aspirin. Clopidogrel monotherapy was associated with reduced risk of recurrent ischemic events with a similar risk of bleeding when compared with aspirin monotherapy beyond 1 year after the index PCI in an observational study.24
Unexpectedly, reduced bleeding risk by clopidogrel monotherapy compared to prolonged DAPT was not demonstrated in the present study. The two groups had similar major bleeding events, while minor bleeding events were more frequently observed in the clopidogrel group. Our study had limited power due to small sample size, and relatively low event rate. The difference of major bleeding event rate between the two groups might have not reached to statistical significance. Also, patients who had ischemic or bleeding events within 12 months after PCI were excluded in our study. Thus, patients with higher bleeding risk might have been excluded and the bleeding risk of prolonged DAPT might have been underestimated in the present study.
This study had several limitations. First, its design was non-randomized observational study, which might have affected the results because of confounding factors. The duration of DAPT was determined by the discretion of attending physicians and it might have affected outcomes. Despite of adjustment using multivariable and PS matching analysis, the possible confounders might not have been completely excluded. Second, with the relatively small sample size, clinical events rate was too low to guarantee our conclusion. Nonetheless, the population of this study was a part of our prospective PCI registry and all events were tracked prospectively. Low event rate in our study is consistent with the excellent long-term outcomes of PCI from other recent studies.425 Third, only clopidogrel was prescribed as a P2Y12 inhibitor for the DAPT regimen, because P2Y12 receptor inhibitors such as ticagrelor or prasugrel were not available in Korea during the study period. However, ticagrelor and prasugrel are indicated only in patients with ACS and are not frequently prescribed beyond 1 year after PCI.
In our observational study, clopidogrel monotherapy and prolonged DAPT have similar long-term risk of MACCE in patients at high-risk undergoing PCI with second-generation DESs. Our data suggest that long-term maintenance clopidogrel monotherapy, rather than prolonged DAPT, can be a promising alternative antiplatelet strategy after PCI for high-risk patients. Further randomized trials should be performed to confirm our suggestion.

Notes

Funding: This work was supported by the 2018 Inje University research grant.

Disclosure: The authors have no potential conflicts of interest to disclose.

Author Contributions:

  • Conceptualization: Hahn JY, Park KT, Choi JH, Choi SH, Lee SH, Gwon HC.

  • Data curation: Cho SW, Park TK, Jang YH, Choi KH, Ahn JH.

  • Formal analysis: Kim DY, Cho SW, Lee JM, Yang JH, Song YB.

  • Writing - original draft: Kim DY, Cho SW.

  • Writing - review & editing: Kim DY, Hahn JY, Park KT.

References

1. Levine GN, Bates ER, Bittl JA, Brindis RG, Fihn SD, Fleisher LA, et al. 2016 ACC/AHA guideline focused update on duration of dual antiplatelet therapy in patients with coronary artery disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on clinical practice guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016; 68(10):1082–1115. PMID: 27036918.
2. Valgimigli M, Bueno H, Byrne RA, Collet JP, Costa F, Jeppsson A, et al. 2017 ESC focused update on dual antiplatelet therapy in coronary artery disease developed in collaboration with EACTS: the task force for dual antiplatelet therapy in coronary artery disease of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2018; 39(3):213–260. PMID: 28886622.
3. Knuuti J, Wijns W, Saraste A, Capodanno D, Barbato E, Funck-Brentano C, et al. 2019 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of chronic coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J. 2020; 41(3):407–477. PMID: 31504439.
4. Mauri L, Kereiakes DJ, Yeh RW, Driscoll-Shempp P, Cutlip DE, Steg PG, et al. Twelve or 30 months of dual antiplatelet therapy after drug-eluting stents. N Engl J Med. 2014; 371(23):2155–2166. PMID: 25399658.
crossref
5. Bonaca MP, Bhatt DL, Cohen M, Steg PG, Storey RF, Jensen EC, et al. Long-term use of ticagrelor in patients with prior myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 2015; 372(19):1791–1800. PMID: 25773268.
crossref
6. Hahn JY, Song YB, Oh JH, Chun WJ, Park YH, Jang WJ, et al. Effect of P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy vs dual antiplatelet therapy on cardiovascular events in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: the SMART-CHOICE randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2019; 321(24):2428–2437. PMID: 31237645.
7. Watanabe H, Domei T, Morimoto T, Natsuaki M, Shiomi H, Toyota T, et al. Effect of 1-month dual antiplatelet therapy followed by clopidogrel vs 12-month dual antiplatelet therapy on cardiovascular and bleeding events in patients receiving PCI: the STOPDAPT-2 randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2019; 321(24):2414–2427. PMID: 31237644.
8. Giustino G, Chieffo A, Palmerini T, Valgimigli M, Feres F, Abizaid A, et al. Efficacy and safety of dual antiplatelet therapy after complex PCI. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016; 68(17):1851–1864. PMID: 27595509.
crossref
9. Cho SW, Park K, Ahn JH, Park TK, Lee SY, Kim J, et al. Extended clopidogrel therapy beyond 12 months and long-term outcomes in patients with diabetes mellitus receiving coronary arterial second-generation drug-eluting stents. Am J Cardiol. 2018; 122(5):705–711. PMID: 30057226.
crossref
10. Hahn JY, Song YB, Oh JH, Cho DK, Lee JB, Doh JH, et al. 6-month versus 12-month or longer dual antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute coronary syndrome (SMART-DATE): a randomised, open-label, non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2018; 391(10127):1274–1284. PMID: 29544699.
crossref
11. Mehran R, Baber U, Sharma SK, Cohen DJ, Angiolillo DJ, Briguori C, et al. Ticagrelor with or without aspirin in high-risk patients after PCI. N Engl J Med. 2019; 381(21):2032–2042. PMID: 31556978.
crossref
12. Shin DH, Kang HJ, Jang JS, Moon KW, Song YB, Park DW, et al. The current status of percutaneous coronary intervention in Korea: based on year 2014 & 2016 cohort of Korean percutaneous coronary intervention (K-PCI) registry. Korean Circ J. 2019; 49(12):1136–1151. PMID: 31347316.
13. Yeh RW, Secemsky EA, Kereiakes DJ, Normand SL, Gershlick AH, Cohen DJ, et al. Development and validation of a prediction rule for benefit and harm of dual antiplatelet therapy beyond 1 year after percutaneous coronary intervention. JAMA. 2016; 315(16):1735–1749. PMID: 27022822.
crossref
14. Baber U, Mehran R, Giustino G, Cohen DJ, Henry TD, Sartori S, et al. Coronary thrombosis and major bleeding after PCI with drug-eluting stents: risk scores from PARIS. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016; 67(19):2224–2234. PMID: 27079334.
15. Costa F, Adamo M, Ariotti S, Ferrante G, Navarese EP, Leonardi S, et al. Left main or proximal left anterior descending coronary artery disease location identifies high-risk patients deriving potentially greater benefit from prolonged dual antiplatelet therapy duration. EuroIntervention. 2016; 11(11):e1222–30. PMID: 26342472.
crossref
16. Thygesen K, Alpert JS, Jaffe AS, Simoons ML, Chaitman BR, White HD, et al. Third universal definition of myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J. 2012; 33(20):2551–2567. PMID: 22922414.
crossref
17. Cutlip DE, Windecker S, Mehran R, Boam A, Cohen DJ, van Es GA, et al. Clinical end points in coronary stent trials: a case for standardized definitions. Circulation. 2007; 115(17):2344–2351. PMID: 17470709.
18. Stolker JM, Kennedy KF, Lindsey JB, Marso SP, Pencina MJ, Cutlip DE, et al. Predicting restenosis of drug-eluting stents placed in real-world clinical practice: derivation and validation of a risk model from the EVENT registry. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2010; 3(4):327–334. PMID: 20606136.
19. Mehran R, Rao SV, Bhatt DL, Gibson CM, Caixeta A, Eikelboom J, et al. Standardized bleeding definitions for cardiovascular clinical trials: a consensus report from the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium. Circulation. 2011; 123(23):2736–2747. PMID: 21670242.
20. Jang WJ, Ahn SG, Song YB, Choi SH, Chun WJ, Oh JH, et al. Benefit of prolonged dual antiplatelet therapy after implantation of drug-eluting stent for coronary bifurcation lesions: results from the coronary bifurcation stenting registry II. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2018; 11(7):e005849. PMID: 30006330.
crossref
21. Bhatt DL, Steg PG, Mehta SR, Leiter LA, Simon T, Fox K, et al. Ticagrelor in patients with diabetes and stable coronary artery disease with a history of previous percutaneous coronary intervention (THEMIS-PCI): a phase 3, placebo-controlled, randomised trial. Lancet. 2019; 394(10204):1169–1180. PMID: 31484629.
22. Yoshikawa S, Ashikaga T, Miyazaki T, Kurihara K, Hirao K. Long-term efficacy and safety of everolimus-eluting stent implantation in Japanese patients with acute coronary syndrome: five-year real-world data from the Tokyo-MD PCI study. J Interv Cardiol. 2019; 2019:3146848. PMID: 31777468.
crossref
23. Armstrong PC, Leadbeater PD, Chan MV, Kirkby NS, Jakubowski JA, Mitchell JA, et al. In the presence of strong P2Y12 receptor blockade, aspirin provides little additional inhibition of platelet aggregation. J Thromb Haemost. 2011; 9(3):552–561. PMID: 21143373.
crossref
24. Park TK, Song YB, Ahn J, Carriere KC, Hahn JY, Yang JH, et al. Clopidogrel versus aspirin as an antiplatelet monotherapy after 12-month dual-antiplatelet therapy in the era of drug-eluting stents. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2016; 9(1):e002816. PMID: 26755571.
crossref
25. Navarese EP, Andreotti F, Schulze V, Kołodziejczak M, Buffon A, Brouwer M, et al. Optimal duration of dual antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention with drug eluting stents: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ. 2015; 350:h1618. PMID: 25883067.
crossref

SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL

Supplementary Table 1

Subgroup analyses for the effect of prolonged DAPT on the primary end point
jkms-36-e106-s001.pdf
TOOLS
Similar articles