1. Kahrilas PJ, Ghosh SK, Pandolfino JE. 2008; Esophageal motility disorders in terms of pressure topography: the Chicago Classification. J Clin Gastroenterol. 42:627–635. DOI:
10.1097/MCG.0b013e31815ea291. PMID:
18364587. PMCID:
PMC2895002.
2. Clouse RE, Staiano A, Alrakawi A, Haroian L. 2000; Application of topographical methods to clinical esophageal manometry. Am J Gastroenterol. 95:2720–2730. DOI:
10.1111/j.1572-0241.2000.03178.x. PMID:
11051340.
3. Pandolfino JE, Ghosh SK, Rice J, Clarke JO, Kwiatek MA, Kahrilas PJ. 2008; Classifying esophageal motility by pressure topography characteristics: a study of 400 patients and 75 controls. Am J Gastroenterol. 103:27–37. DOI:
10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01532.x. PMID:
17900331.
4. Kahrilas PJ, Bredenoord AJ, Fox M, et al. 2015; The Chicago Classification of esophageal motility disorders, v3.0. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 27:160–174. DOI:
10.1111/nmo.12477. PMID:
25469569. PMCID:
PMC4308501.
5. Yadlapati R, Kahrilas PJ, Fox MR, et al. 2021; Esophageal motility disorders on high-resolution manometry: Chicago classification version 4.0
©. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 33:e14058. DOI:
10.1111/nmo.14058. PMID:
33373111.
6. Donnan EN, Pandolfino JE. 2020; EndoFLIP in the esophagus: assessing sphincter function, wall stiffness, and motility to guide treatment. Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 49:427–435. DOI:
10.1016/j.gtc.2020.04.002. PMID:
32718562. PMCID:
PMC7387752.
7. Acharya S, Halder S, Carlson DA, et al. 2021; Assessment of esophageal body peristaltic work using functional lumen imaging probe panometry. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 320:G217–G226. DOI:
10.1152/ajpgi.00324.2020. PMID:
33174457.

8. Hirano I, Pandolfino JE, Boeckxstaens GE. 2017; Functional lumen imaging probe for the management of esophageal disorders: expert review from the clinical practice updates Committee of the AGA Institute. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 15:325–334. DOI:
10.1016/j.cgh.2016.10.022. PMID:
28212976. PMCID:
PMC5757507.
9. Fox MR, Bredenoord AJ. 2008; Oesophageal high-resolution manometry: moving from research into clinical practice. Gut. 57:405–423. DOI:
10.1136/gut.2007.127993. PMID:
17895358.
10. Ghosh SK, Pandolfino JE, Rice J, Clarke JO, Kwiatek M, Kahrilas PJ. 2007; Impaired deglutitive EGJ relaxation in clinical esophageal manometry: a quantitative analysis of 400 patients and 75 controls. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 293:G878–G885. DOI:
10.1152/ajpgi.00252.2007. PMID:
17690172.

11. Pandolfino JE, Kwiatek MA, Nealis T, Bulsiewicz W, Post J, Kahrilas PJ. 2008; Achalasia: a new clinically relevant classification by high-resolution manometry. Gastroenterology. 135:1526–1533. DOI:
10.1053/j.gastro.2008.07.022. PMID:
18722376. PMCID:
PMC2894987.
12. Ghoshal UC, Rangan M. 2011; A review of factors predicting outcome of pneumatic dilation in patients with achalasia cardia. J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 17:9–13. DOI:
10.5056/jnm.2011.17.1.9. PMID:
21369487. PMCID:
PMC3042226.
13. Jung HK, Hong SJ, Lee OY, et al. 2020; 2019 Seoul consensus on esophageal achalasia guidelines. J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 26:180–203. DOI:
10.5056/jnm20014. PMID:
32235027. PMCID:
PMC7176504.
14. Benjamin SB, Gerhardt DC, Castell DO. 1979; High amplitude, peristaltic esophageal contractions associated with chest pain and/or dysphagia. Gastroenterology. 77:478–483. DOI:
10.1016/0016-5085(79)90008-8. PMID:
456842.
15. Drane WE, Johnson DA, Hagan DP, Cattau EL Jr. 1987; "Nutcracker" esophagus: diagnosis with radionuclide esophageal scintigraphy versus manometry. Radiology. 163:33–37. DOI:
10.1148/radiology.163.1.3823454. PMID:
3823454.
16. Jung KW, Jung HY, Yoon IJ, et al. 2010; Basal and residual lower esophageal pressures increase in old age in classic achalasia, but not vigorous achalasia. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 25:1452–1455. DOI:
10.1111/j.1440-1746.2010.06298.x. PMID:
20659237.

17. Jung KW, Jung HY, Myung SJ, et al. 2015; The effect of age on the key parameters in the Chicago classification: a study using high-resolution esophageal manometry in asymptomatic normal individuals. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 27:246–257. DOI:
10.1111/nmo.12482. PMID:
25521290.
18. Agrawal A, Hila A, Tutuian R, Mainie I, Castell DO. 2006; Clinical relevance of the nutcracker esophagus: suggested revision of criteria for diagnosis. J Clin Gastroenterol. 40:504–509. DOI:
10.1097/00004836-200607000-00008. PMID:
16825932.
19. Jung KW, Jung HY, Yoon IJ, et al. 2010; New diagnostic criteria for nutcracker esophagus using conventional water-perfused manometry: a comparison between nutcracker esophagus with and without gastroesophageal reflux disease. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 25:1239–1243. DOI:
10.1111/j.1440-1746.2010.06301.x. PMID:
20594250.

20. Roman S, Pandolfino JE, Chen J, Boris L, Luger D, Kahrilas PJ. 2012; Phenotypes and clinical context of hypercontractility in high-resolution esophageal pressure topography (EPT). Am J Gastroenterol. 107:37–45. DOI:
10.1038/ajg.2011.313. PMID:
21931377. PMCID:
PMC3641840.
21. Xiao Y, Carlson DA, Lin Z, Alhalel N, Pandolfino JE. 2018; Jackhammer esophagus: assessing the balance between prepeak and postpeak contractile integral. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 30:e13262. DOI:
10.1111/nmo.13262. PMID:
29193439. PMCID:
PMC6317707.

22. Xiao Y, Carlson DA, Lin Z, Pandolfino JE. 2020; Chaotic peak propagation in patients with Jackhammer esophagus. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 32:e13725. DOI:
10.1111/nmo.13725. PMID:
31532046. PMCID:
PMC7082896.

23. de Bortoli N, Gyawali PC, Roman S, et al. 2021; Hypercontractile esophagus from pathophysiology to management: proceedings of the pisa symposium. Am J Gastroenterol. 116:263–273. DOI:
10.14309/ajg.0000000000001061. PMID:
33273259.
24. Pandolfino JE, Roman S, Carlson D, et al. 2011; Distal esophageal spasm in high-resolution esophageal pressure topography: defining clinical phenotypes. Gastroenterology. 141:469–475. DOI:
10.1053/j.gastro.2011.04.058. PMID:
21679709. PMCID:
PMC3626105.
25. Lin Z, Kahrilas PJ, Roman S, Boris L, Carlson D, Pandolfino JE. 2012; Refining the criterion for an abnormal integrated relaxation pressure in esophageal pressure topography based on the pattern of esophageal contractility using a classification and regression tree model. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 24:e356–e363. DOI:
10.1111/j.1365-2982.2012.01952.x. PMID:
22716041. PMCID:
PMC3616504.

26. Herregods TV, Roman S, Kahrilas PJ, Smout AJ, Bredenoord AJ. 2015; Normative values in esophageal high-resolution manometry. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 27:175–187. DOI:
10.1111/nmo.12500. PMID:
25545201.
27. Rengarajan A, Rogers BD, Wong Z, et al. 2020; Oct. 31. High-resolution manometry thresholds and motor patterns among asymptomatic individuals. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. [Epub ahead of print]. DOI:
10.1016/j.cgh.2020.10.052. PMID:
33144149.

28. Triggs JR, Carlson DA, Beveridge C, et al. 2019; Upright integrated relaxation pressure facilitates characterization of esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 17:2218–2226.e2. DOI:
10.1016/j.cgh.2019.01.024. PMID:
30708108. PMCID:
PMC6663640.
29. Shaker A, Stoikes N, Drapekin J, Kushnir V, Brunt LM, Gyawali CP. 2013; Multiple rapid swallow responses during esophageal high-resolution manometry reflect esophageal body peristaltic reserve. Am J Gastroenterol. 108:1706–1712. DOI:
10.1038/ajg.2013.289. PMID:
24019081. PMCID:
PMC4091619.
30. Carlson DA, Roman S. 2018; Esophageal provocation tests: are they useful to improve diagnostic yield of high resolution manometry? Neurogastroenterol Motil. 30:e13321. DOI:
10.1111/nmo.13321. PMID:
29603510.

31. Min YW, Shin I, Son HJ, Rhee PL. 2015; Multiple rapid swallow maneuver enhances the clinical utility of high-resolution manometry in patients showing ineffective esophageal motility. Medicine (Baltimore). 94:e1669. DOI:
10.1097/MD.0000000000001669. PMID:
26448010. PMCID:
PMC4616734.

32. Blonski W, Hila A, Jain V, Freeman J, Vela M, Castell DO. 2007; Impedance manometry with viscous test solution increases detection of esophageal function defects compared to liquid swallows. Scand J Gastroenterol. 42:917–922. DOI:
10.1080/00365520701245702. PMID:
17613920.
33. Wong U, Person EB, Castell DO, von Rosenvinge E, Raufman JP, Xie G. 2018; Improving high-resolution impedance manometry using novel viscous and super-viscous substrates in the supine and upright positions: a pilot study. J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 24:570–576. DOI:
10.5056/jnm18010. PMID:
30122029. PMCID:
PMC6175560.
34. Araujo IK, Roman S, Napoléon M, Mion F. 2020; Diagnostic yield of adding solid food swallows during high-resolution manometry in esophageal motility disorders. Neurogastroenterol Motil. e14060. DOI:
10.1111/nmo.14060. PMID:
33314459.

35. Ang D, Hollenstein M, Misselwitz B, et al. 2017; Rapid drink challenge in high-resolution manometry: an adjunctive test for detection of esophageal motility disorders. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 29(1):DOI:
10.1111/nmo.12902. PMID:
27420913.

36. Marin I, Caballero N, Guarner-Argente C, Serra J. 2018; Rapid drink challenge test for the clinical evaluation of patients with Achalasia. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 30:e13438. DOI:
10.1111/nmo.13438. PMID:
30101425.

37. Hsing LC, Jung KW. 2020; Role of the rapid drink challenge test in esophageal motility disorder diagnosis. J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 26:167–168. DOI:
10.5056/jnm20035. PMID:
32235024. PMCID:
PMC7176506.
38. Krause AJ, Su H, Triggs JR, et al. 2020 ; Oct. 11. Multiple rapid swallows and rapid drink challenge in patients with esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction on high-resolution manometry. Neurogastroenterol Motil. [Epub ahead of print]. DOI:
10.1111/nmo.14000. PMID:
33043557. PMCID:
PMC7902305.

41. Ratuapli SK, Crowell MD, DiBaise JK, et al. 2015; Opioid-induced esophageal dysfunction (OIED) in patients on chronic opioids. Am J Gastroenterol. 110:979–984. DOI:
10.1038/ajg.2015.154. PMID:
26032150.

42. Ravi K, Murray JA, Geno DM, Katzka DA. 2016; Achalasia and chronic opiate use: innocent bystanders or associated conditions? Dis Esophagus. 29:15–21. DOI:
10.1111/dote.12291. PMID:
25604060.
43. Jung KW, Kraichely RE, Arora AS, Katzka DA, Romero Y, Murray JA. 2011; Manometric characteristics of opioid esophageal dysmotility disorder by high-resolution manometry. Gastroenterology. 140:S–229. DOI:
10.1016/S0016-5085(11)60925-6.

46. Kim GH, Jung KW. 2019; The role of opioids and alcohol in the development of achalasia type III and esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction. J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 25:177–178. DOI:
10.5056/jnm19047. PMID:
30982237. PMCID:
PMC6474699.
47. Kim GH, Jung KW, Jung HY, et al. 2019; Superior clinical outcomes of peroral endoscopic myotomy compared with balloon dilation in all achalasia subtypes. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 34:659–665. DOI:
10.1111/jgh.14616. PMID:
30695124.
48. Murray JA, Ledlow A, Launspach J, Evans D, Loveday M, Conklin JL. 1995; The effects of recombinant human hemoglobin on esophageal motor functions in humans. Gastroenterology. 109:1241–1248. DOI:
10.1016/0016-5085(95)90584-7. PMID:
7557091.
49. Ghosh SK, Janiak P, Fox M, Schwizer W, Hebbard GS, Brasseur JG. 2008; Physiology of the oesophageal transition zone in the presence of chronic bolus retention: studies using concurrent high resolution manometry and digital fluoroscopy. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 20:750–759. DOI:
10.1111/j.1365-2982.2008.01129.x. PMID:
18422907.
50. Pohl D, Ribolsi M, Savarino E, et al. 2008; Characteristics of the esophageal low-pressure zone in healthy volunteers and patients with esophageal symptoms: assessment by high-resolution manometry. Am J Gastroenterol. 103:2544–2549. DOI:
10.1111/j.1572-0241.2008.02062.x. PMID:
18684179.
51. Ghosh SK, Pandolfino JE, Kwiatek MA, Kahrilas PJ. 2008; Oesophageal peristaltic transition zone defects: real but few and far between. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 20:1283–1290. DOI:
10.1111/j.1365-2982.2008.01169.x. PMID:
18662328. PMCID:
PMC2886597.
52. Jung KW, Jung HY, Romero Y, Katzka D, Murray JA. 2011; Impact of display alternatives in the determination of bolus handling: a study using high-resolution manometry with impedance. Am J Gastroenterol. 106:1854–1857. DOI:
10.1038/ajg.2011.233. PMID:
21979209.
53. Rommel N, Van Oudenhove L, Tack J, Omari TI. 2014; Automated impedance manometry analysis as a method to assess esophageal function. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 26:636–645. DOI:
10.1111/nmo.12308. PMID:
24447538.
54. Singendonk MJ, Lin Z, Scheerens C, et al. 2019; High-resolution impedance manometry parameters in the evaluation of esophageal function of non-obstructive dysphagia patients. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 31:e13505. DOI:
10.1111/nmo.13505. PMID:
30426609.

55. Lin Z, Nicodème F, Lin CY, et al. 2014; Parameters for quantifying bolus retention with high-resolution impedance manometry. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 26:929–936. DOI:
10.1111/nmo.12346. PMID:
24750336. PMCID:
PMC4120956.

56. Carlson DA, Beveridge CA, Lin Z, et al. 2018; Improved assessment of bolus clearance in patients with achalasia using high-resolution impedance manometry. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 16:672–680.e1. DOI:
10.1016/j.cgh.2017.11.019. PMID:
29155168. PMCID:
PMC5911237.
57. Gong EJ, Choi K, Jung KW, et al. 2020; New parameter for quantifying bolus transit with high-resolution impedance manometry: a comparison with simultaneous esophagogram. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 32:e13847. DOI:
10.1111/nmo.13847. PMID:
32299145.

58. Yadlapati R, Pandolfino JE, Fox MR, Bredenoord AJ, Kahrilas PJ. 2021; What is new in Chicago Classification version 4.0? Neurogastroenterol Motil. 33:e14053. DOI:
10.1111/nmo.14053. PMID:
33340190.

59. Rao SS, Gregersen H, Hayek B, Summers RW, Christensen J. 1996; Unexplained chest pain: the hypersensitive, hyperreactive, and poorly compliant esophagus. Ann Intern Med. 124:950–958. DOI:
10.7326/0003-4819-124-11-199606010-00002. PMID:
8624062.
60. Gregersen H, Vinter-Jensen L, Juhl CO, Dajani EZ. 1996; Impedance planimetric characterization of the distal oesophagus in the Goettingen minipig. J Biomech. 29:63–68. DOI:
10.1016/0021-9290(95)00016-X. PMID:
8839018.
61. Kwiatek MA, Pandolfino JE, Hirano I, Kahrilas PJ. 2010; Esophagogastric junction distensibility assessed with an endoscopic functional luminal imaging probe (EndoFLIP). Gastrointest Endosc. 72:272–278. DOI:
10.1016/j.gie.2010.01.069. PMID:
20541755. PMCID:
PMC3019759.
62. Savarino E, di Pietro M, Bredenoord AJ, et al. 2020; Use of the functional lumen imaging probe in clinical esophagology. Am J Gastroenterol. 115:1786–1796. DOI:
10.14309/ajg.0000000000000773. PMID:
33156096.
63. Carlson DA, Lin Z, Kahrilas PJ, et al. 2015; The functional lumen imaging probe detects esophageal contractility not observed with manometry in patients with achalasia. Gastroenterology. 149:1742–1751. DOI:
10.1053/j.gastro.2015.08.005. PMID:
26278501. PMCID:
PMC4663149.
64. Carlson DA, Lin Z, Rogers MC, Lin CY, Kahrilas PJ, Pandolfino JE. 2015; Utilizing functional lumen imaging probe topography to evaluate esophageal contractility during volumetric distention: a pilot study. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 27:981–989. DOI:
10.1111/nmo.12572. PMID:
25898916. PMCID:
PMC4478241.
65. Teitelbaum EN, Soper NJ, Pandolfino JE, et al. 2015; Esophagogastric junction distensibility measurements during Heller myotomy and POEM for achalasia predict postoperative symptomatic outcomes. Surg Endosc. 29:522–528. DOI:
10.1007/s00464-014-3733-1. PMID:
25055891. PMCID:
PMC4343529.
66. Ponds FA, Bredenoord AJ, Kessing BF, Smout AJ. 2017; Esophagogastric junction distensibility identifies achalasia subgroup with manometrically normal esophagogastric junction relaxation. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 29(1):DOI:
10.1111/nmo.12908. PMID:
27458129.

67. Carlson DA, Kahrilas PJ, Lin Z, et al. 2016; Evaluation of esophageal motility utilizing the functional lumen imaging probe. Am J Gastroenterol. 111:1726–1735. DOI:
10.1038/ajg.2016.454. PMID:
27725650. PMCID:
PMC5224528.