Journal List > J Korean Med Sci > v.36(15) > 1146773

Park, Park, Park, Lee, Kim, Kim, Won, Kong, Kim, Shin, and Paek: Long-term Outcome of Microscopic Transsphenoidal Surgery for Prolactinomas as an Alternative to Dopamine Agonists

Abstract

Background

Although long-term dopamine agonist (DA) therapy is recommended as a first-line treatment for prolactinoma, some patients may prefer surgical treatment because of the potential adverse effects of long-term medication, or the desire to become pregnant. This study aimed to determine whether surgical treatment of prolactinomas could be an alternative to DA therapy.

Methods

In this retrospective study, 96 consecutive patients (74 female, 22 male) underwent primary pituitary surgery without long-term DA treatment for prolactinomas at a single institution from 1990 to 2010. All patients underwent primary surgical treatment in the microscopic transsphenoidal approach (TSA).

Results

The median age and median follow-up period were 31 (16–73) years and 139.1 (12.2–319.6) months, respectively. An initial overall remission was accomplished in 47.9% (46 of 96 patients, 33 macroadenomas, and 13 microadenomas) of patients. DA dose reduction was achieved in all patients after TSA. A better remission rate was independently predicted by lower diagnostic prolactin levels and by a greater extent of surgical resection. Overall remission at the last follow-up was 33.3%, and the overall recurrence rate was 30.4%. The permanent complication rate was 3.1%, and there was no mortality.

Conclusion

TSA can be considered a safe and potentially curative treatment for selective microprolactinomas as an alternative to treatment with a long-term DA.

Graphical Abstract

jkms-36-e97-abf001.jpg

INTRODUCTION

Endocrine Society guidelines recommend long-term dopamine agonist (DA) treatment as a first-line approach to treating prolactinoma.1 However, despite the high therapeutic effect of DA,234 surgical approaches are preferred for several reasons: 1) potential side effects of long-term DA medication, 2) intolerance of DA, 3) nonresponders to DA. Approximately one-third of patients treated with DA complained of side effects such as nausea, vomiting, headache, and dizziness.5 Recently, the increased risk of cardiac valve disease in patients treated with long-term cabergoline was reported.67 Furthermore, relapse of hyperprolactinemia has been shown in several studies.8910
On the one hand, pituitary surgery reported higher than 80% of long-term remission rates for patients with microprolactinomas.111213 According to this literature, prolactin (PRL) levels return to normal, and gonadal dysfunctions are recovered after complete surgical resection. Additionally, the development of pituitary surgery has markedly improved the clinical outcomes during the last two decades.1415 The surgical morbidity rate for prolactinomas is infrequent and has been reported to be less than 1% in specialized pituitary centers.1213151617 Notably, the microscopic transsphenoidal approach (TSA) for prolactinomas is accepted for a distinct number of indications, namely, nonresponders to medical therapy, those with an intolerance for DA, and those with neurologic deficits, such as rapid loss of vision or cranial nerve palsy due to tumor hemorrhage or apoplexy. We focused on evaluating surgical outcomes in patients with prolactinomas who opted for primary pituitary surgery instead of long-term therapy with DA.

METHODS

Patient selection

Clinical data, such as age and sex, were retrieved from electronic medical records. This retrospective study included a consecutive series of 96 patients who underwent primary pituitary surgery without prior DA treatment for prolactinomas at the Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University Hospital, between June 1990 and December 2010. The indication for first-line pituitary surgery for all the patients in this study was a patient's preference for surgery rather than long-term DA therapy. We excluded all cases of residual and/or recurrent prolactinomas. A microprolactinoma was defined as a tumor of 1–10 mm; a macroprolactinoma was a lesion of 10–20 mm in diameter. The preoperative data included history and physical examination, PRL levels, and the results of imaging studies. All operations were performed by TSA while the patients were in a supine position.

Hormonal assessment

PRL measurements were performed at the Department of Laboratory Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital. To check PRL, a radioimmunoassay (RIAKEY Prolactin IRMA Tube; Shin Jin Medics, Goyang, Korea) was used to measure the serum PRL level; normal PRL levels were considered to be 5–20 ng/mL and 5–25 ng/mL for men and women, respectively. Complete remission (CR) was defined as a normalized PRL level below 20 μg/L the morning after surgery. Long-term follow-up PRL levels, which were determined at the discretion of the referring physician, and clinical symptoms of hyperprolactinemia were obtained by the patient's referring physician. We defined a radiologic recurrence as local progression observed on radiologic images and a biologic recurrence as hyperprolactinemia (> 20 μg/L) during the follow-up period.

Assessment of invasion into the cavernous sinus

We have adapted the Knosp grading system to evaluate the cavernous sinus invasion of prolactinomas. The Knosp classification includes five grades: 1) grade 0, no invasion with all of the lesion medial to the cavernous carotid artery; 2) grade 1, invasion extending to, but not past, the medial aspect of the cavernous carotid artery; 3) grade 2, invasion extending to, but not past, the lateral aspect of the cavernous carotid artery; 4) grade 3, invasion past the lateral aspect of the cavernous carotid artery, but not completely filling the cavernous sinus; 5) grade 4, tumor completely filling the cavernous sinus both medial and lateral to the cavernous carotid artery.18

Statistical analysis

Values are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation or median (range). The χ2 test or Fisher's exact test were used to compare categorical data. Cox proportional hazard models were used to analyze the recurrence predictors. Cox proportional hazard models were used to analyze the predictive variables for CR after TSA. The Kaplan-Meier survival curves for remission after surgery are presented based on the selection criteria. SPSS software (version 22.0; SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) was used for statistical analyses. The cut-off level for significance was set at P < 0.05.

Ethics statement

This study was approved by the ethics committee of our hospital, and written informed consent was waived due to its retrospective design (Institutional Review Board No. H1805-031-944).

RESULTS

This consecutive series consisted of 74 female and 22 male patients. The median age of the patients was 31 years with a range from 16 to 73 years. The median follow-up period was 139.1 months for all patients (range, 12.2–319.6 months). Twenty patients (20.8%) harbored microprolactinomas, and 76 patients (79.2%) harbored macroprolactinomas. Of these patients, 52 patients underwent subtotal resection and 44 had gross total resection. The median preoperative PRL level was 434.8 ng/mL (range, 24.3–25,000 ng/mL). After TSA, the values of PRL dropped significantly from a median 86.8 ng/mL (range, 1–18,500 ng/mL). All of the patients who underwent TSA achieved surgical reduction as well as a DA dose decrease. There was no need for further treatment of 25 patients after surgery, and 57 patients continued to receive reduced dose of DA, 13 received postoperative radiotherapy, and one received Gamma Knife radiosurgery. There were postoperative complications in 17 patients (17.7%), but none of them had permanent disabilities and there was no mortality. In detail, 7 patients (7.3%) had transient diabetes insipidus lasting up to one week. Postoperative bleeding was recorded in 4 patients (4.2%), cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage in 3 patients (3.1%), and panhypopituitarism in 3 patients (3.1%). Table 1 describes the demographic characteristics of the patients in the study.
Table 1

Patient characteristics and clinical outcomes after microscopic transsphenoidal approach for prolactinomas

jkms-36-e97-i001
Characteristics Values
Age, yr 31 (16–73)
Sex
Male 22 (22.9)
Female 74 (77.1)
Subset of prolactinoma
Micro- 20 (20.8)
Macro- 76 (79.2)
Degree of surgical resection
Subtotal resection 52 (54.2)
Gross total resection 44 (45.8)
Postoperative treatment
Medication 57 (59.4)
Radiotherapy 13 (13.5)
Gamma knife radiosurgery 1 (1.0)
None 25 (26.1)
Postoperative complications 17 (17.7)
Transient SIADH 7 (7.3)
Wound bleeding 4 (4.2)
CSF leakage 3 (3.1)
Panhypopituitarism 3 (3.1)
Data represented as median (range) or number (%).
SIADH = syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone secretion, CSF = cerebrospinal fluid.
Following surgery, a normalization of the PRL values was achieved in 46 of 96 patients (47.9%). Among them, 25 patients achieve CR after surgery, and the remaining 21 patients achieved CR within six months using reduced dosage DAs. However, 50 patients did not achieve CR during the follow-up. In fact, 21 patients had recurrence during the follow-up period, and the final CR rate was 26% (25/96) at the last follow-up. We compared several factors associated with the outcomes of patients who achieved CR and those who did not (Table 2). CR was not correlated with sex, age, visual symptoms, or postoperative radiotherapy. The PRL level at diagnosis was significantly higher in the no remission group than that in the remission group. Particularly, a PRL level greater than 1,000 ng/mL was statistically associated with no remission after surgery. Although for macroprolactinomas were only able to identify their trends without significant differences, the rate of gross total resection and less frequent invasion of the cavernous sinus were significantly higher in the remission group (P < 0.001, Table 2). Surgical outcomes are given in Table 3. There were statistically significant differences between the extent of resection and the Knosp classification (P < 0.001).
Table 2

Comparison of clinical outcome after microscopic transsphenoidal approach

jkms-36-e97-i002
Characteristics Remission (n = 46) No remission (n = 50) P value
Female 38 36 0.218
Age at diagnosis, yr 33.23 ± 8.45 33.12 ± 11.84 0.934a
PRL level at diagnosis 501.50 ± 759.82 3,625.20 ± 5,596.76 < 0.001a
High PRL level, ≥ 1,000 ng/dL 5 27 < 0.001
Macroprolactinoma 33 43 0.089
Cavernous sinus invasion 6 21 < 0.001
Gross total resection 30 14 < 0.001
Visual field defect 7 13 0.193
Preoperative DA 22 16 0.113
Postoperative RT 5 9 0.322
Data are shown as mean ± standard deviation or number of patients.
PRL = prolactin, DA = dopamine agonist, RT = radiotherapy.
aStandard t-test.
Table 3

Tumor resection according to the Knosp classification

jkms-36-e97-i003
Knosp classification Extent of resection (No., % among Knosp classification) P value
Gross total resection Subtotal resection
Grade 0 40 (90.0) 4 (10.0) < 0.001
Grade 1 15 (60.0) 10 (40.0)
Grade 2 5 (38.5) 8 (61.5)
Grade 3 4 (40.0) 6 (60.0)
Grade 4 1 (25.0) 3 (75.0)
Of the 96 patients who underwent TSA, 76 patients had a macroprolactinoma (79.2%, Table 4). Patients with microprolactinomas had significantly lower pre- and postoperative PRL levels than patients with macroprolactinomas (Fig. 1). However, the PRL reduction rate after TSA showed no statistically significant difference (77.01% in microprolactinoma vs. 70.02% in macroprolactinoma, P = 0.268). In the microprolactinoma group, 13 patients achieved surgical CR (13/20, 65%), nine of whom improved immediately after surgery. Compared to the microprolactinoma group, surgical CR was achieved in 33 patients (33/76, 43.4%), and 16 of them improved immediately after surgery. The remaining 17 patients achieved CR within six months. There were no patients with radiologic recurrences among the microprolactinomas, but six patients with macroprolactinomas had a radiologic recurrence. Of the six macroprolactinoma patients who showed a radiologic recurrence, three patients failed to complete the treatment, and three patients achieved CR and then experienced a recurrence. Biological recurrence was observed in four patients with microprolactinoma and 17 patients with macroprolactinoma. Therefore, the recurrence-free CR rate was 69.2% (9/13) in microprolactinomas and 39.4% (13/33) in macroprolactinomas, which was a statistically significant difference (P = 0.037).
Table 4

Characteristics of patient with micro- and macroprolactinoma

jkms-36-e97-i004
Characteristics Microprolactinoma (n = 20) Macroprolactinoma (n = 76) P value
Age (yr) 31.55 ± 6.18 33.61 ± 11.11 0.273
Female 20 (100.0) 54 (71.1) 0.009
Serum prolactin, ng/mL
Preoperative 277.65 ± 214.39 2,425.76 ± 4,768.10 0.001
Postoperative 64.22 ± 78.08 747.86 ± 2,238.14 0.008
Surgical remission 13 (65.0) 33 (43.4) 0.091
Immediate 9 (45.0) 16 (21.0) 0.033
Long-term 4 (20.0) 17 (22.4) 0.819
Radiologic recurrence 0 (0.0) 6 (7.9) 0.342
Biologic recurrence 4 (20.0) 17 (22.4) 0.821
Recurrence-free CR 9 (45.0) 13 (17.1) 0.037
Data represented as mean ± standard deviation or number of patients (%).
CR = complete remission.
Fig. 1

Changes in PRL level after microscopic transsphenoidal approach.

PRL = prolactin.
jkms-36-e97-g001
We conducted Cox-proportional hazard model analysis to identify the predictors for remission after surgery (Table 5). We included several variables that had been considered significant in other studies as well as the significant parameters presented in Table 4. Higher PRL levels at diagnosis and the presence of gross total resection were statistically significant as predictors for patients who achieved surgical CR after TSA. The results obtained from the adjusted Cox-proportional hazard model indicate that the initial PRL level at diagnosis was significant (P = 0.001). The patients who had a greater than 1000 ng/dL PRL at diagnosis had 81% less hazard in comparison with the patients who had lower PRL levels (hazard ratio, 0.19; confidence interval, 0.07–0.54). Kaplan-Meier survival curves for CR after endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal approach showed statistically significant differences according to the extent of surgery (P < 0.001, Fig. 2).
Table 5

Predictors for surgical complete remission after microscopic transsphenoidal approach

jkms-36-e97-i005
Characteristics Unadjusted Adjusted
HR (95% CI) P value HR (95% CI) P value
Microprolactinoma 1.33 (0.64–2.77) 0.438
Female 0.76 (0.52–1.13) 0.221
Higher than 1,000 ng/dL of PRL level 0.21 (0.07–0.64) 0.007 0.19 (0.07–0.54) 0.001
With cavernous invasion 0.59 (0.22–1.62) 0.309
Gross total resection 2.70 (1.05–7.14) 0.039 1.90 (0.95–3.79) 0.037
With preoperative dopamine agonist 1.67 (0.88–3.15) 0.123
With postoperative radiotherapy 2.05 (0.63–6.65) 0.234
With preoperative neurologic symptom 0.96 (0.36–2.52) 0.928
With visual field defect 1.28 (0.44–3.73) 0.647
Adjusted HR adjusted for PRL level ≥ 1,000 ng/dL and gross total resection.
HR = hazard ratio, CI = confidence interval, PRL = prolactin.
Fig. 2

Kaplan-Meier survival curves for complete remission after microscopic transsphenoidal approach.

jkms-36-e97-g002

DICUSSION

It is beyond doubt that DA treatment is the first-line approach for prolactinomas. However, as the Committee recommended, there are cases in which surgical treatment is needed.1920 Additionally, recent developments in surgery have further reduced the incidence of complications, leading to an era in which a new approach is needed in regard to the usefulness of surgical treatment of prolactinoma. From that point of view, our study provides a basis for reconsidering the use of surgery as a treatment for prolactinoma.
A recent meta-analysis demonstrated that transsphenoidal surgery could be an alternative first-line treatment for patients with prolactinomas, especially microprolactinomas.21 The authors showed that a long-term remission rate was achieved in 88% of the surgery group compared with 52% of the DA group. Particularly, long-term remission after surgery for microprolactinomas was higher than that for macroprolactinomas (91% vs. 77%). Unfortunately, our results were inconsistent, with 47.9% CR rate and a 47.8% recurrence-free CR rate. However, in terms of micro/macroprolactinomas considered separately, the CR rates were 65% and 43.4%, respectively, which are consistent with other studies.2223 These prior reports showed that surgical resection achieved to 63–72% CR rate for microprolactinomas and 32–60% for macroprolactinomas. Even for the macroprolactinomas, since more than half of the 34 patients who achieved CR after surgery achieved long-term CR, this result might support the usefulness of surgery. Furthermore, our findings could serve as a basis for surgical treatment in selective microprolactinom patients, as the recurrence-free CR rate of microprolactinoma has been relatively low compared to those of macroprolactinoma.
The recurrence of hyperprolactinemia is common, affecting approximately 80% of patients who have stopped DA treatment for prolactinomas.424 Moreover, there is still debate over how long to maintain the DA treatment due to concerns about the side effects and long-term costs of DA. Therefore, minimally invasive surgery such as TSA might be considered to be an alternative treatment for prolactinomas. The most common complication of TSA is CSF leakage (2–16%) and a life-threatening hemorrhage affects less than 1% of patients, while the incidence of panhypopituitarism is variable, approximately 1–14%.252627 Our results showed no fatal complications, and only three patients had panhypopituitarism requiring medication. Thus, surgical approach, such as TSA, as a primary treatment for prolactinomas might be cautiously considered to be a safe strategy.
Although the response rate of DA treatment is above 80% for prolactinomas,1928 DA-resistant prolactinoma is observed in 10–30% of cases.29 Patients resistant to DA treatment and those who received high-dose DA might also profit from surgical resection. Although it is an incomplete resection, several reports have demonstrated that surgical debulking may improve hormonal control with normalization of PRL levels.2330 Our results showed that complete resection may be an important factor in achieving CR after surgery. Furthermore, the surgical benefit became more apparent as some patients with incomplete resection were also observed achieve CR. Therefore, these results are seen as the weak basis for allowing surgical treatment to be selected in microprolactinoma rather than macroprolactinoma. Additionally, understandably, the level of PRL in all patients who underwent surgery decreased immediately. However, the reduction in the PRL level was not related to the prolactinoma size.
Other considerations are the cost-benefit and the socioeconomic burdens. Several studies have focused on cost-effectiveness, comparing medical treatment and surgical resection for prolactinomas.3132 These reports demonstrated that surgical resection may reduce lower economic costs over 10 years. Although Chinese data showed contrasting results, the cost reduction could vary depending on the healthcare system.33 However, the information that prolactinoma can be removed immediately and definitively may offer patients a choice as to a preferred treatment based on their concerns, such as the use of a chronic medication or the long-term use complications of DA.
As reported in this study, the recurrence rate after TSA in 96 patients with prolactinoma was 47.9% during the 132 months of the median follow-up period. The extent of surgical resection and a lower initial PRL level were the predictors of long-term remission. Of the patients who met all the two criteria, 66.7% achieved CR after TSA. Another report also demonstrated that a successful cure rate is correlated with tumor size, invasion of the cavernous sinus, and degree of hyperprolactinemia.11 However, Song et al.34 reported that good prognostic predictors are preoperative tumor growth patterns and the Ki-67 index, not the degree of hyperprolactinemia.
Our study has several limitations. First, this study does not present the whole cohort of patients treated, which raises concerns about selection bias. Second, we did not evaluate the incidence of DA-resistant prolactinoma. Additionally, we did not assess the changes of neurological symptoms after TSA for prolactinoma. Finally, we did not investigate the Ki-67 index. Notwithstanding these limitations, we believe that our results might provide clinical evidence for the use of TSA for prolactinoma as an alternative treatment. Moreover, TSA is expected to be offered to patients because it has potential to provide a complete cure in one operation instead of long-term DA use.
Based on our results, we believe that TSA for selective prolactinoma is a viable therapeutic modality, especially in the case of microprolactinomas. For small-sized microprolactinoma, we cautiously propose to consider TSA for these selective patients, as the possibility of GTR is high after surgery and thus can increase the CR rate and the recurrent-free rate. The complication rate of TSA is low, and technical advances now allow us to consider surgical modalities for the treatment of prolactinoma. This option is also meaningful by allowing patients to choose treatments that can be expected to offer a permanent cure instead of long-term DA use. Despite several limitations, our results might help selected patients who are concerned about the complications of DA or who want to avoid the use of long-term medication.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

I would like to express my special thanks of gratitude to professor Sun Ha Paek who gave me the golden opportunity to do this wonderful project on the topic, which also helped me in doing a lot of research and I came to know about so many new things I am thankful to them.

Notes

Funding: This study is supported by the Korea Healthcare Technology R&D Project (Grant HI11C21100200, HI18C0886), funded by the Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea; the Industrial Strategic Technology Development Program (Grant 10050154, Business Model Development for Personalized Medicine Based on Integrated Genome and Clinical Information) funded by the Ministry of Trade, Industry & Energy (MI, Korea); the Original Technology Research Program for Brain Science through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (Grant 2015M3C7A1028926, 2017M3C7A1044367); the Original Technology Research Program for Brain Science through the NRF funded by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (2017M3C7A1047392); the Bio & Medical Technology Development Program of the National Research Foundation (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Science & ICT (Grant Number: 2020M3A9G802202921).

Disclosure: The authors have no potential conflicts of interest to disclose.

Author Contributions:

  • Conceptualization: Peak SH.

  • Data curation: Park K.

  • Investigation: Peak SH.

  • Methodology: Peak SH, Won TB, Shin CS.

  • Validation: Kim YH, Kim DY, Kong SH, Kim JH.

  • Writing - original draft: Park K.

  • Writing - review & editing: Park KH, Park HR, Lee JM.

References

1. Melmed S, Casanueva FF, Hoffman AR, Kleinberg DL, Montori VM, Schlechte JA, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of hyperprolactinemia: an Endocrine Society clinical practice guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011; 96(2):273–288. PMID: 21296991.
crossref pmid
2. Casanueva FF, Molitch ME, Schlechte JA, Abs R, Bonert V, Bronstein MD, et al. Guidelines of the Pituitary Society for the diagnosis and management of prolactinomas. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2006; 65(2):265–273. PMID: 16886971.
crossref pmid
3. Gillam MP, Molitch ME, Lombardi G, Colao A. Advances in the treatment of prolactinomas. Endocr Rev. 2006; 27(5):485–534. PMID: 16705142.
crossref pmid
4. Dekkers OM, Lagro J, Burman P, Jørgensen JO, Romijn JA, Pereira AM. Recurrence of hyperprolactinemia after withdrawal of dopamine agonists: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2010; 95(1):43–51. PMID: 19880787.
crossref pmid
5. Molitch ME. Medical treatment of prolactinomas. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am. 1999; 28(1):143–169. PMID: 10207689.
crossref pmid
6. Zanettini R, Antonini A, Gatto G, Gentile R, Tesei S, Pezzoli G. Valvular heart disease and the use of dopamine agonists for Parkinson's disease. N Engl J Med. 2007; 356(1):39–46. PMID: 17202454.
crossref pmid
7. Schade R, Andersohn F, Suissa S, Haverkamp W, Garbe E. Dopamine agonists and the risk of cardiac-valve regurgitation. N Engl J Med. 2007; 356(1):29–38. PMID: 17202453.
crossref pmid
8. Biswas M, Smith J, Jadon D, McEwan P, Rees DA, Evans LM, et al. Long-term remission following withdrawal of dopamine agonist therapy in subjects with microprolactinomas. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2005; 63(1):26–31. PMID: 15963057.
crossref pmid
9. Cannavò S, Curtò L, Squadrito S, Almoto B, Vieni A, Trimarchi F. Cabergoline: a first-choice treatment in patients with previously untreated prolactin-secreting pituitary adenoma. J Endocrinol Invest. 1999; 22(5):354–359. PMID: 10401709.
crossref
10. Kharlip J, Salvatori R, Yenokyan G, Wand GS. Recurrence of hyperprolactinemia after withdrawal of long-term cabergoline therapy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2009; 94(7):2428–2436. PMID: 19336508.
crossref pmid pmc
11. Amar AP, Couldwell WT, Chen JC, Weiss MH. Predictive value of serum prolactin levels measured immediately after transsphenoidal surgery. J Neurosurg. 2002; 97(2):307–314. PMID: 12186458.
crossref pmid
12. Kreutzer J, Buslei R, Wallaschofski H, Hofmann B, Nimsky C, Fahlbusch R, et al. Operative treatment of prolactinomas: indications and results in a current consecutive series of 212 patients. Eur J Endocrinol. 2008; 158(1):11–18. PMID: 18166812.
crossref pmid
13. Turner HE, Adams CB, Wass JA. Trans-sphenoidal surgery for microprolactinoma: an acceptable alternative to dopamine agonists? Eur J Endocrinol. 1999; 140(1):43–47. PMID: 10037250.
crossref pmid
14. Buchfelder M, Schlaffer S. Surgical treatment of pituitary tumours. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2009; 23(5):677–692. PMID: 19945031.
crossref pmid
15. Couldwell WT. Transsphenoidal and transcranial surgery for pituitary adenomas. J Neurooncol. 2004; 69(1-3):237–256. PMID: 15527094.
crossref pmid
16. Qu X, Wang M, Wang G, Han T, Mou C, Han L, et al. Surgical outcomes and prognostic factors of transsphenoidal surgery for prolactinoma in men: a single-center experience with 87 consecutive cases. Eur J Endocrinol. 2011; 164(4):499–504. PMID: 21252173.
crossref pmid
17. Jan M, Dufour H, Brue T, Jaquet P. Prolactinoma surgery. Ann Endocrinol (Paris). 2007; 68(2-3):118–119. PMID: 17512893.
crossref pmid
18. Woodworth GF, Patel KS, Shin B, Burkhardt JK, Tsiouris AJ, McCoul ED, et al. Surgical outcomes using a medial-to-lateral endonasal endoscopic approach to pituitary adenomas invading the cavernous sinus. J Neurosurg. 2014; 120(5):1086–1094. PMID: 24527820.
crossref pmid pmc
19. Salazar-López-Ortiz CG, Hernández-Bueno JA, González-Bárcena D, López-Gamboa M, Ortiz-Plata A, Porias-Cuéllar HL, et al. Clinical practice guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of hyperprolactinemia. Ginecol Obstet Mex. 2014; 82(2):123–142. PMID: 24779268.
pmid
20. Halperin Rabinovich I, Cámara Gómez R, García Mouriz M, Ollero García-Agulló D. Grupo de Trabajo de Neuroendocrinología de la SEEN. Clinical guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of prolactinoma and hyperprolactinemia. Endocrinol Nutr. 2013; 60(6):308–319. PMID: 23477758.
crossref pmid
21. Ma Q, Su J, Li Y, Wang J, Long W, Luo M, et al. The chance of permanent cure for micro- and macroprolactinomas, medication or surgery? a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2018; 9:636. PMID: 30410470.
crossref pmid pmc
22. Donegan D, Atkinson JL, Jentoft M, Natt N, Nippoldt TB, Erickson B, et al. Surgical outcomes of prolactinomas in recent era: results of a heterogenous group. Endocr Pract. 2017; 23(1):37–45. PMID: 27682355.
crossref pmid
23. Primeau V, Raftopoulos C, Maiter D. Outcomes of transsphenoidal surgery in prolactinomas: improvement of hormonal control in dopamine agonist-resistant patients. Eur J Endocrinol. 2012; 166(5):779–786. PMID: 22301915.
crossref pmid
24. Klibanski A. Dopamine agonist therapy in prolactinomas: when can treatment be discontinued? J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2009; 94(7):2247–2249. PMID: 19584197.
crossref pmid
25. Dallapiazza RF, Jane JA Jr. Outcomes of endoscopic transsphenoidal pituitary surgery. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am. 2015; 44(1):105–115. PMID: 25732647.
crossref pmid
26. Dehdashti AR, Ganna A, Karabatsou K, Gentili F. Pure endoscopic endonasal approach for pituitary adenomas: early surgical results in 200 patients and comparison with previous microsurgical series. Neurosurgery. 2008; 62(5):1006–1015. PMID: 18580798.
pmid
27. Cappabianca P, Cavallo LM, Colao A, de Divitiis E. Surgical complications associated with the endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal approach for pituitary adenomas. J Neurosurg. 2002; 97(2):293–298. PMID: 12186456.
crossref pmid
28. Pascal-Vigneron V, Weryha G, Bosc M, Leclere J. Hyperprolactinemic amenorrhea:treatment with cabergoline versus bromocriptine. Results of a national multicenter randomized double-blind study. Presse Med. 1995; 24(16):753–757. PMID: 7784413.
pmid
29. Maiter D. Management of dopamine agonist-resistant prolactinoma. Neuroendocrinology. 2019; 109(1):42–50. PMID: 30481756.
crossref pmid
30. Vroonen L, Jaffrain-Rea ML, Petrossians P, Tamagno G, Chanson P, Vilar L, et al. Prolactinomas resistant to standard doses of cabergoline: a multicenter study of 92 patients. Eur J Endocrinol. 2012; 167(5):651–662. PMID: 22918301.
crossref pmid
31. Jethwa PR, Patel TD, Hajart AF, Eloy JA, Couldwell WT, Liu JK. Cost-effectiveness analysis of microscopic and endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery versus medical therapy in the management of microprolactinoma in the United States. World Neurosurg. 2016; 87:65–76. PMID: 26548828.
pmid
32. Zygourakis CC, Imber BS, Chen R, Han SJ, Blevins L, Molinaro A, et al. Cost-effectiveness analysis of surgical versus medical treatment of prolactinomas. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base. 2017; 78(2):125–131. PMID: 28321375.
pmid
33. Duan L, Yan H, Huang M, Zhang Y, Gu F. An economic analysis of bromocriptine versus trans-sphenoidal surgery for the treatment of prolactinoma. J Craniofac Surg. 2017; 28(4):1046–1051. PMID: 28145933.
crossref pmid
34. Song YJ, Chen MT, Lian W, Xing B, Yao Y, Feng M, et al. Surgical treatment for male prolactinoma: a retrospective study of 184 cases. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017; 96(2):e5833. PMID: 28079813.
TOOLS
Similar articles