Journal List > Korean J Gastroenterol > v.77(1) > 1146350

Case of Crohn’s Disease Initially Misdiagnosed as Intestinal Tuberculosis Due to Active Pulmonary Tuberculosis

Abstract

Differentiating Crohn’s disease (CD) from intestinal tuberculosis (TB) is a challenge. In patients suspected of having CD or intestinal TB compounded with active pulmonary TB in its early stages, clinicians often lean towards a diagnosis of intestinal TB. A 14-year-old female patient was admitted with symptoms of abdominal pain and diarrhea with hematochezia. Colonoscopy revealed a stricture of the ileocecal valve and scattered longitudinal ulcers. Initial chest radiography showed consolidation in the left lower lobe of the lung. Chest CT revealed branching nodular opacities and consolidation. The TB PCR of the bronchial washing fluid was positive. The patient was diagnosed with pulmonary and intestinal TB. The colonoscopy findings favored CD. Despite this, anti-tubercular therapy was initiated based on the radiology findings and PCR test. After treatment with anti-tubercular therapy, the patient’s diarrhea and abdominal pain worsened despite the improvement observed on her chest radiography. Follow-up colonoscopy revealed aggravation of her ulcers. The patient was diagnosed with CD and treated with prednisolone and mesalazine. Her clinical condition improved, and follow-up colonoscopy showed significant improvement of the ulcers. This case highlights the need for caution in diagnosis and suggests that clinicians consider reevaluation in similar cases.

INTRODUCTION

Crohn’s disease (CD) and intestinal tuberculosis tuberculosis (TB) are chronic granulomatous inflammatory diseases of the gastrointestinal tract. Owing to their similar endoscopic, radiological, and clinical presentation, differentiating them is challenging, particularly in regions where TB is endemic.1 This paper reports a case of a delayed diagnosis of CD in a patient with active pulmonary TB. The patient complained of abdominal pain and diarrhea with hematochezia, which was initially attributed incorrectly to intestinal TB. To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this case is the first report of a patient who pre-sented with active pulmonary TB in the early stages of CD.

CASE REPORT

A 14-year-old female patient was admitted to the gastro-enterology department with symptoms of abdominal pain, unintentional 6 kg weight loss over the past month, fatigue, and diarrhea with hematochezia. There was no history of contact with TB patients.
The laboratory results revealed hypochromic microcytic anemia, polymorphonuclear leukocytosis, thrombocytosis, and elevated CRP. The stool and urine microscopy results were normal. The fecal analysis results for bacterial cultures, parasites, and Clostridium difficile toxin were negative. Human immunodeficiency virus, HBV, HCV, and cytomegalovirus (CMV) serological test results were negative. The serological results were equivocal for IgG anti-Saccharomyces cerevisiae antibody (ASCA) (9.4; normal <7 units). The QuantiFERON gold assay result for a latent TB infection was negative. The liver and renal function tests results were normal.
The patient underwent a colonoscopy that revealed a stricture of the ileocecal valve and scattered longitudinal ulcers in the whole colon, with the involvement of more than four segments (Fig. 1). The pathology examination revealed chronic ulcerative inflammation. In addition, AFB staining of the intestinal tissue was negative. The CMV PCR and CMV immunostaining of the intestinal tissue were also negative.
CT of the abdomen revealed a nonspecific colitis pattern of the whole colon and diffuse ascites (Fig. 2). A chest CT scan was performed because the abdominal CT also showed branching nodular opacities and consolidation in the left lower lobe of the lung. The findings indicated active pulmonary TB (Fig. 3). The chest x-ray showed consolidation in the left lower lobe of the lung (Fig. 4A). Bronchoscopy was performed, and TB PCR of bronchial washing was positive.
The patient was diagnosed with pulmonary and intestinal TB. Although the colonoscopic findings favored CD, anti-tubercular therapy (ATT) was initiated based on the radiology findings and PCR test. Two weeks later, she presented with mild improvement of the abdominal pain, diarrhea, and hematochezia, but her gastrointestinal symptoms worsened over the next month despite the improvement observed on her chest X-ray (Fig. 4B). She presented with worsening diarrhea and abdominal pain. The colonoscopy response was assessed after 8 weeks of ATT. Colonoscopy revealed exacerbated ulcers in the whole colon, and the stricture of the ileocecal valve persisted. Although the pulmonary TB had improved after ATT, the gastrointestinal symptoms were aggravated. Hence, the patient was diagnosed with CD and was treated with prednisolone, mesalazine, and ATT. She showed significant improvement in her clinical condition. A follow-up colonoscopy performed three months after treatment with prednisolone and mesalazine revealed considerable improvement of the ulcers (Fig. 5).
After tapering the steroid therapy, the patient was treated with mesalazine and azathioprine. At the 10-month follow-up, the patient remained in clinical and biochemical remission.

DISCUSSION

Approximately 33% of the world’s population has been exposed to TB, particularly in Southeast Asia, India, and Africa.2 The disease demographics are changing due to immigration from endemic areas.3 Of all TB cases, 10-12% of all TB cases are extrapulmonary TB; of these, 11-16% of cases involve the abdomen.4 CD is a chronic inflammatory disease of an unknown etiology with possible genetic, environmental, and immunological factors.1 Over the recent decades, the incidence of CD has increased in areas where the prevalence has been low.
CD is difficult to differentiate from intestinal TB because the clinical, endoscopic, and radiologic findings of these diseases are similar, particularly in areas where TB is endemic. In 2016, the incidence of TB in the Republic of Korea was 5.2 per 100,000 persons.5 This incidence is the highest among member countries of the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. Distinguishing between intestinal TB and CD is critical because the treatments are radically different, and immunosuppressive medications for intestinal TB can be disastrous.6
Endoscopy examinations, longitudinal ulcers, aphthous ulcers, cobblestone appearance, and anorectal lesions are more common in CD. Transverse ulcers, patulous ileocecal valve, and the involvement of fewer than four segments are more frequent in intestinal TB.7 The endoscopy findings of the present patient were more suggestive of CD, but there were no reports of patients who presented with active pulmonary TB in the early stages of CD. Furthermore, immunosuppressive treatment can lead to the fatal spread of TB. Therefore, the patient was diagnosed initially with intestinal TB.
On a pathologic examination, multiple large caseating granulomas are found more frequently in intestinal TB, and trans-mural inflammation in the form of lymphoid aggregates is more common in CD. The presence of AFB in a biopsy on a histology examination is diagnostic of intestinal TB.8
The CT findings more commonly show long-segment involvement, vascular engorgement of the mesentery, skip lesions, and symmetrical bowel wall thickening in CD.9 Large necrotic lymph nodes (>1 cm) in the mesentery, ascites, and asymmetrical thickening of the colonic wall are features of intestinal TB.10
Although extraintestinal manifestations are usually associated with CD, intestinal TB may also present with symptoms, such as uveitis and polyarthritis, mimicking extraintestinal CD.11,12 The patient showed a pulmonary lesion. TB PCR of bronchial washing was positive, and bronchoscopy did not show inflammatory changes suggesting CD, including patches in the tracheobronchial system or redness. Therefore, the case was diagnosed as active pulmonary TB.
An interferon-gamma release assay was performed to confirm the latent TB infection. AFB staining and culture for Mycobacterium TB of the patient’s tissue could also have been conducted, but these examinations show low diagnostic sensitivity. The QuantiFERON gold assay yielded negative results in this patient. Therefore, it was reasonable to attribute this result to the young age of the patient. False-negative QuantiFERON gold assay results are observed more often in younger persons.13
ASCA is related to intestinal bowel disease. On the other hand, ASCA has limited value in the differentiation between CD and TB. Up to 65% of CD patients can present with ASCA, compared to 50% for intestinal TB.14
Recent Asia-Pacific consensus statements for CD stated that in a patient with CD/intestinal TB dilemma, a diagnosis of CD should be considered in patients who do not respond to ATT and later respond to the treatment of CD. The clinical and colonoscopy response is assessed at 8-12 weeks of ATT. A diagnosis of intestinal TB is confirmed if the patient shows symptomatic improvement.15 ATT can be considered in areas with the widespread prevalence of TB. Clinicians may consider ATT if a patient with the CD/intestinal TB dilemma presents with active pulmonary TB. On the other hand, unnecessary ATT may lead to a risk of hepatotoxicity, drug resistance, and a delay in the diagnosis of CD.
Physicians should integrate the clinical, endoscopy, and radiology findings to decide whether the diagnosis is intestinal TB or CD. Continuous caution in making a correct diagnosis based on sufficient findings after the initial diagnosis is very important. Clinicians should consider reevaluation, including repeating the CT scan, testing for TB, and colonoscopy.

Notes

Financial support: None.

Conflict of interest: None.

REFERENCES

1. Gomollón F, Dignass A, Annese V, et al. 2017; 3rd European evidence-based consensus on the diagnosis and management of crohn's disease 2016: part 1: diagnosis and medical management. J Crohns Colitis. 11:3–25. DOI: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjw168. PMID: 27660341.
crossref pmid
2. Kirsch R, Pentecost M, Hall Pde M, Epstein DP, Watermeyer G, Friederich PW. 2006; Role of colonoscopic biopsy in distinguishing between Crohn's disease and intestinal tuberculosis. J Clin Pathol. 59:840–844. DOI: 10.1136/jcp.2005.032383. PMID: 16873564. PMCID: PMC1860439.
crossref pmid pmc
3. Ma JY, Tong JL, Ran ZH. 2016; Intestinal tuberculosis and Crohn's disease: challenging differential diagnosis. J Dig Dis. 17:155–161. DOI: 10.1111/1751-2980.12324. PMID: 26854750.
crossref pmid
4. Sharma MP, Ahuja V. Schaaf HS, Zumla A, Grange JM, editors. 2009. Abdominal tuberculosis in adult. Tuberculosis: a comprehensive clinical reference. Saunders/Elsevier;Edinburgh: p. 424–431. DOI: 10.1016/B978-1-4160-3988-4.00039-1. PMCID: PMC2696123.
5. 2017. Global Tuberculosis Report. [Internet]. World Health Organization;Geneva: Available from https://www.who.int/tb/publications/global_report/gtbr2017_ main_text.pdf?u%20a=1. cited 2017 Nov 13.
6. Zhao XS, Wang ZT, Wu ZY, et al. 2014; Differentiation of Crohn's disease from intestinal tuberculosis by clinical and CT enterographic models. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 20:916–925. DOI: 10.1097/MIB.0000000000000025. PMID: 24694791.
crossref pmid
7. Amarapurkar DN, Patel ND, Rane PS. 2008; Diagnosis of Crohn's disease in India where tuberculosis is widely prevalent. World J Gastroenterol. 14:741–746. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.14.741. PMID: 18205265. PMCID: PMC2684002.
crossref pmid pmc
8. Shepherd NA. 2002; Granulomas in the diagnosis of intestinal Crohn's disease: a myth exploded? Histopathology. 41:166–168. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2559.2002.01441.x. PMID: 12147095.
pmid
9. Kedia S, Das P, Madhusudhan KS, et al. 2019; Differentiating Crohn's disease from intestinal tuberculosis. World J Gastroenterol. 25:418–432. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i4.418. PMID: 30700939. PMCID: PMC6350172.
crossref pmid pmc
10. Almadi MA, Ghosh S, Aljebreen AM. 2009; Differentiating intestinal tuberculosis from Crohn's disease: a diagnostic challenge. Am J Gastroenterol. 104:1003–1012. DOI: 10.1038/ajg.2008.162. PMID: 19240705.
crossref pmid
11. Boudiaf M, Zidi SH, Soyer P, et al. 1998; Tuberculous colitis mimicking Crohn's disease: utility of computed tomography in the differentiation. Eur Radiol. 8:1221–1223. DOI: 10.1007/s003300050539. PMID: 9724443.
crossref pmid
12. Franco-Paredes C, Díaz-Borjon A, Senger MA, Barragan L, Leonard M. 2006; The ever-expanding association between rheumatologic diseases and tuberculosis. Am J Med. 119:470–477. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2005.10.063. PMID: 16750957.
crossref pmid
13. de Visser V, Sotgiu G, Lange C, et al. 2015; False-negative interferon-γ release assay results in active tuberculosis: a TBNET study. Eur Respir J. 45:279–283. DOI: 10.1183/09031936.00120214. PMID: 25359336.
crossref pmid
14. Ghoshal UC, Ghoshal U, Singh H, Tiwari S. 2007; Anti-Saccharomyces cerevisiae antibody is not useful to differentiate between Crohn's disease and intestinal tuberculosis in India. J Postgrad Med. 53:166–170. DOI: 10.4103/0022-3859.33857. PMID: 17699989.
pmid
15. Ooi CJ, Makharia GK, Hilmi I, et al. 2016; Asia Pacific Consensus Statements on Crohn's disease. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 31:45–55. DOI: 10.1111/jgh.12956. PMID: 25819140.
pmid

Fig. 1
Colonoscopy showing multiple scattered longitudinal ulcers and inflammation with mucosal hyperemia on the (A) ascending colon and (B) transverse colon.
kjg-77-1-30-f1.tif
Fig. 2
Abdominal computed tomography scan revealing diffuse wall thickening of the whole colon and terminal ileum with several lymph nodes along the (A) ileocolic chain (arrows) and (B) ascites.
kjg-77-1-30-f2.tif
Fig. 3
Chest computed tomography scan showing branching nodular opacities and consolidation in the left lower lobe and left-sided pleural effusion.
kjg-77-1-30-f3.tif
Fig. 4
Chest x-ray showing consolidation in the (A) left lower lobe (arrow) and (B) improvement of consolidation.
kjg-77-1-30-f4.tif
Fig. 5
Colonoscopy showing improvement of ulcers with healed scars on the (A) ascending colon and (B) transverse colon.
kjg-77-1-30-f5.tif
TOOLS
Similar articles