Journal List > Korean J Gastroenterol > v.76(6) > 1145930

Changes in the Crohn’s Disease Activity Index and Safety of Administering Saccharomyces Boulardii in Patients with Crohn’s Disease in Clinical Remission: A Single Hospital-based Retrospective Cohort Study



Crohn’s disease (CD) is characterized by uncontrolled inflammation of the intestine. Saccharomyces boulardii (S. boulardii), a probiotic, stabilizes the intestinal wall. This study examined the changes in the CD activity index (CDAI) after taking S. boulardii in patients with CD in clinical remission.


In this single hospital-based retrospective cohort study, the medical records of CD patients in clinical remission, who had received S. boulardii for more than 6 months, were reviewed. The CDAI, BMI, and serum levels of hemoglobin (Hb), ferritin, iron, vitamin B12, folate, total protein, albumin, total cholesterol, CRP, and fecal calprotectin (FC) between the initiation and the 6th month were compared. The timing and reasons for the discontinuation were also investigated.


One hundred and fifty-four patients were included, and 92 patients, who received for more than 6 months, were analyzed. The changes in CDAI, BMI, Hb, and total cholesterol were significant as follows: CDAI from 38.52 to 30.53 (p<0.01), BMI (kg/m2) from 23.38 to 23.97 (p<0.01), Hb (g/dL) from 13.73 to 14.03 (p<0.01), and total cholesterol (mg/dL) from 154.9 to 161.5 (p<0.01). On the other hand, the changes in FC, CRP, ferritin, vitamin B12, folate, total protein, and albumin were not statistically significant. Only one patient stopped due to a flare-up, but this was not believed to be related to the drug.


In patients with CD in remission, S. boulardii appears to improve the CDAI, BMI, serum Hb, and total cholesterol level without safety issues. Further randomized controlled studies will be needed.


Probiotics are living microorganisms that benefit the host when administered in sufficient quantities.1 Hundreds of probiotics species live symbiotically in the human colon, including bacteria, fungi, and protists. Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium are representative, while others include Bacillus and Escherichia coli, and the yeast, Saccharomyces boulardii.2 The mechanism of action of probiotics is as follows: multiplying in the intestine first, then taking its place, and preventing pathogenic microorganisms from growing. The immune mechanism for this involves the activation of macrophages in the surrounding tissues, regulation of cytokines, and increasing tolerance for antigens in food. Non-immune mechanisms include consuming food substances required by pathogens, adjusting the pH in the intestine, removing superoxide radicals, increasing mucin secretion, and strengthening the intestinal barrier. Several studies are still ongoing, and due to these mechanisms, they are effective against acute diarrhea, anti-biotics-associated diarrhea, and diarrhea caused by Clostridium difficile.3 Many probiotics have already been commercialized, and further studies are being conducted on the dosage, individual species characteristics, and various effects in different diseases.
The yeast, S. boulardii, is a probiotic that is currently being used by many people. S. boulardii effectively prevents anti-biotic-related diarrhea, traveler’s diarrhea, and acute diarrhea in adults and is safe and well-tolerated, not causing any side effects.4 The activity and effects of S. boulardii are diverse. The yeast produces a 54 kDa protease to degrade C. difficile toxin A and toxin B directly,5 and a 63 kDA phosphatase to break down the endotoxin of the pathogenic E. coli.6 S. boulardii improves the integrity of the tight junctions between the intestinal walls and has metabolic activity that increases the short-chain fatty acids. In addition, it can control the immune response by inhibiting the production of proinflammatory cytokines.7 Many studies regarding the effects of S. boulardii are ongoing, and in the future, these characteristics will be used in accordance with the pathophysiology of many gastro-intestinal diseases.
Crohn’s disease (CD) is an immune-related disease characterized by uncontrolled intestinal inflammation. Although various treatments, such as 5-aminosalicylic acid, thiopurine, biologics, and small molecules, are currently being used as the standard therapies, it sometimes leads to disability because of uncontrolled inflammation.8 Many clinicians believe that probiotics can promote mucosal healing in the intestine against uncontrolled inflammation. Previous studies have shown that in patients with CD, S. boulardii reduces the intestinal permeability and stabilizes the intestinal wall.9 Based on this theoretical background, several studies have examined whether the administration of S. boulardii in CD patients prevents the worsening of the symptoms and helps maintain remission.10-12
This study examined the changes in the Crohn’s disease activity index (CDAI) after administering S. boulardii to patients with CD in the remission status. In addition, the changes in nutritional status and intestinal inflammation were analyzed using a blood and stool test to assess the safety of administering S. boulardii in CD patients.


1. Patients and medication

This was an observational retrospective study in a single hospital-based cohort. The study was conducted under the approval of the Institutional Review Board of Kosin University Gospel Hospital in Busan, Korea (IRB No. 2019-05-016). The medical records of all CD patients with a steroid-free remission for at least 3 months and who had been administered S. boulardii (282.5 mg, powder) at the Crohn’s Disease and Ulcerative Colitis Clinic, Kosin University Gospel Hospital, Busan, Korea from December 1, 2013, to November 30, 2018, were reviewed. The CD remission was designated below 150 points of the CDAI. Patients with any malignancy or those who had previously taken any other probiotics were excluded.

2. Measurement of the results

Among the patients enrolled, those who took the drug for more than 6 months were evaluated to determine the effectiveness and safety of S. boulardii. Their CDAI at the baseline and 6 months after administering S. boulardii were compared. The patient’s weight and BMI were identified. Blood and stool samples were compared to evaluate the nutritional status: serum hemoglobin (Hb), ferritin, vitamin B12, folate, iron, albumin, total protein, and total cholesterol; and the intestinal inflammation status (serum [CRP] and fecal calprotectin [FC] level). The number of people who stopped taking the drug within 6 months was checked, and the timing and reason for the discontinuation were investigated.

3. Statistical analysis

Statistical differences of the CDAI, blood test, and stool test results between the baseline and 6 months after administering the drug were determined. The continuous variables following a normal distribution were compared using a paired-T test. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used in the case of a non-normal distribution or categorical variables. The statistical significance was based on the 95% CI (p<0.05). In addition, Kaplan-Meier curves were drawn by examining the number of patients who had discontinued the S. boulardii treatment during the first 6 months. Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS 21) (IBM Corp, Armonk, NY, USA) was used for the statistical analysis.


1. Baseline patient characteristics

One hundred and fifty-four patients were recruited. Two patients were excluded (one had thyroid cancer, and the other was taking another probiotic-Bacillus subtilis); 152 patients were included in the study. Of these, 49 patients took S. boulardii less than 6 months, and eight patients were excluded because they had no clinical visit at the 6 months. Thus, the medical records in the remaining 95 patients were analyzed to determine the effectiveness of the drug (Fig. 1).
For the 152 patients, Table 1 lists the demographic and clinical baseline characteristics of the patients. There were 97 men and 55 women, with an average age of 39.57 years. The average disease duration was 9.45 years, most of which was 3-6 years (35.5%). The mean BMI was 23.45 kg/m2 (range 16.30-34.35). Among the patients, 142 were taking 5-aminosalicylic acid, and 31 were being administered biologic agents.

2. Crohn’s disease activity index

A comparison of CDAI after taking the drug for 6 months revealed the following (Table 2). The total CDAI score decreased from 40.65 to 32.06 after 6 months (p<0.01). The incidence of diarrhea per week changed from 2.28 to 2.95 (p=0.37). The scores for abdominal pain changed from 0.15 to 0.17 (p=0.61), and the overall state of general well-being changed from 0.06 to 0.08 (p=0.16). Anti-diarrhea drug use, abdominal mass, and extra-gastrointestinal symptoms were not changed significantly. On the other hand, the difference between the ideal body weight and the actual body weight changed from -5.70 to -8.15 (p<0.01), and the difference between the expected hematocrit and the measured hematocrit changed from 5.50 to 3.94 (p<0.01).

3. Changes in BMI, blood, and stool test results after S. boulardii administration

Table 3 list the changes in BMI, blood and stool test results after S. boulardii administration. The nutritional status was evaluated by measuring the BMI and serum levels of Hb, ferritin, vitamin B12, folate, iron, and total cholesterol. CRP and FC were also assessed to evaluate the inflammatory condition. The BMI increased from 23.38 kg/m2 to 23.97 kg/m2 (p<0.01), and Hb increased from 13.73 g/dL to 14.03 g/dL (p<0.01). The changes in ferritin from 85.5 ng/mL to 87.7 ng/mL (p=0.62), vitamin B12 from 472.4 pg/mL to 443.6 pg/mL (p=0.46), folate from 8.45 ng/mL to 8.23 ng/mL (p=0.29), and iron from 96.52 µg/dL to 85.05 µg/dL (p=0.21) were not significant. Regarding intestinal inflammation, the changes in CRP from 0.22 mg/dL to 0.26 mg/dL (p=0.28) and FC from 217.4 µg/g to 233.1 µg/g were not significant (p=0.64).

4. Safety and adherence

Of the 49 patients who received S. boulardii less than 6 months, 16 patients discontinued S. boulardii after a decision by the physician or patient (Table 4). One patient stopped due to acute exacerbation of CD. Other cases of discontinuation were due to abdominal discomfort (n=2), pregnancy (n=1), loss to follow-up (n=5), voluntary discontinuation without adverse events (n=6), and discontinuation due to difficulty in taking the powdered medicine (n=1).
Fig. 2 presents the survival curve showing the cases of discontinuation according to the time. Of the 119 patients, who received S. boulardii for more than 6 months, there was no safety issue during the medication.


This study was an uncontrolled retrospective study that involved patients with CD at a tertiary university hospital. Among the patients with CD who were in remission for more than 3 months, the medical records of 152 patients administered S. boulardii were reviewed, and the 95 cases had received the drug for more than 6 months and had all the data for the baseline and at 6 months were examined to compare the differences with the predose period. The CDAI decreased significantly from 40.65 to 32.06 6 months after taking the drug (p<0.01). On the other hand, there was no significant FC from 217.4 µg/g to 233.1 µg/g. During the period of administration in 152 patients, there was no significant safety issue related to the drug. Sixteen patients stopped within 6 months, and only one of them required hospitalization due to acute exacerbation.
CDAI is a good indicator that reveals the current disease activity of CD, and can be used to judge the patient’s condition in various ways through symptoms, along with the hematocrit and weight. In this study, CDAI decreased by eight points when S. boulardii was taken for 6 months. The declining results are probably due to an increase in body weight (2.45% increase in ideal body weight) and an increase in the hematocrit (1.56 increase). On the other hand, there was no change in the number of liquid or very soft stools per week, abdominal pain, general well-being, extra-gastrointestinal symptoms, anti-diarrhea drug use, or abdominal mass. There was no significant difference in the number of diarrhea episodes, which contrasts with previous results.13 This study targeted the patients who were already in a stable remission for more than 3 months. Therefore, it may be difficult to decrease the mean number of diarrhea episodes further from 2.28 of the baseline number.
CDAI decreased by eight points, and S. boulardii improved the general condition of the CD patients in remission. On the other hand, considering that biologics lowered the CDAI by more than 70 points as maintenance therapy in previous studies,14 S. boulardii did not lead to intensive changes in clinical practice. S. boulardii appeared to help patients with CD who frequently develops chronic anemia and underweight.
Patients with CD are in a state of chronic malnutrition. Studies have shown that weight loss occurs in 65-75%, hypo-albuminemia in 25-80%, and anemia in 60-80% of CD patients.15 There was an increase in BMI, Hb, and total cholesterol after taking S. boulardii. This may be helpful in patients who have a poor overall nutritional status compared to normal people. Taking S. boulardii stabilizes the barrier and strengthens the tight junction to decrease the permeability of the intestine, which will help improve the nutritional status. Nutrient factors related to anemia, such as iron, ferritin, and vitamin B12, were not increased. In the previous study, the predictors of the anemia were the serum erythropoietin, transferrin, and soluble transferrin receptor,16 but these were not included in this study. How the administration of S. boulardii affects these predictors of anemia correction is unknown. This study was conducted without a control group. Therefore, weight gain and anemia correction might be associated with the maintenance effect of a stable remission status for a long period rather than the only effect of S. boulardii. On the other hand, it was assumed that S. boulardii might have contributed in part because many patients were underweight and had a reduced fat mass even in remission.17
The inflammatory condition did not show any significant changes, as judged by CRP and FC. CRP averages within the period were all within the normal range. Therefore, the judgment on improvement and exacerbation is meaningless. FC increased numerically, but the increase was not significant. FC quantifies the neutrophil activity in the intestinal tract; it indicates the degree of inflammation in the intestine. An increase in FC has significance as a prognostic factor for acute exacerbation of CD. There is no clear consensus yet, when the FC is above 250, the possibility of CD flare-up is generally considered.18,19 In this study, the average was over 200 µg/g, and the standard deviation was approximately 400 µg/g. This means that intestinal inflammation is still active, even in patients who are in remission, and the variation is large for each patient. S. boulardii is assumed to regulate pro-inflammatory cytokines and reduce FC and intestinal inflammation. On the other hand, there was no significant decrease in FC. This lack of difference can be attributed to the short observation period of 6 months, where there may be no apparent differences. Considering the characteristics of inflammatory bowel disease, intestinal inflammation is continuously being induced for a long time, eventually leaving the patient with a disability. Long-term use of more than 6 months is required to control the cytokines to change the chronic inflammatory state and eventually change the course of the disease. In addition, probiotics can preoccupy the intestines by forming colonies and pushing the harmful bacteria out of the gut in the case of a pathogenic bacterial invasion. The invasion of pathogenic bacteria causes the flare-up of CD, and the observation period of 6 months is considered short of having an episode of pathogenic bacterial invasion.
Clinicians always pay attention to the safety and stability of probiotics. In general, S. boulardii is very safe.4 Fungemia has been reported in patients with severe comorbidities and central lines, but it is rare.20 In this study, one case was discontinued due to pregnancy while taking the drug. They were very well tolerated in all other cases. In addition, only one patient was hospitalized due to acute exacerbation and required an intravenous systemic steroid treatment. In that case, the effect of S. boulardii for the CD flare-up appears to be small because it had been administered for 120 days.
The advantage of this study is that S. boulardii was administered for 6 months to a relatively large number of patients with CD, and the changes in CDAI in real clinical practice were examined. The limitation is that it was a single institutional study and with a retrospective study design. In addition, owing to the nature of CD, the heterogeneity such as the location of the lesion, degree of inflammation, duration of the disease, and the extra-gastrointestinal symptoms is very diverse. Therefore, the effects of administering S. boulardii cannot be fully explained by the sample size of this study. Generally, S. boulardii takes approximately three days to settle in the intestine after administration.21 The evaluation was performed after 6 months of administration, but it was insufficient to evaluate the long-term changes. In the future, controlled, multi-center studies that administer S. boulardii for a longer time will be necessary.
In conclusion, S. boulardii improves the CDAI in patients with CD in clinical remission and helps stabilize the nutritional status without safety issues. Further randomized controlled studies will be needed through a long-term follow-up.


Dr. Won Moon has received research funding from the Kuhnil Pharm.Co.LTD. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.


Financial support: This work was supported by the Kuhnil Pharm.Co.LTD.

Conflict of interest: None.


1. Fuller R. 1991; Probiotics in human medicine. Gut. 32:439–442. DOI: 10.1136/gut.32.4.439. PMID: 1902810. PMCID: PMC1379087.
2. Elmer GW, McFarland LV. 2001; Biotherapeutic agents in the treatment of infectious diarrhea. Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 30:837–854. DOI: 10.1016/S0889-8553(05)70213-2.
3. Boirivant M, Strober W. 2007; The mechanism of action of probiotics. Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 23:679–692. DOI: 10.1097/MOG.0b013e3282f0cffc. PMID: 17906447.
4. McFarland LV. 2010; Systematic review and meta-analysis of Saccharomyces boulardii in adult patients. World J Gastroenterol. 16:2202–2222. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v16.i18.2202. PMID: 20458757. PMCID: PMC2868213.
5. Castagliuolo I, LaMont JT, Nikulasson ST, Pothoulakis C. 1996; Saccharomyces boulardii protease inhibits Clostridium difficile toxin A effects in the rat ileum. Infect Immun. 64:5225–5232. DOI: 10.1128/IAI.64.12.5225-5232.1996. PMID: 8945570. PMCID: PMC174512.
6. Buts JP, Dekeyser N, Stilmant C, Delem E, Smets F, Sokal E. 2006; Saccharomyces boulardii produces in rat small intestine a novel protein phosphatase that inhibits Escherichia coli endotoxin by dephosphorylation. Pediatr Res. 60:24–29. DOI: 10.1203/01.pdr.0000220322.31940.29. PMID: 16690953.
7. Fidan I, Kalkanci A, Yesilyurt E, et al. 2009; Effects of Saccharomyces boulardii on cytokine secretion from intraepithelial lymphocytes infected by Escherichia coli and Candida albicans. Mycoses. 52:29–34. DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0507.2008.01545.x. PMID: 18627477.
8. Torres J, Bonovas S, Doherty G, et al. 2020; ECCO Guidelines on therapeutics in Crohn's disease: medical treatment. J Crohns Colitis. 14:4–22. DOI: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjz180. PMID: 31711158.
9. Garcia Vilela E, De Lourdes De Abreu Ferrari M, Oswaldo Da Gama Torres H, et al. 2008; Influence of Saccharomyces boulardii on the intestinal permeability of patients with Crohn's disease in remission. Scand J Gastroenterol. 43:842–848. DOI: 10.1080/00365520801943354. PMID: 18584523.
10. Guslandi M, Mezzi G, Sorghi M, Testoni PA. 2000; Saccharomyces boulardii in maintenance treatment of Crohn's disease. Dig Dis Sci. 45:1462–1464. DOI: 10.1023/A:1005588911207. PMID: 10961730.
11. Bourreille A, Cadiot G, Le Dreau G, et al. 2013; Saccharomyces boulardii does not prevent relapse of Crohn's disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 11:982–987. DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2013.02.021. PMID: 23466709.
12. Lichtenstein L, Avni-Biron I, Ben-Bassat O. 2016; Probiotics and prebiotics in Crohn's disease therapies. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 30:81–88. DOI: 10.1016/j.bpg.2016.02.002. PMID: 27048899.
13. Plein K, Hotz J. 1993; Therapeutic effects of Saccharomyces boulardii on mild residual symptoms in a stable phase of Crohn's disease with special respect to chronic diarrhea--a pilot study. Z Gastroenterol. 31:129–134.
14. Hanauer SB, Feagan BG, Lichtenstein GR, et al. 2002; Maintenance infliximab for Crohn's disease: the ACCENT I randomised trial. Lancet. 359:1541–1549. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)08512-4.
15. O'Sullivan M, O'Morain C. 2006; Nutrition in inflammatory bowel disease. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 20:561–573. DOI: 10.1016/j.bpg.2006.03.001. PMID: 16782529.
16. Gasche C, Waldhoer T, Feichtenschlager T, et al. 2001; Prediction of response to iron sucrose in inflammatory bowel disease-associated anemia. Am J Gastroenterol. 96:2382–2387. DOI: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2001.04094.x. PMID: 11513178.
17. Capristo E, Mingrone G, Addolorato G, Greco AV, Gasbarrini G. 1998; Metabolic features of inflammatory bowel disease in a remission phase of the disease activity. J Intern Med. 243:339–347. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2796.1998.00254.x. PMID: 9651555.
18. Maaser C, Sturm A, Vavricka SR, et al. 2019; ECCO-ESGAR guideline for diagnostic assessment in IBD part 1: initial diagnosis, monitoring of known IBD, detection of complications. J Crohns Colitis. 13:144–164. DOI: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjy113. PMID: 30137275.
19. D'Haens G, Ferrante M, Vermeire S, et al. 2012; Fecal calprotectin is a surrogate marker for endoscopic lesions in inflammatory bowel disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 18:2218–2224. DOI: 10.1002/ibd.22917. PMID: 22344983.
20. Boyle RJ, Robins-Browne RM, Tang ML. 2006; Probiotic use in clinical practice: what are the risks? Am J Clin Nutr. 83:1256–1447. DOI: 10.1093/ajcn/83.6.1256. PMID: 16762934.
21. Klein SM, Elmer GW, McFarland LV, Surawicz CM, Levy RH. 1993; Recovery and elimination of the biotherapeutic agent, Saccharomyces boulardii, in healthy human volunteers. Pharm Res. 10:1615–1619. DOI: 10.1023/A:1018924820333. PMID: 8290474.
22. Ford AC, Bernstein CN, Khan KJ, et al. 2011; Glucocorticosteroid therapy in inflammatory bowel disease: systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Gastroenterol. 106:590–600. DOI: 10.1038/ajg.2011.70. PMID: 21407179.

Fig. 1
Selection of the study participants. CD, Crohn’s disease; S. boulardii, Saccharomyces boulardii.
Fig. 2
Kaplan-Meyer survival curve of S. boulardii (n=119). Saccharomyces boulardii, S. boulardii.
Table 1
Demographic and Clinical Characteristics of the 152 Patients
Characteristics (n=152)
Male:female 97 (63.8):55 (36.2)
Age (years) 39.57 (17-81)
Duration after diagnosis (years) 9.45 (2-29)
<3 4 (2.6)
3-6 54 (35.5)
7-9 27 (17.8)
10-12 29 (19.1)
Montreal Classificationa 38 (25.0)
Age at Crohn’s diagnosis: A1/A2/A3 31 (20.4)/92 (60.5)/29 (19.1)
Location of disease activity: L1/L2/L3/L4 56 (36.8)/2 (1.3)/92 (60.6)/2 (1.3)
Disease behavior: B1/B2/B3/p 88 (57.9)/31 (20.4)/33 (21.7)/26 (17.1)
Body weight (kg) 67.35 (42-120)
BMI (kg/m2) 23.45 (16.30-34.35)
History of previous steroid medicationb 115 (75.6)
Medication concomitant with S. boulardii
5-Aminosalicylic acid 142 (93.4)
Thiopurine 125 (82.2)
Biologics or small molecules 31 (20.4)

Values are presented as n (%).

BMI, body mass index.

aAge at diagnosis: A1: ≤16 years, A2: 17-40 years and A3: >40 years; maximal location of disease: L1: ileal, L2: colonic, L3: ileocolonic and L4: upper disease; maximal disease behavior: B1: nonstricturing, nonpenetrating, B2: stricturing, B3: penetrating and p: perianal disease; bCase where 40 mg or more of oral prednisolone had been administered for at least one week.22

Table 2
Changes in the CDAI and Its Components 6 Months after Taking S. boulardii (n=95)
Initiation After 3 months After 6months p-valuea

Mean SD Mean SD Mean SD
CDAI 40.65 53.65 37.60 47.84 32.06 50.29 <0.01
Body weight scoreb -5.70 17.11 -6.59 18.14 -8.15 19.38 <0.01
Hematocrit scorec 5.50 6.12 4.64 4.64 3.94 4.63 <0.01
Number of liquid or very soft stools per week 2.28 5.98 3.26 7.40 2.95 6.87 0.37
Abdominal pain 0.15 0.44 0.18 0.46 0.17 0.46 0.61
General well-being 0.06 0.25 0.07 0.25 0.08 0.28 0.16
Extra-gastrointestinal symptoms 0 0 0.01 0.10 0 0 1.00
Anti-diarrhea drug 0.01 0.10 0.01 0.10 0.01 0.10 1.00
Abdominal mass 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.00

CDAI, Crohn’s disease activity index; S. boulardii, Saccharomyces boulardii; SD, standard deviation.

aComparing baseline point to the 6-month time-point; b(Ideal body weight-observed body weight)/ideal body weight×100; cExpected hematocrit (men: 47, women: 42)-observed hematocrit.

Table 3
BMI, Blood and Fecal Test Results at 6 Months after Taking S. boulardii (n=95)
Initiation 3 months 6 months p-valuea

Mean SD Mean SD Mean SD
Fecal calprotectin (µg/g) 217.4 382.4 208.1 356.9 233.1 378.7 0.64
C-reactive protein (mg/dL) 0.24 0.59 0.32 0.89 0.26 0.46 0.28
Body mass index (kg/m2) 23.38 3.49 23.57 3.76 23.97 4.10 <0.01
Hemoglobin (g/dL) 13.73 1.76 13.84 1.76 14.03 1.89 <0.01
Total cholesterol (mg/dL) 154.9 32.6 160.2 34.7 161.5 35.9 <0.01
Ferritin (ng/mL) 85.5 85.3 97.5 117.1 87.7 96.7 0.62
Iron (µg/dL) 96.52 52.63 93.13 46.66 85.05 37.74 0.21
Vitamin B12 (pg/mL) 472.4 305.3 466.9 310.9 443.6 326.1 0.46
Folate (ng/mL) 8.45 5.33 8.29 5.06 8.23 5.17 0.29
Total protein (g/dL) 7.28 3.07 6.91 0.56 7.72 6.59 0.08
Albumin (g/dL) 4.50 0.43 4.48 0.56 4.47 0.43 0.45

BMI, body mass index; S. boulardii, Saccharomyces boulardii; SD, standard deviation.

ap-value comparing baseline point to the 6-month time-point.

Table 4
Number of Patients Who Discontinued S. boulardii and the Reasons for the Discontinuations (n=16)
Number of patients Date of discontinuation (days)
Acute exacerbation 1 120
Abdominal discomfort 2 33, 63
Pregnancy 1 145
Loss of follow-up 5 7, 30, 98, 112, 119
Voluntary suspension without adverse events 6 5, 7, 76, 105, 119, 140
Difficulty to take powder 1 112

S. boulardii, Saccharomyces boulardii.

Similar articles