Journal List > Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg > v.24(4) > 1145879

Martins and Martins: Surgical anatomy of caudate bile ducts: Silicon-injected cadaveric-livers dissected under magnification

Abstract

Backgrounds/Aims

Caudate bile ducts are routinely presented using negative images as X-ray-cholangiograms. Such information does not provide for instant surgical orientation of the relationships between caudate ducts and the liver itself−a paramount skill for successfully performing hilar cholangiocarcinoma resection and living donor/split transplantation. This study presents a 4-step procedure to prepare, dissect and present, high-quality, 2D/3D anatomical images of biliary caudate ducts in a surgically meaningful way.

Methods

Fresh cadavers had arteries and veins injected with colored-silicone and ducts bile-stained to facilitate recognition. Dissections were performed under magnification with microsurgical instruments. Stepwise 2D and 3D images were acquired.

Results

Dissection of silicone-injected specimens under magnification allows identification of caudate structures, its portions and processes while preserving tridimensional arrangement of caudate vessels, biliary ducts and collectors. Such dissections can help enhance cholangiogram interpretation and favor its direct correlation to intraoperative findings.

Conclusions

A procedure including: a) preparation of high-quality cadaveric livers, b) with silicone-injected vessels, c) dissected under surgical microscope and d) documented using 2&3D images aimed at enhancing the clinical understanding of the anatomy of caudate ducts is presented. It has potential to enhance morphological and clinical understanding of caudate ducts, being useful to anatomists and surgeons alike.

INTRODUCTION

The biliary ducts of the caudate lobe must be dealt with during two major hepatobiliary surgical procedures: a) hilar cholangiocarcinoma resection1,2 and b) living donor/ split liver transplantation. 3,4 Surgical maneuvers and complication avoidance in both procedures involve detailed anatomical knowledge of this area. 5,6
Caudate bile duct anatomy has been extensively described using X-ray cholangiograms,7 CT cholangiogram,8-10 magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP)11 and liver corrosion casts.6,7,12 Because these are negative-image data, these methods fail to provide surgeons with information on the relationships between ducts and surrounding structures-as portal vein, arteries and the caudate lobe itself-and in demonstrating the microsurgical anatomy of the biliary ducts, including the second and third order branches to portions of caudate as paracaval, caudate process and Spiegel lobe.
This study presents a 4-step procedure to prepare, dissect and present, high-quality, 2D/3D anatomical images of biliary caudate ducts in a surgically meaningful way.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Selection & preparation

Anatomical specimens were obtained from the Anatomical Board of the State of Florida. Injection and dissections were undertaken at the George Schrader Colter International Anatomical Lab (Gainesville, US). This studied has been registered at the Institutional Review Board PAAP-HPS 2020 693716 04.
Fixation of fresh whole cadavers was accomplished after thorough saline cleanse of the vascular tree and arterial injection of formalin 10%. Specimens were kept refrigerated (−4°C) until whole-body arterial silicon injection and/or liver harvesting.
Using fresh cadavers treated so early, ducts were bile- stained and were easily recognizable during dissection.

Silicone injection

In specimens that underwent silicone injection, arteries and veins were perfused with red and blue colored silicone using Rhoton’s Lab technique, commonly used in microsurgical anatomy labs around the world and well stablished in Neurosurgery and ENT studies in surgical anatomy. 13,14

Dissection

Six livers were used in this study. After inspected in situ, each liver was resected by sectioning supra and infrahepatic vena cava and the distal liver pedicle.
Dissections were performed using 3× to 14× magnification of a surgical microscope (S21 Surgical Microscope; Carl Zeiss AG, Oberkochen, Germany) and standard microsurgical instruments.
The hilar fissure was fully dissected and exposed under magnification. All the connective tissue originated from Glisson’s capsule was cleaned from the hilar fissure (hilar plate total resection) to highlight the complete extra-hepatic relations of the caudate ducts and its bifurcations before entering the liver tissue.
The last dissection step was accomplished by total removal of vascular (portal and arterial) branches around Segment 1 to expose the caudate ducts and its relations to the lobe itself.

2D & 3D documentation

Stepwise 2D and 3D images were acquired using Nikon cameras (D80, D5100 and P100, Nikon Corp., Tokyo, Japan) and Nikon lenses (Nikon microlenses 2.0, 105 mm, Nikon Corp., Japan). 3D images were also acquired using Fuji cameras (Finepix Real 3D W1 and W3, Fuji Film Corp., Japan). All pictures were taken using a slidebar attached to a Manfrotto tripod (Manfrotto B55 tripod, Manfrotto, Italy). A ring flash was also used (Sigma Corp., Japan).15,16

RESULTS

The anatomical relationships exposed using this 4-step procedure are presented on Fig. 1 (silicone-injected specimens) and Fig. 2 (cleaned hilar fissure: ducts-only specimen) and summarized on Table 1.
The stepwise dissection under magnification allows identification of minute caudate structures and allows differentiation of caudate portions and processes. The tridimensional arrangement of caudate draining veins can be appreciated, and the biliary ducts and collectors followed. Such dissections can help enhance cholangiogram interpretation and favor its direct correlation to intraoperative findings.
To further exemplify the application of this 4-step procedure in highlighting the caudate ducts anatomy, images of a seldom-presented pattern of caudate biliary ducts have been chosen (Fig. 2). This specimen (Liver 1) has a common caudate duct, that collect all portions of Segment 1, entering the confluence of the right and left hepatic ducts. This pattern was observed by Healey and Schroy7 in 5% of livers,17 studied using cholangiography.

DISCUSSION

Anatomical understanding of the liver has changed in the last 2,000 years. Galen described 5-lobed livers in apes18 and even Vesalius19 perpetuated this misunderstanding in his Fabrica. Till renaissance, the internal liver anatomy had seldom been described.
In 1654, Francis Glisson described the inner anatomy of the liver (and its capsule/envelop) using “cooking” and “ants-digestion” methods, earlier described by Spiegel. Glisson named those methods “liver-defleshing”, as the final result would be a cast of intrahepatic vessels. 20
The enlightenment and the modern era brought the availability of organs to be studied (and injected), culminating with the studies of Cantlie, MacIndoe & Counseller, Hjortsjo, Goldsmith & Woodburne and Couinaud. 21,22 Couinaud and his collection of corrosion casts revolutionized the anatomical knowledge of the liver. 22
For the last 50 years, attention has been driven towards the caudate. Its anatomy has been studied using several methods. 7,9,11,12
Considering the caudate lobe complexity, divisions and micro-anatomical architecture, its published anatomical data has been mainly limited to “negative images”, including corrosion casts or X-ray cholangiograms. The missing relationships between caudate ducts and the liver itself are shortcomings of such methodologies. To further increase the difficulties in obtaining a realistic, surgically oriented representations of the caudate ducts, are articles presenting macroscopically dissected (de-fleshed), black-and-white figures of caudate lobes without differentiation between arteries, veins, portal branches and ducts. 15,23,24
Based on techniques described and routinely used in other areas of anatomical knowledge, this study comprises a 4-step procedure that includes: a) preparation of high- quality cadaveric livers, b) with silicone-injected arteries and veins an stained biliary ducts to facilitate recognition, c) dissected under surgical microscope and d) documented using 2 & 3D images aimed at enhancing the clinical understanding of the anatomy of caudate. Its application has the potential to enhance clinical and morphological of the caudate ducts, being of interest to anatomists and surgeons alike.

Notes

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declare no conflict of interest for this article.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

Conceptualization: ACAM. Data curation: ACAM, CM. Formal analysis: ACAM, CM. Methodology: ACAM, CM. Project administration: ACAM, CM. Visualization: CM. Writing - original draft: ACAM, CM. Writing - review & editing: AM, CM.

REFERENCES

1. Nagino M, Kamiya J, Arai T, Nishio H, Ebata T, Nimura Y. 2006; "Anatomic" right hepatic trisectionectomy (extended right hepatectomy) with caudate lobectomy for hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Ann Surg. 243:28–32. DOI: 10.1097/01.sla.0000193604.72436.63. PMID: 16371733. PMCID: PMC1449975.
crossref
2. Sugiura T, Nagino M, Kamiya J, Nishio H, Ebata T, Yokoyama Y, et al. 2007; Infraportal bile duct of the caudate lobe: a troublesome anatomic variation in right-sided hepatectomy for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. Ann Surg. 246:794–798. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3180f633de. PMID: 17968171.
3. Hwang S, Lee SG, Ha TY, Ahn CS, Park KM, Kim KH, et al. 2004; Simplified standardized technique for living donor liver transplantation using left liver graft plus caudate lobe. Liver Transpl. 10:1398–1405. DOI: 10.1002/lt.20241. PMID: 15497157.
crossref
4. Kubota K, Takayama T, Sano K, Hasegawa K, Aoki T, Sugawara Y, et al. 2002; Small bile duct reconstruction of the caudate lobe in living-related liver transplantation. Ann Surg. 235:174–177. DOI: 10.1097/00000658-200202000-00003. PMID: 11807355. PMCID: PMC1422411.
crossref
5. Abdalla EK, Vauthey JN, Couinaud C. 2002; The caudate lobe of the liver: implications of embryology and anatomy for surgery. Surg Oncol Clin N Am. 11:835–848. DOI: 10.1016/S1055-3207(02)00035-2. PMID: 12607574.
6. Kumon M. 2017; Anatomical study of the caudate lobe with special reference to portal venous and biliary branches using corrosion liver casts and clinical application. Liver Cancer. 6:161–170. DOI: 10.1159/000454682. PMID: 28275582. PMCID: PMC5340219.
crossref
7. Healey JE Jr, Schroy PC. 1953; Anatomy of the biliary ducts within the human liver; analysis of the prevailing pattern of branchings and the major variations of the biliary ducts. AMA Arch Surg. 66:599–616. DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.1953.01260030616008. PMID: 13039731.
8. Makki K, Chorasiya V, Srivastava A, Singhal A, Khan AA, Vij V. 2018; Analysis of caudate lobe biliary anatomy and its implications in living donor liver transplantation - a single centre prospective study. Transpl Int. 31:1041–1049. DOI: 10.1111/tri.13272. PMID: 29722074.
crossref
9. Edo H, Sekiguchi R, Edo N, Kajiyama A, Nagamoto M, Gomi T. 2019; Evaluation of biliary anatomy in the caudate lobe using drip infusion cholangiography-computed tomography. Abdom Radiol (NY). 44:886–893. DOI: 10.1007/s00261-018-1825-4. PMID: 30448918.
crossref
10. Ryu M, Cho A. 2009. New liver anatomy- portal segmentation and the drainage vein. Springer Japan;Tokyo: DOI: 10.1007/978-4-431-95993-9.
11. Hyodo T, Kumano S, Kushihata F, Okada M, Hirata M, Tsuda T, et al. 2012; CT and MR cholangiography: advantages and pitfalls in perioperative evaluation of biliary tree. Br J Radiol. 85:887–896. DOI: 10.1259/bjr/21209407. PMID: 22422383. PMCID: PMC3474084.
crossref
12. Gadzijev EM, Ravnik D. 1996. Atlas of applied internal liver anatomy. Springer;New York: DOI: 10.1007/978-3-7091-6580-5. PMID: 8871248.
13. Sanan A, Abdel Aziz KM, Janjua RM, van Loveren HR, Keller JT. 1999; Colored silicone injection for use in neurosurgical dissections: anatomic technical note. Neurosurgery. 45:1267–1271. discussion 1271-1274. DOI: 10.1097/00006123-199911000-00058. PMID: 10549950.
crossref
14. Shimizu S, Tanaka R, Rhoton AL Jr, Fukushima Y, Osawa S, Kawashima M, et al. 2006; Anatomic dissection and classic three-dimensional documentation: a unit of education for neurosurgical anatomy revisited. Neurosurgery. 58:E1000. discussion E1000. DOI: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000210247.37628.43. PMID: 16639290.
crossref
15. Martins C, Ribas EC, Rhoton AL Jr, Ribas GC. 2015; Three-dimensional digital projection in neurosurgical education: technical note. J Neurosurg. 123:1077–1080. DOI: 10.3171/2014.10.JNS13542. PMID: 25884261.
crossref
16. Martins C, Alencastro LF, Campero A, Rhoton A Jr. 2018; Three-dimensional endoscopic photography of anatomic specimens. World Neurosurg. 120:e730–e736. DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.08.150. PMID: 30172064.
crossref
17. Kogure K, Kuwano H, Fujimaki N, Makuuchi M. 2000; Relation among portal segmentation, proper hepatic vein, and external notch of the caudate lobe in the human liver. Ann Surg. 231:223–228. DOI: 10.1097/00000658-200002000-00011. PMID: 10674614. PMCID: PMC1420990.
crossref
18. Rajkumari A. 2015; Galen and his contribution to anatomy: a review. J Evol Med Dent Sci. 4:4509–4516. DOI: 10.14260/jemds/2015/651.
19. Vesalius A. Garrison DH, Hast MH. 2016. The fabric of the human body; an annotated translation of the 1543 and 1555 edition of "De humani corporis fabrica libri septem". Basel Freiburg Karger;Basel:
20. Walker RM. 1966; Francis Glisson and his capsule. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 38:71–91. PMID: 5325981. PMCID: PMC2311879.
21. Fortner JG, Blumgart LH. 2001; A historic perspective of liver surgery for tumors at the end of the millennium. J Am Coll Surg. 193:210–222. DOI: 10.1016/S1072-7515(01)00910-3. PMID: 11491452.
22. Sutherland F, Harris J. 2002; Claude Couinaud: a passion for the liver. Arch Surg. 137:1305–1310. DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.137.11.1305. PMID: 12413326.
23. Lee UY, Murakami G, Han SH. 2004; Arterial supply and biliary drainage of the dorsal liver: a dissection study using controlled specimens. Anat Sci Int. 79:158–166. DOI: 10.1111/j.1447-073x.2004.00077.x. PMID: 15453617.
crossref
24. Murakami G, Hata F. 2002; Human liver caudate lobe and liver segment. Anat Sci Int. 77:211–224. DOI: 10.1046/j.0022-7722.2002.00033.x. PMID: 12557417.
crossref

FIGURES AND TABLE

Fig. 1
(A) Visceral surface of an injected liver. The vena cava is highlighted by the blue silicone and provides instant orientation around the porta hepatis. The gallbladder has a redundant cystic duct. Although not injected, the bile staining allows their clear differentiation from the red silicone-injected arterial branches. (B) Enlarged view of the caudate lobe and its parts after resection of the gallbladder. The common biliary duct and the portal vein have been displaced superiorly. According to Kumon,6 the caudate is divided into Spiegel lobe, paracaval portion and the caudate process. Much is debated about the boundaries of these three portions. The magnification allows identification of minute caudate structures. A microsurgical dissector depresses vena cava’s anterior wall, displaying the veins draining the caudate process. At this level there are two notches, close to the transition between the caudate process and the paracaval portion. These notches should not be confused with Kogure et al.17 external caudate notch. Although the external caudate notch as described by these authors is not present in this specimen, a slight indentation can be seen along the anterior caudate surface in relation to Spiegel lobe’s portal branches. (C) Posterior view of the diaphragmatic surface of the liver. The hepatic veins have been isolated using black ligatures. The superior pole of caudate corresponds to the venous confluence into suprahepatic vena cava (yellow dotted line). Insert: corresponding view of an injected specimen. (D) Liver parenchyma has been resected to expose venous tributaries of the major hepatic veins. This specimen presents an inferior right hepatic vein. (E) A microsurgical dissector has been used to displace the retro hepatic vena cava. A caudate vein can be seen entering its middle third. (F) The portal vein has been elevated to display caudate’s portal branches. The dissector is located at the level of portal bifurcation. Located to the right are a caudate process portal branch and the right portal vein. Paracaval and Spiegel’s lobe portal branches can be seen joining the left portal vein. A biliary duct can be devised through the spaces between these portal branches. (G) The portal vein has been partially resected to expose the caudate ducts. The duct partially visualized in (F) is in fact a Spiegel’s biliary duct passing along the anterior surface of the caudate to join the major biliary collectors.
AHBPS-24-415-f001.tif
Fig. 2
Microsurgical dissection of the caudate biliary ducts after removal of vascular structures along the porta hepatis. This specimen (L1) has been chosen as its anatomical arrangement can be expected in less than 5% of livers studied by cholangiography, according to Healey and Schroy7 and its anatomical images have seldom been presented. (A) Overview of porta hepatis after removal of arterial and venous branches. (B) Enlarged view of (A). Several biliary ducts drain the caudate and form a common biliary caudate collector that joins the major ducts close to its bifurcation. (C) Biliary ducts to the right liver have been exposed. In this specimen, biliary ducts draining the caudate process and paracaval portion collect into an intermediary duct. (D) Parenchymal resection has been undertaken to expose the biliary ducts to the left liver. (E) Caudate process and paracaval biliary ducts join into an intermediary duct. An intermediary duct also collects a set of short ducts from Spiegel lobe. These intermediary ducts join to form a single caudate biliary duct. (F) Although the caudate duct seems to join the major ducts at the bifurcation, view through the common duct lumen shows that this junction involves in fact the right duct. This specimen may explain differences between cholangiography descriptions and surgical findings. (G) The ductal tree has been resected to display its draining pattern. This last step on each dissection has served as model for the summarized data on Table 1.
AHBPS-24-415-f002.tif
Table 1
Summarized data on dissected specimens
Specimen Artery Portal Duct
Liver 1* 2 branches: 1 left hepatic artery 1 Seg 6/7 artery 3 branches: 1 right portal 2 left portal AHBPS-24-415-i1.tif
Liver 2 3 branches: 2 left hepatic artery 1 Seg 6/7 artery 4 branches: 1 right portal 2 left portal 1 main portal AHBPS-24-415-i2.tif
Liver 3 2 branches: 2 left hepatic artery 4 branches: 1 right portal 1 left portal 2 main portal AHBPS-24-415-i3.tif
Liver 4 2 branches: 1 left hepatic artery 1 accessory right artery 2 branches: 1 right portal 1 main portal AHBPS-24-415-i4.tif
Liver 5 3 branches: 1 left hepatic artery 2 right hepatic artery 3 branches: 1 right portal 1 left portal 1 main portal AHBPS-24-415-i5.tif
Liver 6 2 branches: 1 right hepatic artery 1 accessory left artery 3 branches: 1 right portal 1 main portal AHBPS-24-415-i6.tif

*Liver depicted on Figs. 1 and 2

TOOLS
Similar articles