Dear Editor:
Secondary hematologic malignancy associated with chemotherapy or radiotherapy is common and mostly involves AML or MDS. However, therapy-related CML (tr-CML) is relatively rare as the progenitor cells in CML are less susceptible to DNA damage owing to their quiescent characteristics [1, 2] and the oncogene is relatively unified to Philadelphia chromosome (Ph), which harbors the BCR-ABL1 gene [3]. A previous study on tr-CML revealed that the average time for CML development following the first course of therapy is 48 months (range: 23 to 192 months) [2]. tr-CML has been shown to develop following radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy wherein alkylating agents or topoisomerase inhibitors are mostly used [2, 4]. tr-CML has been previously reported in solid tumors, lymphoma, multiple myeloma, etc. [2–5]. Among them, Hodgkin’s lymphoma (HL) was the most common primary malignancy followed by CLL [2]. Uterine, cervical, ovarian, and breast cancers were also common primary malignancies in tr-CML [4]. The major BCR-ABL1 is a common fusion gene in tr-CML, and JAK2-BCR has been reported occasionally [3, 5]. The clinical course of tr-CML seems similar to that of de novo CML [4]. Most patients presented clinical features of CML such as leukocytosis or anemia [2–5].
A few cases of preleukemic CML (termed “preclinical,” “asymptomatic,” or “smoldering” CML), which is characterized by the presence of BCR-ABL1 without clinical features of CML, have been reported. However, most cases were not associated with cytotoxic therapy [6–8]. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first case of preleukemic CML related to cytotoxic therapy (therapy-related preleukemic CML) in Korea. Until now two cases of therapy-related preleukemic CML have been reported worldwide (Table 1) [9, 10]. Our case is unique because we confirmed normal karyotype before chemotherapy, suggesting that the therapy induced preleukemic CML. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Kosin University Gospel Hospital, Busan, Korea (KUGH 2019-12-007) that waived informed consent from the patient.
A 37-year-old man visited the Kosin university Gospel hospital presenting with a mass in his left oropharynx in November 2016 and was diagnosed as having T-lymphoblastic lymphoma (LBL). He showed normal karyotype, 46,XY [20], in his bone marrow with no evidence of lymphoma involvement. He underwent a left tonsillectomy and four cycles of systemic chemotherapy. The chemotherapy regimens included: one cycle of methotrexate, cytarabine, and dexamethasone; two cycles of cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin, and dexamethasone; one cycle of methotrexate and cytarabine; and a final cycle of etoposide, methylprednisolone, cytarabine, and cisplatin. He achieved complete remission in December 2016 and subsequently underwent autologous stem cell transplantation in May 2017 after conditioning with busulfan, etoposide, and cyclophosphamide.
The lymphoma relapsed in his right tonsil in July 2019. The complete blood counts were as follows: Hb 141 g/L, platelets 240×109/L, and leukocytes 6.28×109/L with 34% segmented neutrophils, 1% band neutrophils, 53% lymphocytes, 5% monocytes, 5% eosinophils, and 2% basophils. Bone marrow examination showed no evidence of CML or lymphoma (the myeloid:erythroid ratio was 3.4:1).
The differential counts of the bone marrow aspirate were as follows: myeloblasts, 1.8%; promyelocytes, 1.8%; myelocytes, 14.3%; metamyelocytes, 15.4%; band neutrophils, 15.0%; segmented neutrophils, 16.1%; eosinophils, 2.5%; basophils, 0.5%; proerythroblasts, 0.5%; basophilic erythroblasts, 0.9%; polychromatic erythroblasts, 10.2%; orthochromatic erythroblasts, 8.2%; lymphocytes, 8.6%; monocytes, 1.6; and histiocytes, 2.5%. However, a 46,XY,t(9;22)(q34;q11.2)[15]/46,XY[5] karyotype was detected (Fig. 1A). Additionally, FISH analysis using the locus-specific identifier BCR/ABL (ABL1) translocation, dual fusion probe (Cytocell, Cambridge, UK) revealed the BCR and ABL1 gene fusion in 76.5% of interphases (Fig. 1B). Real-time PCR (Qiagen, Marseille, France) analysis revealed a normalized copy number of 29.5 for minor BCR-ABL1 (e1a2). An additional real-time PCR for relapsed lymphoma was considered; however, the residual tonsillar biopsy sample was insufficient. Moreover, we attempted to identify BCR-ABL1 retrospectively from the initial bone marrow sample and lymphoma tissue which were obtained in 2016; however, this proved unfeasible. The patient was diagnosed as having recurrent T-LBL and preleukemic CML. He was treated for relapsed lymphoma; regular examination for preleukemic CML was scheduled without tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy.
To date, only two cases of therapy-related preleukemic CML have been reported (Table 1) [9, 10]. In one case, a 32-year-old man with HL received radiotherapy and chemotherapy. After 22 months, the presence of BCR-ABL1 was detected and the patient was diagnosed as having preleukemic CML that progressed to clinical CML 16 months later [9]. The other case involved an 82-year-old man diagnosed as having mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). He had a medical history of CLL, which had been treated with chemotherapy seven years previously and did not exhibit any clinical features; however, BCR-ABL1 was detected when he was diagnosed as having MCL. He was diagnosed as having preleukemic CML, which developed into clinical CML within eight months [10]. However, in both cases, the presence of the BCR-ABL1 fusion gene was not evaluated before initial therapy. In contrast, in our study, chemotherapy-induced preleukemic CML was supported by the presence of normal chromosomes in the patient’s bone marrow karyotype before chemotherapy. There is no consensus on the standard treatment for preleukemic CML. However preemptive tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy is often considered and may delay the transformation to clinical CML [6–8].
This report suggests that BCR-ABL1 clones can be asymptomatic after cytotoxic therapy and require some time before progression to clinical CML. During preleukemic CML period TKI therapy can be used preemptively. We believe that this is the first reported case of preleukemic CML that occurred post cytotoxic therapy for T-LBL.
Notes
AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
HC, SC, and DHY conceived and designed the study, searched the scientific literature, interpreted the data, and wrote and revised the report. SC provided technical support for additional tests. WL and HH designed the study, revised the report, and gave administrative support. HSL, DJK, and TK contributed to the interpretation of clinical data. MHK supervised the study and revised the report.
REFERENCES
1. Gale RP, Hlatky L, Sachs RK, Radivoyevitch T. Why is there so much therapy-related AML and MDS and so little therapy-related CML? Leuk Res. 2014; 38:1162–4.
2. Aguiar RC. Therapy-related chronic myeloid leukemia: an epidemiological, clinical and pathogenetic appraisal. Leuk Lymphoma. 1998; 29:17–26.
3. Lee HY, Lee KH, Hyun MS, Kim MK, Koh SA, Cho HS. Chronic myeloid leukemia as a secondary malignancy after diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Korean J Intern Med. 2014; 29:250–2.
4. Waller CF, Fetscher S, Lange W. Treatment-related chronic myelogenous leukemia. Ann Hematol. 1999; 78:341–54.
5. Millett R, Aggarwal A, Tabbara I, Nassereddine S. Chronic myeloid leukemia as secondary malignancy following the treatment of Hodgkin lymphoma: a case series. Anticancer Res. 2019; 39:4333–5.
6. Gheith S, Spranklin L, Agostino N. The clinical relevance of detection of BCR-ABL in an asymptomatic patient: a case report and review of the literature. Ann Clin Pathol. 2015; 3:1054.
7. Aye Le L, Loghavi S, Young KH, Siddiqi I, Yin CC, Routbort MJ, et al. Preleukemic phase of chronic myelogenous leukemia: morphologic and immunohistochemical characterization of 7 cases. Ann Diagn Pathol. 2016; 21:53–8.
8. Yoo DW, Park SH, Yi J, Kim IS, Kim HH, Chang CL, et al. Hidden “preleukemic phase” of chronic myeloid leukemia presenting without leukocytosis in the peripheral blood unrelated to chemotherapy in a patient diagnosed with diffuse large B cell lymphoma. Ann Lab Med. 2017; 37:443–5.
Table 1
Patient | Reference | ID state | preleukemic CML state | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|||||||||
Age (yr) | Sex | ID | BM cytogenetics | Type of therapy | Interval ID-preleukemic CML | Patient’s status | BM cytogenetics | Follow-up | ||
1 | Berman et al. [9] | 82 | M | CLL | NT | CTx | 7 years | Newly diagnosed MCL | 47,XY,t(9;22)(q34;q11.2),+mar[4]/46,XY[16] | Developed clinical CML 8 months later |
|
||||||||||
2 | Bolaños-Meade et al. [10] | 35 | M | HL | NT | CTx + RTx | 14 months | Preparing autologous SCT | 46,XY,t(9;22)(q34;q11)[1]/46,XY[6] | Developed clinical CML 16 months later |
|
||||||||||
3 | Present case | 37 | M | T-LBL | 46,XY[20] | CTx | 32 months | Relapsed T-LBL | 46,XY,t(9;22)(q34;q11.2)[15]/46,XY[5] | Regular follow-up proceeding for 8 months |