Journal List > Anat Cell Biol > v.53(4) > 1145509

Inthasan, Vaseenon, and Mahakkanukrauh: Anatomical study and branching point of neurovascular structures at the medial side of the ankle

Abstract

Nerve entrapment and blood circulation impairment associated with the medial side of the ankle are not uncommon. The purpose of this study was to describe the anatomical basis of neurovascular structures of the medial ankle which comprised the number, origin, branching pattern, and branching point. Forty feet of fresh cadavers were examined by using 2 reference lines: the malleolar-calcaneal (MC) and navicular-calcaneal (NC) axes. We recorded number, origin, length of the 2 axes, the locations and widths of neurovascular structures on MC and NC axes, the branching point of neurovascular structures, and the branching pattern of neurovascular structures was recorded and was separated into 5 types. The posterior tibial nerve (PTN) bifurcated to plantar and calcaneal nerves and branched proximally to the tarsal tunnel (TT). The posterior tibial artery bifurcated to plantar and calcaneal arteries and branched inferiorly to PTN and within the TT. The calcaneal nerves and arteries had more variation of number and origin. The most common branching point of calcaneal nerves and arteries is within the TT, except the medial calcaneal nerve. It branched proximally to the TT. The anatomical knowledge from this study is important for the diagnosis and treatment of clinicians.

Introduction

The clinical implications associated with several neurovascular structures at the medial side of the ankle such as nerve entrapment and impaired blood circulation. The tarsal tunnel (TT) is the important structures which house the posterior tibial nerve (PTN) and the posterior tibial artery (PTA) including the associated branches of nerve and artery. The medial wall of TT composed of the talus, calcaneus, distal tibia, medial malleolus. The flexor retinaculum forms the TT’s roof. The TT is further separated into medial and lateral tunnels by a fibrous septum. The medial tunnel houses the medial plantar nerve (MPN) and artery, and the lateral tunnel houses the lateral plantar nerve (LPN) and artery [1]. There are numerous anatomical studies of the neurovascular structures at the medial of the ankle including identification of its variations. The PTN bifurcates into the two plantar nerves that are the medial and LPNs. The bifurcation point of the PTN varies, such as within, proximal, or distal to the TT [2-4]. Heel pain is the most common symptom that involves TT syndrome or heel spur [2, 3, 5, 6]. Moreover, some researchers represent heel pain may be involved medial and inferior calcaneal nerves (ICNs) [5, 7, 8]. The medial calcaneal nerve (MCN) branches from the PTN and its branches. The MCN has a highly variable origin and a highly variable number of branches. Its origin may be from the PTN, LPN, and MPN [3, 9, 10]. The number of branch ranges from one to five branches [9-12]. For the ICN, it can be called several names such as Baxter’s nerve [13], the first branch of the LPN, deep calcaneal nerve, and nerve to the abductor digiti minimi (ADM) muscle [14]. It originates from the LPN [12]. The number of branches from this nerve is a single to two branches, where a single branching pattern is the most common variation [10-12]. The knowledge of the medial and ICNs at the medial heel region is essential for the diagnosis and treatment of heel pain and TT syndrome [15, 16].
The vascular structures at the medial ankle have a similar pattern with the nerves. The PTA bifurcates into medial and lateral plantar arteries which are distal to the PTN [2]. However, the medial calcaneal artery (MCA) may originate from branches of the PTA. There are relatively few studies on the branching pattern of these arteries [17]. Then, the conditions involved with the MCA and inferior calcaneal artery (ICA) such as TT syndrome, calcaneal nail, operative procedure around the ankle [18] including the injuries of the main branch of these arteries. If the MCA, inferior artery, and their main branches were injured from these conditions, the related structures may be affected. Hence, the anatomical knowledge of vascular structures is essential for clinicians to treat patients.
The neurovascular structures at the medial side of the ankle have more variation, however, further knowledge is still needed. This knowledge is important for clinicians to apply for the diagnosis and treatment of patients at the medial side of the ankle. The lack of anatomical understanding can cause the failure of the treatment [19]. Hence, the purpose of this study was to describe the branching pattern of neurovascular structures of the medial ankle which comprise of the branching point, bifurcation type, origin, and number of a neurovascular structures.

Materials and Methods

Forty fresh legs were randomly dissected which were donated from the Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand. This study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University (Study code: ANA-2561-05229). Only cadavers with sufficient quality and no evidence of surgical intervention at the ankle were included in this study. Cadavers were disarticulated at the knee joint and the tibial artery was identified at the proximal end of the leg. Then, the tibial artery was injected with a silicone solution and was left to solidify. Each leg was placed in the anatomical position and the superficial structures were carefully removed to identify the neurovascular structures at the medial side of the ankle. The nerves were the PTN, the MPN, the LPN, the MCN, and the ICN. Moreover, the vascular structures composed of the PTA, the medial plantar artery (MPA), the lateral plantar artery (LPA), the MCA, and the ICA. This study used 2 reference lines: the malleolar-calcaneal (MC) axis which started from medial malleolus to medial process of the calcaneal tubercle and navicular-calcaneal (NC) axis which started from tubercle of navicular bone to medial process of the calcaneal tubercle as shown in Fig. 1. The boundary of the TT was proximal and distal to 2 cm from the MC axis as shown in Fig. 2. After the neurovascular structures had exposed, photographs of the neurovascular structures were taken, the number and origin of their branches were also recorded. Parameters such as (1) the length of the MC axis and NC axis, (2) the locations of neurovascular structures on MC axis and NC axis, (3) the widths of neurovascular structures on MC axis and NC axis, (4) the branching point of neurovascular structures were measured. The distances of the branching point of neurovascular structures were recorded as X-coordinate and Y-coordinate. The X-axis was the reference lines which were the MC axis and NC axis. The Y-axis was a perpendicular line to the X-axis. The medial malleolus and tubercle of navicular bone were set to zero for measurements. Moreover, the medial process of calcaneal tubercle was set to zero for the measurement of locations of neurovascular structures on the MC and NC axis. The locations, widths, and branching points of neurovascular structures were shown in Figs. 3 and 4. The distance superior to the axis which was indicated as a positive value. On the other hand, the distance inferior to the axis was labeled as a negative value. Furthermore, the branching patterns of the PTN and PTA were also recorded and were classified into 5 types, based on the study of Torres and colleagues [20]: Type I presented that the bifurcation was proximal to the axis and inside the TT; Type II presented that the neurovascular structures bifurcated at the axis; Type III presented that the bifurcation was distal to the axis and inside the TT; Type IV presented that the bifurcation was proximal to the axis and outside the TT, and Type V presented that the bifurcation was distal to the axis and outside the tunnel. All parameters were measured by using a digital vernier caliper (INOX IP54 calipers; Micro Precision Calibration Inc., Mitutoyo, Sao Paulo, Brazil). All data were recorded and calculated using Microsoft Excel 2017 (Microsoft office 365, Redmond, WA, USA). The results were expressed as mean±SD and/or range of minimum and maximum values. All pictures in this study were drawn by Microsoft PowerPoint (Microsoft) based on the dissected structures.

Results

The results showed the length of the MC axis was 77.22±5.56 mm (68.12–94.73 mm) and the length of the NC axis was 63.97±5.28 mm (51.76–78.31 mm). The PTN and PTA bifurcated into MPN, LPN, MPA, and LPA. The locations and widths of MPN, LPN, MPA, and LPA on MC axis and NC axis was shown in Table 1. The MC axis and NC axis were divided into four parts from medial malleolus. The main branches of PTN and PTA located in the third part of the MC axis. For the NC axis, the MPN located in the second part, the MPA located in the second part and third part. On the other hand, the LPN and the LPA located in the third part of the NC axis.

Posterior tibial nerve

The PTN in this study showed 40 legs which bifurcated into two main branches: MPN and LPN. Furthermore, PTN was the origin of the MCN and ICN (Table 2). The branching point of PTN was superior to the MC axis in all cases which separated into 2 types: Type I and Type IV. The bifurcation of PTN was Type I in 20 cases and Type IV in 20 cases. The distances of the branching point of the PTN located in the second part on the MC axis and were shown in Table 3. After PTN bifurcated to MPN and LPN, the plantar nerves ran into their tunnels. The TT was separated into a medial TT for MPN and lateral TT for LPN by fibrous septum.

Medial calcaneal nerve

The number and origin of MCN had more variations. The most common type of MCN was three branches type (Table 2). The distance of the branching point of MCN on the MC axis in all types located in the second part on the MC axis.

The first branch of MCN (MCN1)

The first branch of MCN found 40 cases. The MCN1 originated from PTN, LPN, and MPN. MCN1 bifurcated superior to the MC axis in 30 cases which separated into 2 types: Type I and Type IV. The branching pattern of MCN1 was a Type I in three cases and Type IV in 27 cases. For the other ten cases, they highly branched from the PTN, therefore the method in this study cannot be used for measurements. Moreover, the MCN1 divided into the small branches in 30 cases which branched superior to MC axis in 28 cases and highly branched in two cases. The distances of the branching point of MCN1 were shown in Table 3.

The second branch of MCN (MCN2)

The second branch of MCN was found in 32 cases. They originated from the PTN, MPN, LPN, and both the PTN and MPN. The branching point of MCN2 was superior to the MC axis in 23 cases which separated into two types: Types I and IV. The bifurcation of MCN2 was Type I in 13 cases and Type IV in 15 cases. The other four cases highly branched from the PTN which cannot use the method in this study for measurement. Moreover, the MCN2 divided into the small branches in 17 cases which branched superior to the MC axis in 16 cases and branched on the MC axis in one case. The distances of the branching point of MCN2 on the MC axis included the distance of the branching point of MCN2 at the origin of the MC axis and before the origin of the MC axis in one case and four cases, respectively. The distances of the branching point of MCN2 were shown in Table 3.

The third branch of MCN (MCN3)

The third branch of the MCN was identified in 17 cases originating from the PTN and MPN. The branching point of the MCN3 was superior to the MC axis in 14 cases and bifurcated on the MC axis in one case which separated into Type I, II, and IV. The bifurcation of MCN3 was Type I in six cases, Type II in one case, and Type IV in eight cases. The other two cases branched high above the PTN and were not suitable for the method in this study for measurement. Moreover, the MCN3 divided into the small branches in two cases which branched superior to the MC axis. The distances of the branching point of MCN3 were shown in Table 3.

Inferior calcaneal nerve

The ICN had one to two branches. Most ICN originated from the LPN. The most common type of ICN was a single branch type (Table 2). The distance of the branching point on the MC axis of ICN located in the third part on the MC axis in all cases.

The first branch of ICN (ICN1)

The first branch of ICN was found in all cases and originated from the LPN in all cases except one case which originated from the PTN. The branching point of the ICN1 was superior to the MC axis in all cases which separated into two types: Type I and Type IV. The bifurcation of ICN1 was Type I in 34 cases and Type IV in six cases. Moreover, the ICN1 divided into the small branches in 28 cases which branched superior to the MC axis in 21 cases and branched on the MC axis in seven cases. The distances of the branching point of ICN1 were shown in Table 3.

The second branch of ICN (ICN2)

The second branch of ICN was found only in five cases and originated from the LPN in all cases. The branching point of ICN2 was in the TT in all cases that separated into two types: Type I in four cases and Type II in one case. Moreover, the ICN2 divided into the small branches in three cases which branched on the MC axis in two cases and branched superior to the MC axis in one case. The distances of the branching point of ICN2 were shown in Table 3.

Posterior tibial artery

The PTA in this study represented 40 cases which divided into the MPA and LPA. Moreover, the PTA was the origin of the MCA and the ICA which were shown in Table 4. All cases of the PTA bifurcated in the TT. The PTA bifurcated superior to the MC axis which separated into two types: Type I in 39 cases and Type III in one case. Other types were not represented. The distance of the branching point of PTA located in the third part on the MC axis and were shown in Table 3. The branching point of PTA was lower than the branching point of PTN (closed to MC axis). After the PTA bifurcated to the MPA and LPA, the plantar arteries ran into their tunnels that accompanied the nerves. In their tunnels, the plantar arteries ran lower than the plantar nerves.

Medial calcaneal artery

The number and origin of MCA had more variations. The most common type of MCA was three branches type (Table 4). The distance of the branching point of MCA located in the third part on the MC axis in all cases.

The first branch of MCA (MCA1)

The first branch of MCA was found in 40 cases. They originated from the PTA and LPA. The branching point of the MCA1 was superior to the MC axis in all cases which separated into two types: Type I and IV. The bifurcation of the MCA1 was Type I in 30 cases and Type IV in ten cases. Moreover, the MCA1 divided into small branches in 15 cases which branched superior to the MC axis in all cases. The distances of the branching point of MCA1 on the MC axis included the distance of the branching point of MCA1 before the origin of the MC axis in one case. The distances of the branching point of MCA1 were shown in Table 3.

The second branch of MCA (MCA2)

The second branch of MCA was found in 38 cases. Their origins were the PTA, MPA, LPA, and both the PTA and MPA. The MCA2 bifurcated superior to the MC axis in 34 cases and on the MC axis in four cases which separated into three types: Type I, II, and IV. The bifurcation of MCA2 was Type I in 33 cases, Type II in four cases, and Type IV in one case. Moreover, the MCA2 divided into small branches in 21 cases which branched superior to MC axis in all cases except one which branched on the MC axis. The distances of the branching point of MCA2 were shown in Table 3.

The third branch of MCA (MCA3)

The third branch of MCA was found in 31 cases. Several origins included the PTA, MPA, and LPA. The branching point of MCA3 was superior to the MC axis in 27 cases. In the four other cases, they branched on the MC axis in three cases and branched inferior to the MC axis in one. They separated into four types: Type I in 26 cases, Type II in three cases, Type III in one case, and Type IV in one case. Moreover, the MCA1 divided into small branches in 12 cases which branched superior to the MC axis in seven cases and branched on the MC axis in five cases. The distances of the branching point of MCA3 were shown in Table 3.

The fourth branch of MCA (MCA4)

The fourth branch of the MCA was found in 16 cases. Several origins included the PTA, MPA, and LPA. The branching point of MCA4 was superior to the MC axis in 12 cases. The four other cases branched on the MC axis in three cases and branched inferior to the MC axis in one case. They separated into three types: Type I in 12 cases, Type II in three cases, and Type III in one case. Moreover, the MCA4 divided into small branches in four cases which branched superior to the MC axis in three cases and branched inferior to the MC axis in one case. The distances of the branching point of MCA4 were shown in Table 3.

The fifth branch of MCA (MCA5)

The fifth branch of the MCA was found in five cases originating from the MPA or LPA. The branching point of MCA5 was superior to the MC axis in all cases except one which branched inferior to the MC axis. They separated into two types: Type I in four cases and Type III in one case. The distances of the branching point of MCA5 were shown in Table 3.

Inferior calcaneal artery

The number of ICA had one to three branches. The most common type of ICA was a single branch type. The number and origin of ICA were shown in Table 4.

The first branch of ICA (ICA1)

The first branch of ICA was found in 38 cases and all originated from the LPA. Most of the ICA1 bifurcated within the TT. The branching point of ICA1 was separated into three types: Type I in seven cases, Type II in 12 cases, and Type III in 16 cases. Also, the ICA1 branched on the NC axis in three cases. Moreover, the ICA1 divided into small branches in eight cases which branched superior to the MC axis, on the MC axis, and on the NC axis in four cases, one case, and three cases, respectively. The distances of the branching point of ICA1 located in the fourth part on the MC axis in 35 cases. For the remaining three cases, the distance of branching point of ICA1 located in the fourth part of the NC axis. The distances of the branching point of ICA1 were shown in Table 3.

The second branch of ICA (ICA2)

The second branch of the ICA was found in nine cases. They originated from LPA in all cases. The branching point of ICA2 was Type II in one case. Besides, the ICA2 branched on the NC axis in four cases, branched low from NC axis in one case, and branched superior to NC axis in three cases. Moreover, the ICA2 divided into small branches in one case which branched on the MC axis. The distances of the branching point of ICA2 located in the third part on the MC axis in one case, on the other hand, the distance of the branching point of ICA2 located in the third part of the NC axis in eight cases. The distances of the branching point of ICA2 were shown in Table 3.

The third branch of ICA (ICA3)

The third branch of the ICA identified two cases which all originated from the LPA. The branching point of the ICA3 was inferior to the NC axis. The distances of the branching point of ICA3 were shown in Table 3. They located in the third part on the NC axis.

Discussion

There were several studies on the neurovascular structures branching pattern at the medial side of the ankle [2-4, 10, 18, 20-28]. The researchers studied these structures related to the TT and its clinical implications [2-4, 10, 18, 20-23]. The location, branching point, and branching pattern of the neurovascular structures were essential for the management of several clinical conditions. The clinical conditions related to the neurovascular structures at the medial side of the ankle such as TT syndrome [29-31], heel pain [15, 16], the atrophy of ADM muscle [32], and avascular necrosis of the talus [33-35]. The treatment of each condition depended on the knowledge of the neurovascular structures for successful treatment. Furthermore, the anatomical variations of neurovascular structures had differences in each population.
The previous studies relate the location of the plantar nerves to the MC and NC axes [4, 36]. Heimkes and colleagues [36] and Bilge and colleagues [4] measured the location of the MPN from medial malleolus and the location of the LPN from the medial tubercle of the calcaneus. They represented that the safe area for neurovascular structures approximated 20 to 25 mm from medial malleolus and 25 to 30 mm from the medial tubercle of the calcaneus. Moreover, Heimkes and colleagues [36] measured the location of the MPN from navicular tubercle and the location of the LPN from the medial tubercle of the calcaneus on the NC axis. The safe distances for neurovascular structures approximated 15 mm from medial malleolus and 30 mm from the medial tubercle of the calcaneus. In this study, the areas approximated 35 mm from medial malleolus and 20 mm from the medial tubercle of the calcaneus on the MC axis may be safe for clinical procedures and will not damage the neurovascular structures. For the NC axis, the safe distances for neurovascular structures approximated 25 mm from medial malleolus and 20 mm from the medial tubercle of the calcaneus. The safe areas for neurovascular structures in this study differed from the previous studies [4, 36] because the MPA and LPA were measured in this study. The information could be applied to the surgical approach about the safe areas for pin insertion.
The PTN or tibial nerve in one of the branches of the sciatic nerve [3]. The PTN divided into two main branches such as MPN and LPN including the MCN and ICN. The bifurcation of PTN in the consensus of the previous researchers occurred in the TT which was different from the current study. The bifurcation point of the PTN in this study bifurcated superior and without the tarsal tunnel (Table 3). Furthermore, the bifurcation type of PTN in this study based on the classification of Torres and colleagues [20]. The types of branching points in this study were different from the previous studies (Table 5) [2-4, 18, 20, 22, 24]. These findings of the different types of bifurcation of PTN were important. The high division of the PTN in this study may be related to the development of the TT syndrome in the patients [2]. In addition, the race and/or the individual difference related to the different findings in this study. Clinically, the TT syndrome could be caused by the neurovascular entrapment in the TT. The compression of the neurovascular structures could be caused by the excessive tension of the flexor retinaculum, bone deformities surrounding the TT, bleeding, and adhesions caused by trauma, neuroma, space-occupying lesions, the placement of the foot in inversion and eversion positions [29-31]. The data of these structures, PTN, PTA, and their branches, might improve the anatomical knowledge of neurovascular structures. The branching point of PTN and PTA and the location of their branches might be used as a guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of some diseases of the tarsal region [15, 16, 37, 38]. The knowledge of the PTN’s division level is important for the diagnosis and treatment of the patient of TT syndrome and numerous surgical procedures. Moreover, this knowledge could be applied in a PTN block which should be injected superiorly to the axis.
The knowledge of the MCN was important for the diagnosis and treatment of heel pain [15, 16]. Typically, the MCN was one of the PTN’s branches. The origin of MCN in the consensus of the previous researchers was similar to the current study (Table 6) [2, 3, 9-12, 18, 20, 21, 23, 24, 39, 40]. Besides, the branching point of the MCN was highly variable. The MCN could bifurcate proximal to the TT, within the TT, or distal to the TT [2, 3, 9-12, 18, 20, 21, 23, 24, 39, 40]. These findings from the previous and current studies were important for the symptoms of the patient. The proximal branch of the MCN ran outside of the TT to the medial side of the heel and the calcaneus [41]. It involved the jogger’s heel which was the compression syndrome that caused heel pain [42, 43]. Moreover, the MCN in the patient with the TT syndrome in 35% to 40% might be spared. Within the TT, the MCN was compressed which involved the localized symptoms at the heel. Prolonged standing and walking may be worsened symptoms. The rest and removal of the shoes improved these symptoms [44]. The number of branches of MCN type in this study differed from all previous studies which were seen in Table 6 [2, 3, 9-12, 18, 20, 21, 23, 24, 39, 40]. In addition, our research found 28 types of branch patterns of the MCN. Branching patterns of MCN in this study were similar and different from MCN’s pattern of one previous study [20]. Our study was similar to the first pattern (two cases), second pattern (four cases), third pattern (one case), forth pattern (one case), seventh pattern (four cases), eleventh pattern (two cases), and twelfth pattern (two cases). The current study differed from the previous study because we had a high branching point of PTN. Therefore, the branching pattern had numerous patterns than the previous study.
The knowledge of the ICN at the medial heel region is essential for the diagnosis and treatment of heel pain [15, 16]. The ICN branched typically from the LPN, however, its origin had variable [10, 11, 41]. The origin of ICN in the consensus of the previous researchers was similar to the current study (Table 7) [10-12, 20-22], except for one study. Govsa and colleagues [11] found that most origins of the ICN were the PTN. Besides, the branching point of the ICN was highly variable. The ICN could bifurcate proximal to the TT, within the TT, or distal to the TT. Most branching point of the ICN in the previous studies was inside the TT [10, 11, 20, 22] which was similar to the current study. These findings from the previous and current studies were important for the symptoms of the patient. The pain point for compression of the ICN was anterior to the posterior heel approximate four to five cm or distal to the medial tubercle of the calcaneus. The ICN’s compression caused burning pain which radiated to the plantar foot at the lateral side [6] include the atrophy of ADM muscle [32]. Moreover, the feeling of pain at the plantar foot led to a change in the position of the patient’s feet during walking [20]. The number of branches of ICN type in this study differed from all previous studies which were seen in Table 7 [10-12, 20-22]. In addition, our research found six types of branch patterns of the ICN.
The knowledge of the various locations and branching points of these nerves could improve the understanding regarding heel pain especially the medial and inferior site of the heel. Moreover, the calcaneal nerves might be endangered during the calcaneal osteotomy [4]. This information offers an application advantage for safe incisions, safe screw insertions, external fixation at the calcaneus, diagnosis, and treatment of medial ankle injuries including prevention of neuroma formation during operation. Also, the anatomical pattern of these nerves could improve regional ankle region knowledge for surgical operations.
In this study, we had clarified the location of the branching point of the PTA. From literature, the PTA divided from the popliteal artery at the inferior border of the popliteus muscle [28]. The PTA accompanied the PTN [26]. The MPA and LPA bifurcated from the PTA at deep in the abductor halluces muscle. The MPA supplied the instep of the foot, moreover, the LPA supplied the lateral midfoot and forefoot [41]. The branching point of the PTA in the previous studies bifurcated distal to the PTN [4, 18, 23, 26] and located within the TT [18, 23, 45] which were similar to the current study. On the other hand, Bilge and colleagues [4] and Tamang and colleagues [23] found that the PTA bifurcated distal to the TT which was not found in this study. Clinically, the complications of the PTA involved avascular necrosis of the talus. The PTA was one of the three extra-osseous arterial contributed branches which supplied the talus. Branches of the PTA supplied medial, inferior, and posterior aspects of the talus [33-35]. The PTA and its branches connected with other arteries such as the anterior tibial artery and its branches [17]. Each area of the talus was supplied with different anastomosis networks [46]. The injured PTA might be led to the talus necrosis. For the MPA, this artery was important for endovascular recanalization because the MPA branched to the superficial and deep branches which anastomosed with other arteries to supply dorsum of foot or the first toe. In addition, the LPA formed the plantar arch and anastomosed with anterior circulation for supply forefoot [26].
Researches of the MCA is still limited. This artery ran inferior and branched like a tree to supply the medial heel region [41]. The study of the number and origin of the MCA was highly variable. The current study had different numbers, origin, and common types from the previous studies which were shown in Table 8 [18, 39]. The branching point of the MCA in the previous studies bifurcated distal to the MCN [18, 39]. The MCA branched superior to the MC axis [18, 39] which was similar to the current study. Furthermore, our research found 23 types of branch patterns of the MCA which differed from the previous study [18]. The origin and number of MCA in the current study had differences. Therefore, the branching pattern had several patterns than the previous study. Typically, the MCA was the first branch that bifurcated from the PTA at the ankle level [28]. Moreover, the MCA was the first branch of the posterior circulation which supplied the medial malleolus region and medial plantar heel [26]. The causes of injuries involved the MCA such as TT syndrome, calcaneal nail, and operative procedures which might lead to a change in the blood supply of the related region [18].
The research of the ICA was also limited. The study of the number and origin of ICA was not cleared. In this study, the ICA bifurcated from the LPA which accompanied the ICN. The ICA bifurcated within the TT closed to the medial process of the calcaneus. Our research identified ten types of branch patterns of the ICA. The complication of the ICA might relate to the injury of the LPA, MPA, PTA, or MCA. The injured ICA might affect the related structures which were supplied from the PTA and its branches.
Clinically, the anatomical knowledge of vascular structures is essential information. The incision in operations must be in the correct location. The blood flow should be located on either side of the incision for optimized healing [17]. A free flap can be dissected out with high reliability. The vascular knowledge could decrease the risk of distal tissue necrosis in an amputated patient. Moreover, this knowledge advantage for revascularization can increase wound healing or healing of lesions.
This study may have been limited by the small cadavers. Moreover, the shrinkage tissue of the cadaver after death during dissection which may be occurred. Iborra and colleagues [22] compared the measurements from dissection and the high-resolution US in cadavers showed that the high-resolution US was as effective as the dissection of anatomical variations of the nerves at the medial side of the ankle. The noninvasive technique had a slight error about the number of branches in one specimen. The small diameter of the nerves may not be detected by the high-resolution US. However, the comparison between the invasive and noninvasive measurements could increase the reliability for clinicians to treat the patients. In the future, the small invasive techniques will be more success rate.
In conclusion, the knowledge of the location, width, number, origin, branching point, and branching types of neurovascular structures at the medial side of the ankle could help clinicians to understand the anatomy of these structures. It will benefit for clinicians in making better patient treatment decisions. Hence, the understanding of the anatomy of nerves and vessels in the medial tarsal region is essential for clinicians. The anatomical knowledge of neurovascular structures in the medial tarsal region will be a continued study in the future.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the Excellence in Osteology Research and Training Center (ORTC) with partial support by Chiang Mai University. We also thank the Research Administration, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University for their financial support of this project (grant number 152/2561).

Notes

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: CI, TV, PM. Data acquisition: CI. Data analysis or interpretation: CI. Drafting of the manuscript: CI, PM. Critical revision of the manuscript: CI, PM. Approval of the final version of the manuscript: all authors.

Conflicts of Interest

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

References

1. Ahmad M, Tsang K, Mackenney PJ, Adedapo AO. 2012; Tarsal tunnel syndrome: a literature review. Foot Ankle Surg. 18:149–52. DOI: 10.1016/j.fas.2011.10.007. PMID: 22857954.
crossref
2. Dellon AL, Mackinnon SE. 1984; Tibial nerve branching in the tarsal tunnel. Arch Neurol. 41:645–6. DOI: 10.1001/archneur.1984.04210080053013. PMID: 6721738.
crossref
3. Havel PE, Ebraheim NA, Clark SE, Jackson WT, DiDio L. 1988; Tibial nerve branching in the tarsal tunnel. Foot Ankle. 9:117–9. DOI: 10.1177/107110078800900304. PMID: 2852629.
crossref
4. Bilge O, Ozer MA, Govsa F. 2003; Neurovascular branching in the tarsal tunnel. Neuroanatomy. 2:39–41.
5. Henricson AS, Westlin NE. 1984; Chronic calcaneal pain in athletes: entrapment of the calcaneal nerve? Am J Sports Med. 12:152–4. DOI: 10.1177/036354658401200212. PMID: 6742290.
crossref
6. Schon LC, Glennon TP, Baxter DE. 1993; Heel pain syndrome: electrodiagnostic support for nerve entrapment. Foot Ankle. 14:129–35. DOI: 10.1177/107110079301400304. PMID: 8491426.
crossref
7. Arenson DJ, Cosentino GL, Suran SM. 1980; The inferior calcaneal nerve: an anatomical study. J Am Podiatry Assoc. 70:552–60. DOI: 10.7547/87507315-70-11-552. PMID: 7430535.
crossref
8. Baxter DE, Pfeffer GB. 1992; Treatment of chronic heel pain by surgical release of the first branch of the lateral plantar nerve. Clin Orthop Relat Res. (279):229–36. DOI: 10.1097/00003086-199206000-00029. PMID: 1600660.
crossref
9. Dellon AL, Kim J, Spaulding CM. 2002; Variations in the origin of the medial calcaneal nerve. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 92:97–101. DOI: 10.7547/87507315-92-2-97. PMID: 11847261.
crossref
10. Louisia S, Masquelet AC. 1999; The medial and inferior calcaneal nerves: an anatomic study. Surg Radiol Anat. 21:169–73. DOI: 10.1007/BF01630895. PMID: 10431329.
crossref
11. Govsa F, Bilge O, Ozer MA. 2006; Variations in the origin of the medial and inferior calcaneal nerves. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 126:6–14. DOI: 10.1007/s00402-005-0088-z. PMID: 16333630.
crossref
12. Kim BS, Choung PW, Kwon SW, Rhyu IJ, Kim DH. 2015; Branching patterns of medial and inferior calcaneal nerves around the tarsal tunnel. Ann Rehabil Med. 39:52–5. DOI: 10.5535/arm.2015.39.1.52. PMID: 25750872. PMCID: PMC4351495.
crossref
13. Baxter DE, Pfeffer GB, Thigpen M. 1989; Chronic heel pain. Treatment rationale. Orthop Clin North Am. 20:563–9. PMID: 2797751.
14. Presley JC, Maida E, Pawlina W, Murthy N, Ryssman DB, Smith J. 2013; Sonographic visualization of the first branch of the lateral plantar nerve (baxter nerve): technique and validation using perineural injections in a cadaveric model. J Ultrasound Med. 32:1643–52. DOI: 10.7863/ultra.32.9.1643. PMID: 23980227.
15. Greene DL, Thompson MC, Gesink DS, Graves SC. 2001; Anatomic study of the medial neurovascular structures in relation to calcaneal osteotomy. Foot Ankle Int. 22:569–71. DOI: 10.1177/107110070102200706. PMID: 11503981.
crossref
16. Mekhail AO, Ebraheim NA, Heck BE, Yeasting RA. 1996; Anatomic considerations for safe placement of calcaneal pins. Clin Orthop Relat Res. (332):254–9. DOI: 10.1097/00003086-199611000-00033. PMID: 8913170.
crossref
17. Attinger C, Cooper P, Blume P, Bulan E. 2001; The safest surgical incisions and amputations applying the angiosome principles and using the Doppler to assess the arterial-arterial connections of the foot and ankle. Foot Ankle Clin. 6:745–99. DOI: 10.1016/S1083-7515(02)00012-8. PMID: 12134581.
crossref
18. Yang Y, Du ML, Fu YS, Liu W, Xu Q, Chen X, Hao YJ, Liu Z, Gao MJ. 2017; Fine dissection of the tarsal tunnel in 60 cases. Sci Rep. 7:46351. DOI: 10.1038/srep46351. PMID: 28398291. PMCID: PMC5387925.
crossref
19. Gould JS. 2014; Recurrent tarsal tunnel syndrome. Foot Ankle Clin. 19:451–67. DOI: 10.1016/j.fcl.2014.06.015. PMID: 25129355.
crossref
20. Torres AL, Ferreira MC. 2012; Study of the anatomy of the tibial nerve and its branches in the distal medial leg. Acta Ortop Bras. 20:157–64. DOI: 10.1590/S1413-78522012000300005. PMID: 24453596. PMCID: PMC3718430.
21. Davis TJ, Schon LC. 1995; Branches of the tibial nerve: anatomic variations. Foot Ankle Int. 16:21–9. DOI: 10.1177/107110079501600105. PMID: 7697149.
crossref
22. Iborra A, Villanueva M, Barrett SL, Rodriguez-Collazo E, Sanz P. 2018; Anatomic delineation of tarsal tunnel innervation via ultrasonography. J Ultrasound Med. 37:1325–34. DOI: 10.1002/jum.14499. PMID: 29205431.
crossref
23. Tamang BK, Sinha P, Bhutia KL, Sarda RK. 2016; Neurovascular relation and origin of medial calcaneal nerve in the tarsal tunnel in embalmed cadavers of eastern India. Ann Int Med Dent Res. 2:AT19–22. DOI: 10.21276/aimdr.2016.2.6.AT5.
crossref
24. Malar D. 2016; A study of tibial nerve bifurcation and branching pattern of calcaneal nerve in the tarsal tunnel. Int J Anat Res. 4:2034–6. DOI: 10.16965/ijar.2016.139.
25. Attinger CE, Evans KK, Bulan E, Blume P, Cooper P. 2006; Angiosomes of the foot and ankle and clinical implications for limb salvage: reconstruction, incisions, and revascularization. Plast Reconstr Surg. 117(7 Suppl):261S–93S. DOI: 10.1097/01.prs.0000222582.84385.54. PMID: 16799395.
crossref
26. Manzi M, Cester G, Palena LM, Alek J, Candeo A, Ferraresi R. 2011; Vascular imaging of the foot: the first step toward endovascular recanalization. Radiographics. 31:1623–36. DOI: 10.1148/rg.316115511. PMID: 21997985.
crossref
27. Taylor GI, Pan WR. 1998; Angiosomes of the leg: anatomic study and clinical implications. Plast Reconstr Surg. 102:599–616. discussion 617–8. DOI: 10.1097/00006534-199809030-00001. PMID: 9727424.
crossref
28. Falluji N, Mukherjee D. 2014; Critical and acute limb ischemia: an overview. Angiology. 65:137–46. DOI: 10.1177/0003319712470966. PMID: 23277633.
29. Bracilovic A, Nihal A, Houston VL, Beattie AC, Rosenberg ZS, Trepman E. 2006; Effect of foot and ankle position on tarsal tunnel compartment volume. Foot Ankle Int. 27:431–7. DOI: 10.1177/107110070602700608. PMID: 16764800.
crossref
30. Kim K, Isu T, Morimoto D, Sasamori T, Sugawara A, Chiba Y, Isobe M, Kobayashi S, Morita A. 2014; Neurovascular bundle decompression without excessive dissection for tarsal tunnel syndrome. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 54:901–6. DOI: 10.2176/nmc.oa.2014-0090. PMID: 25367582. PMCID: PMC4533351.
crossref
31. Williams THD, Robinson AHN. 2009; (iii) Entrapment neuropathies of the foot and ankle. Orthop Trauma. 23:404–11. DOI: 10.1016/j.mporth.2009.09.004.
crossref
32. De Maeseneer M, Madani H, Lenchik L, Kalume Brigido M, Shahabpour M, Marcelis S, de Mey J, Scafoglieri A. 2015; Normal anatomy and compression areas of nerves of the foot and ankle: US and MR imaging with anatomic correlation. Radiographics. 35:1469–82. DOI: 10.1148/rg.2015150028. PMID: 26284303.
crossref
33. Mulfinger GL, Trueta J. 1970; The blood supply of the talus. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 52:160–7. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.52B1.160. PMID: 5436202.
crossref
34. Gelberman RH, Mortensen WW. 1983; The arterial anatomy of the talus. Foot Ankle. 4:64–72. DOI: 10.1177/107110078300400204. PMID: 6642325.
crossref
35. Pearce DH, Mongiardi CN, Fornasier VL, Daniels TR. 2005; Avascular necrosis of the talus: a pictorial essay. Radiographics. 25:399–410. DOI: 10.1148/rg.252045709. PMID: 15798058.
crossref
36. Heimkes B, Posel P, Stotz S, Wolf K. 1987; The proximal and distal tarsal tunnel syndromes. An anatomical study. Int Orthop. 11:193–6. DOI: 10.1007/BF00271447. PMID: 3623755.
37. Santi MD, Botte MJ. 1996; External fixation of the calcaneus and talus: an anatomical study for safe pin insertion. J Orthop Trauma. 10:487–91. DOI: 10.1097/00005131-199610000-00007. PMID: 8892149.
crossref
38. Casey D, McConnell T, Parekh S, Tornetta P 3rd. 2002; Percutaneous pin placement in the medial calcaneus: is anywhere safe? J Orthop Trauma. 16:26–9. DOI: 10.1097/00005131-200201000-00006. PMID: 11782629.
crossref
39. Kim DI, Kim YS, Han SH. 2015; Topography of human ankle joint: focused on posterior tibial artery and tibial nerve. Anat Cell Biol. 48:130–7. DOI: 10.5115/acb.2015.48.2.130. PMID: 26140224. PMCID: PMC4488641.
crossref
40. Sharma S, Khullar M, Bhardwaj S. 2015; Variations in the origin and number of medial calcaneal nerve. Int J Med and Dent Sci. 4:842–7. DOI: 10.19056/ijmdsjssmes/2015/v4i2/79814.
crossref
41. Kelikian AS, Sarrafian SK. 2011. Sarrafian's anatomy of the foot and ankle: descriptive, topographic, functional. 3rd ed. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins;Philadelphia:
42. Flanigan RM, DiGiovanni BF. 2011; Peripheral nerve entrapments of the lower leg, ankle, and foot. Foot Ankle Clin. 16:255–74. DOI: 10.1016/j.fcl.2011.01.006. PMID: 21600446.
crossref
43. Lopez-Ben R. 2011; Imaging of nerve entrapment in the foot and ankle. Foot Ankle Clin. 16:213–24. DOI: 10.1016/j.fcl.2011.04.001. PMID: 21600443.
crossref
44. Oh SJ, Meyer RD. 1999; Entrapment neuropathies of the tibial (posterior tibial) nerve. Neurol Clin. 17:593–615. viiDOI: 10.1016/S0733-8619(05)70154-7. PMID: 10393755.
crossref
45. Koulouris G, Connell D, Schneider T, Edwards W. 2003; Posterior tibiotalar ligament injury resulting in posteromedial impingement. Foot Ankle Int. 24:575–83. DOI: 10.1177/107110070302400802. PMID: 12956561.
crossref
46. Prasarn ML, Miller AN, Dyke JP, Helfet DL, Lorich DG. 2010; Arterial anatomy of the talus: a cadaver and gadolinium-enhanced MRI study. Foot Ankle Int. 31:987–93. DOI: 10.3113/FAI.2010.0987. PMID: 21189192.
crossref

Fig. 1
The reference lines: the MC axis and the NC axis. The MC axis started from the medial M to the C. The NC axis that starts from the N to the C. C, medial process of calcaneal tubercle; M, medial malleolus; MC, malleolar-calcaneal; N, tubercle of navicular bone; NC, navicular-calcaneal.
ACB-53-422-f1.tif
Fig. 2
The boundary of the TT expanded ±2 cm from the MC axis. The solid line () presented the MC axis. The dotted line () presented the MC axis with ±1 cm width. The dashed line (–––) presented the MC axis with ±2 cm width. C, medial process of calcaneal tubercle; M, medial malleolus; MC, malleolar-calcaneal; N, tubercle of navicular bone; TT, tarsal tunnel.
ACB-53-422-f2.tif
Fig. 3
Location and width of the neurovascular structures on the MC axis and the NC axis. LMC, locations of neurovascular structures on malleolar-calcaneal axis from medial process of calcaneal tubercle; LMM, locations of neurovascular structures on malleolar-calcaneal axis from medial malleolus; LNC, locations of neurovascular structures on navicular-calcaneal axis from medial process of calcaneal tubercle; LNM, locations of neurovascular structures on navicular-calcaneal axis from tubercle of navicular bone; M, medial malleolus; MC, malleolar-calcaneal; NC, navicular-calcaneal; WM, widths of neurovascular structures on MC axis; WN, widths of neurovascular structures on NC axis.
ACB-53-422-f3.tif
Fig. 4
The distance of the branching point of the neurovascular structures on the MC axis and NC axis (X-coordinate) and the perpendicular distance from the branching point of the neurovascular structures to MC axis and NC axis (Y-coordinate). The solid line () presented the distance of the branching point of the neurovascular structures from the medial malleolus on the MC axis. The dotted line () presented the perpendicular distance from the branching point of the neurovascular structures to MC axis. The dashed line (–––) presented the distance of the branching point of the neurovascular structures from the medial malleolus on the NC axis. The long-dashed line (–––) presented the perpendicular distance from the branching point of the neurovascular structures to NC axis. C, medial process of calcaneal tubercle; M, medial malleolus; MC, malleolar-calcaneal; N, tubercle of navicular bone; NC, navicular-calcaneal.
ACB-53-422-f4.tif
Table 1
The locations and widths of MPN, MPA, LPN, and LPA on MC axis and NC axis
Measurements MPN MPA LPN LPA
Locations of neurovascular structures on MC axis from medial malleolus (mm) 39.62±4.19 44.76±4.45 49.47±4.88 53.56±5.12
Locations of neurovascular structures on MC axis from medial process of calcaneal tubercle (mm) 34.00±3.85 30.22±2.96 24.17±3.55 20.59±4.86
Width of neurovascular structures on MC axis (mm) 3.46±0.58 2.19±0.20 3.58±0.09 3.08±0.27
Locations of neurovascular structures on NC axis from tubercle of navicular bone (mm) 25.64±3.22 30.07±3.77 39.13±4.19 44.93±4.71
Locations of neurovascular structures on NC axis from medial process of calcaneal tubercle (mm) 33.78±4.28 31.62±4.01 21.35±5.31 16.82±5.43
Width of neurovascular structures on NC axis (mm) 4.40±0.31 2.14±0.21 3.50±0.16 2.23±0.22

Values are presented as mean±SD. MPN, medial plantar nerve; MPA, medial plantar artery; LPN, lateral plantar nerve; LPA, lateral plantar artery; MC, malleolar-calcaneal; NC, navicular-calcaneal.

Table 2
Origin and number of MCN and ICN types
Origin Number of branches of each MCN type (case) Number of branches of each ICN type (case)


1 branch type
(8 cases)
2 branches type
(15 cases)
3 branches type
(17 cases)
1 branch type
(35 cases)
2 branches type
(5 cases)
PTN 2 7 5
PTNa) 3 1
LPN 2 35 4
MPN 1
PTN, PTN, and MPN 1
PTNa) and PTN 5
PTNa) and MPN 1 1
PTN and MPN 6 3
PTN and LPN 1
PTN, LPN, and MPN 2

MCN, medial calcaneal nerve; ICN, inferior calcaneal nerve; PTN, posterior tibial nerve; LPN, lateral plantar nerve; MPN, medial plantar nerve. a)High division branch of PTN.

Table 3
The branching point of neurovascular structures on medial side of the ankle
Neurovascular structures No. MC axis NC axis


X-coordinate (mm) Y-coordinate (mm) X-coordinate (mm) Y-coordinate (mm)
Nerves
PTN 40 33.36±8.17 21.18±9.46
First branch of MCN 40 25.27±12.67 32.95±11.07
Second branch of MCN 32 25.49±19.02 26.68±13.96
Third branch of MCN 17 26.93±11.71 22.57±13.67
First branch of ICN 40 43.88±5.46 13.18±7.12
Second branch of ICN 5 52.09±5.87 5.32±6.06
Arteries
PTA 40 47.00±5.02 5.68±3.98
First branch of MCA 40 42.69±12.12 15.18±10.85
Second branch of MCA 38 50.79±5.93 7.02±6.27
Third branch of MCA 31 50.72±7.08 4.11±5.33
Fourth branch of MCA 16 51.81±6.32 3.68±4.11
Fifth branch of MCA 5 54.11±10.28 3.97±5.00
First branch of ICAa) 38 58.44±6.27 –1.04±3.79 49.21±6.26 0.00
Second branch of ICAb) 7 56.72 0.00 43.33±4.10 0.56±1.94
Third branch of ICA 2 39.64±5.48 –2.29±1.07

Values are presented as mean±SD or number only. MC, malleolar-calcaneal; NC, navicular-calcaneal; PTN, posterior tibial nerve; MCN, medial calcaneal nerve; ICN, inferior calcaneal nerve; PTA, posterior tibial artery; MCA, medial calcaneal artery; ICA, inferior calcaneal artery. a)Branched on NC axis three cases. b)Branched on MC axis one case.

Table 4
Origin and number of branch of MCA type and ICA type
Origin Number of branch of each MCA type (case) Number of branch of each ICA type (case)


1 (2 cases) 2 (7 cases) 3 (15 cases) 4 (11 cases) 5 (5 cases) 1 (29 cases) 2 (7 cases) 3 (2 cases)
PTA 1 1
LPA 1 3 1 29 7 2
PTA and MPA 1 1
PTA and LPA 1 4 2 2
LPA and MPA 1 3 1 1
PTA, LPA, and MPA 6 7 2
PTA, PTA and MCA, and LPA 1

MCA, medial calcaneal artery; ICA, inferior calcaneal artery; PTA, posterior tibial artery; LPA, lateral plantar artery; MPA, medial plantar artery.

Table 5
Branching pattern of PTN and PTA
Authors Year No. Branching pattern of PTN Branching pattern of PTA


Type I Type II Type III Type IV Type V Type I Type II Type III Type IV Type V
Dellon and Mackinnon [2] 1984 31 22.58% 54.84% 16.13% 6.45%
Heimkes et al. [36] 1987 60 100%
Havel et al. [3] 1988 68 45.59% 38.24% 8.82% 7.35%
Bilge et al. [4] 2003 50 84% 12% 4% 10% 44% 46%
Torres and Ferreira [20] 2012 50 52% 14% 22% 12%
Malar [24] 2016 20 85% 10% 5%
Tamang et al. [23] 2016 30 90% 10% 93.3% 6.6%
Yang et al.a) [18] 2017 60 70% 7% 18% 71.7% 28.3%
Iborra et al. [22] 2018 12 91.7% 8.3%
Present study 2020 40 50% 50% 97.5% 2.5%

PTN, posterior tibial nerve; PTA, posterior tibial artery. a)PTN branched at the tarsal tunnel border 5%.

Table 6
The studies of origin and number of branching of MCN
Authors Year No. Type of sample Origin of MCN Number of branching


PTN Bifurcation of PTN LPN MPN 2 nerves >2 nerves 1 2 3 4 5
Dellon and Mackinnon [2] 1984 20 Patients 18 2 15 5
Havel et al. [3] 1988 68 Embalmed 47 13 1 8 54 14 (>1 branch)
Davis and Schon [21] 1995 20 Embalmed 15 2 3 8 12 (>1 branch)
Louisia and Masquelet [10] 1999 15 Embalmed (13) 10 3 2 2 9 2 2
Fresh (2)
Dellon et al. [9] 2002 85 Patients 48 56 39 31 35 16 3
Govsa et al. [11] 2006 50 Embalmed 11 7 15 6 1–4 branches
Torres and Ferreira [20] 2012 50 Fresh 45 1 4 29 17 4
Kim et al. [12] 2015 11 Fresh 7 3 1 None
Kim et al. [39] 2015 90 Embalmed 24 16 50 29 38 16 3 1
Sharma et al. [40] 2015 60 Embalmed 21 24 15 21 24 9 5 1
Malar [24] 2016 20 Embalmed 17 3 10 6 4
Tamang et al. [23] 2016 30 Embalmed 17 13 7 16 7
Yang et al. [18] 2017 60 - 2 4 29 22 3 16 31 10 2 1
Present study 2020 40 Fresh 18 2 1 16 3 8 15 17

MCN, medial calcaneal nerve; PTN, posterior tibial nerve LPN, lateral plantar nerve; MPN, medial plantar nerve.

Table 7
The studies of origin and number of branching of ICN
Authors Year No. Type of
sample
Origin of ICN Number of branching


PTN Bifurcation of PTN LPN MPN 2 nerves >2 nerves 1 2
Davis and Schon [21] 1995 20 Embalmed 20
Louisia and Masquelet [10] 1999 15 Embalmed (13) 14 1 15
Fresh (2)
Govsa et al. [11] 2006 50 Embalmed 41 5 2 2 50
Torres and Ferreira [20] 2015 50 Fresh 9 4 35 2 50
Kim et al. [12] 2015 11 Fresh 11 11
Iborra et al.a) [22] 2018 12 Fresh 11
Present study 2020 40 Fresh 39 1 35 5

ICN, inferior calcaneal nerve; PTN, posterior tibial nerve; LPN, lateral plantar nerve; MPN, medial plantar nerve. a)Trifurcation in 1 case.

Table 8
The studies of origin and number of branching of MCA
Authors Year No. Type of
sample
Origin of MCA Number of branching


PTA Bifurcation of PTA LPA MPA 2
arteries
>2
arteries
1 2 3 4 5
Kim et al. [39] 2015 90 Embalmed 23 39 28 51 28 11
Yang et al. [18] 2017 60 - 35 23 2 6 28 18 8
Present study 2020 40 Fresh 2 5 17 16 2 7 15 11 5

MCA, medial calcaneal artery; PTA, posterior tibial artery; LPA, lateral plantar artery; MPA, medial plantar artery.

TOOLS
Similar articles