Journal List > Lab Med Online > v.10(4) > 1145170

Emergence of Monosomy 7 in Philadelphia-Negative Cells during MDS Development and not CML Diagnosis Proved by Serial Droplet Digital PCR

Abstract

Emergence of new clonal chromosomal abnormality (CCA) has been reported in Philadelphia-negative cells in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) undergoing the tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) treatment. However, the time of emergence and clinical significance of CCA remains to be elucidated. In this study, we report a CML patient undergoing TKI treatment who developed myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) after 206 months since the diagnosis of CML. Results of droplet digital PCR performed with serial bone marrow samples revealed that monosomy 7 in Philadelphia-negative cells appeared at the time of MDS development that did not exist initially at the time of CML diagnosis.

초록

만성골수성백혈병환자를 티로신키나아제억제제로 치료하는 동안 필라델피아 음성 세포에서의 새로운 클론성 염색체이상이 보고되어왔다. 새로운 클론성 염색체이상의 발현 시기와 임상적 중요성은 아직 밝혀야 할 부분이 있다. 우리는 이 논문에서 만성골수성백혈병 환자가 티로신키나아제억제제 치료를 받는 동안 진단받은 지 206개월 후 골수형성이상증후군으로 진단된 환자에 대해 보고하고자 한다. 연속된 검체를 이용하여 미세방울 디지털 PCR (droplet digital PCR) 방법으로 검사한 결과 만성골수성백혈병 진단 당시에는 발견되지 않았던 7번 염색체 소실(-7)이 골수형성이상증후군 발생 당시에 필라델피아 음성 세포에서 새로 생겨났음을 밝혔다.

Previously, additional clonal chromosomal abnormality (CCA) in Philadelphia-positive cells (CCA/Ph+) has been reported to occur in newly diagnosed CML patients but with poor prognosis. Conversely, unrelated CCAs in Philadelphia-negative cells (CCA/Ph-) were found to appear in 2 to 17% of CML patients treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI), but the clinical impact of CCA/Ph- has remained debatable [1-4]. Among the frequently reported causes of CCA/Ph- are trisomy 8, monosomy 7/deletion of 6338chromosome 7q (-7/del (7q)), loss of Y chromosome, deletion of 20q (del(20q)), and others. Moreover, -7/del (7q) abnormality has been considered as a warning sign of incidence according to the 2013 European Leukemia Net recommendations [5].
In this study, we report the case of a CML patient who developed myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) with monosomy 7 in CCA/Ph- at 196 months of TKI treatment (206 months since CML was diagnosed), after the emergence of del(20q) in CCA/Ph- that transiently existed between 150 and 162 months and then disappeared later. To investigate the time of development of monosomy 7 in CCA/Ph- in the CML patient undergoing TKI treatment, we conducted droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) assay to assess chromosome 7 using the serial bone marrow samples. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report on monosomy 7 in Philadelphia-negative cells that was confirmed by ddPCR.
The 42-year-old female who was diagnosed with accelerated phase CML exhibited 11% blasts of bone marrow cells based on WHO classification of CML. After receiving 3 months of treatment with interferon and hydroxyurea, she underwent allogeneic stem cell transplantation. However, she exhibited a relapse of CML after 6 months of stem cell transplantation and was thereafter treated with imatinib. She had been suffered from at least one of peripheral blood cytopenia of grade 2 to 4 since the TKI treatment. Peripheral blood cytopenia was assessed according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 5.0 [6]. Philadelphia clones reappeared at 9 months, and were detected again at 36 and 51 months after diagnosis. Thereafter, the therapeutic agent was replaced with a 2nd generation TKI, namely nilotinib (84 months after diagnosis). Bone marrow examinations were performed once every 1–2 years, which showed hypocellular or normocellular marrows without any sign of significant dysplasia even when the transient del (20q) of CCA/Ph- was detected. After 206 months of diagnosis, she started to exhibit progressive peripheral blood pancytopenia and her bone marrow showed dysplastic features in erythroid and megakaryocytic lineages enabling the diagnosis of MDS (Fig. 1). Therefore, she was subjected to hypomethylating agent therapy, but her blood cell counts could not be recovered to normal. She was no longer followed up at 224 months of diagnosis.
Cytogenetic and molecular responses were assessed during the 19-years of follow-up period (Table 1). Conventional cytogenetic analysis was performed on unstimulated 24- or 48-hour cultures using bone marrow aspirates. Molecular response was assessed by quantitative PCR of BCR/ABL1 using the commercialized kit (BCR-ABL Mbcr IS (international scale)-MMR Dx kit, IPSOGEN, Marseille, France), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The molecular responses were presented as major molecular response (MMR, BCR-ABL1≤0.1% IS) and complete molecular response (CMR, MR4.5 [≥4.5-log reduction in BCR-ABL1 transcripts from baseline]) [7]. The ddPCR was performed using the QX200™ Droplet Digital PCR platform (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA), with a commercially available probe targeting 7q31 (Prime PCR ddPCR Copy Number Assay: MET, human, Bio-RAD) and a reference gene targeting EIF2C1 (Prime PCR ddPCR Copy Number Assay: EIF2C1, HEX, human, Bio-RAD). Thereafter, the droplet counts were evaluated using the Quanta Soft Analysis Pro Software (Bio-Rad). Peripheral blood samples obtained from 15 healthy individuals were considered as control and showed the result of 2.04±0.12 (mean±SD) for chromosome 7 copy number analyzed by ddPCR.
At 150 months of TKI treatment for CML, del (20q) in CCA/Ph- was found to appear that persisted for almost one year. However, later the karyotype returned to normal. At 206 months from CML diagnosis (196 months after the initiation of TKI treatment), monosomy 7 in CCA/Ph- was found to appear as the only cytogenetic abnormality. The ddPCR showed that the copy number for chromosome 7 had remained normal before the 206th month (Table 1). At the same time when monosomy 7 was identified by cytogenetic analysis, ddPCR revealed a reduction in the copy number of chromosome 7 (Table 1).
The exact mechanism leading to the emergence of CCA/Ph- cells is not fully understood. Also, time of occurrence for CCA/Ph- cell appearance has not been discovered yet. Some researchers previously suggested that when CML patients are exposed to genomic changes, it leads to the emergence of multiple abnormal clones, including t(9;22) clones, even before the diagnosis of CML [4, 8, 9]. Therefore, the preexisting CCA/Ph- clones may not be apparent during the proliferative phase of the Philadelphia-positive clones. However, TKI treatment suppresses the proliferation of Philadelphia-positive clones and thus may allow the CCA/Ph- clones to emerge. The CCA/Ph- clones may thus represent a form of genomic instability in patients with CML. The other hypotheses is that CCA/Ph- may get involved in leukemic process as a result of TKI treatment with evidences of the absence of CCA/Ph- clones at the time of diagnosis [1, 10]. TKI targeting BCR/ABL1 oncoprotein may predispose genomic instability and lead to the emergence of CCA/Ph- [1]. Therefore, TKI treatment itself might contribute in the development of CCA/Ph- clones in patients with CML.
Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) test is a highly sensitive method when compared to the conventional cytogenetic methods, and thus may allow more frequent discovery of CCA/Ph-, which could be missed by conventional cytogenetics in TKI treated CML patients [1]. The sensitivity of ddPCR is known to be higher than that of FISH, as it is able to detect copy number variation at a level of less than 1% of somatic mosaicism [11]. In this case study, we used ddPCR to assess serial specimens that were obtained from a patient with CML, the monosomy 7 clone in CCA/Ph- had not been observed until 176 months since CML diagnosis. Our finding suggests that monosomy 7 in CCA/Ph- might develop as a result of TKI treatment, which is not present initially at the time of CML diagnosis.
Persistent cytopenia during TKI treatment of patients with CML has often been reported, but is rarely associated with disease transformation to MDS, AML, or aplastic anemia [12-15]. In this case study, the patient had persistent peripheral blood cytopenia since the beginning of TKI treatment and then, was finally diagnosed with MDS accompanied with newly occurred monosomy 7 in CCA/Ph- at 206 months from CML diagnosis.
Bone marrow examination is not considered as a prerequisite for disease monitoring in the case of CML [7]. The clinical significance of CCA/Ph- has not been well established. Since most cases of CCA/Ph- are transient and exhibit benign clinical course [1, 3, 16], routine bone marrow examination is not required. However, recent reports have shown that poor prognosis of certain types of CCA/Ph-, especially -7/del(7q), increases the risk of disease progression to AML or MDS [17-19]. In the present case study, del(20q) in CCA/Ph- cells occurred during the follow up period and the clinical course remained stable for one year. However, after the disappearance of del(20q), -7 emerged in the CCA/Ph- cells that later transformed into MDS. Altogether, these findings suggest that persistent cytopenia should be monitored cautiously and may require bone marrow examination for detection of CCA/Ph- cells.
In summary, this study suggests the emergence of monosomy 7 in CCA/Ph- cells may occur as a result of TKI treatment. Also, it is important to examine the CML patients with persistent cytopenia who undergo TKI treatment using conventional cytogenetic techniques on bone marrow samples to identify possible genetic changes occurring in the CCA/Ph- cells.

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the Ewha Womans University scholarship of 2018.

Notes

Conflicts of Interest

None declared.

REFERENCES

1. Ni H, Sun X, Xu Y, Lyle D, Peterson P, Zhao X, et al. 2019; Clinical implications of clonal chromosomal abnormalities in Philadelphia negative cells in CML patients after treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Cancer Genet. 238:44–9. DOI: 10.1016/j.cancergen.2019.07.008. PMID: 31425925.
crossref
2. Issa GC, Kantarjian HM, Gonzalez GN, Borthakur G, Tang G, Wierda W, et al. 2017; Clonal chromosomal abnormalities appearing in Philadelphia chromosome-negative metaphases during CML treatment. Blood. 130:2084–91. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2017-07-792143. PMID: 28835440. PMCID: PMC5680612.
crossref
3. Lin Y, Bruyère H, Horsman DE, Pantzar T, Barnett MJ, Hogge DE, et al. 2006; Philadelphia-negative clonal hematopoiesis following imatinib therapy in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia: a report of nine cases and analysis of predictive factors. Cancer Genet Cytogenet. 170:16–23. DOI: 10.1016/j.cancergencyto.2006.04.012. PMID: 16965950.
crossref
4. Bumm T, Müller C, Al-Ali HK, Krohn K, Shepherd P, Schmidt E, et al. 2003; Emergence of clonal cytogenetic abnormalities in Ph- cells in some CML patients in cytogenetic remission to imatinib but restoration of polyclonal hematopoiesis in the majority. Blood. 101:1941–9. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2002-07-2053. PMID: 12411298.
5. Baccarani M, Deininger MW, Rosti G, Hochhaus A, Soverini S, Apperley JF, et al. 2013; European LeukemiaNet recommendations for the management of chronic myeloid leukemia: 2013. Blood. 122:872–84. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2013-05-501569. PMID: 23803709. PMCID: PMC4915804.
crossref
7. Radich JP, Deininger M, Abboud CN, Altman JK, Berman E, Bhatia R, et al. 2018; Chronic Myeloid Leukemia, Version 1. 2019, NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 16:1108–35. DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2018.0071. PMID: 30181422.
8. Zaccaria A, Testoni N, Valenti AM, Luatti S, Tonelli M, Marzocchi G, et al. 2010; Chromosome abnormalities additional to the Philadelphia chromosome at the diagnosis of chronic myelogenous leukemia: pathogenetic and prognostic implications. Cancer Genet Cytogenet. 199:76–80. DOI: 10.1016/j.cancergencyto.2010.02.003. PMID: 20471509.
crossref
9. Krysiak K, Christopher MJ, Skidmore ZL, Demeter RT, Magrini V, Kunisaki J, et al. 2016; A genomic analysis of Philadelphia chromosome-negative AML arising in patients with CML. Blood Cancer J. 6:e413. DOI: 10.1038/bcj.2016.18. PMID: 27058228. PMCID: PMC4855253.
crossref
10. Giustacchini A, Thongjuea S, Barkas N, Woll PS, Povinelli BJ, Booth CAG, et al. 2017; Single-cell transcriptomics uncovers distinct molecular signatures of stem cells in chronic myeloid leukemia. Nat Med. 23:692–702. DOI: 10.1038/nm.4336. PMID: 28504724.
crossref
11. Abyzov A, Mariani J, Palejev D, Zhang Y, Haney MS, Tomasini L, et al. 2012; Somatic copy number mosaicism in human skin revealed by induced pluripotent stem cells. Nature. 492:438–42. DOI: 10.1038/nature11629. PMID: 23160490. PMCID: PMC3532053.
crossref
12. Paul TR, Uppin SG, Uppin MS, Jacob RT, Rao DR, Rajappa SJ. 2010; Evaluation of cytopenias occurring in imatinib treated chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients. Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus. 26:56–61. DOI: 10.1007/s12288-010-0030-6. PMID: 21629637. PMCID: PMC3002067.
crossref
13. Quintás-Cardama A, De Souza Santos FP, Kantarjian H, O'Brien S, Faderl S, Awais A, et al. 2009; Dynamics and management of cytopenias associated with dasatinib therapy in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase after imatinib failure. Cancer. 115:3935–43. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.24432. PMID: 19517473. PMCID: PMC4386888.
crossref
14. LeMarbre G, Schinstock C, Hoyer R, Krook J, Tefferi A. 2007; Late onset aplastic anemia during treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia with imatinib mesylate. Leuk Res. 31:414–5. DOI: 10.1016/j.leukres.2006.08.011. PMID: 17010430. PMCID: PMC4342850.
crossref
15. Ramdial JL, Aguirre LE, Ali RA, Swords R, Goodman M. 2019; Aplasia in chronic phase CML post-TKI therapy: A management dilemma. Case Rep Hematol. 2019:4861673. DOI: 10.1155/2019/4861673. PMID: 31662918. PMCID: PMC6778880.
crossref
16. Jawad MD, Go RS, Ketterling RP, Begna KH, Reichard KK, Shi M. 2016; Transient monosomy 7 in a chronic myelogenous leukemia patient during nilotinib therapy: a case report. Clin Case Rep. 4:282–6. DOI: 10.1002/ccr3.506. PMID: 27014453. PMCID: PMC4771850.
crossref
17. Larsson N, Billström R, Lilljebjörn H, Lassen C, Richter J, Ekblom M, etal . 2010; Genetic analysis of dasatinib-treated chronic myeloid leukemia rapidly developing into acute myeloid leukemia with monosomy 7 in Philadelphia-negative cells. Cancer Genet Cytogenet. 199:89–95. DOI: 10.1016/j.cancergencyto.2010.02.005. PMID: 20471511.
crossref
18. Navarro JT, Feliu E, Grau J, Espinet B, Colomer D, Ribera JM, et al. 2007; Monosomy 7 with severe myelodysplasia developing during imatinib treatment of Philadelphia-positive chronic myeloid leukemia: two cases with a different outcome. Am J Hematol. 82:849–51. DOI: 10.1002/ajh.20859. PMID: 17563075.
crossref
19. Bidet A, Dulucq S, Smol T, Marceau-Renaut A, Morisset S, Coiteux V, et al. 2019; Poor prognosis of chromosome 7 clonal aberrations in Philadelphia-negative metaphases and relevance of potential underlying myelodysplastic features in chronic myeloid leukemia. Haematologica. 104:1150–5. DOI: 10.3324/haematol.2018.208801. PMID: 30573507. PMCID: PMC6545846.
crossref

FIGURES AND TABLES

Fig. 1
Bone marrow examination at 206 months since the diagnosis of chronic myeloid leukemia. (A and B) Bone marrow aspirate smears stained with the Wright-Giemsa stain show erythroid dysplasia of nuclear budding and megaloblastoid change, (1,000×). (C) Bone marrow biopsy sections stained with hematoxylin and eosin show hypocellularity (100×) and (D and E) clustered, multinucleated or hypolobated megakaryocytes (1,000×).
LMO-10-321-f1.tif
Table 1
Characteristics of the patient with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) carrying monosomy 7 in Philadelphia-negative cells
Time from diagnosis (months) Treatment Cytogenetics BCR-ABL1 quantitative PCR (IS, %) ddPCR for monosomy 7 (Copy number)

Type of CCA/Ph- CCA/Ph- (%) CyR Ph+ (%, No.)
0 Diagnosis none 0 100 (8/8) NA NA
6 3 months post allo-SCT none 0 CCyR 0 (0/15) NA NA
9 6 months post allo-SCT none 0 NCyR 100 (3/3) NA NA
36 imatinib at 26 months none 0 PCyR 10 (2/20) NA 2.12
51 imatinib at 41 months none 0 PCyR 10 (1/9) NA NA
54 imatinib at 44 months none 0 CCyR 0 (0/20) NA 2.06
60 imatinib at 50 months none 0 CCyR 0 (0/20) NA 2.36
150 nilotinib at 66 months del (20q) 40 CCyR 0 (0/37) NA 1.94
162 nilotinib at 78 months del (20q) 5 CCyR 0 (0/40) NA NA
176 nilotinib at 92 months none 0 CCyR 0 (0/5) MMR(0.06) 2.06
206 nilotinib at 122 months -7 100 CCyR, 0 (0/6) CMR (<0.032) 1.38
211 decitabine at 5 months -7 85 CCyR 0 (0/20) CMR (<0.032) 1.41*
223 decitabine at 17 months -7 55 CCyR 0 (0/20) CMR (<0.032) NA

*Performed using peripheral blood samples.

Abbreviations: IS, International Scale; ddPCR, droplet digital PCR; CCA/Ph-, clonal cytogenetic abnormalities in Philadelphia-negative cells; CyR, cytogenetic response; Ph+, Philadelphia-positive cells; NA, not applicable; allo-SCT, allogeneic stem cell transplantation; CCyR, complete cytogenetic response; NCyR, no cytogenetic response; PCyR, partial cytogenetic response; MMR, major molecular response; CMR, complete molecular response.

TOOLS
Similar articles