Journal List > Lab Med Online > v.10(4) > 1145169

Utility of Plasma Cell Screening Tube Kit to Differentiate Neoplastic Plasma Cells from Reactive Plasma Cells

Abstract

Flow cytometry is a powerful tool for analysis of hematologic malignancies, that provides rapid, quantitative, and multiparametric analysis of heterogeneous cell populations, but requires standardization because of complexities in panel design and interpretation. Here, we compared the Plasma Cell Screening Tube (PCST) kit (Cytognos, Spain) in conjunction with EuroFlow antibody panels for standardization of flow cytometry to a conventional method for diagnosis of plasma cell dyscrasias. Thirty-nine bone marrow samples and one peripheral blood sample from 40 patients were tested. Thirty-three patients were diagnosed with multiple myeloma (MM), and seven were in a reactive state. In PCST implementation, eight antibodies were used for staining, including anti-CD45-Pacific Blue, anti-CD19-PECy7, anti-CD138-OC515, anti-CD38-FITC, anti-CD56-PE, anti-β2-microglobulin-PerCPCy5.5, anti-kappa-APC, and anti-lambda-APC-C750. Plasma cells were initially identified using CD38 and CD138; thereafter, CD38+, CD138+ gated cells were analyzed for CD56, CD19, CD45, cytoplasmic kappa, cytoplasmic lambda, and β2-microglobulin. Conventional flow cytometry was performed with six monoclonal antibodies, including anti-CD56-FITC, anti-kappa-FITC, anti-CD19-PE, anti-lambda-PE, anti-CD138-PECy5, and anti-CD45-PECy7 (Beckman Coulter, USA). Monoclonal plasma cells with cytoplasmic light-chain restriction were detected in 30 of 33 (90.9%) MM cases by conventional methods, and 32 of 33 (97.0%) MM cases with the PCST method. No differences were noted between PCST and the conventional method in immunophenotyping and plasma cell percentages (P=0.323). Among plasma cells, levels (%) were significantly higher by the PCST approach than those in the conventional method (97.6% vs 95.8%, P=0.010). PCST exhibited better performance for plasma cell dyscrasias diagnosis, and could improve laboratory efficiency and quality.

초록

유세포 분석은 다양한 세포 군집을 분석하는 데에 빠르고 정량적이며 다변수 분석 결과를 제공하기 때문에 혈액종양 질환을 분석하는데 강력한 도구이다. 하지만 패널 구성과 데이터 분석 및 해석의 복잡성 때문에 표준화가 필요하다. 저자들은 형질세포질환을 진단하는 데에 있어 기존방법과 유세포분석의 표준화를 위하여 EuroFlow와 협력하여 개발된 plasma cell screening tube (PCST) 키트(Cytognos, Spain)를 비교, 분석하였다. 40명의 환자들로부터 얻어진 39개의 골수와 한 개의 말초혈액을 검사하였다. 이 중 33명은 형질세포골수종으로 진단받았고 7명은 염증반응으로 확인되었다. PCST는 Pacific Blue-conjugated anti-CD45, PECy7-conjugated anti-CD19, OC515-conjugated anti-CD138, FITC-conjugated anti-CD38, PE-conjugated anti-CD56, PerCPCy5.5-conjugated anti-β2-microglobulin, APC-conjugated anti-kappa, APC-C750-conjugated anti-lambda의 8개의 항체를 사용한다. CD38과 CD138을 사용하여 형질세포를 게이팅한 후, CD56, CD19, CD45, cytoplasmic kappa, cytoplasmic lambda, β2-microglobulin을 분석하였다. 기존 검사실 방법은 anti-CD56-FITC, anti-kappa-FITC, anti-CD19-PE, anti-lambda-PE, anti-CD138-PECy5, anti-CD45-PECy7 (Beckman Coulter, USA)의 6개의 항체를 사용하여 검사를 시행하였다. 기존 검사실 방법에서는 형질세포골수종 33건 중 30건(90.9%), PCST 방법에서는 33건 중 32건(97.0%)에서 단클론성 형질세포 및 세포질 경쇄 제한을 확인하였다. 면역표현형과 형질세포비율에 있어 PCST와 기존 검사의 두 방법 사이에 차이는 없었다(P=0.323). 형질세포 중, 비정상 면역표현형을 보이는 형질세포의 비율은 PCST에서 기존 검사보다 더 높았다(97.6% vs 95.8%, P=0.010). PCST는 형질세포질환의 면역표현형을 분석하는데 더 우수한 결과를 보였고 검사실의 효율과 질향상에 도움이 될 것으로 생각된다.

Flow cytometry is being used increasingly in clinical hematology to establish diagnosis, prognostic classification, and evaluation of treatment effectiveness of hematologic neoplasms. However, flow cytometry is highly dependent on expertise, and is diffificult to standardize [1]. For development and standardization of flow cytometry, the EuroFlow Consortium was formed in 2005, and the EuroFlow project was initiated in 2006 [1]. Currently Cytognos, Inc. (Salamanca, Spain) provides several EuroFlow products, such as multiple myeloma (MM) minimal residual disease (MRD) kits, lymphoid screening tube (LST), acute leukemia orientation tube (ALOT), and plasma cell screening tube (PCST) kits [2]. The PCST kit is a pre-mixed combination of 8 conjugated antibodies designed for identification and quantitation of plasma cells. Additionally, it can also discriminate between normal polyclonal plasma cells versus aberrant monoclonal plasma cells [2]. As there are no prior reports in the literature regarding the PCST kit designed by Cytognos used with the EuroFlow panel, herein we have described our experience with the PCST kit, comparing it to a conventional 4-color, 2-tube method for analysis of plasma cell dyscrasias.
In total, 40 patients were tested in this study from December 2017 to June 2019, of which 33 were newly diagnosed with MM and the remaining 7 were in the reactive state. Diagnosis of MM was based on the International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) criteria. Reactive plasmacytosis was defined as a level of bone marrow (BM) plasma cells >3.0%, without any evidence of a plasma cell disorder. Thirty-nine BM samples and one peripheral blood (PB) sample were analyzed. Five hundred cells in BM aspirate smears and two hundred cells in PB smears were counted for differentials. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Soonchunhyang University Hospital, Seoul (IRB 2018-01-001). Conventional 4-color, 2-tube analysis was performed using monoclonal antibodies against CD56, CD19, CD138, and CD45 for surface staining, and using kappa, and lambda monoclonal antibodies for cytoplasmic staining [3]. White blood cell counts were adjusted to 3×106/mL. For the surface staining tube, 100 μL of the washed specimens was incubated with 10 μL of each of the monoclonal antibodies for 20 minuts at room temperature in the dark. Four monoclonal antibodies were used for flow cytometric immunophenotyping: fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-conjugated anti-CD56; phycoerythrin (PE)-conjugated anti-CD19; PE-cyanine 5.1 (PECy5)-conjugated anti-CD138; and PE-Cyanine 7 (PECy7)-conjugated anti-CD45 (Beckman Coulter, Miami, FL, USA). VersaLyse lysing solution (Beckman Coulter) was added to the tube, vortexed immediately for 10 sec, and then incubated for 10 min at room temperature in the dark. For cytoplasmic staining tube, 50 μL of the washed samples was stained with PECy5-anti-CD138 and PECy7-anti-CD45, and then incubated for 20 minutes at room temperature in the dark. Thereafter, an IntraPrep procedure was performed. Then, FITC-anti-kappa and PE-anti-lambda (Beckman Coulter) were added and incubated for 20 minutes at room temperature in the dark. Acquisition of 250,000 nucleated cells was performed using a BC Navios flow cytometer (Beckman Coulter), and subsequent analyses were performed using Kaluza (v.1.3, Beckman Coulter). Plasma cells were initially identified using CD138 and side scatter, and CD138+ gated cells were analyzed for CD56, CD19, CD45, and cytoplasmic kappa and lambda (Fig. 1A).
In the PCST method, the Beckman Coulter Navios flow cytometer setup and fluorescence compensation settings were performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions [4]. Fluorochrome-conjugated antibodies for surface staining were Pacific Blue-conjugated anti-CD45, PECy7-conjugated anti-CD19, OC515-conjugated anti-CD138, FITC-conjugated anti-CD38, PE-conjugated anti-CD56, and PerCPCy5.5-conjugated anti-β2-microglobulin (Cytognos). Fluorochrome-conjugated antibodies for cytoplasmic staining were APC-conjugated anti-kappa, and APC-C750-conjugated anti-lambda (Cytognos). Both are present in the pre-mixed antibody cocktail in the PCST kit. 50 μL of the sample and 30 μL of the surface staining reagent were added to each tube, and PBS with 1.0% bovine serum albumin was added to a final volume of 100 μL per tube. Incubation for 30 minutes was conducted at room temperature in the dark. After washing, Reagent A (fixative solution; Nordic-MUbio BV, Susteren, Netherlands) was added and incubated for 15 minutes, washed with PBS, then reagent B (permeabilizing solution; Nordic-MUbio) was added. Next, 10 μL of the pre-mixed vial intracellular antibodies was added and incubated for 15 minutes. After washing with PBS, data acquisition for 150,000 nucleated cells was performed using the Navios flow cytometer; subsequent analyses were performed using Kaluza. Plasma cells were initially identified using CD38 and CD138, following which, CD38+, CD138+ gated cells were analyzed for CD56, CD19, CD45, cytoplasmic kappa, cytoplasmic lambda, and β2-microglobulin (Fig. 1B). Data were entered into SPSS v.22 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) and analyzed. To determine the correlation of each method, generalized estimating equation (GEE) and the Spearman’s rank correlation tests were performed.
Among the 33 MM cases, conventional methods could detect the abnormal immunophenotypes of plasma cells with light-chain restriction in 30 cases (90.9%). However, the PCST method was able to detect abnormal immunophenotypes in 32 cases (97.0%). In the single remaining case, malignant plasma cells were not identified by either conventional or PCST methods. Therefore, there were three cases in which malignant plasma cells could not be detected by conventional methods; these cases are shown in Fig. 2. In case A, gated plasma cells comprised 1.13% by PCST and 0.72% by conventional methods. Although the detected plasma cell (%) levels were lower by conventional methods, surface antigens such as CD19 and CD56 could be analyzed. However, it was difficult to analyze cytoplasmic light-chain restriction due to the poor intracellular staining observed in the conventional method. In Case B, sufficient plasma cells were present in the sample, but cytometric gating could not be performed in the conventional method without CD38 staining. In case C, malignant plasma cells were not found because they displayed normal immunophenotypes, such as CD19+, CD56-, and CD45+. Additionally, light-chain restriction could not be observed because the patient had biclonal gammopathy involving IgG-κ and IgG–λ types.
Among the 37 cases, with an exception of the three cases presenting discrepant results, there were no differences in terms of immunophenotyping results. Mean values [95% confidential interval, CI] of plasma cell numbers (%) detected by PCST and conventional methods were 14.7% [8.9-20.6%] and 16.0% [9.0-23.0%], respectively. The plasma cell (%) levels identified by the PCST method were 1.3% lower than by the conventional method, but there was no significant difference between the two methods (GEE, P=0.323). The plasma cell (%) numbers detected by the two methods were significantly lower than those identified by manual differential counts (GEE, P<0.001). Compared to manual differential counts, plasma cell (%) abundance using PCST was 22.1% lower, and the conventional method was 20.9% lower. Among plasma cells, detection of abnormal plasma cell (%) levels was significantly higher by PCST than that by the conventional method (GEE, P=0.010). Mean values [95% CI] of abnormal plasma cell (%) levels determined using PCST and conventional methods were 97.6% [95.7-99.4%] and 95.8% [92.8-98.8%]. Mean fluorescent intensity (MFI) values for β2-microglobulin were not correlated with β2-microglo-bulin concentrations identified by radioimmunoassay (the Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient=0.09, P=0.648).
Among our 33 MM cases, there was only one patient in which light-chain restriction could be confirmed by the PCST method, but not by the conventional method. It could be assumed that this difference between the two methods arose due to the differing composition of assay reagents and the testing procedures involved. This could represent an example of the importance of using validated reagents and kits. Percentages of plasma cells determined by both methods were significantly lower than those determined by manual differential counts. The lower percentage of plasma cells determined by flow cytometry compared to morphology may be due to the provision of a blood-diluted sample, or a sample of liquid BM [5, 6]. MFI values of β2-microglobulin were not correlated with β2-microglobulin concentrations determined by radioimmunoassay. β2-microglobulin levels identified by flow cytometry reflect the amount of β2-microglobulin on the cell surface. Further study will be needed to determine how the amount of β2-microglubulin on the cell surface is related to patient prognosis in MM.
There have been many studies regarding the identification and characterization of plasma cells by flow cytometry [7-13]. In 2008, the European Myeloma Network (EMN) reported reaching a consensus involving multiparametric flow cytometry in MM and related disorders. The minimal test antigens for classification of abnormal plasma cells are CD19 and CD56. Assessment of cytoplasmic κ/λ expression by flow cytometry is important to demonstrate clonality at presentation [14]. The Cytognos PCST kit contains antibodies against essential markers such as CD19, CD56, Igκ, and Igλ. The major advantage of this PCST kit is the use of multiple colors in one tube, and thus, it can recognize multiple antigens simultaneously. For example, when abnormal plasma cells are mixed with normal plasma cells and analyzed using the PCST kit, cytoplasmic light-chain restriction can be analyzed only in abnormal plasma cells [2]. The PCST kit contains premixed reagent combinations with 8 conjugated antibodies, with instructions regarding the device, and compensation settings. Therefore, a variety of laboratories use it for convenience and with ease. The PCST kit can be used to test PB samples, as well as BM samples [2]. Among 40 samples in our study, there was one PB sample from a patient who was diagnosed with plasma cell leukemia. Although only this single case was tested using a PB sample, there were no differences in the MFI of the target population cells compared to the results for other BM samples. The presence of clonal circulating plasma cells is an indicator of high risk of disease development in newly diagnosed MM patients [15, 16]. Therefore, prognostic evaluation of MM patients, when needed, as well as diagnosis of plasma cell leukemia, can be undertaken using PCST.
Multi-color analysis in a single tube is a powerful advantage of the PCST method for gating neoplastic plasma cells and for analyzing their properties. Accelerated acquisition times and standardized compensation parameters may shorten total test times. Additionally, standardized protocols and approaches may overcome the variability inherent in flow cytometric assays conducted by different laboratories. PCST exhibited superior performance in detection of monoclonal plasma cells than that by the conventional method. Therefore, PCST is suitable for immunophenotypic screening of plasma cell dyscrasias, and may improve laboratory efficiency and quality.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Mr. Hyung Yeol Choi, ANSE Inc., for his technical assistance for this study.

Notes

Conflicts of Interest

None declared.

REFERENCES

1. van Dongen JJ, Orfao A. 2012; EuroFlow: Resetting leukemia and lymphoma immunophenotyping. Basis for companion diagnostics and personalized medicine. Leukemia. 26:1899–907. DOI: 10.1038/leu.2012.121. PMID: 22948488. PMCID: PMC3437406.
crossref
2. van Dongen JJ, Lhermitte L, Böttcher S, Almeida J, van der Velden VH, Flores-Montero J, et al. 2012; EuroFlow antibody panels for standardized n-dimensional flow cytometric immunophenotyping of normal, reactive and malignant leukocytes. Leukemia. 26:1908–75. DOI: 10.1038/leu.2012.120. PMID: 22552007. PMCID: PMC3437410.
crossref
3. Jeong TD, Park CJ, Shim H, Jang S, Chi HS, Yoon DH, et al. 2012; Simplified flow cytometric immunophenotyping panel for multiple myeloma, CD56/CD19/CD138(CD38)/CD45, to differentiate neoplastic myeloma cells from reactive plasma cells. Korean J Hematol. 47:260–6. DOI: 10.5045/kjh.2012.47.4.260. PMID: 23320004. PMCID: PMC3538797.
crossref
4. EuroFlow. EuroFlow standard operating protocol (SOP) for instrument setup and compensation, BC Navios Instruments. Version 1.4. https://www.euroflow.org/protocols. Updated on May 2014.
5. Nadav L, Katz BZ, Baron S, Yossipov L, Polliack A, Deutsch V, et al. 2006; Diverse niches within multiple myeloma bone marrow aspirates affect plasma cell enumeration. Br J Haematol. 133:530–2. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2006.06068.x. PMID: 16681641.
crossref
6. Cogbill CH, Spears MD, Vantuinen P, Harrington AM, Olteanu H, Kroft SH. 2015; Morphologic and cytogenetic variables affect theflow cytometric recovery of plasma cell myeloma cells in bone marrow aspirates. Int J Lab Hematol. 37:797–808. DOI: 10.1111/ijlh.12411. PMID: 26224420.
7. Terstappen LW, Johnsen S, Segers-Nolten IM, Loken MR. 1990; Identification and characterization of plasma cells in normal human bone marrow by high-resolutionflow cytometry. Blood. 76:1739–47. DOI: 10.1182/blood.V76.9.1739.1739. PMID: 2224123.
8. Leo R, Boeker M, Peest D, Hein R, Bartl R, Gessner JE, et al. 1992; Multiparameter analyses of normal and malignant human plasma cells: CD38++, CD56+, CD54+, cIg+ is the common phenotype of myeloma cells. Ann Hematol. 64:132–9. DOI: 10.1007/BF01697400. PMID: 1373957.
crossref
9. Harada H, Kawano MM, Huang N, Harada Y, Iwato K, Tanabe O, et al. 1993; Phenotypic difference of normal plasma cells from mature myeloma cells. Blood. 81:2658–63. DOI: 10.1182/blood.V81.10.2658.2658. PMID: 8490175.
crossref
10. Ruiz-Argüelles GJ, San Miguel JF. 1994; Cell surface markers in multiple myeloma. Mayo Clin Proc. 69:684–90. DOI: 10.1016/S0025-6196(12)61350-0. PMID: 8015335.
11. Ocqueteau M, Orfao A, Almeida J, Bladé J, González M, García-Sanz R, et al. 1998; Immunophenotypic characterization of plasma cells from monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance patients. Implications for the differential diagnosis between MGUS and multiple myeloma. Am J Pathol. 152:1655–65.
12. Lin P, Owens R, Tricot G, Wilson CS. 2004; Flow cytometric immunophenotypic analysis of 306 cases of multiple myeloma. Am J Clin Pathol. 121:482–8. DOI: 10.1309/74R4TB90BUWH27JX. PMID: 15080299.
crossref
13. Seegmiller AC, Xu Y, McKenna RW, Karandikar NJ. 2007; Immunophenotypic differentiation between neoplastic plasma cells in mature B-cell lymphoma vs plasma cell myeloma. Am J Clin Pathol. 127:176–81. DOI: 10.1309/5EL22BH45PHUPM8P. PMID: 17210522.
crossref
14. Rawstron AC, Orfao A, Beksac M, Bezdickova L, Brooimans RA, Bumbea H, et al. 2008; Report of the European Myeloma Network on multiparametric flow cytometry in multiple myeloma and related disorders. Haematologica. 93:431–8. DOI: 10.3324/haematol.11080. PMID: 18268286.
crossref
15. Nowakowski GS, Witzig TE, Dingli D, Tracz MJ, Gertz MA, Lacy MQ, et al. 2005; Circulating plasma cells detected byflow cytometry as a predictor of survival in 302 patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Blood. 106:2276–9. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2005-05-1858. PMID: 15961515. PMCID: PMC1895270.
16. Gonsalves WI, Morice WG, Rajkumar V, Gupta V, Timm MM, Dispenzieri A, et al. 2014; Quantification of clonal circulating plasma cells in relapsed multiple myeloma. Br J Haematol. 167:500–5. DOI: 10.1111/bjh.13067. PMID: 25113422. PMCID: PMC4211997.
crossref

FIGURES

Fig. 1
Representative example of flow cytometric immunophenotyping using two methods to distinguish between neoplastic plasma cells and reactive plasma cells in a patient with multiple myeloma. (A) Conventional 4-color, 2 tube method. Plasma cells were gated with CD138+ and low side scatter, and were distinguished as neoplastic cells (CD56+/CD19-/CD138+/CD45-) and reactive plasma cells (CD56-/CD19+/CD138+/CD45+) in a first tube (A-1). Cytoplasmic light-chain restriction was analyzed in a second tube (A-2). (B) Plasma Cell Separation Tube (PCST) method. Plasma cells were gated for CD38+ and CD138+ and analyzed for CD56, CD19, CD45, cytoplasmic kappa, cytoplasmic lambda, and β2-microglobulin in one tube.
LMO-10-314-f1.tif
Fig. 2
Flow cytometry analysis of three cases in which we were not able to detect malignant plasma cells using the conventional method (A-1, B-1, C-1: Plasma Cell Separation Tube (PCST) method; A-2, B-2, C-2: Conventional method). (A) The first case was a 56-year-old female patient who was diagnosed with kidney amyloidosis, and then diagnosed with multiple myeloma (MM) because of IgM-λ type monoclonal gammopathy (M protein: 0.02 g/dL), with increased plasma cells in bone marrow aspirates (27% of all the nucleated cells, ANCs). Immunophenotyping of plasma cells was CD19-CD56+CD45-/dim+. PCST was able to identify cytoplasmic lambda light-chain restriction. However, the conventional method failed to do so. (B) The second case was a 59-year-old female patient who was admitted with left flank pain. She was diagnosed as MM because of IgD-λ type monoclonal gammopathy (M protein: 0.51 g/dL) with increased plasma cells in bone marrow aspirates (35% of ANCs). Using flow cytometry analysis, plasma cells were found to represent 7.67% of ANCs, and 99.21% of these presented CD19-CD56dim+CD45-/dim+ immunophenotypes, whereas it was difficult to gate plasma cells by the conventional method, which prevented accurate analysis. (C) The third case was a 72-year-old female patient who was diagnosed with MM because of biclonal gammopathy, IgG-κ and IgG-λ (M protein: 2.03 g/dL), with increased plasma cells in bone marrow aspirates (22% of ANCs). Malignant plasma cells showed normal immunophenotypes, CD19+ CD56- CD45+. Therefore, malignant plasma cells could not be detected with either PCST or conventional methods. Additionally, cytoplasmic light-chain restriction could not be observed because of biclonal gammopathy composed of two different types of light-chains, κ and λ.
LMO-10-314-f2.tif
TOOLS
Similar articles