Journal List > Lab Med Online > v.10(3) > 1145158

Recent Seroprevalence of Anti-hepatitis A IgG in the Korean Population: a Large, Population-based Study

Abstract

Background

Because there is limited recent information on this topic, this study investigated the seroprevalence of anti-hepatitis A virus (HAV) immunoglobulin G (IgG) in the South Korean population in 2015–2017.

Methods

Anti-HAV IgG seroprevalence data were obtained from the laboratory information system of Green Cross Laboratories, one of the largest referral laboratories in South Korea.

Results

During the three-year study period, we obtained test results from 240,840 individuals (124,353 men and 116,487 women) from 1,348 hospitals and local clinics throughout South Korea. The median (range) age of subjects was 38.0 (18.0–97.2) years. The annual seroprevalence of anti-HAV IgG was 53.3%, 53.0%, and 53.1% in 2015, 2016, and 2017, respectively. The median age differed among geographic regions and anti-HAV seroprevalence differed among age groups and geographic regions (P<0.0001). Subjects in their 20’s had a significantly lower rate of anti-HAV IgG-positivity than subjects in their 10’s (odds ratio, [OR] 0.74, 95% CI, 0.69–0.78, P<0.0001), while other age groups had higher rates. Multivariable-adjusted logistic regression analysis showed that women and subjects living in Inchoen, Sejong city, Gangwon province, Gwangju, and North Jeolla province were more likely to be immune to HAV compared to subjects living in Seoul (OR >1.0, P<0.05).

Conclusions

This study provides basic information about the recent seroprevalence of anti-HAV IgG in the Korean population and contributes to identifying groups at high risk of an HAV epidemic.

초록

배경

최근 한국의 항- A형 간염 바이러스(HAV) IgG 항체의 혈청유병률에 대한 정보가 거의 없기 때문에 본 연구에서는 2015년부터 2017년까지 한국인에서 항-HAV IgG 항체의 혈청유병률을 조사하고자 하였다.

방법

항-HAV IgG 항체의 혈청유병률(양성률) 정보는 한국에서 가장 큰 수탁 실험실 중 하나인 녹십자의료재단의 검사실 정보 시스템으로부터 얻어졌다.

결과

3년간의 연구 기간 동안 한국 전역 1,233개의 병원 및 지역 의원에서 240,480명(남성 124,353명과 여성 116,487명)으로부터 항-HAV IgG 검사 결과를 얻었다. 연령의 중앙값(범위)은 38.0 (18.0-97.2)였다. 항-HAV IgG 항체의 연간 혈청유병률은 2015년 53.3%, 2016년 53.0%, 2017년 53.1%였다. 연령의 중앙값은 지역에 따라 달랐고, 항-HAV IgG 항체의 혈청유병률은 연령대와 지역에 따라 달랐다(P<0.0001). 항-HAV IgG 양성률은 20대 연령 군에서 10 대 연령 군 보다 유의하게 낮았으며(오즈비 0.74, 95% 신뢰구간 0.69-0.78, P<0.0001), 다른 연령 군은 10대 연령 군보다 높았다. 다변수-보정 로지스틱 회귀 분석에서 항-HAV IgG 양성률은 여성에서 남성보다 높았고, 서울 거주자에 비해 인천, 세종시, 강원도, 광주, 전라북도 지역에 사는 거주자에서 더 높았다(오즈비 >1.0, P<0.05).

결론

이 연구는 한국인에서 항-HAV IgG 항체의 혈청유병률에 대한 기본 정보를 제공하고 A형 간염 유행의 고위험군을 확인하는데 기여할 것이다.

INTRODUCTION

Hepatitis A infection caused by the hepatitis A virus (HAV) is a global health concern, with an estimated 1.5 million people infected annually [1]. Although HAV infection is usually a self-limited illness that does not become chronic, fulminant hepatitis may develop, for which liver transplantation may also be required [1, 2]. Globally, acute HAV caused 52,000 deaths in 1980–2016 [2]. The population incidence of HAV infection is related to socioeconomic factors including housing density, sanitation, water quality, and income [1, 3]. HAV infection confers lifelong immunity and is preventable via vaccination; the so-called ‘‘paradox of hepatitis A risk” refers to the fact that a high seroprevalence of anti-HAV IgG antibodies reflects high endemicity, meaning high levels of population immunity [1].
In recent years, HAV seropositivity among young adults in South Korea has decreased owing to improved general hygiene and economic status [3]. The HAV seropositivity was above 80% in teenagers during the 1970s in South Korea but had decreased to less than 20% in 2007, highlighting a rapid decline in immunity against HAV [3, 4]. In South Korea, the HAV vaccine was rst introduced in 1997 and has been recommended for high-risk groups; it is currently recommended for children over 12 months of age [5]. Although HAV vaccination was introduced in South Korea more than 20 years ago, the reported infection incident rates in 2017 were 8-9 patients per 100,000 population [3, 6]. Because there is little information about the more recent seroprevalence of anti-HAV IgG in South Korea [3, 6], this study retrospectively analyzed seroprevalence from 2015 to 2017.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

1. Study populations

Anti-HAV IgG Seroprevalence data from January 2015 to December 2017 were obtained from the laboratory information system of Green Cross Laboratories, one of the largest referral laboratories in South Korea that provides clinical sample analysis services to 1,348 hospitals and local clinics nationwide. We analyzed the seroprevalence data of all adults (>18 years) who visited hospitals or local clinics and underwent serum anti-HAV IgG tests by Green Cross Laboratories during the study period. Duplicated test results were excluded. The subjects were categorized into age groups by decade and all data were anonymized before analysis. This study was conducted according to the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and all procedures involving human subjects were approved by the Institutional Review Board of Green Cross Laboratories (GCL-2018-1010-01). This study involved no more than minimal risk to the subjects and the Institutional Review Board of Green Cross Laboratories waived informed consent for the retrospective data collection and review.

2. Analytical procedures

Serum anti-HAV IgG tests were performed by chemiluminescence microparticle immunoassay (CMIA; Abbott, USA) on an Architect i2000 analyzer (Abbott, Singapore) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The resulting chemiluminescent reactions were measured as relative light units (RLU). CMIA test positivity was de ned as a serum anti-HAV IgG level ≥1.00 S/CO (sample RLU/cut-off RLU). Positive anti-HAV IgG tests were considered ‘immune’ to HAV (representing either past HAV infection or vaccination) [1].

3. Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using MedCalc software for Windows, version 17.9.7 (MedCalc Software, Ostend, Belgium) and OpenEpi software, version 3.01 (www.openepi.com). Seroprevalence and disease burden were compared among age groups, sexes, and geographical regions. To compare the seroprevalence of anti-HAV IgG among geographic regions by population density in 2015 based on data from the KOrean Statistical Information Service (KOSIS) [7], Seoul, Gyeonggi province, Incheon, Daejeon, Ulsan, Daegu, Busan, and Gwangju were categorized as density group 1 (population density over 1,000 persons/km2); the other regions were categorized as density group 2 (population density <1,000 persons/km2). Geographic regions were also categorized into three groups based on their populations in 2015 [7] as follows: group 1, >10% of the total Korean population (Seoul and Gyeonggi province); group 2, 5–10% of the total Korean population (Incheon, North and South Gyeongsang provinces, and Busan); and group 3, <5% of the total Korean population (the other regions). Differences in seroprevalence between categorical variables were analyzed by Chi-square tests, while continuous variables were compared by analysis of variance (ANOVA). Multivariable-adjusted logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate variables associated with HAV immunity (anti-HAV IgG-positive). P-values <0.05 were considered statistically significant.

4. Data availability

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are not publicly available due to restrictions in data sharing but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request

RESULTS

During the three-year study period, we obtained anti-HAV IgG test results from 240,840 individuals (124,353 men and 116,487 women). The median (range) age was 38.0 (18.0–97.2) years. The annual anti-HAV IgG seroprevalence in 2015, 2016, and 2017 was 53.3%, 53.0%, and 53.1%, respectively (Table 1). Factors associated with positive anti-HAV IgG results were analyzed (Table 2). We observed differences in seroprevalence by sex (men 59.4% vs. women 46.4%, P<0.0001). The age-related seroprevalence of anti-HAV IgG was lowest in subjects in their 20s (Fig. 1). Anti-HAV IgG antibody seroprevalence was also evaluated by geographic region in Korea. Different numbers of subjects living in different geographic regions were tested during the study period. Among the 240,840 anti-HAV IgG test results, 50.8% were from Gyeonggi province. Subjects living in Jeju (anti-HAV IgG positivity rate: 37.0%) were the most susceptible to HAV infection. The median age of subjects differed signi cantly among geographic regions (data not shown). The seroprevalence of anti-HAV IgG among geographic regions according to KOSIS population density [7] is shown in Table 3. A higher anti-HAV IgG positivity rate (53.6%) was observed in density group 1 regions (population density over 1,000 persons/km2) than that in density group 2 regions (48.9%, <1,000 persons/km2, P<0.0001). According to geographic regions based on population proportions, the anti-HAV positivity rates in population proportion groups 1 (43.8% of the total Korean population), 2 (24.2% of the total Korean population), and 3 (32.0% of the total Korean population) were 53.4%, 56.3%, and 48.9%, respectively (P<0.0001).
Logistic regression analysis to investigate the factors associated with HAV immune status (Table 2) showed that the odds ratios (ORs) for HAV immunity were lower in women than in men; subjects in their 20’s than those in their 10’s; and subjects living in Sejong city, North and South Chungcheong provinces, Daegu, and Jeju province than in subjects living in Seoul (ORs <1.00, P<0.001). However, multivariable-adjusted logistic regression analysis showed that the OR for HAV immunity was higher in women than that in men (OR 1.04, 95% con dence interval [CI], 1.02–1.06, P=0.0001). Multivariable-adjusted logistic regression analysis also showed a signi cantly lower rate of anti-HAV IgG positivity in 2016 and 2017 compared to that in 2015. After adjusting for age, sex, and years tested, subjects living in Sejong city showed a higher rate of anti-HAV IgG positivity than subjects living in Seoul, contrary to the results of the univariable logistic regression analysis. Subjects living in Inchoen, Sejong city, Gangwon, Gwangju, and North Jeolla provinces had higher ORs for HAV immunity than subjects living in Seoul (OR>1.00, P<0.05).
Previous studies on HAV seroprevalence performed in general populations throughout Korea and studies that included more than 10,000 subjects since 2005 are summarized in Table 4. Koreans in their 10s and 20s were the most likely groups to contract HAV infections in 2005–2017. The anti-HAV IgG seroprevalence in Koreans in their 30s decreased from 50.7–71.7% before 2010 [5, 8-10] to 31.0% during 2015–2017.

DISCUSSION

This study evaluated the annual anti-HAV IgG seroprevalence in the Korean adult population between 2015 and 2017. The strength of this study is its large, nationwide population. Thus, investigating the current seroprevalence of anti-HAV IgG and the disease burden of hepatitis A will aid in efforts for infection prevention and control [3].
Seroepidemiologic changes were evaluated through a review of previous studies performed in Korea with more than 10,000 subjects and those performed in various geographic regions (Table 4). The previous studies summarized in Table 4 were performed by assessing total anti-HAV antibodies (including IgG and IgM), unlike the present study. Differences in analytical methods might have affected the seroprevalence of the speci c study population. However, since 2005, Koreans in their 10s and 20s were the most likely to be infected with HAV. Of note, more Koreans in their 30s are currently at high risk of HAV infection. The seropositivity of anti-HAV decreased from 2005 to 2017. This nding was similar to that reported in Thailand, in which the seroprevalence among 21–30-year-olds decreased from 84.9% in 1991 to 35.8% in 2007 and 17% in 2016 [11]. A study in Beijing, China, reported anti-HAV positivity rates in the general population of 68.23%, 81.73%, and 82.47%, respectively, in 1992, 2006, and 2014 [12]. The seroprevalence among 20–29-year-olds was 78.24–81.60% in 1992, 72.31–63.77% in 2006, and 70.63–75.89% in 2014 [12]. Another study performed in Shijiazhuang prefecture, China, reported a seroprevalence among 20–29-year-olds of 80% and a coverage rate in the target population above 99% after integration of the hepatitis A vaccine into the Expanded Program on Immunization [13].
Serological surveillance is an important tool for the evaluation of vaccination programs and avoids the limitations of passive disease reporting systems [14]. Because this study provides basic information on the seroprevalence of anti-HAV IgG in the Korean population, it contributes to identifying groups at high risk for an HAV epidemic in Korea. Speci cally, Koreans in their 20s, 30s, and 40s are at increased risk for hepatitis A and should be identi ed and vaccinated [3, 5]. Despite the availability of the HAV vaccine in South Korea since 1997, vaccination of children only started in 2015 and the rate of catch-up vaccinations for young adults remains low due to high cost and low levels of knowledge and awareness [3]. An immunity gap in young adults and an epidemiologic transition cannot be ignored when formulating public health policies [15]. Therefore, a hepatitis A immunization program to promote catch-up vaccinations for young adults and an active public campaign regarding young adult vaccination are needed in South Korea [3].
More than half of the positive results in this study were from Gyeonggi province, which includes the capital area of South Korea and about 23.7% of the total Korean population [7]. In early 2007, the South Korean government created a special administrative district— ‘Sejong city’—from parts of the South Chungcheong and North Chungcheong provinces, near Daejeon, to relocate nine ministries and four national agencies from Seoul. The median age of the subjects differed signi cantly among geographic regions in this study. This might have affected the seroprevalences in different regions. In this study, fewer than 1,000 subjects were tested for anti-HAV IgG in the Ulsan and South Jeolla provinces, which could have affected the observed anti-HAV IgG seropositivity. Additional studies are needed to determine the effects of regional differences in various factors including health awareness and government programs for encouraging public health on anti-HAV IgG seropositivity.
One limitation of this study was the lack of clinical information, including detailed history, physical examination, other laboratory and image studies associated with HAV infection, and disease severity, which were substantially omitted from the seroprevalence reports. As a result, preliminary diagnoses or misdiagnoses may obfuscate the true incidence of hepatitis A in South Korea. Nevertheless, anti-HAV IgG is a well-known marker of the epidemiologic status of population immunity and this study provides valuable information despite the lack of clinical information [1, 3, 5, 15]. Additionally, fewer than 1,000 subjects aged over 80 years and subjects living in some geographic regions had been tested for anti-HAV IgG. This may have affected the observed seropositivity. Finally, the present study evaluated anti-HAV IgG seropositivity from Korean hospitals and local clinics; thus, the ndings may not be generalizable to other populations such as patients visiting tertiary hospitals.
In conclusion, hepatitis A seroprevalence has been relatively low in the Korean adult population in recent years. Young adults (10s-30s) are especially at risk for an HAV epidemic and should be identi ed and vaccinated. This study provides valuable information for establishing a catch-up vaccination program in South Korea; however, additional studies on long-term changes in seroprevalence in patient populations are needed.

Acknowledgements

Thanks to Ms. Son and Mr. Kim at Green Cross Laboratories for their administrative support.

Notes

Conflicts of Interest

None declared.

REFERENCES

1. Lemon SM, Ott JJ, Van Damme P, Shouval D. 2018; Type A viral hepatitis: A summary and update on the molecular virology, epidemiology, pathogenesis and prevention. J Hepatol. 68:167–84. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2017.08.034. PMID: 28887164.
crossref
2. GBD 2013 Mortality and Causes of Death Collaborators. 2015; Global, regional, and national age-sex specific all-cause and cause-specific mortality for 240 causes of death, 1990-2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. Lancet. 385:117–71. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61682-2.
3. Yoon JG, Choi MJ, Yoon JW, Noh JY, Song JY, Cheong HJ, et al. 2017; Seroprevalence and disease burden of acute hepatitis A in adult population in South Korea. PLoS One. 12:e0186257. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0186257. PMID: 29065115. PMCID: PMC5655533.
crossref
4. Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2008. Changing patterns of hepatitis A virus infection in Korea. Public Health Weekly Report. http://www.nih.kr/CDC/cms/cmsFileDownload.jsp?d=496&cid=12809& eldName=attach1&index=1. Updated on Apr 2020.
5. Lee H, Cho HK, Kim JH, Kim KH. 2011; Seroepidemiology of hepatitis A in Korea: Changes over the past 30 years. J Korean Med Sci. 26:791–6. DOI: 10.3346/jkms.2011.26.6.791. PMID: 21655066. PMCID: PMC3102874.
crossref
6. Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2018. 2017 Infectious Diseases Surveillance Yearbook. http://www.cdc.go.kr/npt/biz/npp/portal/nppPblctDtaView.do?.pblctDtaSeAt=1&pblctDtaSn=631 (Updated on Apr 2020). Updated on Apr 2020.
8. Lee A, Lim HS, Nam CM, Song SM, Yoon HR, Lee KR. 2009; An epidemiological analysis of hepatitis A virus serologic markers during the recent four years in Korea. Korean J Lab Med. 29:563–9. DOI: 10.3343/kjlm.2009.29.6.563. PMID: 20046089.
crossref
9. Lee D, Ki M, Lee A, Lee KR, Park HB, Kim CS, et al. 2011; A nationwide seroprevalence of total antibody to hepatitis A virus from 2005 to 2009: age and area-adjusted prevalence rates. Korean J Hepatol. 17:44–50. DOI: 10.3350/kjhep.2011.17.1.44. PMID: 21494077. PMCID: PMC3304627.
crossref
10. Cho SE and Kim Y. 2013; Seroepidemiology of hepatitis A in South Korea: a nationwide study by the Eone Reference Laboratory. J Epidemiol. 23:270–4. DOI: 10.2188/jea.JE20120188. PMID: 23629647. PMCID: PMC3709547.
11. Gripenberg M, Aloysia D'Cor N, L'Azou M, Marsh G, Druelles S, Nealon J. 2018; Changing sero-epidemiology of hepatitis A in Asia Pacific countries: a systematic review. Int J Infect Dis. 68:13–7. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijid.2017.12.021. PMID: 29292043.
crossref
12. Wang H, Gao P, Chen W, Bai S, Lv M, Ji W, et al. 2019; Changing epidemiological characteristics of hepatitis A and warning of Anti-HAV immunity in Beijing, China: a comparison of prevalence from 1990 to 2017. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 15:420–5. DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2018.1529128. PMID: 30260275. PMCID: PMC6422449.
crossref
13. Chen Y, Zhang XJ, Zhao YL, Zhang YH, Wang SM, Hao ZY, et al. 2014; Waning of anti-HAV immunity in Shijiazhuang prefecture, Hebei province, China: a comparison of seroprevalence between 1992 and 2011. Vaccine. 32:6227–32. DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.09.022. PMID: 25258099.
crossref
14. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. VPD surveillance manual enhancing surveillance: Chapter 19. https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/pubs/surv-manual/chpt19-enhancing-surv.html. Updated on Nov 2017.
15. Choe YJ, Choe S-A, Cho S-I. 2018; Trends in infectious disease mortality, South Korea, 1983-2015. Emerg Infect Dis. 24:320–7. DOI: 10.3201/eid2402.170862. PMID: 29350153. PMCID: PMC5782883.
crossref

Fig. 1
Numbers of positive anti-hepatitis A virus IgG results and age-stratified anti-hepatitis A virus IgG seroprevalence (%) from 2015 to 2017 in Korean adults. (A) Men and (B) women.
LMO-10-227-f1.tif
Table 1
Age- and sex-stratified anti-hepatitis A virus immunoglobulin G (HAV IgG) results (numbers and percentages) in Korean adults, 2015–2017
Sex Age (yr) 2015 2016 2017 2015–2017




Total Positive %Positive Total Positive %Positive Total Positive %Positive Total Positive %Positive
Men 18–19 1,321 360 27.3 1,580 581 36.8 956 359 37.6 3,857 1,300 33.7
20–29 4,279 1,007 23.5 6,371 1,627 25.5 5,578 1,748 31.3 16,228 4,382 27.0
30–39 8,234 2,699 32.8 15,513 4,602 29.7 11,774 3,117 26.5 35,521 10,418 29.3
40–49 9,246 7,124 77.0 15,229 10,935 71.8 11,755 7,997 68.0 36,230 26,056 71.9
50–59 6,247 6,086 97.4 7,999 7,697 96.2 7,247 6,954 96.0 21,493 20,737 96.5
60–69 2,294 2,292 99.9 2,805 2,799 99.8 2,775 2,767 99.7 7,874 7,858 99.8
70–79 897 894 99.7 893 890 99.7 870 868 99.8 2,660 2,652 99.7
80–89 154 154 100 151 150 99.3 159 158 99.4 464 462 99.6
≥90 6 6 100 3 3 100 17 17 100 26 26 100
Men total 32,678 20,622 63.1 50,544 29,284 57.9 41,131 23,985 58.3 124,353 73,891 59.4
Women 18–19 1,123 248 22.1 731 218 29.8 587 177 30.2 2,441 643 26.3
20–29 8,495 1,682 19.8 8,054 1,744 21.7 6,719 1,527 22.7 23,268 4,953 21.3
30–39 18,178 5,653 31.1 18,771 6,191 33.0 16,446 5,275 32.1 53,395 17,119 32.1
40–49 6,025 4,732 78.5 7,944 5,720 72.0 6,911 4,770 69.0 20,880 15,222 72.9
50–59 3,663 3,582 97.8 3,651 3,543 97.0 3,551 3,415 96.2 10,865 10,540 97.0
60–69 1,283 1,280 99.8 1,313 1,310 99.8 1,403 1399 99.7 3,999 3,989 99.7
70–79 535 533 99.6 427 424 99.3 411 409 99.5 1,373 1,366 99.5
80–89 111 111 100 70 69 98.6 63 63 100 244 243 99.6
≥90 10 9 90.0 4 4 100 8 8 100 22 21 95.5
Women total 39,423 17,830 45.2 40,965 19,223 46.9 36,099 17,043 47.2 116,487 54,096 46.4
Both Total 72,101 38,452 53.3 91,509 48,507 53.0 77,230 41,028 53.1 240,840 127,987 53.1
Table 2
Factors associated with positive anti-hepatitis A virus immunoglobulin G (HAV IgG) results in 240,840 Korean subjects*
Total Positive %Positive Univariable logistic regression Multivariable logistic regression


OR 95% CI P-value OR 95% CI P-value
Sex
Men 124,353 73,891 59.4
Women 116,487 54,096 46.4 0.59 0.58–0.60 <0.0001 1.04 1.02–1.06 0.0001
Test year
2015 72,101 38,452 53.3
2016 91,509 48,507 53.0 0.95 0.93–0.97 <0.0001
2017 77,230 41,028 53.1 0.89 0.87–0.92 <0.0001
Age group (yr)
18–19 6,298 1,943 30.9
20–29 39,496 9,335 23.6 0.69 0.67–0.71 <0.0001 0.74 0.69–0.78 <0.0001
30–39 88,916 27,537 31.0 1.11 1.05–1.18 0.0004
40–49 57,110 41,278 72.3 5.81 5.68–5.95 <0.0001 6.54 6.16–6.94 <0.0001
50–59 32,358 31,277 96.7 64.50 60.63–68.65 <0.0001 73.00 67.17–79.31 <0.0001
60–69 11,873 11,847 99.8 1,016.00 691.31–1,493.22 <0.0001 1,143.04 774.71–1,686.50 <0.0001
70–79 4,033 4,018 99.6 597.30 359.67–991.87 <0.0001 667.96 401.04–1,112.55 <0.0001
80–89 708 705 99.6 234.00 168.58–1,628.78 <0.0001 585.68 188.16–1,823.04 <0.0001
≥90 48 47 97.9 104.80 14.46–759.64 <0.0001 118.51 16.33–860.25 <0.0001
Geographic regions
Seoul 42,885 22,115 51.6
Gyeonggi Province 122,413 66,122 54.0 1.10 1.08–1.13 <0.0001
Incheon 30,495 17,380 57.0 1.24 1.21–1.28 <0.0001 1.07 1.04–1.10 <0.0001
Daejeon 9,569 4,885 51.1 0.92 0.87–0.97 0.0013
Sejong City 3,875 1,520 39.2 0.61 0.57–0.65 <0.0001 1.39 1.29–1.50 <0.0001
North Chungcheong Province 2,850 1,282 45.0 0.77 0.71–0.83 <0.0001 0.79 0.72–0.87 <0.0001
South Chungcheong Province 4,850 1,996 41.2 0.66 0.62–0.70 <0.0001
Gangwon Province 1,947 1,203 67.8 1.04 1.38–1.67 <0.0001 2.97 2.68–3.29 <0.0001
Ulsan 563 337 59.9 1.40 1.18–1.66 <0.0001
Daegu 5,492 2,296 41.8 0.67 0.64–0.71 <0.0001 0.61 0.57–0.65 <0.0001
North Gyeongsang Province 1,888 1,005 53.2 0.80 0.71–0.90 0.0001
South Gyeongsang Province 1,247 678 54.4
Busan 4,152 2,204 53.1 0.79 0.74–0.86 <0.0001
Gwangju 2,208 1,361 61.1 1.51 1.38–1.65 <0.0001 1.46 1.31–1.63 <0.0001
North Jeolla Province 4,926 2,952 59.9 1.40 1.32–1.49 <0.0001 1.13 1.06–1.22 0.0006
South Jeolla Province 445 268 60.2 1.42 1.18–1.72 0.0003
Jeju Province 1,035 383 37.0 0.55 0.49–0.63 <0.0001

*Data are not presented when P-values >0.05.

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio.

Table 3
Hepatitis A seroprevalence among geographic regions in Korea
Geographic regions Population in 2015, Korea [7] anti-HAV IgG test results Population density group Population number group


Density person/km2 Numbers Total Positive 95% Confidence limit*




N % N N % Lower Upper
Total 509.2 51,069,375 100 240,840 127,987 53.1 52.9 53.3
Seoul 16,364.0 9,904,312 19.4 42,885 22,115 51.6 51.1 52.0 1 1
Gyeonggi Province 1,226.4 12,479,061 24.4 122,413 66,122 54.0 53.7 54.3 1 1
Incheon 2,755.5 2,890,451 5.7 30,495 17,380 57.0 56.4 57.6 1 2
Daejeon 2,852.3 1,538,394 3.0 9,569 4,885 51.1 50.1 52.1 1 3
Sejong City 439.0 204,088 0.4 3,875 1,520 39.2 37.7 40.8 1 3
North Chungcheong Province 214.6 1,589,347 3.1 2,850 1,282 45.0 43.2 46.8 2 3
South Chungcheong Province 256.6 2,107,802 4.1 4,850 1,996 41.2 39.8 42.6 2 3
Gangwon Province 90.2 1,518,040 3.0 1,947 1,203 67.8 59.6 63.9 2 3
Ulsan 1,099.6 1,166,615 2.3 563 337 59.9 55.8 63.8 1 3
Daegu 2,791.0 2,466,052 4.8 5,492 2,296 41.8 40.5 43.1 1 3
North Gyeongsang Province 140.8 2,680,294 5.2 1,888 1,005 53.2 51.0 55.5 2 2
South Gyeongsang Province 316.4 3,334,524 6.5 1,247 678 54.4 51.6 57.1 2 2
Busan 4,479.9 3,448,737 6.8 4,152 2,204 53.1 51.6 54.6 1 2
Gwangju 2,998.8 1,502,881 2.9 2,208 1,361 61.1 60.0 63.7 1 3
North Jeolla Province 227.4 1,834,114 3.6 4,926 2,952 59.9 58.6 61.3 2 3
South Jeolla Province 146.1 1,799,044 3.5 445 268 60.2 55.6 64.7 2 3
Jeju Province 327.5 605,619 1.2 1,035 383 37.0 34.1 40.0 2 3

*Adjusted for population number. Geographic regions with population densities over 1,000 persons/km2 (group 1) and <1,000 persons/km2 (group 2). A higher anti-HAV IgG positivity rate was observed in density group 1 regions than that in density group 2 regions (53.6% vs 48.9%, P<0.0001). Geographic regions with population number >10% of the total Korean population (group 1: Seoul and Gyeonggi province), 5–10% of the total Korean population (group 2: Incheon, North and South Gyeongsang provinces, and Busan), and <5% of the total Korean population (group 3: other regions). Anti-HAV positivity rates in population proportion group 1, group 2, and group 3 were 53.4%, 56.3%, and 48.9%, respectively (P<0.0001).

Table 4
Hepatitis A seroprevalence studies in Korea
Reference Study year Serologic study Analytical method Region Lee et al. [8] 2005-2008 anti-HAV (total) Elecsys Modular analytics E170 (Roche) Throughout Korea Lee et al. [9] 2005-2009 anti-HAV (total) Elecsys Modular analytics E170 (Roche) Throughout Korea Lee et al. [5] 2008-2010 anti-HAV (total) Elecsys Modular analytics E170 (Roche) Throughout Korea




Age (yr) Total Positive Total Positive Total Positive






N N % N N % N N %

Total 11,068 6,951 62.8 25,140 13,052 51.9 1,872 1,008 53.8
0–9 38.0–47.3 1,235 634 51.3 810 514 63.5
10–19 14.1–21.4 2,104 472 22.4 277 72 26
20–29 18.7–30.1 4,459 691 15.5 206 24 11.7
30–39 60.8–71.7 6,767 3,619 53.5 301 157 52.2
40–49 96.6–98.6 5,008 4,542 90.7 119 99 83.2
50–59 5,565 5,497 98.8 59 48 81.4
60–69 59 55 93.2
70–79 41ǁ 39ǁ 95.1ǁ

Reference Study year Serologic study Analytical method Region Cho et al. [10] 2009–2010 anti-HAV (total) ADVIA Centaur (Siemens) Throughout Korea Yoon et al. [3] 2010–2014 anti-HAV (total) Not reported Seoul This study 2015–2017 anti-HAV IgG CMIA on an Architect i2000 analyzer (Abbott) Throughout Korea




Age (yr) Total Positive Total Positive Total Positive






N N % N N % N N %

Total 56,623 28,843 50.9 11,177 7,719 69.1 240,840 80,811 53.1
0-9 977 542 55.5
10-19 6,849 1,545 22.6 6,298 1,946 30.9
20-29 13,976 1,985 14.2 395 61 15.4 39,496 9,335 23.6
30-39 18,485 9,370 50.7 4,159 1,788 43.0 88,916 27,537 31.0
40-49 9,102 8,317 91.4 4,294 3,581 83.4 57,110 41,278 72.3
50-59 4,548 4,505 99.1 1,957 1,920 98.1 32,358 31,277 96.7
60-69 2,686§ 2,579§ 96.0§ 371§ 370§ 99.7§ 11,873 11,847 99.8
70-79 4,033 4,018 99.6
80-89 708 705 99.6
≥90 48 47 97.9

*Detailed information including numbers tested by age group are not reported in the literature. Data are expressed as ≥40 years. ≥50 years. §60 years. ǁ≥70 years.

Abbreviation: HAV, hepatitis A virus.

TOOLS
Similar articles