1. Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Osterman MJK. Births in the United States, 2016. NCHS Data Brief. 2017; 1–8.
2. Korean Statistical Information Service. Birth data for 2016, Korea. Daejeon: Korean Statistical Information Service;2017.
3. Lee GH, Song HJ, Lee KS, Choi YM. Current status of assisted reproductive technology in Korea, 2010. Clin Exp Reprod Med. 2015; 42:8–13. PMID:
25874168.

4. Aduloju OP, Olofinbiyi B, Olagbuji BN, Ade-Ojo IP, Akintayo A. Obstetric outcome of twin gestations in a tertiary hospital South-western Nigeria. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2015; 28:900–904. PMID:
25030878.

5. Luke B, Keith LG. The contribution of singletons, twins and triplets to low birth weight, infant mortality and handicap in the United States. J Reprod Med. 1992; 37:661–666. PMID:
1432978.
6. Ananth CV, Joseph KS, Demissie K, Vintzileos AM. Trends in twin preterm birth subtypes in the United States, 1989 through 2000: impact on perinatal mortality. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005; 193:1076–1082. PMID:
16157115.

7. Yoo EH, Chun D, Kim MJ, Cha HH, Seong WJ. Comparison of perinatal outcomes in late preterm birth between singleton and twin pregnancies. Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2017; 60:421–426. PMID:
28989917.

8. Black M, Bhattacharya S. Epidemiology of multiple pregnancy and the effect of assisted conception. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2010; 15:306–312. PMID:
20630816.

9. Masheer S, Maheen H, Munim S. Perinatal outcome of twin pregnancies according to chorionicity: an observational study from tertiary care hospital. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2015; 28:23–25. PMID:
24605797.

10. Doss AE, Mancuso MS, Cliver SP, Jauk VC, Jenkins SM. Gestational age at delivery and perinatal outcomes of twin gestations. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012; 207:410.e1–410.e6. PMID:
22959832.

11. Acosta-Rojas R, Becker J, Munoz-Abellana B, Ruiz C, Carreras E, Gratacos E, et al. Twin chorionicity and the risk of adverse perinatal outcome. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2007; 96:98–102. PMID:
17250837.

12. Hansen M, Kurinczuk JJ, Milne E, de Klerk N, Bower C. Assisted reproductive technology and birth defects: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 2013; 19:330–353. PMID:
23449641.

13. Wen J, Jiang J, Ding C, Dai J, Liu Y, Xia Y, et al. Birth defects in children conceived by
in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 2012; 97:1331–1337.e1-4. PMID:
22480819.
14. Tararbit K, Lelong N, Jouannic JM, Goffinet F, Khoshnood B; EPICARD Study Group. Is the probability of prenatal diagnosis or termination of pregnancy different for fetuses with congenital anomalies conceived following assisted reproductive techniques? A population-based evaluation of fetuses with congenital heart defects. BJOG. 2015; 122:924–931. PMID:
25752912.
15. Moses XJ, Torres T, Rasmussen A, George C. Congenital anomalies identified at birth among infants born following assisted reproductive technology in Colorado. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2014; 100:92–99. PMID:
24532453.

16. Reefhuis J, Honein MA. Maternal age and non-chromosomal birth defects, Atlanta--1968–2000: teenager or thirty-something, who is at risk? Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2004; 70:572–579. PMID:
15368555.

17. Cleary-Goldman J, Malone FD, Vidaver J, Ball RH, Nyberg DA, Comstock CH, et al. Impact of maternal age on obstetric outcome. Obstet Gynecol. 2005; 105:983–990. PMID:
15863534.

18. Goldenberg RL, Culhane JF, Iams JD, Romero R. Epidemiology and causes of preterm birth. Lancet. 2008; 371:75–84. PMID:
18177778.

19. Rafael TJ, Berghella V, Alfirevic Z. Cervical stitch (cerclage) for preventing preterm birth in multiple pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014; CD009166. PMID:
25208049.

20. Nam SH, Lee JE, Choi SJ, Oh SY, Kim JH, Roh CR. Pregnancy outcome of cervical incompetence in twin versus singleton pregnancies. Korean J Perinatol. 2007; 18:149–153.
21. Meath AJ, Ramsey PS, Mulholland TA, Rosenquist RG, Lesnick T, Ramin KD. Comparative longitudinal study of cervical length and induced shortening changes among singleton, twin, and triplet pregnancies. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005; 192:1410–1415. PMID:
15902123.

22. Kahn B, Lumey LH, Zybert PA, Lorenz JM, Cleary-Goldman J, D'Alton ME, et al. Prospective risk of fetal death in singleton, twin, and triplet gestations: implications for practice. Obstet Gynecol. 2003; 102:685–692. PMID:
14550996.

23. Cheung YB, Yip P, Karlberg J. Mortality of twins and singletons by gestational age: a varying-coefficient approach. Am J Epidemiol. 2000; 152:1107–1116. PMID:
11130615.

24. Lewi L, Van Schoubroeck D, Gratacós E, Witters I, Timmerman D, Deprest J. Monochorionic diamniotic twins: complications and management options. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2003; 15:177–194. PMID:
12634610.

25. Van Mieghem T, De Heus R, Lewi L, Klaritsch P, Kollmann M, Baud D, et al. Prenatal management of monoamniotic twin pregnancies. Obstet Gynecol. 2014; 124:498–506. PMID:
25162249.

26. Vergani P, Russo FM, Follesa I, Cozzolino S, Fedeli T, Ventura L, et al. Perinatal complications in twin pregnancies after 34 weeks: effects of gestational age at delivery and chorionicity. Am J Perinatol. 2013; 30:545–550. PMID:
23096054.

27. Newman RB, Unal ER. Multiple gestations: timing of indicated late preterm and early-term births in uncomplicated dichorionic, monochorionic, and monoamniotic twins. Semin Perinatol. 2011; 35:277–285. PMID:
21962627.

28. Spong CY, Mercer BM, D'alton M, Kilpatrick S, Blackwell S, Saade G. Timing of indicated late-preterm and early-term birth. Obstet Gynecol. 2011; 118:323–333. PMID:
21775849.

29. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Antenatal management of multiple gestations: NICE clinical guideline 129 [Internet]. London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence;c2011. cited 2015 Mar 20. Available from:
http://guidance.nice.org.uk/CG129.
30. Lee HJ, Kim SH, Chang KH, Sung JH, Choi SJ, Oh SY, et al. Gestational age at delivery and neonatal outcome in uncomplicated twin pregnancies: what is the optimal gestational age for delivery according to chorionicity? Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2016; 59:9–16. PMID:
26866030.

31. Sung JH, Kim SH, Kim YM, Kim JH, Kim MN, Lee HR, et al. Neonatal outcomes of twin pregnancies delivered at late-preterm versus term gestation based on chorionicity and indication for delivery. J Perinat Med. 2016; 44:903–911. PMID:
27149198.

32. Lee YM, Cleary-Goldman J, D'Alton ME. The impact of multiple gestations on late preterm (near-term) births. Clin Perinatol. 2006; 33:777–792. PMID:
17148004.

33. Smith GC, Shah I, White IR, Pell JP, Dobbie R. Mode of delivery and the risk of delivery-related perinatal death among twins at term: a retrospective cohort study of 8073 births. BJOG. 2005; 112:1139–1144. PMID:
16045531.

34. Smith GC, Fleming KM, White IR. Birth order of twins and risk of perinatal death related to delivery in England, Northern Ireland, and Wales, 1994–2003: retrospective cohort study. BMJ. 2007; 334:576. PMID:
17337456.

35. Barrett JF, Hannah ME, Hutton EK, Willan AR, Allen AC, Armson BA, et al. A randomized trial of planned cesarean or vaginal delivery for twin pregnancy. N Engl J Med. 2013; 369:1295–1305. PMID:
24088091.

36. Schmitz T, Carnavalet CC, Azria E, Lopez E, Cabrol D, Goffinet F. Neonatal outcomes of twin pregnancy according to the planned mode of delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2008; 111:695–703. PMID:
18310373.

37. Rossi AC, Mullin PM, Chmait RH. Neonatal outcomes of twins according to birth order, presentation and mode of delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BJOG. 2011; 118:523–532. PMID:
21291505.

38. Yamashita A, Ishii K, Taguchi T, Mabuchi A, Ota S, Sasahara J, et al. Adverse perinatal outcomes related to the delivery mode in women with monochorionic diamniotic twin pregnancies. J Perinat Med. 2014; 42:769–775. PMID:
24728848.

39. Lim JS, Lim SW, Ahn JH, Song BS, Shim KS, Hwang IT. New Korean reference for birth weight by gestational age and sex: data from the Korean Statistical Information Service (2008–2012). Ann Pediatr Endocrinol Metab. 2014; 19:146–153. PMID:
25346919.
