A 36-year-old female with no previous comorbidities, presented with anemia and renal failure (serum creatinine, 8.4 mg/dL; urine output, 700 mL/d). The M component was 0.22 g/dL, serum kappa (κ) light chain was 3,650 mg/L, and the lambda light chain (λ) was 7.41 mg/L. The difference in free light chain (dFLC) was 3,642 mg/L. Bone marrow evaluation demonstrated 50% clonal plasma cells. The myeloma fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH) panel was negative. The patient was diagnosed with IgG kappa multiple myeloma R-ISS stage III with severe renal impairment requiring dialysis and started on a cyclophosphamide, bortezomib, dexamethasone (CyBorD) regimen. After 2 weeks of CyBorD therapy, the patient developed hyperemesis due to cyclophosphamide. Cyclophosphamide was replaced with thalidomide. Bortezomib, thalidomide, and dexamethasone (VTD) were administered for 2 weeks, following which thalidomide was discontinued owing to severe myalgia. Next, the ABCD regimen, comprising liposomal doxorubicin, bortezomib, cyclophosphamide (100 mg D1–D15), and dexamethasone (40 mg weekly), was initiated. The patient tolerated the ABCD therapy well, and disease evaluation performed after two ABCD cycles presented stable disease (κ>3,650 mg/L; λ, 7.41 mg/L and M spike of 0.24 g/dL), with a continuing need for dialysis. As no disease response was observed, daratumumab (16 mg/kg/dose weekly ×8 doses, followed by 2-weekly ×8 doses, then monthly), lenalidomide (5 mg), and dexamethasone were administered. To avoid fluid overload, the daratumumab infusion was administered after the dialysis session, and the infusion rate did not exceed 100 mL/h. No infusion reactions or cytopenia were observed. The patient was dialysis-independent after the fourth daratumumab dose, reporting a serum creatinine stabilized at 4.3 mg/dL. After the ninth daratumumab dose, disease evaluation demonstrated a Very Good Partial Response (VGPR) including M band of 0.12 g/dL, κ–22.1 mg/L, λ–12.9 mg/L (κ/λ ratio 1.73), and dFLC of 9.2 mg/L. The patient underwent an autologous stem cell transplant with high dose melphalan (140 mg/m²). Hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) mobilization was performed with the granulocyte colony-stimulating factor and upfront plerixafor. The total HSC dose collected after two sessions of apheresis was 1.52×10⁶ cells/kg. Neutrophil engraftment was achieved on day 12, and platelet engraftment was achieved on day 14. The patient was restarted on monthly daratumumab injections from day 60 post-transplant, indicating a stringent complete response (κ, 2.8 mg/L; λ, 1.8 mg/L and ratio 2.1) on the day 100 evaluation, with continuing complete remission observed 21 months post-transplant on monthly daratumumab.

The second patient, a 53-year-old female, with no previous comorbidities, was diagnosed with λ light chain myeloma RISS-III with renal failure requiring hemodialysis (serum creatinine, 7.9 mg/dL; urine output, 200 mL/d). The patient demonstrated an initial serum λ light chain of 1,620 mg/L, with a κ light chain value of 72 mg/L. Unfortunately, the myeloma FISH panel was not performed. The patient was started on bortezomib, dexamethasone, and a renal modified dose of lenalidomide for five cycles, following which disease evaluation showed complete remission. The patient was continued on maintenance bortezomib once every 2 weeks, remaining dialysis-dependent with no improvement in renal function. After 2 years, the patient relapsed while on bortezomib maintenance, with λ–1,440 mg/L, κ–140 mg/L, and a ratio of 0.097. Next, daratumumab, lenalidomide (5 mg, later increased to 10 mg), and dexamethasone were initiated. Daratumumab (16 mg/kg weekly ×8 wk) was administered on the day after dialysis. The urine output was 400 mL/day. We arranged to perform dialysis post daratumumab infusion as the patient tended to retain fluid and appeared swollen. However, post-infusion dialysis was not needed. Disease evaluation performed after the eighth daratumumab dose demonstrated a partial response with κ–59.7 mg/L, λ–417 mg/L, and ratio of 0.143, with a 50% reduction in dFLC. The patient developed anemia and thrombocytopenia, defaulting therapy after the eighth daratumumab dose. One year later, the patient presented with symptomatic disease and was administered daratumumab (16 mg/kg/dose weekly ×8 wk) with dexamethasone and pomalidomide (4 mg). Due to itching and diarrhea, pomalidomide was discontinued after 2 weeks. Low dose lenalidomide (5 mg) was restarted but was discontinued after 2 weeks due to reported intolerance. Daratumumab and dexamethasone were continued and modified to two weekly injections after the eighth dose. Disease evaluation after the tenth dose presented stable disease, with κ–56.3 mg/L, λ–233 mg/L, and a ratio of 0.24. The patient complained of new-onset back pain, and Positron Emission Tomography-Computed Tomography (PET-CT) reported multiple 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-avid lytic lesions. Owing to the observed disease progression, the ABCD regimen was initiated. Post two ABCD cycles, the patient defaulted therapy again and was lost to follow up.

A triple combination of bortezomib, dexamethasone, and cyclophosphamide has been used to treat myeloma patients with renal failure. Lenalidomide can be prescribed in bortezomib refractory patients; dose alteration is needed in patients with a creatinine clearance <30 mL/min. In a relapsed setting, carfilzomib and pomalidomide have demonstrated safety and efficacy in myeloma patients with dialysis-dependent renal failure [56].

In this report, we demonstrate the safe use of combination daratumumab therapy in two patients with multiple myeloma on regular hemodialysis. One patient reported a long-lasting complete response with dialysis-independence. The other patient demonstrated a partial response to daratumumab. Nonetheless, the therapy was well-tolerated by both patients. Furthermore, one patient indicated poor mobilization of stem cells following autologous stem cell transplant, despite upfront plerixafor. In vitro studies have demonstrated that even though CD34+ stem cells indicate minimal CD38 expression, daratumumab is non-toxic to CD34+ progenitor cells in myeloma patients [7]. Poor mobilization in one of our patients could be attributed to the multiple treatments received earlier.

There are limited reports on the use of daratumumab in myeloma patients with severe renal impairment. In a Spanish retrospective multicenter trial [8], eight patients (6 with myeloma-related renal failure and 2 with pre-existing CKD) were administered daratumumab in the presence of renal failure requiring dialysis. After diagnosis, the median time to daratumumab initiation was 4.6 years (range, 1–6). All patients were heavily pre-treated, with four median prior therapies. Four patients had received daratumumab after stem cell transplant (3 autologous and 1 allogeneic). At a median number of four cycles, the overall response rate was 62.5% (1 VGPR and 2 PR). However, daratumumab therapy failed to result in dialysis independence. Grade 1 or 2 infusion reactions were observed in four patients, with none discontinuing therapy due to toxicity. In a report published by Rocchi et al. [9], a 68-year-old patient, demonstrating relapsed refractory multiple myeloma post four lines of therapy, was administered single-agent daratumumab. After the ninth dose, the patient attained a stringent complete response, with no reports of infusion-related adverse events. Furthermore, the renal functions improved, necessitating a reduced dialysis frequency. Notably, our study is only the second report in which a patient demonstrated significant renal recovery post daratumumab therapy [10]. Currently, a phase II trial is evaluating daratumumab combination therapy in myeloma requiring dialysis (NCT03450 057).

There were concerns regarding the large volume of fluids to be administered with daratumumab. The manufacturer's guidelines recommended the administration of 1,000 mL, increased to 200 mL/h gradually. Infusion was started at 50 mL/h and titrated as per protocol with standard dilution volumes, with no infusion-related reactions reported. The infusion rate did not exceed 100 mL/h. The second patient appeared swollen after each infusion but did not require a second dialysis. We planned daratumumab therapy immediately after dialysis to minimize the impact of fluid imbalance. In both patients, standard hemodialysis was performed using the F6 low flux dialyzer as monoclonal antibodies are not dialyzable. Now, it has been identified that daratumumab can be administered in 500 mL normal saline over 3–4 h.

Our first patient demonstrated recent-onset renal failure and was dialysis-independent after therapy. The second patient had been dialysis-dependent for 3 years; hence, renal recovery was not expected. In conclusion, daratumumab can be safely administered in dialysis-dependent patients with renal failure. The effect on HSC mobilization needs to be investigated in larger studies.