Journal List > Arch Hand Microsurg > v.24(4) > 1143619

Fujiwara, Matsushita, Maeba, Suzuki, and Fukamizu: Free Posterior Interosseous Artery Flap for Treatment of First Web Space Contracture: Methods of Venous Anastomosis

초록

Purpose:

First web space widening is crucial in the hand function. The skin on the dorsal side of the forearm can provide a thin and pliable skin suitable for first web space reconstruction. Although previous reports have described the use of the posterior interosseous artery (PIA) flap as a reverse-flow flap for treatment of first web space contracture, only a few have addressed its use as a free flap for this purpose. The caliber of the concomitant veins accompanying the PIA is usually small, which may give rise to a problem in the treatment.

Methods:

Seven patients with first web space contracture were treated with a free PIA flap and the details of the venous anastomosis method were elucidated.

Results:

Six of seven flaps survived. In a post-burn case, a flap was lost by late thrombosis. The PIA is anastomosed end-to-end to the dorsal branch of the radial artery. There are two choices for the recipient venous pedicle: concomitant veins of radial artery and a tributary of the cephalic vein. In our cases, there were four types of venous anastomosis. An average postoperative increase of the thumb radial abduction was 36° and that of the palmar abduction was 35°.

Conclusion:

Since the caliber of the concomitant veins accompanying the PIA is small, a careful scheme for venous anastomosis is essential in the treatment of first web space contracture using the free PIA flap.

REFERENCES

1.Tonkin MA., Stern H. The posterior interosseous artery free flap. J Hand Surg Br. 1989. 14:215–7.
crossref
2.Chen HC., Tang YB., Chuang D., Wei FC., Noordhoff MS. Microvascular free posterior interosseous flap and a comparison with the pedicled posterior interosseous flap. Ann Plast Surg. 1996. 36:542–50.
crossref
3.Park JJ., Kim JS., Chung JI. Posterior interosseous free flap: various types. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1997. 100:1186–97. discussion 1198-9.
crossref
4.Shibata M., Iwabuchi Y., Kubota S., Matsuzaki H. Compari-son of free and reversed pedicled posterior interosseous cutaneous flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1997. 99:791–802.
crossref
5.Cavadas PC. Posterior interosseous free flap with extend-ed pedicle for hand reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001. 108:897–901.
crossref
6.Eo SR., Hwang SH., Hong KY., Lim SA., Lee GJ. Revisiting the posterior interosseous artery flap. Arch Hand Microsurg. 2018. 23:195–205.
crossref
7.Angrigiani C., Grilli D., Dominikow D., Zancolli EA. Posterior interosseous reverse forearm flap: experience with 80 consecutive cases. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1993. 92:285–93.
8.Fujiwara M., Kawakatsu M., Yoshida Y., Sumiya A. Modified posterior interosseous flap in hand reconstruction. Tech Hand Up Extrem Surg. 2003. 7:102–9.
crossref
9.Chen HC., Cheng MH., Schneeberger AG., Cheng TJ., Wei FC., Tang YB. Posterior interosseous flap and its variations for coverage of hand wounds. J Trauma. 1998. 45:570–4.
crossref
10.Costa H., Soutar DS. The distally based island posterior interosseous flap. Br J Plast Surg. 1988. 41:221–7.
crossref
11.Costa H., Pinto A., Zenha H. The posterior interosseous flap - a prime technique in hand reconstruction. The experience of 100 anatomical dissections and 102 clinical cases. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2007. 60:740–7.
crossref
12.Pan ZH., Jiang PP., Wang JL. Posterior interosseous free flap for finger re-surfacing. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2010. 63:832–7.
crossref
13.Tahara S., Takagi T., Kinishi M., Makino K., Amatsu M. Role of the perforating vein in vascular pedicle of free forearm flap. Microsurgery. 1995. 16:743–5.
crossref
14.Liu J., Song D., Xu J., Li J., Li K., Lv H. Use of free modi-fied innervated posterior interosseous artery perforator flap to repair digital skin and soft tissue defects. Indian J Surg. 2015. 77(Suppl 3):886–92.
crossref

Fig. 1.
(A) Preoperative palmar view. (B) Preoperative lateral view. (C) Free posterior interosseous artery flap design. The mark X indicates the position of the cutaneous perforators confirmed with color Doppler examination. (D) Appearance of flap harvest. (E) Intraoperative palmar view. (F) Intraoperative lateral view. (G) A vascular anastomotic site (an enlargemant of the area enclosed by dots in [F]). (H) Palmar view 7 months after surgery. (I) Lateral view 7 months after surgery.
ahm-24-408f1.tif
Fig. 2.
(A) Preoperative palmar view. (B) Preoperative lateral view. (C) Palmar view 17 months after surgery. (D) Lateral view 17 months after surgery.
ahm-24-408f2.tif
Fig. 3.
Types of venous anastomoses. Left panels: before vascular anastomosis, right panels: after vascular anastomosis. (A) Type 1: two concomitant veins of PIA were anastomosed to two concomitant veins of radial artery. (B) Type 2: one concomitant vein of PIA was anastomosed to one concomitant vein of radial artery and the other concomitant vein of PIA was done to a tributary of the cephalic vein. (C) Type 3: junction of concomitant veins accompanying PIA was anastomosed to one concomitant vein of radial artery. (D) Type 4: junction of concomitant veins accompanying PIA was anastomosed to a tributary of the cephalic vein. PIA: posterior interosseous artery, RA: radial artery, SubcV: subcutaneous vein. *Flap.
ahm-24-408f3.tif
Table 1.
Clinical profile of the patients
Case No. Age (yr) Sex Lesion site Cause Flap size width×length (mm) Number of anastomoses between pCV and rCV Number of anastomoses between pCV and subV Classification of venous anastomosis n Result Follow-up period (mo) Preoperative thumb abduction Postoperative thumb abduction
Radial abduction (°) Palmar abduction (°) Radial abduction (°) Palmar abduction (°)
1 47 M R Incomplete hand amputation 35×150 2 0 Type 1 CS 7 34 60 75 80
2 56 M L Degloving injury 35×150 1 (junction) 0 Type 3 CS 17 32 46 90 88
3 40 M L Press injury, open fracture 35×155 1 1 Type 2 CS 4 40 39 70 82
4 59 M L Burn 40×150 0 1 (junction) Type 4 CF - - - - -
5 35 M R Crush 40×160 2 0 Type 1 CS 10 28 39 55 76
6 45 M R Crush 35×160 2 0 Type 1 CS 9 30 35 56 70
7 60 M R Press injury 30×155 1 1 Type 2 CS 6 26 35 62 68

Type 1: two concomitant veins of PIA were anastomosed to two concomitant veins of radial artery. Type 2: one concomitant vein of PIA was anastomosed to one concomitant vein of radial artery and the other concomitant vein of PIA was done to a tributary of the cephalic vein. Type 3: junction of concomitant veins accompanying PIA was anastomosed to one concomitant vein of radial artery. Type 4: junction of concomitant veins accompanying PIA was anastomosed to a tributary of the cephalic vein. PIA: posterior interosseous artery, pCV: concomitant vein of posterior interosseous artery, rCV: concomitant vein of radial artery, subV: subcutaneous vein, M:male, R:right, L: left, CS: complete survival, CF: complete flap failure, -: not available.

TOOLS
Similar articles