Journal List > Korean J Leg Med > v.44(1) > 1143463

Park, Lee, Choi, Yang, Park, Won, Choi, Lee, Kim, Kang, and Choi: Usefulness of Near-infrared Spectroscopy for Diagnosis of Traumatic Intracranial Hemorrhage in Postmortem Inspection

Abstract

Near-infrared spectroscopy is a device used to determine whether traumatic intracranial hemorrhage has occurred and is primarily used for screening in emergency situations. In this study we examined the applicability of this equipment in postmortem inspection. This study included 124 autopsy cases and 59 postmortem inspection cases performed in the National Forensic Service from July 2017 to October 2018. We carried out the test using Infrascanner Model 2000 (Infrascan Inc.). Autopsy cases were divided into four groups (epidural hemorrhage or subdural hemorrhage group, traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage or cerebral contusion group, nontraumatic intracerebral hemorrhage group, and control group) and analyzed. There was no difference in the test results according to the presence and type of intracranial hemorrhage. The possibility that variables related to postmortem change affected the test results was considered. In conclusion, this study confirmed that near-infrared spectroscopy is not suitable for the detection of traumatic intracranial hemorrhage in postmortem inspection.

REFERENCES

1. Leon-Carrion J, Dominguez-Roldan JM, Leon-Dominguez U, et al. The Infrascanner, a handheld device for screening in situ for the presence of brain haematomas. Brain Inj. 2010; 24:1193–201.
2. Ayaz H, Izzetoglu M, Izzetoglu K, et al. Early diagnosis of traumatic intracranial hematomas. J Biomed Opt. 2019; 24:1–10.
crossref
3. Bressan S, Daverio M, Martinolli F, et al. The use of handheld near-infrared device (Infrascanner) for detecting intracranial haemorrhages in children with minor head injury. Childs Nerv Syst. 2014; 30:477–84.
crossref
4. Kontojannis V, Hostettler I, Brogan RJ, et al. Detection of intracranial hematomas in the emergency department using near infrared spectroscopy. Brain Inj. 2019; 33:875–83.
crossref
5. Liang CY, Yang Y, Shen CS, et al. Chinese military evaluation of a portable near-infrared detector of traumatic intracranial hematomas. Mil Med. 2018; 183:e318–23.
crossref
6. Peters J, Van Wageningen B, Hoogerwerf N, et al. Near-infrared spectroscopy: a promising prehospital tool for management of traumatic brain injury. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2017; 32:414–8.
crossref
7. Schober P, Bossers SM, Schwarte LA. Intracranial hematoma detection by near infrared spectroscopy in a helicopter emergency medical service: practical experience. Biomed Res Int. 2017; 2017:1846830.
crossref
8. Semenova Zh B, Marshintsev AV, Melnikov AV, et al. Infrascanner in the diagnosis of intracranial lesions in children with traumatic brain injuries. Brain Inj. 2016; 30:18–22.

Fig. 1.
Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of difference in optical density (ΔOD) for postmortem diagnosis of traumatic intracranial hemorrhage.
kjlm-44-24f1.tif
Table 1.
Success rate of near-infrared spectroscopy test by anatomical position
No. Frontal area Temporal area Parietal area Occipital area
Autopsy 124 122 (98.4) 117 (94.4) 107 (86.3) 104 (83.9)
PI 59 59 (100) 59 (100) 59 (100) 57 (96.4)

Values are presented as number (%). PI, postmortem inspection.

Table 2.
Comparison of difference in optical density (∆OD) according to type of intracranial hemorrhage
Group I Group II Group III Group IV P-value
No. Median (IQR) No. Median (IQR) No. Median (IQR) No. Median (IQR)
Frontal area 14 0.36 (0.52) 11 0.14 (0.52) 13 0.19 (0.24) 84 0.14 (0.19) 0.083
Temporal area 14 0.99 (1.22) 10 0.59 (0.66) 11 0.32 (0.48) 82 0.24 (0.33) 0.012
Parietal area 12 0.32 (0.55) 10 0.18 (0.24) 10 0.33 (0.31) 75 0.26 (0.39) 0.289
Occipital area 9 0.32 (1.13) 10 0.43 (1.09) 10 0.41 (0.67) 75 0.23 (0.34) 0.324

P-values were determined with use of the Kruskal-Wallis test.

Group I, epidural hemorrhage or subdural hemorrhage; Group II, traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage or cerebral contusion; Group III, nontraumatic intracerebral hemorrhage; Group IV, control; IQR, interquartile range.

Table 3.
Comparison of positive rate according to type of intracranial hemorrhage
Group I Group II Group III Group IV P-value
Frontal area
 Positive 9 (64.3) 5 (45.5) 6 (46.2) 32 (38.1) 0.077
 Negative 5 (35.7) 6 (54.5) 7 (53.8) 52 (61.9)  
Temporal area
 Positive 10 (71.4) 8 (80.0) 7 (63.6) 52 (63.4) 0.364
 Negative 4 (28.6) 2 (20.0) 4 (36.4) 30 (36.6)  
Parietal area
 Positive 9 (75.0) 4 (40.0) 8 (80.0) 46 (61.3) 0.751
 Negative 3 (25.0) 6 (60.0) 2 (20.0) 29 (38.7)  
Occipital area
 Positive 6 (66.7) 7 (70.0) 7 (70.0) 43 (57.3) 0.362
 Negative 3 (33.3) 3 (30.0) 3 (30.0) 32 (42.7)  

Values are presented as number (%).

P-value were determined with use of the Mantel-Haenszel x2 test.

Group I, epidural hemorrhage or subdural hemorrhage; Group II, traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage or cerebral contusion; Group III, nontraumatic intracerebral hemorrhage; Group IV, control.

Table 4.
Difference in optical density (∆OD) and false-positive rate in postmortem inspection
No. Median (IQR) False-positive rate (%)
Frontal area 59 0.12 (0.15) 27.1
Temporal area 59 0.18 (0.30) 47.5
Parietal area 59 0.20 (0.29) 50.8
Occipital area 57 0.20 (0.24) 50.9

IQR, interquartile range.

Table 5.
Optimal cutoff value of difference in optical density (∆OD) for postmortem test
Frontal area Temporal area Parietal area Occipital area
AUC 0.739 0.710 0.534 0.583
Cutoff value 0.45 0.99 0.29 0.69
Sensitivity (%) 50.0 57.1 66.7 44.4
Specificity (%) 89.8 97.2 56.8 84.2

AUC, area under the curve.

TOOLS
Similar articles