Journal List > J Dent Anesth Pain Med > v.17(4) > 1143348

Kim, So, Karm, Kim, and Seo: Learning fiberoptic intubation for awake nasotracheal intubation

Abstract

Background

Fiberoptic nasotracheal intubation (FNI) is performed if it is difficult to open the mouth or if intubation using laryngoscope is expected to be difficult. However, training is necessary because intubation performed by inexperienced operators leads to complications.

Methods

Every resident performed intubation in 40 patients. Success of FNI was evaluated as the time of FNI. First intubation time was restricted to 2 min 30 s. If the second attempt was unsuccessful, it was considered a failed case, and a specialist performed nasotracheal intubation. If the general method of intubation was expected to be difficult, awake intubation was performed. The degree of nasal bleeding during intubation was also evaluated.

Results

The mean age of the operators (11 men, 7 women) was 27.8 years. FNI was performed in a total of 716 patients. The success rate was 88.3% for the first attempt and 94.6% for the second attempt. The failure rate of intubation in anesthetized patients was 4.9%, and 13.6% in awake patients. When intubation was performed in anesthetized patients, the failure rate from the first to fifth trial was 9.6%, which decreased to 0.7% when the number of trials increased to > 30 times. In terms of awake intubation, there was no failed attempt when the resident had performed the FNI > 30 times. The number of FNIs performed and nasal bleeding were important factors influencing the failure rate.

Conclusion

The success rate of FNI increased as the number of FNI performed by residents increased despite the nasal bleeding.

INTRODUCTION

Generally, oral intubation is performed to secure the airway during general anesthesia; however, because oral cavity is operation field during oral and maxillofacial surgery and dental treatment, nasotracheal intubation is performed to maintain the airway [1]. For nasotracheal intubation, generally, a laryngoscope and Magill forceps are used; however, if any difficulty in securing the airway is expected, for example, cervical fracture and dislocation or airway tumor and abscess, fiberoptic nasotracheal intubation (FNI) is performed. Depending on the situation, if risks, such as difficult facial mask ventilation, restricted mouth opening, or pulmonary aspiration are present, then awake fiberoptic intubation is performed [2]. An anesthesiology resident should be able to perform FNI for the management of difficult airways.
Because of the complex anatomical structure of the nasal cavity, performing nasotracheal intubation can cause complications such as nasal cavity damage, dental injuries, airway bleeding and bronchospasm. Thus, securing the airway during FNI can be difficult due to increased risk for bleeding and discharge during emergency situations such as damage to the oral cavity, edema, or hematoma after surgery [3]. Therefore, training is required to perform proficient awake fiberoptic intubation.
FNI can be performed in two ways: inserting the tube into the nasal cavity first, then finding the vocal cord using a fiberscope; or inserting the fiberscope first into trachea through the nasal cavity, then inserting the tube into the trachea through the nostril. Although the former method was introduced earlier, and requires fiberscope insertion when it is difficult to secure the airway [4] and the risk for nasal bleeding may increase, the tube can be used as a guide to easily insert a flexible endoscope into the oral cavity. The latter method is generally performed if any difficulty in securing the airway is initially expected when performing FNI. Although interference of the visual field due to bleeding in the nasal cavity can be prevented, damage to the nasal cavity can be more severe when inserting the tube following the fiberscope.
To train intubation using a fiberscope in case of difficulty in securing the airway during nasotracheal intubation, the method of inserting the tube first into the nasal cavity was taught. Furthermore, awake intubation training was also conducted for the same method.
For every nasotracheal intubation using a fiberscope that was performed, success status was evaluated to plot a learning curve and the time it takes to train individuals to perform awake FNI. In addition, factors that influence the level of difficulty in FNI were also investigated.

METHODS

1. Study subjects

Operators: For this study, Institutional Review Board approval was obtained from Seoul National University Dental Hospital (SNUDH, No. L0605-12). Second-year anesthesiology residents of Seoul National University Hospital who were on 1-month rotation from August 2005 to April 2007 were included. Although the operators had at least 1 year of experience with oral intubation, they had virtually no experience with nasotracheal intubation and FNI.
Patients: All patients who were undergoing surgery at SNUDH during the residents' rotation period and receiving nasotracheal intubation were considered. However, only those who were educated about the possible complications of general anesthesia and nasotracheal intubation and provided informed written consent were included in the study. Patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists physical class III or lower, children < 8 years of age, and patients with lung or heart disease were excluded. Patients in whom a difficulty with nasotracheal intubation was anticipated due to nasal cavity obstruction, mass or deformity, and those undergoing emergency surgery were also excluded. If the use of mask ventilation was expected to be difficult, due to reasons such as severe maxillofacial deformities or mass in the oral cavity, or the visual field with laryngoscope was not satisfactory due to trismus, awake FNI was performed.
Study subjects only included individuals for whom intubation was performed by residents. Each resident performed FNI in at least 40 patients.

2. Protocol

2.1. Resident training

All residents who participated received more than 1 h of FNI practice using an airway management trainer (Laerdal Co., Stavanger, Norway) before performing nasotracheal intubation. Up to the third time performing FNI on patients, specialists provided training using videos, and these attempts were not included in the study analysis.

2.2. Preparation of general anesthesia and nasotracheal intubation

When a patient was transferred to the operating room, the anatomical condition of the nasal cavity was assessed, and the appropriate nostril was chosen for intubation. An RAE endotracheal tube with internal diameter (ID) 6.5 mm was used in women, while ID 7.0 mm was used in men. For children between 8 and 15 years of age, the (age/4 +3) mm equation was used to select the appropriate RAE tube ID with cuff.
Anticholinergics were not administered as pretreatment for anesthesia. The tube was softened by immersion in water heated to a temperature of approximately 40℃, and then coated with surgical gel for insertion into the nasal cavity. While performing intubation, an assistant held the patient's chin upward.
A flexible endoscope with a diameter of 4.2 mm (LF2, Olympus Co., Japan) was used and if the tube ID was < 5.5 mm, then a 2.8 mm tube (LF-DP, Olympus Co., Japan) was used. The ocular of the endoscope was equipped with a camera (AR-TF08E; Olympus Co., Japan) that enables viewing through a video system. While performing FNI, the operator viewed through the ocular, and the observer viewed the monitor. The fiberscope was cleaned with antiseptic solution before and after use to minimize infection risk. Before intubation, the flexible endoscope was coated with surgical lubricant and the lens was wiped with a cotton ball soaked in alcohol to secure the view.
Before injecting the anesthetic, 100% oxygen ventilation was administered. Intravenous anesthetic (thiopental or propofol) was injected and the inhalation anesthetic or propofol was continuously administered until complete loss of consciousness. Vecuronium 0.15 mg/kg was injected to induce complete muscle relaxation, then nasotracheal intubation was performed.
If awake intubation was required, the patient was nebulized with 4% lidocaine for 20 min, then fentanyl 25–50 mcg and midazolam 1–2 mg were administered by intravenous injection before performing FNI.

2.3. Evaluation of FNI success

FNI success was evaluated as the time required for intubation. The endotracheal tube was inserted into the nasal cavity and tip of the tube was positioned at the nasopharynx. Next, the fiberscope was inserted into the endotracheal tube to find the vocal cord, and then the tip of the fiberscope was inserted through the trachea until the carina was seen. An RAE tube was inserted into the trachea following the fiberscope. An assistant held the patient's chin upward with one hand to facilitate intubation. Another assistant measured the time from the moment the tip of the fiberscope was inserted into the endotracheal tube until the carina was seen on the monitor.

2.4. Time measurement interval and safety maintenance

Before inserting the endotracheal tube into the nostril, 100% oxygen saturation level was maintained by manual ventilation of oxygen and inhalation anesthetics. Tracheal intubation time was restricted to 2 min 30 s. Once 2 min 30 s passed, the endotracheal tube was removed from the nasal cavity, and 100% oxygen was provided via mask ventilation for 1 min. If significant bleeding and discharge were occurred, suction was performed. Even if the time was within 2 min 30 s, if the oxygen saturation level dropped below 95%, then 100% oxygen manual ventilation was performed. The first two attempts were performed by the same operator. After two failed attempts, a specialist intervened and performed the intubation. If bleeding was severe or too much time had passed, then nasotracheal intubation was performed using laryngoscope and Magill forceps. The resident's failure after two attempts was evaluated as a failed case [5].

2.5. Measurement of nasal bleeding

The degree of nasal bleeding during nasotracheal intubation with fiberscope was measured by the degree of visibility: grade 1 no bleeding (no interference with securing the visual field); grade 2 mild bleeding (the degree of bleeding that did not influence the visual field); and grade 3 massive bleeding (the degree of bleeding that influenced the visual field) (Fig. 1). If too much bleeding and discharge were occurred, suction was performed by the assistant.

2.6. Learning curve analysis method

Patient sex, age, weight, height, and the size of the tube were recorded. For each patient, the time required for FNI by the resident and the degree of bleeding observed with endoscope were also recorded.
The times recorded as required time for FNI were depicted as a learning curve, and the ratio of FNI success and failure cases were evaluated. For awake FNI, success was evaluated separately. The success rate was analyzed by dividing into several intervals based on the sum of 5 trials. The effect of nasal bleeding on the degree of difficulty was determined, and logistic regression analysis was used for comparative analysis of the influence of awake status, degree of nasal bleeding, and increased FNI trials on the success rate of intubation.
Depending on the situation, the chi-squared test, Student's t-test, and logistic regression analysis were performed for analysis, and a P < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.

RESULTS

A total of 18 second-year anesthesiology residents (11 men, 7 women) were included in the present study. The age of the residents were 27 (n = 10), 28 (n = 4), 29 (n = 1), 30 (n = 2), and 31 (n = 1) years.
All residents performed a total of 716 FNIs, in which 15 residents performed the procedure 40 times, 2 performed it 39 times, and 1 performed it 38 times. Awake FNI was performed a total of 44 times (mean 2.4 times), in which 2 residents performed it 5 times, 3 residents performed it 4 times, 3 residents performed it 3 times, 6 residents performed it 2 times twice, 1 resident performed it once; 3 residents were not able to perform the maneuver at all (Table 1).
The success rate was 88.3% for the first attempt and 94.6% for the second attempt. The failure rate was 4.9% in anesthetized patients and 13.6% in awake patients (Table 2).
Time for each successful intubation for each resident was represented as a learning curve (Fig. 2). Analysis of the learning curves revealed that improvement was observed as the number of attempts increased. The learning curves exhibited diverse patterns, in which some showed frequent failures in the beginning, interim and end, some had a high interim failure rate, and some had a steady success rate from beginning to end.
In terms of the mean time to successful performance, the mean time was 53.8 ± 47.4 s for anesthetized intubation and 103.2 ± 79.8 s for awake intubation, demonstrating a difference in time to successful intubation depending on awake status (P = 0.001) (Fig. 3). When analyzing the cumulative success rate by dividing by 5 trial intervals, the failure rate up to the first fifth post-anesthesia intubation was 9.0%, and the failure rate decreased to 0.7 % when the total performance number was > 30 (Fig. 4). Even for awake intubation, the failure rate was 0% when performed > 30 times (Fig. 5).
When nasal bleeding was severe, the failure rate increased to 30% when FNI was performed while awake (Table 3) (P < 0.001 chi-squared test). According to logistic regression analysis, awake status, degree of nasal bleeding, and the number of attempts for nasotracheal intubation had an influence on the intubation success rate and, among them, nasal bleeding was the factor with the most influence (Table 4).

DISCUSSION

The results of this study demonstrated that the success rate of intubation and awake FNI increased as the number of attempts increased. However, when bleeding occurred as the endotracheal tube was inserted, the difficulty of FNI increased.
In patients for whom endotracheal intubation is expected to be difficult, awake intubation using fiberscope has been presented as the standard method of airway management [2]. However, to proficiently perform intubation using fiberscope without complications, significant training and performance experience are needed [6].
For new residents, the FNI learning curve for a normal airway simulator showed that it converged to 51 seconds to reach the carnia from the nostril and that the number of trials required for proficient intubation performance varied from 27 to 58 [7]. For oral intubation, the first attempt required 4 minutes, but it fell to 1.53 minutes after 10 trials, with a success rate > 95% [8]. Another study reported that when fiberscope was first inserted to nasal cavity, followed by nasotracheal intubation, the intubation time was approximately 50 seconds in 12 residents who performed intubation 20 times [5]. In the present study, the mean performance time for anesthetized FNI was 53.8 ± 47.4 seconds and that of awake FNI was 103.2 ± 79.8 seconds, yielding similar results.
An American Society Anesthesiologists Closed Claims Study collected data on adverse respiratory events from the 1980s and found that improper ventilation accounted for 38%, esophageal intubation for 18%, and difficult endotracheal intubation for 17% of the adverse respiratory events [9]. According to data collected after the 1990s, esophageal intubation has decreased significantly to less than 5%; however, difficult endotracheal intubation remains an important issue, at 27% [10].
Adverse respiratory events mainly occur during anesthesia induction, [11] and two failed attempts at intubation into the airway has been associated with hypoxia, arrhythmia, cardiac arrest, brain damage and death. Therefore, the competence of the operator is related to the incidence of adverse respiratory events [12].
The use of a fiberscope is a highly successful method in patients for whom securing the airway is difficult. Even if the laryngeal view of laryngoscope is poor, a fiberscope inserted up to the carina can be a guide for the endotracheal tube to appropriately position within the trachea, and the position can be confirmed while the fiberscope is removed. A previous study reported that among patients for whom intubation was impossible with the usual method, more than 90% showed success with fiberscope [13].
Many methods of local anesthesia for the airway are available for awake FNI, and the authors have chosen a highly stable and noninvasive lidocaine nebulizer [1415]. In addition, an appropriate amount of midazolam and fentanyl were administered when inserting the fiberscope to reduce airway reflexes and to safely maintain natural ventilation [16].
Endotracheal intubation generally uses a laryngoscope, and the degree of difficulty is evaluated based on the laryngeal view grade established by Cormack and Lehane [17]. In addition to cases with a high Cormack and Lehane's laryngeal view grade, a flexible endoscope can be useful in cases with difficulty in securing the airway due to poor cervical extension, short thyromental distance, and modified Mallampati test [1819].
The correlation analysis between the degree of difficulty of flexible laryngoscope intubation and the laryngeal view grade revealed that laryngeal view grade had no effect on the degree of difficulty [20]. Results of this study demonstrate that excessive bleeding and discharge are the most significant disadvantages interfering with the visual field of laryngoscope, making intubation difficult [21]. Therefore, to increase residents' success rate in FNI, reducing intra-oral bleeding and discharge are important.
Intra-oral and nasal cavity discharge can be reduced using antisialagogues such as glycopyrrolate [22]. Nasal bleeding occurs commonly during nasotracheal intubation when endotracheal tubes with large diameters are used, when too much force is applied during tube insertion, or when multiple attempts at intubation are made [23]. Many studies have investigated methods to reduce nasal bleeding, such as using a siphon as a guide at the tip of the tube [2425], softening of the tube by immersing it in warm water [25], and applying epinephrine [26]. In addition, the presence of systemic diseases associated with major bleeding disorders should be screened through patient history taking, and the appropriate nostril for intubation should be selected through physical examination [121]. Insertion of a flexible laryngoscope into the nasal cavity first was one method to reduce the frequency of nasal bleeding when performing FNI [27]. In this study, however, the purpose was to train residents for FNI in cases of unexpected difficult airway during nasotracheal intubation. Thus, methods of inserting the tube into the nasal cavity first were pursued.
In conclusion, even with some nasal bleeding, the success rate of FNI was found to increase with residents' FNI proficiency.

Notes

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

References

1. Mahmood S, Lowe T. Management of epistaxis in the oral and maxillofacial surgery setting: An update on current practice. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2003; 95:23–29. PMID: 12539023.
crossref
2. Apfelbaum JL, Hagberg CA, Caplan RA, Blitt CD, Connis RT, Nickinovich DG, et al. Practice guidelines for management of the difficult airway: An updated report by the american society of anesthesiologists task force on management of the difficult airway. Anesthesiology. 2013; 118:251–270. PMID: 23364566.
3. Delaney KA, Hessler R. Emergency flexible fiberoptic nasotracheal intubation: A report of 60 cases. Ann Emerg Med. 1988; 17:919–926. PMID: 3415064.
crossref
4. Ovassapian A, Yelich SJ, Dykes MH, Brunner EE. Fiberoptic nasotracheal intubation--incidence and causes of failure. Anesth Analg. 1983; 62:692–695. PMID: 6859572.
crossref
5. Smith JE, Jackson AP, Hurdley J, Clifton PJ. Learning curves for fibreoptic nasotracheal intubation when using the endoscopic video camera. Anaesthesia. 1997; 52:101–106. PMID: 9059089.
crossref
6. Ovassapian A, Yelich SJ, Dykes MH, Golman ME. Learning fibreoptic intubation: Use of simulators v. Traditional teaching. Br J Anaesth. 1988; 61:217–220. PMID: 3415894.
7. Dalal PG, Dalal GB, Pott L, Bezinover D, Prozesky J, Bosseau Murray W. Learning curves of novice anesthesiology residents performing simulated fibreoptic upper airway endoscopy. Can J Anaesth. 2011; 58:802–809. PMID: 21710368.
crossref
8. Johnson C, Roberts JT. Clinical competence in the performance of fiberoptic laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation: A study of resident instruction. J Clin Anesth. 1989; 1:344–349. PMID: 2627408.
9. Caplan RA, Posner KL, Ward RJ, Cheney FW. Adverse respiratory events in anesthesia: A closed claims analysis. Anesthesiology. 1990; 72:828–833. PMID: 2339799.
crossref
10. Bailie R, Posner KL. New trends in adverse respiratory events. ASA Newsl. 2011; 75:28–29.
11. Huitink JM, Lie PP, Heideman I, Jansma P, Greif R, Schagen Nv, et al. A prospective, cohort evaluation of major and minor airway management complications during routine anaesthetic care at an academic medical centre. Anaesthesia. 2017; 72:42–48. PMID: 27665740.
crossref
12. Buis ML, Maissan IM, Hoeks SE, Klimek M, Stolker RJ. Defining the learning curve for endotracheal intubation using direct laryngoscopy: A systematic review. Resuscitation. 2016; 99:63–71. PMID: 26711127.
crossref
13. Ovassapian A. Fiberoptic tracheal intubation. Fiberoptic Airway Endoscopy in Anesthesia and Critical Care. New York: Raven Press;1990. p. 57–79.
14. Korttila K, Tarkkanen J, Tarkkanen L. Comparison of laryngotracheal and ultrasonic nebulizer administration of lidocaine in local anaesthesia for bronchoscopy. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1981; 25:161–165. PMID: 7324824.
crossref
15. Somerson SJ, Sicilia MR. AANA journal course: update for nurse anesthetists--beyond the laryngoscope: advanced techniques for difficult airway management. AANA J. 1993; 61:64–71. PMID: 8368059.
16. Machata AM, Gonano C, Holzer A, Andel D, Spiss CK, Zimpfer M, et al. Awake nasotracheal fiberoptic intubation: Patient comfort, intubating conditions, and hemodynamic stability during conscious sedation with remifentanil. Anesth Analg. 2003; 97:904–908. PMID: 12933427.
crossref
17. Cormack RS, Lehane J. Difficult tracheal intubation in obstetrics. Anaesthesia. 1984; 39:1105–1111. PMID: 6507827.
crossref
18. Collins SR, Blank RS. Fiberoptic intubation: An overview and update. Respir Care. 2014; 59:865–878. PMID: 24891196.
crossref
19. K Nasa V, Kamath SS. Risk factors assessment of the difficult intubation using intubation difficulty scale (IDS). J Clin Diagn Res. 2014; 8:GC01–GC03.
20. Kim HW, Seo KS, Shin TJ, Kim HJ. The effect of laryngeal view grade and intraoral bleeding on intubation difficulty during fiberoptic nasotracheal intubation. J Korean Dent Soc Anesthesiol. 2009; 9:91–97.
crossref
21. Sanuki T, Hirokane M, Kotani J. Epistaxis during intubation: A comparison of nostril sides. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010; 68:618–621. PMID: 19931965.
22. Lai HC, Chang YH, Huang RC, Hung NK, Lu CH, Chen JH, et al. Efficacy of sevoflurane as an adjuvant to propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia for attenuating secretions in ocular surgery. Medicine. 2017; 96:e6729. PMID: 28445291.
crossref
23. O'Connell JE, Stevenson DS, Stokes MA. Pathological changes associated with short-term nasal intubation. Anaesthesia. 1996; 51:347–350. PMID: 8686823.
24. Morimoto Y, Sugimura M, Hirose Y, Taki K, Niwa H. Nasotracheal intubation under curve-tipped suction catheter guidance reduces epistaxis. Can J Anaesth. 2006; 53:295–298. PMID: 16527796.
crossref
25. Elwood T, Stillions DM, Woo DW, Bradford HM, Ramamoorthy C. Nasotracheal intubation: A randomized trial of two methods. Anesthesiology. 2002; 96:51–53. PMID: 11753001.
26. Kameyama K, Watanabe S, Kano T, Kusukawa J. Effects of nasal application of an epinephrine and lidocaine mixture on the hemodynamics and nasal mucosa in oral and maxillofacial surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008; 66:2226–2232. PMID: 18940484.
crossref
27. Kwon MA, Song J, Kim S, Ji SM, Bae J. Inspection of the nasopharynx prior to fiberoptic-guided nasotracheal intubation reduces the risk epistaxis. J Clin Anesth. 2016; 32:7–11. PMID: 27290935.
crossref
Fig. 1

Grade of intra-oral bleeding. A. No bleeding (grade 1), B. Mild bleeding: the degree of bleeding which does not influence on fiberoptic nasal intubation (grade 2), C. Massive bleeding: the degree of bleeding which influences on fiberoptic nasal intubation (grade 3).

jdapm-17-297-g001
Fig. 2

The learning curve of each of the anesthesiology residents. Up to 150 s, one successful intubation is represented by a dot. Dots between 150 and 300 s represent the success of the 2nd intubation attempt. Dots at 300 s represent failed intubation. Red dots represent awake intubation.

jdapm-17-297-g002
Fig. 3

Plot of average time in cumulative trials in successful cases (divided by awake intubation and post-anesthesia intubation).

jdapm-17-297-g003
Fig. 4

Percentage of success and numbers of failure cases in the 5th cumulative interval (post-anesthesia intubation).

jdapm-17-297-g004
Fig. 5

Percentage of success and numbers of cases in the 5th cumulative interval (awake intubation).

jdapm-17-297-g005
Table 1

Patient characteristics

jdapm-17-297-i001
Characteristic Status of consciousness at intubation Total (716)
Anesthetized (n = 672) Awake (n = 44)
M:F, n 356:316 33:11 389:327
Age (yr) 32.8 ± 17.4 (8–84) 39.6 ± 17.7 (18–76) 33.2 ± 17.5 (8–84)
Height (cm) 164.3 ± 10.8 (121–194) 167.2 ± 8.8 (150–184.5) 164.5 ± 10.7 (121–194)
Weight (kg) 61.0 ± 13.3 (19–119) 63.5 ± 10.8 (42–87.5) 61.1 ± 13.1 (19–119)

Data presented as mean ± standard deviation (range) unless otherwise indicated.

Table 2

Success rate of fiberoptic nasotracheal intubation (divided by awake intubation and postanesthesia intubation)

jdapm-17-297-i002
Status of consciousness at intubation Total
Anesthetized (n = 672) Awake (n = 44)*
1st trial success 601 (89.4) 31 (70.5) 632 (88.3)
2nd trial success 38 (5.7) 7 (15.9) 45 (6.3)
Fail 33 (4.9) 6 (13.6) 39 (5.4)
Total 672 (100) 44 (100) 716 (100)

Data are presented as n (%). *Anesthetized versus awake, P = 0.001 (chi-squared test).

Table 3

Influence of nasal bleeding on the success rate of flexible endoscopy

jdapm-17-297-i003
Nasal bleeding* Status of consciousness at intubation
Anesthetized Awake
Success Fail Success Fail
No (grade 1) 446 (98.5) 7 (1.5) 19 (95) 1 (5)
Mild (grade 2) 129 (97) 4 (3) 12 (85.7) 2 (14.3)
Massive (grade 3) 63 (75) 21 (25) 7 (70) 3 (30)
Total 638 (95.2) 32 (4.8) 38 (86.4) 6 (13.6)

Data presented as n (%). *Nasal bleeding grade P < 0.001 (chi-squared analysis).

Table 4

Logistic analysis of factors affecting success rate of flexion endoscopy

jdapm-17-297-i004
Factor B (SE) Wald P-value
Awake 1.07 (0.54) 3.82 0.05
Nasal bleeding 1.51 (0.22) 45.58 < 0.0001
Intubation trial count −0.05 (0.017) 9.33 0.002
TOOLS
Similar articles