Abstract
Purpose
The purpose of the study was to evaluate the influence of patient activation on diabetes self-care activities and diabetes-specific distress among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Methods
This cross-sectional correlational study was a secondary data analysis, utilizing data collected from September 2016 to July 2017, for 151 adults diagnosed with type 2 diabetes in ambulatory endocrinology units of two tertiary hospitals in a metropolitan city. The instruments used for data collection included the Summary of Diabetes Self-Care Activities Questionnaire, the Patient Activation Scale, and the Brief Diabetes Distress Screening Instrument. Hierarchical multiple linear regression analyses were conducted to test the influence of patient activation levels on self-care activities and diabetes-specific distress, after controlling for demographic and clinical variables.
Results
The average patient activation level was 67.8±16.72 (with the possible range from 0 to 100), and the average diabetes-specific distress level was 6.91±2.69 (with the possible range from 2 to 12). Diabetes self-care activities scores were highest in medication adherence and lowest in glucose self-monitoring. Patient activation was the significant factor influencing self-care activities, after controlling for demographic and clinical variables, but showed no significant influence on diabetes-specific distress. Oral hypoglycemic agents and insulin medications were the significant factors influencing diabetes-specific distress.
Figures and Tables
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
This article is a revision of the first author's master's thesis from Kyungpook National University.
This study was conducted by the support of the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF-2017R1A1A3A04069500).
References
1. Korean Diabetes Association. Diabetes fact sheet in Korea 2018 [Internet]. Seoul: Korean Diabetes Association;2018. cited 2018 October 1. Available from: http://www.diabetes.or.kr/pro/news/admin.php?category=A&code=admin&number=1546&mode=view.
2. Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Korea Health Statistics 2017: Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES VII-2). Osong: 2018. 12. Report No.: 11-1351159-000027-10.
3. American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2011; 34 Suppl 1:S11–S61. DOI: 10.2337/dc11-0174.
4. American Diabetes Association. Lifestyle management: standards of medical care in diabetes-2019. Diabetes Care. 2019; 42(Suppl 1):S46–S60. DOI: 10.2337/dc19-S005.
5. Park JY. A study on self management, HbA1c, and perceived health status for the type 2 diabetes patients. Journal of Korean Biological Nursing Science. 2010; 12(2):106–113.
6. Jung KM, Lee SJ, Park ES, Park YJ, Kim SG, Choi DS. Self-care and related factors in young and middle adulthood patients with type 2 diabetes. The Journal of Korean Diabetes. 2015; 16(1):65–77. DOI: 10.4093/jkd.2015.16.1.65.
7. Park JY, Lee TY, Jang KS, Oh HY. A study on blood glucose level and self management among community dwelling type II diabetes patients. Korean Journal of Adult Nursing. 2010; 22(3):271–280.
8. Nam H, Shin MH, Kweon SS, Oh HS, Rhee HA, Choi JS. Management of diabetes mellitus and factors associated with poor glycemic control in an urban area. Korean Journal of Health Promotion. 2012; 12(3):115–122.
9. Song MS, Lee MR, Shim BM. Barriers to and facilitators of self-management adherence in Korean older adults with type 2 diabetes. International Journal of Older People Nursing. 2010; 5(3):211–218. DOI: 10.1111/j.1748-3743.2009.00189.x.
10. Gonzalez JS, Fisher L, Polonsky WH. Depression in diabetes: have we been missing something important? Diabetes Care. 2011; 34(1):236–239.
11. Hibbard JH, Stockard J, Mahoney ER, Tusler M. Development of the Patient Activation Measure (PAM): conceptualizing and measuring activation in patients and consumers. Health Services Research. 2004; 39:1005–1026.
12. Greene J, Hibbard JH. Why does patient activation matter? An examination of the relationships between patient activation and health-related outcomes. Journal of General Internal Medicine. 2012; 27(5):520–526. DOI: 10.1007/s11606-011-1931-2.
13. Polonsky WH, Fisher L, Earles J, Dudl RJ, Lees J, Mullan J, et al. Assessing psychosocial stress in diabetes: development of the Diabetes Distress Scale. Diabetes Care. 2005; 28(3):626–631. DOI: 10.2337/diacare.28.3.626.
14. Delahanty LM, Grant RW, Wittenberg E, Bosch JL, Wexler DJ, Cagliero E, et al. Association of diabetes-related emotional distress with diabetes treatment in primary care patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association. 2007; 24(1):48–54. DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2007.02028.x.
15. Gonzalez JS, Shreck E, Psaros C, Safren SA. Distress and type 2 diabetes-treatment adherence: a mediating role for perceived control. Health Psychology. 2015; 34(5):505–513. DOI: 10.1037/hea0000131.
16. Fisher L, Polonsky WH, Hessler DM, Masharani U, Blumer I, Peters AL, et al. Understanding the source of diabetes distress in adults with type 1 diabetes. Journal of Diabetes and Its Complications. 2015; 29(4):572–577. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2015.01.012.
17. Fisher L, Mullan JT, Arean P, Glasgow RE, Hessler D, Masharani U. Diabetes distress but not clinical depression or depressive symptoms is associated with glycemic control in both cross sectional and longitudinal analyses. Diabetes Care. 2010; 33(1):23–28. DOI: 10.2337/dc09-1238.
18. Jeong M, Reifsnider E. Associations of diabetes-related distress and depressive symptoms with glycemic control in Korean americans with type 2 diabetes. The Diabetes Educator. 2018; 44(6):531–540. DOI: 10.1177/0145721718807443.
19. Cummings DM, Lutes L, Littlewood K, DiNatale E, Hambridge B, Schulman K, et al. Regimen-related distress, medication adherence, and glycemic control in rural African American women with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Annals of Pharmacotherapy. 2014; 48(8):970–977. DOI: 10.1177/1060028014536532.
20. Schmitt A, Reimer A, Kulzer B, Haak T, Ehrmann D, Hermanns N. How to assess diabetes distress: comparison of the Problem Ares In Diabetes Scale (PAID) and the Diabetes Distress Scale (DDS). Diabetic Medicine. 2016; 33(6):835–843. DOI: 10.1111/dme.12887.
21. Zhang P, Lou P, Chang G, Chen P, Zhang L, Li T, et al. Combined effects of sleep quality and depression on quality of life in patients with type 2 diabetes. BMC Family Practice. 2016; 17:40.
22. Kim SH, Utz S. Effectiveness of social media-based health-literacy-sensitive diabetes self-management intervention: a randomized controlled trial. Journal of Nursing Scholarship. 2019; 51(6):661–669. DOI: 10.1111/jnu.12521.
23. Toobert DJ, Hampson SE, Glasgow RE. The summary of diabetes self-care activities measure: results from 7 studies and a revised scale. Diabetes Care. 2000; 23(7):943–950. DOI: 10.2337/diacare.23.7.943.
24. Chang SJ, Song MS. The validity and reliability of a Korean version of the Summary of Diabetes Self-Care Activities questionnaire for older patients with type 2 diabetes. Korean Journal of Adult Nursing. 2009; 21(2):235–244.
25. Hibbard JH, Mahoney ER, Stock R, Tusler M. Do increases in patient activation result in improved self-management behaviors? Health Services Research. 2007; 42(4):1443–1463. DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2006.00669.x.
26. Ahn YH, Yi CH, Ham OK, Kim BJ. Psychometric properties of the Korean version of the Patient Activation Measure 13 (PAM13-K) in patient with osteoarthritis. Evaluation & the health professions. 2015; 38(2):255–264. DOI: 10.1177/0163278714540915.
27. Fisher L, Glasgow RE, Mullan JT, Skaff MM, Polonsky WH. Development of a brief Diabetes Distress Screening instrument. Annals of Family Medicine. 2008; 6(3):246–252.
28. Seo YJ. The relationship between the self-indulgence of the elderly with diabetes and the meaning of life [master's thesis]. Busan: Catholic University of Pusan;2004.
29. Korea Diabetes Association. Treatment guideline for diabetes. 6th ed. Seoul: Korea Diabetes Association;2019.
30. Park SW, Kim DJ, Min KW, Baik SH, Choi KM, Park IB, et al. Current status of diabetes management in Korea using National Health Insurance Database. The Journal of Korean Diabetes Association. 2007; 31(4):362–367. DOI: 10.4093/jkda.2007.31.4.362.
31. National Health Insurance Service. Expansion of National Health Insurance support for insulin syringes [Internet]. Wonju: National Health Insurance Service;2018. cited 2018 October 1. Available from: http://www.nhis.or.kr/bbs7/boards/B0039/26793#.
32. Bus SA, Lavery LM, Monteiro-Soares M, Rasmussen A, Raspovic A, Sacco IC, et al. IWGDF guideline on the prevention of foot ulcers in persons with diabetes [Internet]. Amsterdam: The International Working Group on the Diabetic Foot;2019. cited 2019 October 14. Available from: https://iwgdfguidelines.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/02-IWGDF-prevention-guideline-2019.pdf.
33. Holmes-Truscott E, Skinner TC, Pouwer F, Speight J. Negative appraisals of insulin therapy are common among adults with type 2 diabetes using insulin: results from diabetes MILES-Australia cross-sectional survey. Diabetic Medicine. 2015; 32(10):1297–1303. DOI: 10.1111/dme.12729.
34. Wardian J. Diabetes cannot be controlled, but it can be managed. Clinical Diabetes. 2017; 35(5):329–330. DOI: 10.2337/cd16-0061.
35. Kim B, Song Y, Kim JI. Psychological insulin resistance and low self-efficacy as barriers to diabetes self-care management in patients with type 2 diabetes. Korean Journal of Adult Nursing. 2019; 31(1):61–67. DOI: 10.7475/kjan.2019.31.1.61.