PDF
ePub
Citation
Print
Spinal disorders continue to affect millions of patients a year, causing pain and disability that permanently alter their daily life. First described by Hippocrates and the Greek, these conditions are found in an increasing number of patients complaining of neck and back pain each year, costing patients and our health care system millions of dollars in treatment a year.123456) Primary care, emergency medicine, and pain physicians are usually the first health care providers that see these patients and use a combination of physical therapy, pain medication, and lifestyle modification to help patients optimize their pain control and functional status.78) When these measures do not bring the patient acceptable relief, these physicians refer the patient to spine surgeons for specialized treatment and possible surgical intervention.
Both orthopedic spine surgeons and neurosurgeons are trained in treating various spine pathologies. Some literature suggests that neurosurgery residents may be more likely to be exposed to cervical disorders, intradural pathology, and microsurgery, while orthopedic residents are more likely to see thoracolumbar pathology, scoliosis, and kyphosis.9) Currently, a majority of orthopedic surgeons complete dedicated additional fellowship training for spinal operations. The same is not true for graduating neurosurgeons who, more than half the time, do not complete additional dedicated spinal fellowship training, and this is probably due to several reasons stemming from exposure to spine surgery in residency or differences in regulation and credentialing between the specialties.910) Surgeons in both specialties finish their 12–18 months' fellowship training, when required, to be proficient in treating disc herniation, laminectomies, spinal fusions, bone graft harvests, and spinal fracture management both operatively and nonoperatively, even if treatment algorithms vary between specialties.11121314)
The choice of surgeon for spinal surgery is often dictated by primary care physician (PCP) referral and in some scenarios by patient choice. Previous studies have reported what patients value when choosing their spine surgeon.15161718) However, there are no studies exploring PCP referral patterns and their beliefs when recommending a specific spine surgeon to their patients. Our study aims to identify any trends and differences in PCPs' perception of orthopedic versus neurosurgery spine surgeons and how it affects referral patterns.
METHODS
Approval for this survey-based study was obtained both from the St. Luke's University Health Network IRB Committee and the Thomas Jefferson University School of Medicine IRB Committee. Surveys were distributed electronically at our suburban community hospital, urban academic university hospital, and urban private practice. Overall, 450 internal medicine, family medicine, emergency medicine, neurology, and pain management physicians who practice at one of our three locations were asked to participate. Physicians who consented were given our 24-question survey to complete (Supplementary Material 1).
The first subset of questions addresses various pathologies including cervical, thoracic, lumbar, intradural, and extradural pathologies. The second subset of questions asks which specialty a physician would refer to on the basis of the type of surgery the physician believes the patient needs. The third subset of questions looks to identify general opinions each physician has about both specialties. Finally, the fourth subset of questions looks to assess patient demographics, practice settings, and general experience.
Survey answers were anonymously stored online. Physicians who participated in our study had to answer all 24 questions in order to successfully submit the survey and be included in our sample. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze our results and determine associations IBM SPSS ver. 23.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). For all analyses, a p ≤ 0.05 denotes statistical significance.
RESULTS
Overall, 108 physicians completed our survey (24% response rate). Most of the surveys were filled out by family medicine physicians (n = 46, 42.6%) and internal medicine physicians (n = 38, 35.2%), most of whom practice in a community hospital setting (n = 68, 63.0%) (Table 1). Most physicians reported either having less than 5 years of experience (n = 33, 30.6%) or more than 20 years of experience (n = 28, 25.9%) and making either less than 25 (n = 42, 38.9%) or 26–50 (n = 36, 33.3%) patient referrals to a spine surgeon per year (Table 2). Fifty-seven physicians (52.8%) answered that they feel they have easy access to a comprehensive spine institute consisting of orthopedic surgeons, neurosurgeons, pain management specialists, physiatrists, and neurologists to refer their patients to. Sixty-five physicians (60.2%) felt that orthopedic spine surgeons are easier to contact than neurosurgeons, but 57 physicians (52.8%) felt that neurosurgeons provide better long-term comprehensive spinal care.
Overall, 66.7% of physicians answered that they would refer to neurosurgery for cervical spine radiculopathy, and 52.8% of physicians would turn to neurosurgery for thoracic spine radiculopathy. However, 56.5% of physicians would refer to orthopedic surgery for lumbar spine radiculopathy (Fig. 1). A majority of physicians answered that they would refer all spine fractures (compression, thoracic, lumbar, and sacral) to an orthopedic surgeon for treatment other than cervical spine fractures, where 56.5% of physicians would refer their patient to a neurosurgeon (Fig. 2). If a patient was found or suspected of having a spinal tumor, 91.7% of physicians would turn to neurosurgery for help in treating their patient for extradural tumors, and 96.3% of physicians would turn to neurosurgery for help in treating intradural spinal tumors.
Most PCPs answered that they would turn to orthopedic surgeons to help treat their patients with chronic pain, whether it was chronic neck and back pain (75.9%), sacroiliac joint pain (90.7%), or scoliosis and kyphosis structural pathology (90.7%) (Fig. 3). Finally, if a PCP believed that a patient would eventually need a spinal fusion on the basis of clinical presentation and imaging, the physician would most likely to refer to an orthopedic spine surgeon (61.1%). If a PCP believed a patient would need discectomy, 58.3% of physicians would refer to an orthopedic surgeon. Finally, if a PCP believed that a patient would benefit from minimally invasive surgery, 59.3% of physicians would refer the patient to a neurosurgeon (Fig. 4).
DISCUSSION
Since the advent of internal fixation in the 1970s, coupled with the use of anterior and posterior approaches to the spine, spine surgeons now offer more effective surgical interventions for the increasing number of patients suffering from neck and back pain.3419) The PCPs, who are now seeing and referring out many more patients to spine surgeons, are tasked with identifying ideal surgical candidates and surgeons to refer to. This survey-based study provides an analysis of PCP referral patterns on the basis of pathology, location of pathology in spine, and type of procedure that a PCP expects is needed.
Even though previous studies do show that orthopedic spine surgeons and neurosurgical spine surgeons have similar treatment and management strategies, our survey results show that overall physicians refer their patients to different specialties on the basis of the clinical situation.20) More physicians answered that they would refer their patients with radiculopathy to neurosurgeons, except lumbar radiculopathy, possibly because they believe neurosurgeons would be better equipped to nonsurgically or surgically treat nerve root compression. However, more physicians answered that they would refer their patients to orthopedic spine surgeons for spine fractures (other than cervical spine) and chronic joint pain or structural deformity, possibly because they believe orthopedic surgeons are better equipped to nonsurgically or surgically treat bony pathology in the spine. Finally, more PCPs answered that they would refer their patients to orthopedic surgeons for spinal fusions and discectomies but not minimally invasive surgery.
While statistical tests were not done to show any statistically significant difference in referring patterns, the variation by pathology, spine location, and required surgery suggests that PCPs do not believe orthopedic and neurosurgery spine surgeons are equally trained and capable of handling every spinal pathology. While residency does offer each specialty a different focus on pathology, each spine surgeon is well trained for all pathologies and operations at the completion of their training, making each surgeon capable of successfully treating each pathology (even if there are differences in comfort level among specialties).91011) Because of these differences in PCPs' perceptions of spine surgeons, it is important to explore what drives these perceptions and what can be done to rectify them.
PCPs' bias and referral patterns may be due in part to personal experiences with their local spine surgeons, access limitations, marketing campaigns, or hospital-driven initiatives amongst a myriad of other factors. Various practice setting may also affect referral patterns. Better relationships with open lines of communication between spine surgeons and PCPs and education about the breath of practice and capabilities may help alleviate this discrepancy, assuring PCPs that each spine surgeon can help their patients regardless of pathology. Understanding these perceptions and pushing for unbiased referral patterns also allows for better patient access to a spine surgeon for quicker, definitive care.
Our study has a few limitations, most inherent to the survey design. Since only physicians agreeing to participate in the study were included, our cohort stands as a convenience sample. The physician response rate in our sample is approximately 25%, a low number that is consistent with the variability of responses documented in the literature but further classifies our cohort as a convenience sample.2122) Finally, our survey questions were intentionally created to have binomial answers. Without having answer choices such as other or none, respondents were forced to choose between orthopedic spine surgeon and neurosurgeon, providing a distribution that might be biased.
XML Download