Journal List > J Korean Ophthalmol Soc > v.61(1) > 1141395

Kim, Park, Oh, and Choi: Retinal Ganglion Cell Layer Thicknesses and Visual Functions in Patients with Bilateral Temporal Optic Atrophy

Abstract

Purpose

To investigate correlations between macular retinal ganglion cell (RGC) layer thickness and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and visual field parameters in patients with bilateral temporal optic atrophy.

Methods

Thirty eyes of 15 patients with bilateral temporal optic atrophy and 30 eyes of 15 normal subjects that were age- and sex-matched were included in the study. We measured the thicknesses of the RGC layers of posterior poles using optical coherence tomography volume scanning. The RGC layer was divided into nine zones based on the Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study baseline. Possible correlations of the RGC layer with the BCVA and visual field parameters were determined.

Results

The RGC layer thickness was significantly thinner in all patients compared to those in the control group (p = 0.001). The RGC layer thicknesses in the inner superior, inner temporal, inner inferior, and inner nasal areas were significantly correlated with the BCVA (r = −0.650, r = −0.626, r = −0.616, and r = −0.636, respectively; p = 0.000). The RGC layer thicknesses in the outer superior, outer temporal, outer inferior, and outer nasal areas were significantly correlated with the mean deviation of the visual field test (r = 0.470, r = 0.349, r = 0.496, and r = 0.469, respectively; p < 0.05).

Conclusions

In patients with bilateral temporal optic atrophy, the RGC layer thickness in the medial region was correlated with the BCVA, and the RGC layer thickness in the lateral region was correlated with the mean deviation of the visual field test.

Figures and Tables

Figure 1

Representative figure of a 40-year-old female with visual acuity of 0.30 logarithm of minimal angle of resolution (logMAR) in the right eye and 0.30 logMAR in the left eye, showing a severe decrease in the retinal ganglion cell layer thickness.

jkos-61-92-g001
Figure 2

Graphs showing retinal ganglion cell layer thicknesss of patient group and control group. In the patient group, the average thickness is thin in all areas.

jkos-61-92-g002
Figure 3

Scatterplots showing each linear regression analysis model. (A) Relationship between inner superior retinal ganglion cell (RGC) layer thickness and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA). (B) Relationship between inner temporal RGC layer thickness and BCVA. (C) Relationship between inner inferior RGC layer thickness and BCVA. (D) Relationship between inner nasal RGC layer thickness and BCVA; thinner RGC layer thicness was correlated with lower BCVA. logMAR = logarithm of minimal angle of resolution.

jkos-61-92-g003
Figure 4

Scatterplots showing each linear regression analysis model. (A) Relationship between outer superior retinal ganglion cell (RGC) layer thickness and mean deviation (MD). (B) Relationship between outer temporal RGC layer thickness and MD. (C) Relationship between outer inferior RGC layer thickness and MD. (D) Relationship between outer nasal RGC layer thickness and MD; thinner RGC layer thicness was correlated with lower MD.

jkos-61-92-g004
Table 1

Demographics of bilateral optic atrophy patients

jkos-61-92-i001

Values are presented as mean ± standard deviation (range) or number unless otherwise indicated.

M/F = male/female; BCVA = best corrected visual acuity; logMAR = logarithm of minimal angle of resolution; IOP = intraocular pressure; SE = spherical equivalent refractive error; D = diopters.

Table 2

Comparison of RGC layer of each regions thickness between two groups

jkos-61-92-i002

Values are presented as mean ± standard deviation.

RGC = retinal ganglion cell.

*Independent sample t-test.

Table 3

Pearson correlation coefficient between the best corrected visual acuity and RGC layer thickness of each region

jkos-61-92-i003

RGC = retinal ganglion cell.

*Simple correlation analysis.

Table 4

Pearson correlation coefficient between the visual field defect parameters and RGC layer thickness of each region

jkos-61-92-i004

RGC = retinal ganglion cell; MD = mean deviation; PSD = pattern standard deviation; VFI = visual field index.

*Simple correlation analysis.

Notes

This work was supported by the 2011 Inje University research grant.

References

1. Oluleye TS, Ajaiyeoba AI, Fafowora OF, Olusanya BA. The aetiology of optic atrophy in Nigerians--a general hospital clinic study. Int J Clin Pract. 2005; 59:950–952.
pmid
2. Vaphiades MS, Brodsky MC. Pediatric optic atrophy. Int Ophthalmol Clin. 2012; 52:17–28. xiii
crossref pmid
3. Soltan-Sanjari M, Parvaresh MM, Maleki A, et al. Correlation between retinal nerve fiber layer thickness by optical coherence tomography and perimetric parameters in optic atrophy. J Ophthalmic Vis Res. 2008; 3:91–94.
pmid pmc
4. Zhang Y, Huang H, Wei S, et al. Characterization of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness changes associated with Leber's hereditary optic neuropathy by optical coherence tomography. Exp Ther Med. 2014; 7:483–487.
crossref pmid
5. Kim TW, Hwang JM. Stratus OCT in dominant optic atrophy: features differentiating it from glaucoma. J Glaucoma. 2007; 16:655–658.
pmid
6. DeWitt CA, Johnson LN, Schoenleber DB, et al. Visual function in patients with optic nerve pallor (optic atrophy). J Natl Med Assoc. 2003; 95:394–397.
pmid pmc
7. Park JY, Choi J, Oh WH, Kim JS. Influence of RNFL thickness on visual acuity and visual field in bilateral temporal optic atrophy. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2016; 57:969–976.
crossref
8. Xu X, Xiao H, Guo X, et al. Diagnostic ability of macular ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer thickness in glaucoma suspects. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017; 96:e9182.
crossref
9. Mead B, Tomarev S. Evaluating retinal ganglion cell loss and dysfunction. Exp Eye Res. 2016; 151:96–106.
crossref pmid pmc
10. Corajevic N, Larsen M, Rönnbäck C. Thickness mapping of individual retinal layers and sectors by Spectralis SD-OCT in Autosomal Dominant Optic Atrophy. Acta Ophthalmol. 2018; 96:251–256.
crossref pmid
11. Asanad S, Tian JJ, Frousiakis S, et al. Optical coherence tomography of the retinal ganglion cell complex in leber's hereditary optic neuropathy and dominant optic atrophy. Curr Eye Res. 2019; 44:638–644.
crossref pmid
12. Cheung CY, Ikram MK, Chen C, Wong TY. Imaging retina to study dementia and stroke. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2017; 57:89–107.
crossref pmid
13. Moster SJ, Moster ML, Scannell Bryan M, Sergott RC. Retinal ganglion cell and inner plexiform layer loss correlate with visual acuity loss in LHON: a longitudinal, segmentation OCT analysis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2016; 57:3872–3883.
crossref pmid
14. Lee JY, Choi JH, Park KA, Oh SY. Ganglion cell layer and inner plexiform layer as predictors of vision recovery in ethambutolinduced optic neuropathy: a longitudinal OCT analysis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2018; 59:2104–2109.
crossref pmid
15. Kobayashi W, Kunikata H, Omodaka K, et al. Correlation of papillomacular nerve fiber bundle thickness with central visual function in open-angle glaucoma. J Ophthalmol. 2015; 2015:460918.
crossref
16. Rebolleda G, Sánchez-Sánchez C, González-López JJ, et al. Papillomacular bundle and inner retinal thicknesses correlate with visual acuity in nonarteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2015; 56:682–692.
crossref pmid
17. Cho KH, Ahn SJ, Jung C, et al. Ischemic injury of the papillomacular bundle is a predictive marker of poor vision in eyes with branch retinal artery occlusion. Am J Ophthalmol. 2016; 162:107–120.
crossref pmid
18. Park SW, Hwang JM. Optical coherence tomography shows early loss of the inferior temporal quadrant retinal nerve fiber layer in autosomal dominant optic atrophy. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2015; 253:135–141.
crossref pmid
TOOLS
Similar articles