Journal List > J Korean Neuropsychiatr Assoc > v.58(4) > 1138964

Lee, Han, Lee, Kim, Na, Suh, and Kim: Electrophysiological Characteristics of Mild Cognitive Impairment Patients during Semantic Memory Process

Abstract

Objectives

Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) patients show decreased semantic memory-processing ability including that for naming objects. We examined event-related potentials (ERPs) associated with the semantic processing of MCI patients and compared their ERPs to those of cognitively normal elderly subjects.

Methods

A total of 25 MCI patients and 23 age-matched cognitively normal elderly controls (CN) participated in an object-word matching task that consisted of responding to whether a word stimulus matched the picture stimulus preceding it. There were three types of object-name pairs: 1) matched pair, 2) related but mismatched pair, and 3) unrelated mismatched pair. We compared the mean amplitude of ERPs to examine the mismatch effects between matched and mismatched pairs (N400M) and the category effect between inner category and outer category mismatched words (N400C) in CN and MCI patients.

Results

Compared to the CN subjects, the MCI patients showed a distinct N400M response to mismatch conditions, but the observed range was limited in the centroparietal area. While CN individuals showed a significantly larger N400C amplitude for unrelated mismatch pairs than those for related mismatch pairs, MCI patients exhibited no significant difference between those pair types.

Conclusion

The MCI showed a lack of the category effects in ERP responses, which may reflect latent behavioral impairments.

Figures and Tables

Fig. 1

Behavioral performance of the OWMT. Accuracy (A) and reaction time (B) of the OWMT in MCI and CN groups. All error bar means standard error. *: p<0.05, **: p<0.01, ***: p<0.001. OWMT : Object-word matching task, CN : Cognitively normal, MCI : Mild cognitive impairment, MATCH : Matched pair, RELMIS : Related mismatched pair, UNRMIS : Unrelated mismatched pair, REMAT : Repeated matched.

jkna-58-353-g001
Fig. 2

The grand-averaged event-related potential of RELMIS, UNRMIS and MATCH at right frontal and centroparietal areas (A) and the topographical distribution of mean amplitude's differences (µV) calculated by subtracting MATCH from RELMIS or UNRMIS (B) in MCI and CN groups. MATCH : Matched pair, RELMIS : Related mismatched pair, UNRMIS : Unrelated mismatched pair, MCI : Mild cognitive impairment, CN : Cognitively normal.

jkna-58-353-g002
Table 1

Results of the repeated measures 4-way analysis of variance for N400M depends on the polarity and laterality of electrode locations and match-mismatch conditions in CN and MCI groups

jkna-58-353-i001

*: p<0.05, **: p<0.001. CN : Cognitively normal, MCI : Mild cognitive impairment

Table 2

The mean amplitudes (µV, standard deviation) of N400M depends on the polarity and laterality of electrode locations and match-mismatch conditions in CN and MCI groups

jkna-58-353-i002

*: p<0.05, **: p<0.01, ***: p<0.001. CN : Cognitively normal, MCI : Mild cognitive impairment

Table 3

Results of the repeated measures 4-way analysis of variance for N400C depends on the polarity and laterality of electrode locations and category conditions (inner or out-category) in CN and MCI groups

jkna-58-353-i003

*: p<0.05, **: p<0.001. CN : Cognitively normal, MCI : Mild cognitive impairment

Table 4

The mean amplitudes (µV, standard deviation) of N400C depends on the polarity and laterality of electrode locations and category conditions (inner or out-category) in CN and MCI groups

jkna-58-353-i004

*: p<0.05, **: p<0.01. CN : Cognitively normal, MCI : Mild cognitive impairment

Notes

Conflicts of Interest The authors have no financial conflicts of interest.

References

1. Petersen RC, Smith GE, Waring SC, Ivnik RJ, Tangalos EG, Kokmen E. Mild cognitive impairment: clinical characterization and outcome. Arch Neurol. 1999; 56:303–308.
2. Morris JC, Storandt M, Miller JP, McKeel DW, Price JL, Rubin EH, et al. Mild cognitive impairment represents early-stage Alzheimer disease. Arch Neurol. 2001; 58:397–405.
crossref
3. Tchakoute CT, Sainani KL, Henderson VW. Semantic memory in the clinical progression of Alzheimer disease. Cogn Behav Neurol. 2017; 30:81–89.
crossref
4. Jonker C, Geerlings MI, Schmand B. Are memory complaints predictive for dementia? A review of clinical and population-based studies. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2000; 15:983–991.
crossref
5. Albert MS, DeKosky ST, Dickson D, Dubois B, Feldman HH, Fox NC, et al. The diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment due to Alzheimer's disease: recommendations from the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer's Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer's disease. Alzheimers Dement. 2011; 7:270–279.
crossref
6. Dubois B, Hampel H, Feldman HH, Scheltens P, Aisen P, Andrieu S, et al. Preclinical Alzheimer's disease: definition, natural history, and diagnostic criteria. Alzheimers Dement. 2016; 12:292–323.
crossref
7. Cuetos F, Arce N, Martínez C, Ellis AW. Word recognition in Alzheimer's disease: effects of semantic degeneration. J Neuropsychol. 2017; 11:26–39.
crossref
8. Hodges JR, Patterson K. Is semantic memory consistently impaired early in the course of Alzheimer's disease? Neuroanatomical and diagnostic implications. Neuropsychologia. 1995; 33:441–459.
crossref
9. Perry RJ, Watson P, Hodges JR. The nature and staging of attention dysfunction in early (minimal and mild) Alzheimer's disease: relationship to episodic and semantic memory impairment. Neuropsychologia. 2000; 38:252–271.
crossref
10. Lambon Ralph MA, Patterson K, Hodges JR. The relationship between naming and semantic knowledge for different categories in dementia of Alzheimer's type. Neuropsychologia. 1997; 35:1251–1260.
crossref
11. Verma M, Howard RJ. Semantic memory and language dysfunction in early Alzheimer's disease: a review. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2012; 27:1209–1217.
crossref
12. Chi YK, Han JW, Jeong H, Park JY, Kim TH, Lee JJ, et al. Development of a screening algorithm for Alzheimer's disease using categorical verbal fluency. PLoS One. 2014; 9:e84111.
crossref
13. Adlam AL, Bozeat S, Arnold R, Watson P, Hodges JR. Semantic knowledge in mild cognitive impairment and mild Alzheimer's disease. Cortex. 2006; 42:675–684.
crossref
14. Ahmed S, Arnold R, Thompson SA, Graham KS, Hodges JR. Naming of objects, faces and buildings in mild cognitive impairment. Cortex. 2008; 44:746–752.
crossref
15. Bozoki A, Giordani B, Heidebrink JL, Berent S, Foster NL. Mild cognitive impairments predict dementia in nondemented elderly patients with memory loss. Arch Neurol. 2001; 58:411–416.
crossref
16. Chen P, Ratcliff G, Belle SH, Cauley JA, DeKosky ST, Ganguli M. Patterns of cognitive decline in presymptomatic Alzheimer disease: a prospective community study. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2001; 58:853–858.
crossref
17. Clague F, Dudas RB, Thompson SA, Graham KS, Hodges JR. Multidimensional measures of person knowledge and spatial associative learning: can these be applied to the differentiation of Alzheimer's disease from frontotemporal and vascular dementia? Neuropsychologia. 2005; 43:1338–1350.
crossref
18. de Jager CA, Budge MM. Stability and predictability of the classification of mild cognitive impairment as assessed by episodic memory test performance over time. Neurocase. 2005; 11:72–79.
crossref
19. Dudas RB, Clague F, Thompson SA, Graham KS, Hodges JR. Episodic and semantic memory in mild cognitive impairment. Neuropsychologia. 2005; 43:1266–1276.
crossref
20. Lehrner J, Coutinho G, Mattos P, Moser D, Pflüger M, Gleiss A, et al. Semantic memory and depressive symptoms in patients with subjective cognitive decline, mild cognitive impairment, and Alzheimer's disease. Int Psychogeriatr. 2017; 29:1123–1135.
crossref
21. Kutas M, Hillyard SA. Event-related brain potentials to semantically inappropriate and surprisingly large words. Biol Psychol. 1980; 11:99–116.
crossref
22. Friedman D, Johnson R Jr. Event-related potential (ERP) studies of memory encoding and retrieval: a selective review. Microsc Res Tech. 2000; 51:6–28.
crossref
23. Kutas M, Federmeier KD. Thirty years and counting: finding meaning in the N400 component of the event-related brain potential (ERP). Annu Rev Psychol. 2011; 62:621–647.
crossref
24. Brouwer H, Crocker MW, Venhuizen NJ, Hoeks JCJ. A Neurocomputational model of the N400 and the P600 in language processing. Cogn Sci. 2017; 41:1318–1352.
crossref
25. Tse CY, Lee CL, Sullivan J, Garnsey SM, Dell GS, Fabiani M, et al. Imaging cortical dynamics of language processing with the event-related optical signal. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007; 104:17157–17162.
crossref
26. Taylor JR, Olichney JM. From amnesia to dementia: ERP studies of memory and language. Clin EEG Neurosci. 2007; 38:8–17.
crossref
27. Schwartz TJ, Kutas M, Butters N, Paulsen JS, Salmon DP. Electrophysiological insights into the nature of the semantic deficit in Alzheimer's disease. Neuropsychologia. 1996; 34:827–841.
crossref
28. Ford JM, Woodward SH, Sullivan EV, Isaacks BG, Tinklenberg JR, Yesavage JA, et al. N400 evidence of abnormal responses to speech in Alzheimer's disease. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1996; 99:235–246.
crossref
29. Yang JC, Chi L, Teichholtz S, Schneider A, Nanakul R, Nowacki R, et al. ERP abnormalities elicited by word repetition in fragile X-associated tremor/ataxia syndrome (FXTAS) and amnestic MCI. Neuropsychologia. 2014; 63:34–42.
crossref
30. Hurley RS, Paller KA, Wieneke CA, Weintraub S, Thompson CK, Federmeier KD, et al. Electrophysiology of object naming in primary progressive aphasia. J Neurosci. 2009; 29:15762–15769.
crossref
31. Olichney JM, Iragui VJ, Salmon DP, Riggins BR, Morris SK, Kutas M. Absent event-related potential (ERP) word repetition effects in mild Alzheimer's disease. Clin Neurophysiol. 2006; 117:1319–1330.
crossref
32. Olichney JM, Taylor JR, Gatherwright J, Salmon DP, Bressler AJ, Kutas M, et al. Patients with MCI and N400 or P600 abnormalities are at very high risk for conversion to dementia. Neurology. 2008; 70:1763–1770.
crossref
33. Han JW, Kim TH, Kwak KP, Kim K, Kim BJ, Kim SG, et al. Overview of the Korean Longitudinal Study on Cognitive Aging and Dementia. Psychiatry Investig. 2018; 15:767–774.
crossref
34. Winblad B, Palmer K, Kivipelto M, Jelic V, Fratiglioni L, Wahlund LO, et al. Mild cognitive impairment--beyond controversies, towards a consensus: report of the International Working Group on Mild Cognitive Impairment. J Intern Med. 2004; 256:240–246.
crossref
35. Delorme A, Makeig S. EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis. J Neurosci Methods. 2004; 134:9–21.
crossref
36. Lopez-Calderon J, Luck SJ. ERPLAB: an open-source toolbox for the analysis of event-related potentials. Front Hum Neurosci. 2014; 8:213.
crossref
37. Willers IF, Feldman ML, Allegri RF. Subclinical naming errors in mild cognitive impairment: a semantic deficit? Dement Neuropsychol. 2008; 2:217–222.
crossref
38. Ford JM, Askari N, Mathalon DH, Menon V, Gabrieli JD, Tinklenberg JR, et al. Event-related brain potential evidence of spared knowledge in Alzheimer's disease. Psychol Aging. 2001; 16:161–176.
crossref
39. Ostrosky-Solís F, Castañeda M, Pérez M, Castillo G, Bobes MA. Cognitive brain activity in Alzheimer's disease: electrophysiological response during picture semantic categorization. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 1998; 4:415–425.
40. Lau EF, Phillips C, Poeppel D. A cortical network for semantics: (de) constructing the N400. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2008; 9:920–933.
crossref
41. Gold BT, Balota DA, Jones SJ, Powell DK, Smith CD, Andersen AH. Dissociation of automatic and strategic lexical-semantics: functional magnetic resonance imaging evidence for differing roles of multiple frontotemporal regions. J Neurosci. 2006; 26:6523–6532.
crossref
TOOLS
Similar articles