1. O'Shea P. Future medicine shaped by an interdisciplinary new biology. Lancet. 2012; 379(9825):1544–1550.
2. Kolahi J, Khazaei S, Iranmanesh P, Soltani P. Analysis of highly tweeted dental journals and articles: a science mapping approach. Br Dent J. 2019; 226(9):673–678.
3. Heidary F, Gharebaghi R. Surgical innovation, a niche and a need. Med Hypothesis Discov Innov Ophthalmol. 2012; 1(4):65–66.
4. Bains W. Hypotheses, limits, models and life. Life (Basel). 2014; 5(1):1–3.
5. Bains W. Hypotheses and humility: Ideas do not have to be right to be useful. Biosci Hypotheses. 2009; 2(1):1–2.
6. Fleming A, Fish EW. Influence of penicillin on the coagulation of blood with especial reference to certain dental operations. BMJ. 1947; 2(4519):242–243.
7. Bentley R. The development of penicillin: genesis of a famous antibiotic. Perspect Biol Med. 2005; 48(3):444–452.
8. Shama G. The role of the media in influencing public attitudes to penicillin during World War II. Dynamis. 2015; 35(1):131–152.
10. Strachan DP. Hay fever, hygiene, and household size. BMJ. 1989; 299(6710):1259–1260.
11. Bach JF. The effect of infections on susceptibility to autoimmune and allergic diseases. N Engl J Med. 2002; 347(12):911–920.
12. Bach JF. The hygiene hypothesis in autoimmunity: the role of pathogens and commensals. Nat Rev Immunol. 2018; 18(2):105–120.
14. Ben-Chetrit E, Levy M. Familial Mediterranean fever. Lancet. 1998; 351(9103):659–664.
15. Ozen S, Balci B, Ozkara S, Ozcan A, Yilmaz E, Besbas N, et al. Is there a heterozygote advantage for familial Mediterranean fever carriers against tuberculosis infections: speculations remain? Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2002; 20(4):Suppl 26. S57–S58.
16. Cattan D. Familial Mediterranean fever: is low mortality from tuberculosis a specific advantage for MEFV mutations carriers? Mortality from tuberculosis among Muslims, Jewish, French, Italian and Maltese patients in Tunis (Tunisia) in the first half of the 20th century. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2003; 21(4):Suppl 30. S53–S54.
17. Chatzidionysiou K. Rheumatic disease and artistic creativity. Mediterr J Rheumatol. 2019; 30(2):103–109.
18. Appelboom T. Hypothesis: Rubens--one of the first victims of an epidemic of rheumatoid arthritis that started in the 16th-17th century? Rheumatology (Oxford). 2005; 44(5):681–683.
19. Wardle J, Rossi V. Medical hypotheses: a clinician's guide to publication. Adv Intern Med. 2016; 3(1):37–40.
20. Gasparyan AY, Ayvazyan L, Blackmore H, Kitas GD. Writing a narrative biomedical review: considerations for authors, peer reviewers, and editors. Rheumatol Int. 2011; 31(11):1409–1417.
21. Methley AM, Campbell S, Chew-Graham C, McNally R, Cheraghi-Sohi S. PICO, PICOS and SPIDER: a comparison study of specificity and sensitivity in three search tools for qualitative systematic reviews. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014; 14(1):579.
22. Misra DP, Agarwal V. Systematic reviews: challenges for their justification, related comprehensive searches, and implications. J Korean Med Sci. 2018; 33(12):e92.
23. Heidary F, Gharebaghi R. Welcome to beautiful mind; a call to action. Med Hypothesis Discov Innov Ophthalmol. 2012; 1(1):1–2.
24. Erren TC, Shaw DM, Groß JV. How to avoid haste and waste in occupational, environmental and public health research. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2015; 69(9):823–825.
25. Ruxton GD, Mulder T. Unethical work must be filtered out or flagged. Nature. 2019; 572(7768):171–172.
26. Rosenblatt-Farrell N. The landscape of antibiotic resistance. Environ Health Perspect. 2009; 117(6):A244–50.
27. Patki A. Eat dirt and avoid atopy: the hygiene hypothesis revisited. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2007; 73(1):2–4.
28. Bloomfield SF, Rook GA, Scott EA, Shanahan F, Stanwell-Smith R, Turner P. Time to abandon the hygiene hypothesis: new perspectives on allergic disease, the human microbiome, infectious disease prevention and the role of targeted hygiene. Perspect Public Health. 2016; 136(4):213–224.
29. Goodson P. Questioning the HIV-AIDS hypothesis: 30 years of dissent. Front Public Health. 2014; 2:154.
30. Abatzopoulos TJ. A new era for Journal of Biological Research-Thessaloniki
. J Biol Res (Thessalon). 2014; 21(1):1.
31. Rosen J. Research protocols: a forest of hypotheses. Nature. 2016; 536(7615):239–241.
32. Steinhauser G, Adlassnig W, Risch JA, Anderlini S, Arguriou P, Armendariz AZ, et al. Peer review versus editorial review and their role in innovative science. Theor Med Bioeth. 2012; 33(5):359–376.
33. Eriksson S, Helgesson G. The false academy: predatory publishing in science and bioethics. Med Health Care Philos. 2017; 20(2):163–170.
34. Beall J. Dangerous predatory publishers threaten medical research. J Korean Med Sci. 2016; 31(10):1511–1513.
35. Bazrafshan A, Haghdoost AA, Zare M. A comparison of downloads, readership and citations data for the Journal of Medical Hypotheses and Ideas
. J Med Hypotheses Ideas. 2015; 9(1):1–4.
36. Zavos C, Kountouras J, Zavos N, Paspatis GA, Kouroumalis EA. Predicting future citations of a research paper from number of its internet downloads: the Medical Hypotheses case. Med Hypotheses. 2008; 70(2):460–461.
37. Duyx B, Urlings MJ, Swaen GM, Bouter LM, Zeegers MP. Selective citation in the literature on the hygiene hypothesis: a citation analysis on the association between infections and rhinitis. BMJ Open. 2019; 9(2):e026518.
38. Greenberg SA. How citation distortions create unfounded authority: analysis of a citation network. BMJ. 2009; 339:b2680.
39. Duyx B, Urlings MJ, Swaen GM, Bouter LM, Zeegers MP. Scientific citations favor positive results: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Epidemiol. 2017; 88:92–101.
40. Bevelander KE, Kaipainen K, Swain R, Dohle S, Bongard JC, Hines PD, et al. Crowdsourcing novel childhood predictors of adult obesity. PLoS One. 2014; 9(2):e87756.
41. Castelvecchi D. Physicists doubt bold superconductivity claim following social-media storm. Nature. 2018; 560(7720):539–540.
42. Kolahi J, Khazaei S. Altmetric analysis of contemporary dental literature. Br Dent J. 2018; 225(1):68–72.