Journal List > J Korean Orthop Assoc > v.54(5) > 1136195

Wan-Hyeong, Won, Kang, Dae-Geun, Chang-Bae, and Hee: Myxoid Liposarcoma: A Single Institute Experience

Abstract

Purpose:

This study assessed the treatment outcomes of myxoid liposarcoma in the extremities and investigate the prognostic factors.

Materials and Methods:

A total of 91 patients with myxoid liposarcoma (83 primary, 8 recurrent) between 2001 and 2015 were reviewed retrospectively. The local recurrence and metastasis after treatment were examined. The survival rates and prognostic factors affecting the survival were investigated. The mean follow-up was 84 months (range, 5–196 months).

Results:

The overall survival rates at 5-yr and 10-yr were 82% and 74%, respectively. The tumor size (p=0.04), round cell component (p<0.0001), grade (p=0.0002), and local recurrence (p=0.006) affected survival in primary patients. Extrapulmonary metastases were observed in 75.0% (18/24) of metastatic patients and the mean post metastasis survival was 26 months (range, 2–72 months)

Conclusion:

Myxoid liposarcoma developed mainly at the lower extremities. The tumor size, grade, component of round cells, and local recurrence were associated with the prognosis. The unique feature of extrapulmonary metastasis in myxoid liposarcoma should be noted in the treatment and follow-up.

References

1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2016. CA Cancer J Clin. 2016. 66:7–30.
crossref
2. Linch M, Miah AB, Thway K, Judson IR, Benson C. Systemic treatment of soft-tissue sarcoma-gold standard and novel therapies. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2014. 11:187–202.
crossref
3. Fletcher CD. The evolving classification of soft tissue tumours - an update based on the new 2013 WHO classification. Histopathology. 2014. 64:2–11.
crossref
4. ten Heuvel SE, Hoekstra HJ, van Ginkel RJ, Bastiaannet E, Suurmeijer AJ. Clinicopathologic prognostic factors in myxoid liposarcoma: a retrospective study of 49 patients with long-term follow-up. Ann Surg Oncol. 2007. 14:222–9.
5. Dalal KM, Antonescu CR, Singer S. Diagnosis and management of lipomatous tumors. J Surg Oncol. 2008. 97:298–313.
crossref
6. Narendra S, Valente A, Tull J, Zhang S. DDIT3 gene break-apart as a molecular marker for diagnosis of myxoid liposarcoma: assay validation and clinical experience. Diagn Mol Pathol. 2011. 20:218–24.
7. Cheng EY, Springfield DS, Mankin HJ. Frequent incidence of extrapulmonary sites of initial metastasis in patients with liposarcoma. Cancer. 1995. 75:1120–7.
crossref
8. Estourgie SH, Nielsen GP, Ott MJ. Metastatic patterns of extremity myxoid liposarcoma and their outcome. J Surg Oncol. 2002. 80:89–93.
crossref
9. Lee SH, Cho IJ, Yang WI, Suh JS, Shin KH. Liposarcoma in the extremity. J Korean Bone Joint Tumor Soc. 2010. 16:62–8.
crossref
10. Chung YG, Kang YK, Bahk WJ. . Prognostic factors in liposarcomas: a retrospective study of 52 patients. J Korean Bone Joint Tumor Soc. 2010. 16:14–20.
crossref
11. Fiore M, Grosso F, Lo Vullo S. . Myxoid/round cell and pleomorphic liposarcomas: prognostic factors and survival in a series of patients treated at a single institution. Cancer. 2007. 109:2522–31.
12. Antonescu CR, Tschernyavsky SJ, Decuseara R. . Prognostic impact of P53 status, TLS-CHOP fusion transcript structure, and histological grade in myxoid liposarcoma: a molecular and clinicopathologic study of 82 cases. Clin Cancer Res. 2001. 7:3977–87.
13. Knebel C, Lenze U, Pohlig F. . Prognostic factors and outcome of liposarcoma patients: a retrospective evaluation over 15 years. BMC Cancer. 2017. 17:410.
crossref
14. Beane JD, Yang JC, White D, Steinberg SM, Rosenberg SA, Rudloff U. Efficacy of adjuvant radiation therapy in the treatment of soft tissue sarcoma of the extremity: 20-year follow-up of a randomized prospective trial. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014. 21:2484–9.
crossref
15. Engström K, Bergh P, Cederlund CG. . Irradiation of myxoid/round cell liposarcoma induces volume reduction and lipoma-like morphology. Acta Oncol. 2007. 46:838–45.
crossref
16. Guadagnolo BA, Zagars GK, Ballo MT. . Excellent local control rates and distinctive patterns of failure in myxoid liposarcoma treated with conservation surgery and radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008. 70:760–5.
crossref
17. Gronchi A, Bui BN, Bonvalot S. . Phase II clinical trial of neoadjuvant trabectedin in patients with advanced localized myxoid liposarcoma. Ann Oncol. 2012. 23:771–6.
crossref
18. Grosso F, Jones RL, Demetri GD. . Efficacy of trabectedin (ecteinascidin-743) in advanced pretreated myxoid liposarcomas: a retrospective study. Lancet Oncol. 2007. 8:595–602.
crossref
19. Di Giandomenico S, Frapolli R, Bello E. . Mode of action of trabectedin in myxoid liposarcomas. Oncogene. 2014. 33:5201–10.
20. Lee ATJ, Thway K, Huang PH, Jones RL. Clinical and molecular spectrum of liposarcoma. J Clin Oncol. 2018. 36:151–9.
crossref
21. Fuglø HM, Maretty-Nielsen K, Hovgaard D, Keller JØ, Safwat AA, Petersen MM. Metastatic pattern, local relapse, and survival of patients with myxoid liposarcoma: a retrospective study of 45 patients. Sarcoma. 2013. 2013:548–628.
crossref
22. Nishida Y, Tsukushi S, Nakashima H, Ishiguro N. Clinicopathologic prognostic factors of pure myxoid liposarcoma of the extremities and trunk wall. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010. 468:3041–6.
crossref
23. Schwab JH, Boland PJ, Antonescu C, Bilsky MH, Healey JH. Spinal metastases from myxoid liposarcoma warrant screening with magnetic resonance imaging. Cancer. 2007. 110:1815–22.
crossref
24. Conill C, Setoain X, Colomo L. . Diagnostic efficacy of bone scintigraphy, magnetic resonance imaging, and positron emission tomography in bone metastases of myxoid liposarcoma. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2008. 27:625–8.
crossref

Figure 1.
Metastatic myxoid liposarcoma case (male/35 years old). (A) Abdomen computed tomography scan (18 months after the initial calf sarcoma excision) shows 4.5×3.0×3.5 cm low attenuated lobulated mass (arrow) in right retroperitoneum, paracolic gutter with indentation of right psoas muscle. (B) Bone scan shows a focal hot uptake lesion (arrow) on the left proximal humerus (left) and subsequent T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging shows a definite metastatic lesion (right).
jkoa-54-440f1.tif
Table 1.
Characteristics of the 91 Patients
Characteristic Value
Sex (male/female) 65/26
Age (yr) 46 (14–86)
Presentation
  Primary/Reexcision 83/27
  Recurrent 8
Location
  L/E 82
  U/E 9
Tumor size (cm) 10.7 (2.2–34.0)
  <10 40
  ≥10 41
  Unknown 10
Depth
  Superficial 14
  Deep 77
Grade
  1 33
  2 44
  3 8
  Unknown 6
Round cell component
  <5% 47
  ≥5% 38
  Unknown 6

Values are presented as number only or median (range). L/E, lower extremity; U/E, upper extremity.

Table 2.
Univariate and Multivariate Survival Analysis of 83 Primary Patients
Variable Univariate Multivariate
5-year survival 95% CI 10-year survival 95% CI p-value RR (95% CI) p-value
Sex Male (n=59) 81.0±10.7 70.6±14.6 0.08
Female (n=24) 90.4±9.6 90.4±9.6
Age (yr) <40 (n=29) 89.5±10.5 83.9±15.0 0.57
≥40 (n=54) 80.3±11.7 73.3±14.2
Tumor size (cm) <10 (n=40) 90.3±9.7 86.2±12.8 0.04 1
≥10 (n=38) 75.1±14.2 65.2±18.0 0.19 2.3 (0.7–8.2)
Depth Superficial (n=14) 100±0 100±0 0.06
Deep (n=69) 80.3±10.1 71.8±13.1
Round cell component <5% (n=44) 97.6±2.4 93.8±6.2 <0.0001 1
≥5% (n=33) 61.2±18.2 49.5±21.1 0.047 5.6 (1.0–30.4)
Grade 1 (n=30) 100.0 94.7±5.3 0.0002 1
2 (n=41) 73.7±15.0 69.1±16.6 3.2 (0.3–31.2)
3 (n=6) 44.4±43.6 0±0 0.48 4.7 (0.4–57.6)
Local recurrence No (n=66) 87.7±8.6 85.4±9.5 1
Yes (n=17) 70.1±22.0 43.8±32.4 0.006 0.4 1.6 (0.5-4.6)
Chemotherapy Yes (n=13) 61.5±13.5 61.5±13.5 0.07
No (n=70) 86.3±4.6 80.3±6.0

CI, confidence interval; RR, relative risk.

Values are presented as mean±standard deviation.

Table 3.
Time to LR or Metastasis by the Round Cell Component, Metastasis Location of 83 Primary Patients
Variable Round cell No. of LR (total=17) Mean time to LR (mo) p-value No. of distant metastasis (total=15) Mean time to metastasis (mo) p-value
Round cell component <5% 7 36 0.008 3 26 0.75
≥5% 10 15 12 20
Location of metastasis Pulmonary 4 36 0.03
Extrapulmonary 11 16

LR, local recurrence.

Table 4.
Previous Studies of Myxoid Liposarcoma
Study (yr) No. of case Age (yr) RC>5% (%) LR (%) Metastasis (%) Extrapulmonary metastasis (%) % of survival (yr) F/U (mo) Prognosis factor
Antonescu et al. (2001)12) 82 46 43 28 38 67% NA 44 RC>5%, necrosis (>5%), P53(+)
Dalal et al. (2008)5) 144 NA 0 86 (12) NA
Dalal et al. 81 NA 100 55 (12) NA
(2008)5)
Fiore et al. (2007)11) 269 25 25 24 14 74 77 (10) 119 recurrence (+) Size (>10 cm), grade (>2), margin (+),
ten Heuvel et al. 49 44 17 33 27 77 72 (10) 101 Age (>45 yr), grade, size (>5 cm)
(2007)4)
Nishida et al. (2010)22) 53 52 0 13 11 50 90 (5) 60 Age (>60 yr)
Fuglø et al. (2013)21) 45 49 0 18 15 100 69 (10) 102 Metastasis (+)
Knebel et al. (2017)13) 40 50 NA 22 NA NA 58 (10) NA
Current study 91 46 45 21 26 75 74 (10) 84 Size (≥10 cm), RC≥5%, grade (≥2), recurrence (+)

RC, round cell component; LR, local recurrence; F/U, follow-up; NA, not available.

TOOLS
Similar articles