Journal List > Asian Oncol Nurs > v.19(3) > 1134857

Zheng, Lee, Zhou, and Li: Effects of Illness Perception and Health Beliefs on the Quality of Life of Breast Cancer Patients in the Yanbian Area of China

Abstract

Purpose

This study aimed to identify the effects of illness perception and health beliefs on the quality of life (QOL) of breast cancer patients.

Methods

A cross-sectional study was conducted. Data were collected using questionnaires administered to 200 patients admitted for chemotherapy after a partial or total mastectomy at a university hospital in Yanji City. The data were analyzed using t-tests, analysis of variance, Pearson's correlation coefficients, and hierarchical regression analysis.

Results

The QOL of the breast cancer patients was significantly correlated with health beliefs and a subfactor of illness perception. The significant factors influencing QOL were understanding illness and feeling threatened, accounting for 31.7% of the variance in QOL.

Conclusion

Illness perception of breast cancer patients had a negative influence on QOL, whereas health beliefs affected it positively. An implication of this study's findings is that interventions to reduce negative illness perception can improve the QOL among breast cancer patients.

References

1. The National Cancer Center (KR). Lung cancer, breast cancer in Chinese male and female cancer incidence first respectively [Internet]. Available from:. https://www.chyxx.com/industry/201806/649922.html. [Accessed June 15, 2018].
2. Zheng Y, Wu CX, Zhang ML. The epidemic and characteristics of female breast cancer in China. Chin Oncol. 2013; 23:561–9.
3. Kim E, Kim S, Kim S, Lee Y. Resilience and related factors for patients with breast cancer. Asian Oncol Nurs. 2015; 15:193–202.
crossref
4. Greco A, Steca P, Pozzi R, Monzani D, D'Addario M, Villani A, et al. Predicting depression from illness severity in cardiovascular disease patients: self-efficacy beliefs, illness perception, and perceived social support as mediators. Int J Behav Med. 2014; 21:221–9.
crossref
5. Leventhal H. A perceptual-motor theory of emotion. Soc Sci Inf (Paris). 1982; 21:819–45.
crossref
6. Wang Q, Zang XQ, Wang QP. The specialties of illness perception and its connection with self-efficacy and quality of life in cancer chemotherapy patients. J Anhui Med Univ. 2017; 21:1538–41.
7. Qiu Y, Yang J, Ma KS, Jie B, Shu WQ. Correlation of illness perceptions with quality of life in early-and intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma patients. J Third Mil Med Univ. 2017; 39:1150–4.
8. Fan SY, Eiser C, Ho MC, Lin CY. Health-related quality of life in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: the mediation effects of illness perceptions and coping. Psychooncology. 2013; 22:1353–60.
crossref
9. Yang C, Jiang HL, Weng FN. Research on the impact of exercise adherence on health locus of control and illness perception in postoperative breast cancer patients. Chin Rural Health Serv Adm. 2018; 38:619–21.
10. Croom AR, Hamann HA, Kehoe SM, Paulk E, Wiebe DJ. Illness perceptions matter: understanding quality of life and advanced illness behaviors in female patients with late-stage cancer. J Support Oncol. 2013; 11:165–73.
crossref
11. Mickevičienė A, Vanagas G, Jievaltas M, Ulys A. Does illness perception explain quality of life of patients with prostate cancer? Medicina (Kaunas). 2013; 49:235–41.
crossref
12. Jiang DY, Gao LM, Hou XC, Liu WM. Qualitative study on reasons of doctor delay of middle and late breast cancer patients. Clin Nurs Res. 2013; 27:3229–30.
13. Chen HZ, Zhang LF, Chen JG. Application of health belief model in radiation and chemotherapy of radical mastectomy patients during radiotherapy and chemotherapy. J Qilu Nurs. 2014; 20:115–6.
14. Champion VL. Instrument development for health belief model constructs. ANS Adv Nurs Sci. 1984; 6:73–85.
crossref
15. Sun MQ, Wei D, Xu Q, Wang MX, Meng AF, Fu BL, et al. Effective study on self-efficacy of breast cancer patients after surgery by health belief model education. Chin J Surg Oncol. 2017; 9:204–7.
16. Ji SY. Cross-cultural debugging and empirical research of health beliefs scale in nursing outcome classification [dissertation]. Jinzhong: Shanxi Medical Univ.;2013.
17. Wu J. The correlation research quality of life, hope and coping style in breast cancer patients [dissertation]. Hengyang: Univ. of South China;2013.
18. Broadbent E, Petrie KJ, Main J, Weinman J. The brief illness perception questionnaire. J Psychosom Res. 2006; 60:631–7.
crossref
19. Mei YQ, Li HP, Yang YJ. Reliability and validity of Chinese version of the brief illness perception questionnaire in patients with breast cancer. J Nurs (China). 2015; 22:11–4.
20. Wan CH, Meng Q, Yang Z, Tang XL, Zhang CZ, Lu YB, et al. Development of the general module of the system of quality of life instruments for cancer patients: reliability and validity analysis. Ai Zheng. 2007; 26:225–9.
21. Yang Z, Tang XL, Wan CH, Zou TN, Chen DD, Zhang DM, et al. Development of the system of quality of life instruments for patients with breast cancer (QLICP-BR). Ai Zheng. 2007; 26:1122–6.
22. Li SJ. The illness perception in COPD patients and influencing factors of research [dissertation]. Beijing: Beijing Union Medical College;2016.
23. Seong YS, Lee YW. Relationship of illness perception, self-efficacy, and self-care among pulmonary tuberculosis patients. Korean J Adult Nurs. 2011; 23:31–9.
24. Hwang E, Yi M. Factors influencing quality of life in patients with breast cancer on hormone therapy. J Korean Acad Nurs. 2014; 44:108–17.
crossref
25. Lim JW, Han IY. Comparison of quality of life on the stage of cancer survivorship for breast and gynecological cancer survivors. Korean J Soc Welf. 2008; 60:5–27.
26. Petrie KJ, Weinman J. Patients' perception of their illness: the dynamo of volition in health care. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2012; 21:60–5.
27. Leventhal H, Nerenz DR, Steele DF. Illness representations and coping with health threats. Baum A, Taylor SE, Singer JE, editors. A handbook of psychology and health: sociopsychological aspects of health. Hills-dale, NJ: Erlbaum;1984. p. 219–52.
crossref
28. Choi M, Yoon S, Oh JH. Development and validation of the Korean illness perception questionnaire (K-IPQ). Health Commun. 2016; 11:123–43.
29. Hagger MS, Orbell S. A meta-analytic review of the common-sense model of illness representations. Psychol Health. 2003; 18:141–84.
crossref

Table 1.
Illness Perception, Health Belief, and Quality of Life of Participants (N= 200)
Variables Range Min Max M ± SD
Illness perception 0∼80 24 69 46.72 ± 6.79
   Cognitive illness representations 0∼50 15 39 27.20 ± 3.98
   Emotional representations 0∼20 4 20 14.94 ± 2.98
   Illness understanding 0∼10 1 10 4.58 ± 2.37
Health belief 48∼240 89 231 187.83 ± 18.75
   Personal health belief 10∼50 17 50 40.46 ± 5.55
   Implementation ability 7∼35 14 35 28.69 ± 3.63
   Control ability 6∼30 7 30 23.58 ± 3.05
   Resource utilization 14∼70 32 70 53.40 ± 6.16
   Feel the threat 11∼55 11 55 41.97 ± 6.80
Quality of life 0∼100 28 63 49.36 ± 6.95
   Physical domain 0∼100 21 92 56.46 ± 12.49
   Psychological domain 0∼100 12 67 40.55 ± 11.94
   Social domain 0∼100 3 96 60.87 ± 17.0
   Common symptom & side-effect domain 0∼100 7 75 45.67 ± 12.39
   Specific domain 0∼100 7 96 41.11 ± 13.31
Table 2.
Differences of Illness Perception, Health Belief, and Quality of Life according to General Characteristics (N= 200)
Characteristics Categories n (%) or M ± SD Illness perception Health belief Quality of life
M ± SD t or F (p) M ± SD t or F (p) M ± SD t or F (p)
Age (yr) <40 31 (15.5) 47.55 ± 5.12 0.45 192.10 ± 9.89 a 5.82 52.52 ± 4.47 a 4.85
40∼49 70 (35.0) 46.27 ± 6.97 (.716) 193.51 ± 14.88 b (.001) 50.36 ± 6.53 b (.003)
50∼59 72 (36.0) 46.44 ± 6.98   182.94 ± 20.01 c b> a> c> d 47.76 ± 7.18 c a> b> c> d
≥60 27 (13.5) 47.63 ± 7.66   181.22 ± 26.01 d   47.41 ± 8.21 d  
  49.34 ± 9.01            
Race Han 106 (53.0) 47.40 ± 7.80 1.44 188.09 ± 19.48 0.02 48.09 ± 7.99 a 4.18
Korean 80 (40.0) 46.18 ± 5.65 (.239) 187.54 ± 18.76 (.978) 51.03 ± 5.27 b (.017)
Others 14 (7.0) 44.64 ± 3.41   187.50 ± 13.23   49.43 ± 5.05 c b> a
Marital status Married 158 (79.0) 47.13 ± 7.28 2.87 187.54 ± 20.20 0.18 48.68 ± 7.25 8.05
Others 42 (21.0) 45.14 ± 4.22 (.092) 188.93 ± 11.95 (.670) 52.10 ± 4.73 (.005)
Education Elementary 27 (13.5) 45.15 ± 7.19 a 1.97 170.41 ± 33.42 a 11.20 45.33 ± 8.86 a 4.90
Middle school 61 (30.5) 46.82 ± 6.58 b (.020) 187.75 ± 15.77 b (<.001) 48.90 ± 6.79 b (.003)
High school 83 (41.5) 46.87 ± 5.91 c d d> c> b> a 191.77 ± 9.85 c d d> c> b> a 50.99 ± 5.66 c d c> b> a
≥ College 29 (14.5) 49.24 ± 8.68 d   192.93 ± 16.70 d   49.41 ± 7.35 d  
Living area City 124 (62.0) 47.60 ± 7.16 5.73 188.60 ± 17.04 0.54 49.93 ± 6.72 2.19
Rural 76 (38.0) 45.26 ± 5.91 (.018) 186.58 ± 21.31 (.461) 48.43 ± 7.26 (.141)
Job Yes 99 (49.5) 46.53 ± 6.56 0.15 191.02 ± 15.11 5.81 50.58 ± 6.36 6.15
No 101 (50.5) 46.90 ± 7.05 (.697) 184.70 ± 21.35 (.017) 48.17 ± 7.32 (.014)
Monthly income (Yuan) <1,000 66 (33.0) 47.32 ± 7.67 a b 4.38 185.82 ± 19.95 1.24 47.06 ± 7.81 a b 4.10
1,000∼2,000 65 (32.5) 45.42 ± 5.55 b c (.005) 186.46 ± 21.59 (.296) 50.80 ± 5.65 b c (.008)
2,000∼4,000 49 (24.5) 45.80 ± 4.60 c d d> c> b> a 192.14 ± 11.75   50.65 ± 6.15 c b> c
>4,000 20 (10.0) 51.20 ± 9.77 d   188.35 ± 18.24   49.10 ± 8.03 b> a
Family history of breast cancer Yes 65 (32.5) 45.14 ± 3.04 5.30 190.49 ± 12.02 1.95 51.35 ± 5.32 8.21
No 135 (67.5) 47.47 ± 7.90 (.022) 186.55 ± 21.17 (.164) 48.40 ± 7.44 (.005)
Postoperative period (month) <1 57 (28.5) 48.82 ± 8.53 2.35 186.88 ± 20.00 a 3.21 46.84 ± 8.96 a 3.71
1∼3 83 (41.5) 46.01 ± 6.07 (.055) 190.41 ± 14.72 b (.014) 50.11 ± 6.10 b (.013)
3∼6 27 (13.5) 46.81 ± 5.37   190.00 ± 17.05 c c> a 49.71 ± 7.30 c b> a
≥6 33 (16.5) 44.76 ± 5.36   181.21 ± 25.04 d b> a 43.00 ± 7.02 d c> d
Economic burden Light 78 (39.0) 46.65 ± 6.33 0.01 189.58 ± 14.42 1.11 50.85 ± 6.36 5.99
Heavy 122 (61.0) 46.75 ± 7.10 (.919) 186.71 ± 21.04 (.293) 48.41 ± 7.17 (.015)
Payment method Pocket money 22 (11.0) 44.55 ± 2.50 1.10 193.00 ± 9.12 a 3.13 51.86 ± 4.19 a 4.78
Health insurance 83 (41.5) 47.46 ± 7.77 (.352) 186.67 ± 18.99 b (.027) 49.04 ± 7.43 b (.003)
Rural health services s 68 (34.0) 46.60 ± 6.27   184.41 ± 22.60 c d> c 47.62 ± 7.41 c d> c
Government subsidy y 27 (13.5) 46.48 ± 7.12   195.78 ± 6.90 d d> b 52.70 ± 3.87 d d> b
Number of chemotherapy 1∼2 68 (34.0) 47.88 ± 7.85 1.14 188.76 ± 17.87 1.85 48.97 ± 6.59 a 4.21
3∼4 84 (42.0) 45.94 ± 5.92 (.335) 190.17 ± 18.33 (.139) 51.04 ± 6.72 b (.007)
5∼6 30 (15.0) 46.77 ± 5.07   182.63 ± 17.87   47.87 ± 7.49 c b> a
≥6 18 (9.0) 45.83 ± 8.57   182.06 ± 23.64   45.50 ± 6.62  
Stage of disease Stage 1 28 (14.0) 48.04 ± 9.16 1.84 191.21 ± 14.09 0.74 47.89 ± 7.45 2.50
Stage 2 89 (44.5) 47.40 ± 7.45 (0.14) 185.81 ± 22.51 (.530) 48.36 ± 7.31 (.060)
Stage 3 62 (31.0) 45.95 ± 5.02   189.06 ± 16.41   50.98 ± 6.38  
Stage 4 21 (10.5) 44.29 ± 3.51   188.24 ± 11.91   50.76 ± 5.5  
Whether to keep breasts or not Yes 30 (15.0) 44.97 ± 4.21 2.35 192.90 ± 9.58 2.60 51.37 ± 5.26 2.97
No 170 (85.0) 47.02 ± 7.11 (0.13) 186.94 ± 19.82 (.108) 49.01 ± 7.16 (.086)
Table 3.
Correlations between Sub-factors of Illness Perception, Health belief, and Quality of Life (N= 200)
Variables 1 1–1 1–2 1–3 2 2–1 2–2 2–3 2–4 2–5 3 3–1 3–2 3–3 3–4 3–5
1. Illness perception 1                              
   1–1. Cognitive illness representation .79** 1                            
   1–2. Emotional representation .76** .36** 1                          
   1–3. Illness understanding .58* .15** .33** 1                        
2. Health belief .25** .21** .23** .06 1                      
   2–1. Personal health belief .17* .14** .13 .07 .82** 1                    
   2–2. Implementation ability .15** .17** .11 .01 .71** .66** 1                  
   2–3. Control ability .08 .01 .06 .14* .60** .45** .50** 1                
   2–4. Resource utilization .04 .02 .06 .00 .74** .47** .44** .41** 1              
   2–5. Feel the threat .34** .27** .43** –.01 .64** .31** .28** .19** .26** 1            
3. Quality of life –.05 .05 .09 –.32** .35** .23** .21** .16* .19** .41** 1          
   3–1. Physical domain –.04 –.06 –.03 .03 .16* .17* .27** .29** .17*- –.04 .35** 1        
   3–2. Psychological domain –.15* .10 .09 –.35** .33** .23** .12 .04 .18* .43** .72** .02 1      
   3–3. Social domain .04 –.08 .18* .01 .18* .13 .14 .19** .22**- –.50- –.01 .01 –.02 1    
   3–4. Common symptom/side effect domain –.12 –.05 –.04 –.20** .13 .08 .07 .07 .06 .10 .59** .04 .49**- –.13 1  
   3–5. Specific domain .05 .10 .13 –.20** .15* .07- –.01 –.02 .01 .36** .71** .02 .40**- –.20** .31** 1

* p<.05,

** p<.01.

Table 4.
Variables Influencing on Quality of Life of Participants
Variables Model 1 Model 2 Model 3
β (p) β (p) β (p)
Age –.23 (.012) –.18 (.030) –.16 (.057)
Marital status .18 (.011) .14 (.035) .12 (.063)
Job –.13 (.129) –.15 (.083) –.05 (.554)
Postoperative period –.06 (.409) –.10 (.129) –.01 (.883)
Family history of breast cancer –.10 (.151) –.04 (.564) –.01 (.842)
Emotional representation   .19 (.009) .05 (.542)
Illness understanding   –.38 (<.001) –.33 (<.001)
Personal health belief     .05 (.590)
Implementation ability     –.00 (.993)
Control ability     .07 (.388)
Resource utilization     .01 (.848)
Feel the threat     .31 (<.001)
F (p) 3.51 (<.001) 5.15 (<.001) 5.38 (<.001)
R2 (Adj. R2) .20 (.141) .31 (.251) .39 (.317)
TOOLS
Similar articles