Journal List > J Korean Ophthalmol Soc > v.60(9) > 1133071

Park, Yang, Park, Lee, Park, and Lee: Effectiveness of Cyclosporine-steroid Treatment after Cataract Surgery according to Dry Eye Severity

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate the effectiveness of topically administered 0.05% cyclosporine combined with a topical steroid in the early postoperative period after cataract surgery, and to compare the therapeutic efficacy according to the severity of dry eye.

Methods

One hundred and fifty-six patients who underwent unilateral cataract surgery and received topical cyclosporine 0.05% for 8 weeks combined with a fluorometholone 0.1% steroid for 4-weeks were classified into three groups according to preoperative dry eye level: the control group, non-dry eye (n = 78); group 1, level I dry eye (n = 38); and group 2, level II dry eye (n = 40). The best-corrected distance visual acuity, intraocular pressure, dry eye symptom questionnaire (ocular surface disease index), tear film break-up time (TBUT), and Schirmer test-I (STI) were evaluated.

Results

The preoperative score of dry eye symptoms improved significantly at one week postoperatively and continued to improve until postoperative 8-weeks in all groups, especially in group 2 compared with the control. Groups 1 and 2 showed significant improvement in the TBUT at one week, four weeks, and eight weeks postoperatively, compared to eight weeks postoperatively in the control; Group 2, especially, showed significant improvement in TBUT. There was no difference in STI value after cyclosporine-steroid treatment in the control group; however, a significant difference was observed at four weeks postoperatively in dry eyes. No significant differences in STI results were observed among the three groups.

Conclusions

Use of topical cyclosporine 0.05% combined with a topical fluorometholone 0.1% steroid after cataract surgery is more effective in dry eyes level II than in non-dry eyes, especially those with TBUT and dry eye symptoms at eight weeks postoperatively.

Figures and Tables

Figure 1

Schematic flow chart of this study. The BCDVA, IOP, STI, TBUT, and OSDI questionnaire were performed or administered at 1-week, 4-weeks, and 8-weeks postoperatively. BCDVA = best corrected distant visual acuity; IOP = intraocular pressure; STI = Schirmer test I; TBUT = tear film break-up time; OSDI = ocular surface disease index score.

jkos-60-821-g001
Figure 2

Changes of ocular surface disease index (OSDI) score after cataract surgery. The OSDI score improved significantly at postoperative 1-week and continuously improved until postoperative 8-weeks in all three groups. W = weeks; m = months. *Significant improvement (one-way analysis of variance, p < 0.05) compared with preoperative values.

jkos-60-821-g002
Figure 3

Changes of tear film break-up time (TBUT) after cataract surgery. In the control group, the TBUT improved significantly at postoperative 8-weeks. The Group 1 showed significant improvement in the TBUT at 1-week, 4-weeks, and 8-weeks postoperatively. In the Group 2, the TBUT also improved significantly at 1-week, 4-weeks, and 8-weeks postoperatively. W = weeks; m = months. *Significant improvement (one-way analysis of variance, p < 0.05) compared with preoperative values.

jkos-60-821-g003
Figure 4

Changes of Schirmer test I (STI) after cataract surgery. In the Group 1 and Group 2, the STI improved significantly at postoperative 4-weeks. W = weeks; m = months. *Significant improvement (one-way analysis of variance, p < 0.05) compared with preoperative values.

jkos-60-821-g004
Figure 5

The magnitude of changes in the preoperative dry eye after cataract surgery compared among all the three groups. The OSDI score improvement of group 2 was significantly larger than that of control group at postoperative 8-weeks. The tear film break-up time (TBUT) improvement was significantly larger in group 1 and group 2, compared to control group at postoperative 1-week. There was significant difference in TBUT improvement only between the group 2 and the control group at postoperative 4- and 8-weeks. OSDI = ocular surface disease index; W = weeks; STI = Schirmer test I. *Significant difference (p < 0.05) among the three groups.

jkos-60-821-g005
Table 1

The baseline characteristics of each group

jkos-60-821-i001

Data were compared between each individual treatment group and the control group at 1 week and 1 and 2 months. One-way analysis of variance was used to compare between each group. Significance was indicated at p < 0.05. Values are presented as mean ± standard deviation unless otherwise indicated.

M:F = male:female; BCDVA = the best corrected distant visual acuity; logMAR = the logarithm of minimal angle of resolution; IOP = intraocular pressure; TBUT = tear film break-up time; OSDI = ocular surface disease index score.

Notes

This study was supported by a grant from University Research Park Project of Busan National University funded by Busan Innovation Institute of Industry, Science & Technology Planning.

Conflicts of Interest The authors have no conflicts to disclose.

References

1. Khanal S, Tomlinson A, Esakowitz L, et al. Changes in corneal sensitivity and tear physiology after phacoemulsification. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2008; 28:127–134.
crossref
2. Kohlhaas M. Corneal sensation after cataract and refractive surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1998; 24:1399–1409.
crossref
3. Li XM, Hu L, Hu J, Wang W. Investigation of dry eye disease and analysis of the pathogenic factors in patients after cataract surgery. Cornea. 2007; 26(9 Suppl 1):S16–S20.
crossref
4. Donnenfeld ED, Solomon R, Roberts CW, et al. Cyclosporine 0.05% to improve visual outcomes after multifocal intraocular lens implantation. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010; 36:1095–1100.
crossref
5. Chung YW, Oh TH, Chung SK. The effect of topical cyclosporine 0.05% on dry eye after cataract surgery. Korean J Ophthalmol. 2013; 27:167–171.
crossref
6. Sahli E, Hoşal BM, Zilelioğlu G, et al. The effect of topical cyclosporine A on clinical findings and cytological grade of the disease in patients with dry eye. Cornea. 2010; 29:1412–1416.
crossref
7. Baiza-Durán L, Medrano-Palafox J, Hernández-Quintela E, et al. A comparative clinical trial of the efficacy of two different aqueous solutions of cyclosporine for the treatment of moderate-to-severe dry eye syndrome. Br J Ophthalmol. 2010; 94:1312–1315.
8. Report of the Definition and Classification Subcommittee of the International Dry Eye WorkShop. The definition and classification of dry eye disease. Ocul Surf. 2007; 5:75–92.
9. Schiffman RM, Christianson MD, Jacobsen G, et al. Reliability and validity of the Ocular Surface Disease Index. Arch Ophthalmol. 2000; 118:615–621.
crossref
10. Lemp MA. Report of the National Eye Institute/Industry workshop on Clinical Trials in Dry Eyes. CLAO J. 1995; 21:221–232.
11. Kasetsuwan N, Satitpitakul V, Changul T, Jariyakosol S. Incidence and pattern of dry eye after cataract surgery. PLoS one. 2013; 8:e78657.
crossref
12. Liu Z, Luo L, Zhang Z, et al. Tear film changes after phacoemulsification. Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi. 2002; 38:274–277.
13. Cho YK, Kim MS. Dry eye after cataract surgery and associated intraoperative risk factors. Korean J Ophthalmol. 2009; 23:65–73.
crossref
14. Müller LJ, Vrensen GF, Pels L, et al. Architecture of human corneal nerves. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1997; 38:985–994.
15. Roberts CW, Elie ER. Dry eye symptoms following cataract surgery. Insight. 2007; 32:14–21.
16. Wilson WS, Duncan AJ, Jay JL. Effect of benzalkonium chloride on the stability of the precorneal tear film in rabbit and man. Br J Ophthalmol. 1975; 59:667–669.
crossref
17. Zabel RW, Mintsioulis G, MacDonald IM, et al. Corneal toxic changes after cataract extraction. Can J Ophthalmol. 1989; 24:311–316.
18. Al-Aqaba MA, Fares U, Suleman H, et al. Architecture and distribution of human corneal nerves. Br J Ophthalmol. 2010; 94:784–789.
crossref
19. Hamada S, Moore TCB, Moore JE, et al. Assessment of the effect of cyclosporine A 0.05% emulsion on the ocular surface and corneal sensation following cataract surgery. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2016; 39:15–19.
20. Choi W, Yoon KC. Effect of 0.1% sodium hyaluronate and 0.05% cyclosporine on tear film parameters after cataract surgery. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2011; 52:800–806.
crossref
21. Peyman GA, Sanders DR, Batlle JF, et al. Cyclosporine 0.05% ophthalmic preparation to aid recovery from loss of corneal sensitivity after LASIK. J Refract Surg. 2008; 24:337–343.
crossref
22. Sall K, Stevenson OD, Mundorf TK, Reis BL. Two multicenter, randomized studies of the efficacy and safety of cyclosporine ophthalmic emulsion in moderate to severe dry eye disease. CsA Phase 3 Study Group. Ophthalmology. 2000; 107:631–639.
23. Lee HS, Jang JY, Lee SH, et al. Clinical effectiveness of topical cyclosporine a 0.05% after laser epithelial keratomileusis. Cornea. 2013; 32:e150–e155.
crossref
24. Ursea R, Purcell TL, Tan BU, et al. The effect of cyclosporine A (Restasis) on recovery of visual acuity following LASIK. J Refract Surg. 2008; 24:473–476.
crossref
25. Sheppard JD, Scoper SV, Samudre S. Topical loteprednol pretreatment reduces cyclosporine stinging in chronic dry eye disease. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther. 2011; 27:23–27.
crossref
26. Cho P, Yap M. Schirmer test. II. A clinical study of its repeatability. Optom Vis Sci. 1993; 70:157–159.
crossref
27. Massingale ML, Li X, Vallabhajosyula M, et al. Analysis of inflammatory cytokines in the tears of dry eye patients. Cornea. 2009; 28:1023–1027.
crossref
28. Byun YJ, Kim TI, Kwon SM, et al. Efficacy of combined 0.05% cyclosporine and 1% methylprednisolone treatment for chronic dry eye. Cornea. 2012; 31:509–513.
crossref
29. Toker E, Asfuroğlu E. Corneal and conjunctival sensitivity in patients with dry eye: the effect of topical cyclosporine therapy. Cornea. 2010; 29:133–140.
crossref
TOOLS
Similar articles