Journal List > Lab Med Online > v.9(3) > 1131952

Lim and Baek: A Case of False-negative Malaria Rapid Diagnostic Test Induced by Treatment with Doxycycline

Abstract

Rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) for malaria using antibodies against pan-Plasmodium antigen lactate dehydrogenase (pLDH) are commonly used for malaria diagnosis. The level of malaria parasitemia determined by peripheral blood smears (PBS) correlates with the pLDH concentration in most cases. We report a case of malaria recurrence associated with false-negative RDT results. A 22-year-old male patient was admitted to the Armed Forces Capital Hospital with fever and chills, and was diagnosed with malaria infection. Four days after antimalarial treatment, these symptoms recurred. After admitting to our hospital, doxycycline was administered for 4 days. Even after administration of doxycycline, the malaria parasites in blood smears remained positive, but RDT showed negative results. Therefore, for patients receiving doxycycline, serial blood smear testing should be performed to exclude false-negative malaria RDT results.

INTRODUCTION

Rapid diagnostics tests (RDTs) using anti-pan-Plasmodium lactate dehydrogenase (pLDH) antibody have been widely used along with peripheral blood smears (PBS) for the diagnosis of malaria. Malaria parasitemia, as determined by PBS, correlates with pLDH concentration in most cases [1]. Here, we report a case of malaria recurrence associated with false-negative RDT results, suggesting that caution must be exercised in the diagnosis of malaria when using anti-pLDH antibody.

CASE

A 22-year-old man was admitted to the hospital following 4 days of fever and chills. One month prior, the patient, with no remarkable medical history, was admitted to the Armed Forces Capital Hospital and was diagnosed with malaria. He was administered chloroquine for 3 days and primaquine for 11 days, and his symptoms subsided. However, the symptoms recurred 4 days before admission to our hospital. On admission, his leukocyte count was 6,400/µL; hemoglobin, 14.8 g/dL; platelet, 78,000/µL; and C-reactive protein was elevated, 3.61 mg/dL. No pathogens were isolated from sputum or throat cultures. PBS was performed and more than 300 fields were examined at high magnification (×400). At the time of admission, both PBS and RDT (Malaria Ag Pf/Pan test, Standard Diagnostics, Yongin, Korea) results were negative.
Due to negative RDT and PBS results and low clinical suspicion of malaria reinfection or recurrence, clinicians initiated a course of doxycycline for suspected epidemic hemorrhagic fever (EHF). On the 3rd day of hospitalization, PBS was repeated and yielded a positive result with a titer of 1,131/µL, rising to 1,360/µL on the 5th day. However, RDTs performed on both days remained negative. The patient was administered hydroxychloroquine and primaquine, and PBS results were negative after three days of treatment; he was discharged 10 days after admission (Fig. 1).
To evaluate the inconsistency between the RDT and PBS results on the 3rd and 5th days, the RDT was re-evaluated using internal quality control samples, but the results did not differ. A prozone phenomenon due to a high level of pLDH has been previously described [2], so to investigate this potential explanation, the specimens were diluted 2 and 4 times with normal saline; however, the results of this test were also negative.

DISCUSSION

Diagnosis of malaria based only on RDTs is cost-effective and operationally advantageous, since RDTs are easy to perform and provide results rapidly [3]. Most RDTs detect parasite histidine-rich protein 2 (pHRP-2) and pLDH from Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium spp., respectively. While the pHRP-2 antigen can be detected up to 40 days post-antibiotics treatment [4], the pLDH antigen has very short half-life of less than 2 days, and the median time on treatment for this test to become negative was reported as just 2 days [5]. Even though RDTs show good correlation with PBS results and can be used for evaluation of the treatment response and follow-up, low blood levels of pLDH can lead to false-negative results [16]. We were not able to evaluate the pLDH level in this patient's sample; the parasitemia was much higher than that reported previously with low detectable pLDH (<1,000/µL) [16]. Similarly, Jang et al. [1] reported 7 cases of high parasitemia with low pLDH levels, but did not provide additional detailed data regarding treatment history. pLDH levels reflect the level of viable parasitemia [7], and the World Health Organization guidelines also state that parasitemia is the most important criteria for confident diagnosis [8].
In this case, we suspect that doxycycline administration may have influenced the RDT results. Doxycycline exhibits antimicrobial activity via inhibition of bacterial cell wall synthesis and eliminates malarial parasites in hepatocytes. Due to its effectiveness, doxycycline is administered as a therapeutic and preventive drug for malaria [9]. Despite a lack of studies reporting a direct association between doxycycline treatment and RDT results, Pasricha et al. [10] showed that 50% of patients with malarial infection and negative PBS and RDT results at the time of admission, had a history of treatment with doxycycline. Even though anti-malarial drugs decrease the number of parasites in the blood [11], in our case, the malarial parasite titers were not low. These reports suggest that antibiotics administration lowered the pLDH concentration due to a decreased number of viable parasites, resulting in false-negative RDT results. Therefore, in patients receiving doxycycline, serial PBS testing should be performed to exclude false-negative malarial RDT results. Further studies are required to elucidate the effect of doxycycline administration on RDT results.

Figures and Tables

Fig. 1

Flow chart of diagnostic tests and treatments.

Abbreviations: HD, hospital day of admission; RDT, rapid diagnostic test; PBS, peripheral blood smear; Neg, negative; Pos, positive.
lmo-9-194-g001

Notes

AUTHORS' DISCLOSURES OF POTENTIAL CONFLICTS OF INTEREST No potential conflicts of interest relevant to this article were reported.

References

1. Jang JW, Cho CH, Han ET, An SS, Lim CS. pLDH level of clinically isolated Plasmodium vivax and detection limit of pLDH based malaria rapid diagnostic test. Malar J. 2013; 12:181.
crossref
2. Gillet P, Scheirlinck A, Stokx J, De Weggheleire A, Chaúque HS, Canhanga OD, et al. Prozone in malaria rapid diagnostics tests: how many cases are missed? Malar J. 2011; 10:166.
crossref
3. Kim HS, Kang G, Lee S, Yoon CG, Kim M. Cost-benefit analysis of malaria chemoprophylaxis and early diagnosis for Korean soldiers in malaria risk regions. J Korean Med Sci. 2018; 33:e59.
crossref
4. Dalrymple U, Arambepola R, Gething PW, Cameron E. How long do rapid diagnostic tests remain positive after anti-malarial treatment? Malar J. 2018; 17:228.
crossref
5. Grandesso F, Nabasumba C, Nyehangane D, Page AL, Bastard M, De Smet M, et al. Performance and time to become negative after treatment of three malaria rapid diagnostic tests in low and high malaria transmission settings. Malar J. 2016; 15:496.
crossref
6. Fogg C, Twesigye R, Batwala V, Piola P, Nabasumba C, Kiguli J, et al. Assessment of three new parasite lactate dehydrogenase (pan-pLDH) tests for diagnosis of uncomplicated malaria. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2008; 102:25–31.
crossref
7. Piper R, Lebras J, Wentworth L, Hunt-Cooke A, Houzé S, Chiodini P, et al. Immunocapture diagnostic assays for malaria using Plasmodium lactate dehydrogenase (pLDH). Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1999; 60:109–118.
crossref
8. World Health Organization. Guidelines for the treatment of malaria - 3rd edition. Geneva: World Health Organization;2015. p. 27–30.
9. Gaillard T, Madamet M, Pradines B. Tetracyclines in malaria. Malar J. 2015; 14:445.
crossref
10. Pasricha JM, Juneja S, Manitta J, Whitehead S, Maxwell E, Goh WK, et al. Is serial testing required to diagnose imported malaria in the era of rapid diagnostic tests? Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2013; 88:20–23.
crossref
11. Miller RS, McDaniel P, Wongsrichanalai C. Following the course of malaria treatment by detecting parasite lactate dehydrogenase enzyme. Br J Haematol. 2001; 113:558–559.
crossref
TOOLS
ORCID iDs

Eun Jung Baek
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5477-6486

Similar articles