Journal List > J Korean Acad Nurs > v.49(4) > 1131260

Wang, Xu, Wang, and Zhu: The Mediating Effects of Learning Motivation on the Association between Perceived Stress and Positive-Deactivating Academic Emotions in Nursing Students Undergoing Skills Training

Abstract

Purpose

Nursing students experience a high degree of perceived stress during skills training. The resulting academic sentiment is worthy of research. This study examined the learning motivation as a mediator in the association between perceived stress and positive deactivating academic emotions in nursing students undergoing skills training.

Methods

A survey was conducted on 386 third-year undergraduate nursing students at a university in Changchun, China, in 2017. The survey included the items on perceived stress, learning motivation during nursing skill training, and general academic emotion. There were 381 valid responses (response rate=98.7%). Based on the results of partial correlation and stepwise multiple regression equations, the study examined the mediation model between perceived stress, learning motivation and positive-deactivating academic emotions using process 2.16 (a plug-in specifically used to test mediation or moderation effect in SPSS).

Results

There was a significant negative correlation between students’ perceived stress and learning motivation during nursing skills training and positive-deactivating academic emotions. Nervousness, loss of control, and interest in developing reputation had significant predictive effects on positive-deactivating academic emotions. The mediating model was well supported.

Conclusion

Learning motivation during nursing skills training lessened the damage of perceived stress on positive-deactivating academic emotions. Improving students’ motivation to learn could reduce their perceived stress and build more positive emotions. Positive emotions during learning played an important role in helping nursing students improve skills and enhance their nursing competence.

References

1. Pekrun R. Emotion and achievement during adolescence. Child Development Perspectives. 2017; 11(3):215–221. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12237.
crossref
2. Pekrun R, Goetz T, Titz W, Perry RP. Academic emotions in students’ self-regulated learning and achievement: A program of qualitative and quantitative research. Educational Psychologist. 2002; 37(2):91–105. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3702_4.
crossref
3. Ma H. [Development of the general academic emotion questionnaire for college students]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology. 2008; 16(6):594–596. Chinese.https://doi.org/10.16128/j.cnki.1005-3611.2008.06.015.
4. Jiang Z, Xu Z. [The relationship among middle school students’ academic emotions, resilience and school-work achievement]. China Journal of Health Psychology. 2017; 25(2):290–293. Chinese.https://doi.org/10.13342/j.cnki.cjhp.2017.02.034.
5. He L, Deng H, Li X. [Study on correlation between professional identity and academic emotions of undergraduate nursing students]. Chinese Evidence-Based Nursing. 2017; 3(6):612–615. Chinese.https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.2095-8668.2017.06.012.
6. Zhao L. [The effect of group counselling on academic emotions of vocational nursing students]. China Journal of Health Psychology. 2014; 22(03):396–398. Chinese.https://doi.org/10.13342/j.cnki.cjhp.2014.03.034.
7. Aherne D, Farrant K, Hickey L, Hickey E, McGrath L, Mc-Grath D. Mindfulness based stress reduction for medical students: Optimising student satisfaction and engagement. BMC Medical Education. 2016; 16(1):209–219. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-016-0728-8.
crossref
8. Neville HA, Heppner PP, Wang LF. Relations among racial identity attitudes, perceived stressors, and coping styles in African American college students. Journal of Counseling & Development. 1997; 75(4):303–311. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6676.1997.tb02345.x.
crossref
9. Wakim N. Occupational stressors, stress perception levels, and coping styles of medical surgical RNs: A generational perspective. The Journal of Nursing Administration. 2014; 44(12):632–639. https://doi.org/10.1097/nna.0000000000000140.
10. Passardi S, Peyk P, Rufer M, Plichta MM, Mueller-Pfeiffer C, Wingenbach TSH, et al. Impaired recognition of positive emotions in individuals with posttraumatic stress disorder, cumulative traumatic exposure, and dissociation. Psychotherapy & Psychosomatics. 2018; 87(2):118–120. https://doi.org/10.1159/000486342.
crossref
11. Liu S, Zhu M, Yu DJ, Rasin A, Young SD. Using real-time social media technologies to monitor levels of perceived stress and emotional state in college students: A Web-based questionnaire study. JMIR Mental Health. 2017; 4(1):e2. https://doi.org/10.2196/mental.5626.
crossref
12. Brooks SK, Chalder T, Rimes KA. Chronic fatigue syndrome: Cognitive, behavioural and emotional processing vulnerability factors. Behavioural & Cognitive Psychotherapy. 2017; 45(2):156–169. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1352465816000631.
crossref
13. Long C, Liu Z. [The mechanism of motivation influencing learning autonomy with mediating effect of learning competence]. Chinese Journal of Applied Psychology. 2016; 22(3):203–210. Chinese.https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1006-6020.2016.03.002.
14. You JW. Testing the three-way interaction effect of academic stress, academic self-efficacy, and task value on persistence in learning among Korean college students. Higher Education. 2018; 76(5):921–935. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-018-0255-0.
crossref
15. Zhang C, Liu H, Chen J, Xu L, Wang Z. [The relationship among previous academic achievement, academic motivation and strategies: The mediating effect of academic emotions]. Journal of Psychological Science. 2017; 40(6):1365–1371. Chinese.https://doi.org/10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.20170614.
16. Hobfoll SE. Conservation of resources: A new attempt at conceptualizing stress. American Psychologist. 1989; 44(3):513–524. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.44.3.513.
crossref
17. Rappaport J. In praise of paradox: A social policy of empowerment over prevention. American Journal of Community Psychology. 1981; 9(1):1–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00896357.
crossref
18. Treloar AE. Sampling techniques. American Journal of Public Health and the Nations Health. 1954; 44(4):542–543. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.44.4.542-b.
crossref
19. Yang T, Huang H. [An epidemiological study on stress among urban residents in social transition period]. Chinese Journal of Epidemiology. 2003; 24(9):760–764. Chinese.https://doi.org/10.3760/j.issn:0254-6450.2003.09.004.
20. Cohen S, Kamarck T, Mermelstein R. A global measure of perceived stress. Journal of Health and Social Behavior. 1983; 24(4):385–396. https://doi.org/10.2307/2136404.
crossref
21. Feng AL, Wesely NC, Hoehle LP, Phillips KM, Yamasaki A, Campbell AP, et al. A validated model for the 22-item Sino-Nasal Outcome Test subdomain structure in chronic rhinosinusitis. International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology. 2017; 7(12):1140–1148. https://doi.org/10.1002/alr.22025.
crossref
22. Chi L, Xin Z. [The measure of learning motivation and the relationship between it and self-efficacy of college students]. Psychological Development and Education. 2006; 22(2):64–70. Chinese.https://doi.org/10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2006.02.012.
23. Bolin JH, Hayes Andrew F.2013; Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression‐ based approach. New York, NY: The Guilford Press. Journal of Educational Measurement. 2014. 51(3):335–337. https://doi.org/10.1111/jedm.12050.
24. Preacher KJ, Hayes AF. SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers. 2004; 36(4):717–731. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03206553.
crossref
25. Malhotra NK, Kim SS, Patil A. Common method variance in IS research: A comparison of alternative approaches and a reanalysis of past research. Management Science. 2006; 52(12):1865–1883. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1060.0597.
crossref
26. Franke N, Keinz P, Klausberger K. “Does this sound like a fair deal?”: Antecedents and consequences of fairness expectations in the individual’s decision to participate in firm innovation. Organization Science. 2013; 24(5):1495–1516. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1120.0794.
crossref
27. Wilkinson L. Statistical methods in psychology journals: Guidelines and explanations. American Psychologist. 1999; 54(8):594–604. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066x.54.8.594.
crossref
28. Thompson B. Effect sizes, confidence intervals, and confidence intervals for effect sizes. Psychology in the Schools. 2007; 44(5):423–432. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.20234.
crossref
29. Falk CF, Biesanz JC. Abstract: Inference and interval estimation for indirect effects with latent variable models. Multivariate Behavioral Research. 2011; 46(6):1012. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2011.636702.
crossref
30. Gao X, Ding B, Feng S, Xing S. [The joint effects of paternal and maternal psychological control and children temperament on children problem behaviors: Diathesis stress or differential susceptibility]. Psychological Development & Education. 2018; 34(1):28–37. Chinese.https://doi.org/10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2018.01.04.
31. Han L, Liao C, Zhang J. [Stressful life events and subjective well-being: Multiple mediating modes of emotion regulation and resilience]. Chinese Journal of Special Education. 2016; 197(11):75–81.
37. Chinese. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1007-3728.2016.11.013.
32. Reichenberger J, Kuppens P, Liedlgruber M, Wilhelm FH, Tiefengrabner M, Ginzinger S, et al. No haste, more taste: An EMA study of the effects of stress, negative and positive emotions on eating behavior. Biological Psychology. 2018; 131:54–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2016.09.002.
crossref
33. Shi G, Cui L, Lei L, Zheng R. [Stress, affect and resilience in college students]. Chinese Mental Health Journal. 2013; 27(9):703–708. Chinese.https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1000-6729.2013.09.013.
34. Lüftenegger M, Klug J, Harrer K, Langer M, Spiel C, Schober B. Students’ achievement goals, learning-related emotions and academic achievement. Frontiers in Psychology. 2016; 7:603. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00603.
crossref
35. Delahaij R, Dam KV. Coping with acute stress in the military: The influence of coping style, coping self-efficacy and appraisal emotions. Personality and Individual Differences. 2017; 119:13–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.06.021.
crossref
36. Gloria CT, Steinhardt MA. Relationships among positive emotions, coping, resilience and mental health. Stress and Health. 2016; 32(2):145–156. https://doi.org/10.1002/smi.2589.
crossref
37. Wang Z, Liu Y, Jiang C. The effect of low versus high approach-motivated positive affect on cognitive control. Acta Psychologica Sinica. 2013; 45(5):546–555. http://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1041.2013.00546.
crossref
38. Hsu D, Kakade SM, Zhang T. Random design analysis of ridge regression. Foundations of Computational Mathematics. 2014; 14(3):569–600. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10208-014-9192-1.
crossref
39. Visser CLF, Wilschut JA, Isik U, van der Burgt SME, Croiset G, Kusurkar RA. The association of readiness for interprofessional learning with empathy, motivation and professional identity development in medical students. BMC Medical Education. 2018; 18(1):125. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-018-1248-5.
crossref

Figure 1.
Hypothesis of the mediation model.
jkan-49-495f1.tif
Table 1.
Stress Perception, Learning Motivation and PDAE among Nursing Students (N=381)
Men (n=44) Women (n=337) X2 F p
Rural areas 18 128 .43 .806>.05
Towns 9 84
Cities 17 125
Age (yr) 20.27±1.02 20.43±1.08 1.31 .362>.05
Total score for perceived stress 23.55±7.01 22.68±6.68 0.09 .423>.05
  Nervousness 18.07±4.44 17.80±4.08 0.89 .680>.05
  Loss of control 19.48±3.43 18.89±3.18 0.46 .252>.05
Total score for learning motivation 115.48±31.27 127.84±24.42 6.18 .015<.05
  Interest in studying 36.30±10.59 40.95±8.91 2.29 .002<.01
  Hankering for capability 31.75±8.15 34.43±5.70 13.34 .040<.05
  Interest in developing reputation 21.27±7.94 22.97±7.02 1.85 .138>.05
  Tendency toward altruism 26.16±8.64 29.49±6.49 11.31 .017<.05
PDAE 60.43±12.43 64.01±10.00 0.84 .031<.05
  Pride 28.66±6.59 30.73±5.07 2.43 .015<.05
  Relief 31.77±6.47 33.28±5.83 0.02 .112>.05

PDAE=Positive-deactivating academic emotions.

Table 2.
Bivariate Correlations among Variables (N=381)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
1- perceived stress 1
2- nervousness .94*** 1
3- loss of control .89*** .67*** 1
4- learning motivation -.24*** -.24*** -.19*** 1
5- interest in studying -.38*** -.39*** -.30*** .89*** 1
6- hankering for -.28*** -.30*** -.20*** .85*** .73*** 1
capability
7- interest in developing .01 .02 -.00 .82*** .56*** .55*** 1
reputation
8- tendency toward -.15** -.14** -.13* .92*** .74*** .70*** .76*** 1
altruism
9- PDAE -.49*** -.48*** -.41*** .54*** .61*** .48*** .33*** .43*** 1
10- pride -.39*** -.39*** -.32*** .57*** .59*** .51*** .39*** .48*** .91*** 1
11- relief -.51*** -.49*** -.43*** .43*** .53*** .38*** .23*** .32*** .93*** .70*** 1

PDAE=Positive-deactivating academic emotions.

* p<.05; **p<.01; ***p<.001.

Table 3.
Summary of Stepwise Regression Analysis (<.001)
Independent Variable R R2 ΔR2 ΔF B β Tolerance VIF CI
Gender .11 .01 .01 4.71* .72 .02 .97 1.03 7.50
Interest in studying .61 .38 .36 219.86*** *** .69 .42 .51 1.96 10.86
Nervousness .67 .44 .07 46.82*** * -.72 -.23 .48 2.08 16.67
Loss of control .67 .45 .01 5.76* -.41 -.13 .54 1.84 22.29
Interest in developing reputation .68 .46 .01 4.27* .14 .10 .62 1.62 29.57

VIF=Variance inflation factor; CI=Conditional index.

* p<.05; **p<.01; ***p<.001.

TOOLS
Similar articles