INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Cells, virus, and antibody
Cold adaptation of PEDV
Virus titration
Nucleotide sequence analyses
Multiple alignments and phylogenetic analyses
Animal infection experiments and clinical assessments
Quantitative real-time RT-PCR
Histopathology and immunohistochemistry of the small intestines
Virus neutralization
Statistical analysis
RESULTS
Isolation and characterization of a PEDV Aram strain
![]() | Fig. 1Cytopathology and growth properties of PEDV G2b isolate Aram. (A) CPE formation in Vero cells infected with Aram-P5 virus. PEDV-specific CPE was observed daily, and cells were photographed at 24 hpi using an inverted microscope at a magnification of 200× (left panels). For immunostaining, infected cells were fixed at 24 hpi and incubated with MAb against the N protein, followed by incubation with Alexa green-conjugated goat anti-mouse secondary antibody. The cells were then examined under a fluorescence microscope at 200× magnification (left panels). (B) One-step growth kinetics for Aram-P5. At the indicated time points post-infection, culture supernatants were harvested from Aram-P5-infected Vero cells, and virus titers were determined.
CPE, cytopathic effects; PEDV, porcine epidemic diarrhea virus; DAPI, 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole; TCID, tissue culture infectious dose.
|
![]() | Fig. 2Sequence alignments of the N-terminal region of the S protein (A) and the C-terminal region of ORF3 (B) of global PEDV strains. Genetic subgroups of PEDV are indicated in parenthesis on the left. The dashes (–) indicate deleted sequences. Potential N-glycosylation sites in the S protein predicted by the NetNGlyc 1.0 server (http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/NetNGlyc/) are shown in boldface type. The S insertions-deletion genetic signature of G2 epidemic strains, that includes two discontinuous 4-aa and 1-aa insertions at positions 55/56 and 135/136 and one 2-aa DEL at positions 160 and 161 within S compared to the prototype CV777 strain, is shown in solid boxes. The Aram strain-specific DELs in S and ORFs are shaded. An alternative TAA stop codon (boldface) and a corresponding premature termination (asterisk) in nucleotide (top panel) and deduced amino acid (bottom panel) sequences of ORF3 are also indicated.
ORF, open reading frame; PEDV, porcine epidemic diarrhea virus; DEL, deletion.
|
![]() | Fig. 3Phylogenetic analyses based on the nucleotide sequences of the spike (S) genes (A) and full-length genomes (B) of the porcine epidemic diarrhea virus strains. A region of the S gene and the complete genome sequence of transmissible gastroenteritis virus were included as the outgroups in each tree. Multiple sequence alignments were performed using ClustalX software and phylogenetic trees were constructed from the aligned nucleotide sequences using the neighbor-joining method. Numbers at each branch are bootstrap values greater than 50% based on 1000 replicates. The names of the strains, countries and dates (year) of isolation, GenBank accession numbers, and genogroups and subgroups are shown. Solid circles indicate the Aram strains described in this study. Scale bars indicate nucleotide substitutions per site. |
Table 1
Summary of pig groups and corresponding numbers, inoculum, and pig diarrhea and death outcomes after inoculation

Immunogenicity of the cold-adapted Aram strains
![]() | Fig. 4Porcine epidemic diarrhea virus -specific neutralizing antibody responses of cold-adapted strains. Piglets at 3 weeks of age were inoculated orally with each cold-adapted Aram-CA strain. The serum samples were collected at the indicated time points and were tested by virus neutralization assay using Aram-P5. Neutralizing antibody titers for individual samples were presented as a log2 scale. Values are representative of the mean from three independent experiments in duplicate and error bars denote the mean ± standard deviation of the mean. |
Phenotypic and genotypic characteristics of the cold-adapted Aram-P29-CA strain
![]() | Fig. 5Schematic representation of amino acid differences between the parental Aram-P5 virus and its cold-adapted derivative Aram-P29-CA. The illustration on top represents the organization of the porcine epidemic diarrhea virus genome (approximately 28 kb). The coding region for each non-structural protein in ORFs 1a and 1b and for each structural protein is indicated. The lower panels symbolize the genomes of the parental Aram-P5 strain and its cold-adapted derivative, where the vertical lines denote silent substitutions (dotted) and non-silent aa substitutions (solid) in relation to the aa sequence of Aram-P5.
ORF, open reading frame.
|
Table 2
Changes of nucleotides and amino acids between the parental Aram-P5 and the cold adaptive P29-CA virus during in vitro serial passages

Pathogenicity of the cold-adapted Aram-P29-CA virus in neonatal piglets
![]() | Fig. 6Clinical significance scores and virus shedding in piglets inoculated with PEDV Aram-P5, -P29-CA, or mock. (A) Clinical significance scores were measured as described in the Materials and Methods section. (B) PEDV titers in rectal swap samples at each time point were determined by a quantitative real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction. The virus titers (log10 tissue culture infectious dose50/mL) are the mean virus titers from all pigs and error bars represent the mean ± standard deviation of the mean. The p values were calculated by comparing the parental (Aram-P5) virus- and cold-adapted (P29-CA) virus-inoculated groups using Student's t-test.
PEDV, porcine epidemic diarrhea virus.
*p < 0.001.
|
![]() | Fig. 7Macroscopic and microscopic small intestine lesions in piglets from three groups. (A-C) Small intestines from representative piglets inoculated with PEDV Aram-P5 (A), -P29-CA (B), or mock (C) were examined for gross lesions. Note that only piglets inoculated with the parental virus typical thin and transparent intestinal walls (panel A). (D-F) Hematoxylin and eosin-stained tissue sections of the jejunum from representative piglets inoculated with PEDV Aram-P5 (D), -P29-CA (E), or mock (F) (100× magnification). Jejunums from piglets infected with the virulent Aram-P5 strain showed acute diffuse, severe atrophic enteritis with villous shortening (panel D). The normal villous epithelium of the jejunums was recorded in pigs inoculated with Aram-P29-CA (panel E), and a mock-inoculated piglet (panel F). (G-I) Detection of PEDV antigen by IHC analysis of jejunum tissue sections from representative piglets inoculated with PEDV Aram-P5 (G), -P29-CA (H), or mock (I) (200× magnification). PEDV antigen signals appear as brown staining and were detected in epithelial cells of the jejunums of all PEDV Aram-P5-inoculated piglets (panel G). No PEDV antigen was detected in the jejunums of piglets inoculated with Aram-P29-CA (panel H), or a mock-inoculated piglet (panel I).
PEDV, porcine epidemic diarrhea virus.
|
Protective efficacy of the cold-adapted live attenuated Aram-P29-CA vaccine
![]() | Fig. 8Clinical significance scores, survival rates, and virus shedding in piglets from three experimental groups. Pregnant sows were primed/boosted orally with a live Aram-P29-CA vaccine at 2-week intervals pre-farrowing and their nursing piglets were challenged with virulent G2b PEDV at 4 days of age (A) Clinical significance scores were measured as described in the Materials and Methods section. (B) Survival rate of piglets from vaccinated (group 1), challenge-control (group 2), and negative-control (group 3) sows through 7 DPC. (C) PEDV titers in rectal swap samples at each time point were determined by quantitative real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction analysis. The virus titers (log10 tissue culture infectious dose50/mL) are the mean virus titers from all pigs and error bars represent the mean ± standard deviation of the mean. The p values were calculated by comparing the data from the vaccinated and unvaccinated sow groups after challenge using Student's t-test.
PEDV, porcine epidemic diarrhea virus; DPC, days post-challenge.
*p = 0.001 to 0.05; †
p < 0.001.
|
Neutralizing antibody responses of the cold-adapted live attenuated Aram-P29-CA vaccine
![]() | Fig. 9PEDV-specific neutralizing antibody responses in serum (A) and colostrum (B) samples of sows and sera (C) of their corresponding litters from three experimental groups. Pregnant sows were primed/boosted orally with a live Aram-P29-CA vaccine at 4 and 2 weeks pre-farrowing and their nursing piglets were challenged with virulent G2b PEDV at 4 days of age. The samples were collected at the indicated time points and were tested by virus neutralization assay using Aram-P5. Neutralizing antibody titers for individual samples were presented as a log2 scale. Values are representative of the mean from three independent experiments in duplicate and error bars denote the mean ± standard deviation of the mean. The p values were calculated by comparing the data from the vaccinated and unvaccinated sow groups after challenge using Student's t-test.
*p = 0.001 to 0.05; †
p < 0.001.
|