Journal List > J Korean Foot Ankle Soc > v.22(4) > 1130310

Lee, Nam, Ahn, Lee, Lee, Choi, and Lee: Surgical Treatment of Chronic Tophaceous Gout in the 1st Metatarso-Phalangeal Joint

Abstract

Purpose:

Chronic tophaceous gout is a painful and disabling inflammatory disease. Surgical treatment for chronic tophaceous gout is very difficult with many complications. This study evaluated the efficacy of shortening scarf osteotomy on the treatment of chronic tophaceous gout in the 1st metatarso-phalangeal (MTP) joint.

Materials and Methods:

From January 2006 to December 2015, 14 patients (19 cases) who underwent axial shortening scarf osteotomy for chronic tophaceous gout were reviewed. All patients were male. The average age at the time of surgery was 59.6 years (42∼66 years). The minimum follow-up was 24 months. Total removal of the tophi mass with the adhered medial capsule of the 1st MTP joint was attempted. Axial shortening scarf osteotomy was done on the 1st metatarsal shaft. The visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain and the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) forefoot score was assessed preoperatively and postoperatively. The range of motion (ROM) of the 1st MTP joint was also compared pre- and postoperatively.

Results:

The average size of the extracted tophaceous mass was 32 mm. The mean amount of the length of metatarsal shortening was 4.9 mm. The mean ROM of the 1st MTP joint was improved from 30.4° to 62.3°. The mean AOFAS forefoot score improved from 51.4 to 86.6 points. The mean VAS for pain improved from 4.6 to 0.3 points.

Conclusion:

The axial shortening scarf osteotomy used on chronic tophaceous gout could reconstruct the 1st MTP joint with an improved ROM and was free of pain. Axial shortening scarf osteotomy is suggested as a useful and effective method for the treatment of chronic tophaceous gout.

REFERENCES

1.Brook RA., Forsythe A., Smeeding JE., Lawrence Edwards N. Chronic gout: epidemiology, disease progression, treatment and disease burden. Curr Med Res Opin. 2010. 26:2813–21.
crossref
2.Poratt D., Rome K. Surgical Management of gout in the foot and ankle. A systematic review. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2016. 106:182–8.
3.Khanna D., Khanna PP., Fitzgerald JD., Singh MK., Bae S., Neogi T, et al. 2012 American College of Rheumatology guidelines for management of gout. Part 2: therapy and antiinflammatory prophylaxis of acute gouty arthritis. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2012. 64:1447–61.
crossref
4.Kemp TJ., Hirose CB., Coughlin MJ., Otto R. Treatment of chronic tophaceous gout with a wound vacuum-assisted device. Foot Ankle Int. 2010. 31:729–31.
crossref
5.Lin CT., Chang SC., Chen TM., Dai NT., Fu JP., Deng SC, et al. Free-flap resurfacing of tissue defects in the foot due to large gouty tophi. Microsurgery. 2011. 31:610–5.
crossref
6.Wünschel M., Wülker N., Walter C. Surgical treatment of a young patient with bilaterally destroyed first metatarsophalangeal joints suffering from gout. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2012. 102:334–7.
crossref
7.Kim YS., Park EH., Lee HJ., Koh YG. First metatarsophalangeal joint arthrodesis for the treatment of tophaceous gouty arthritis. Orthopedics. 2014. 37:e141–7.
crossref
8.Wang CC., Lien SB., Huang GS., Pan RY., Shen HC., Kuo CL, et al. Arthroscopic elimination of monosodium urate deposition of the first metatarsophalangeal joint reduces the recurrence of gout. Arthroscopy. Arthroscopy. 2009. 25:153–8.
crossref
9.Barouk LS. Forefoot reconstruction. 2nd ed.Paris: Springer;2005. p. 305–12.
10.Barouk LS., Barouk P. Joint-preserving surgery in rheumatoid forefoot: preliminary study with more-than-two-year followup. Foot Ankle Clin. 2007. 12:435–54. vi.
crossref
11.Coughlin MJ. Arthrodesis of the first metatarsophalangeal joint. Orthop Rev. 1990. 19:177–86.

Figure 1.
Preoperative radiograph (A) and clinical photograph (B).
jkfas-22-156f1.tif
Figure 2.
(A, B) Removal of tophi mass with medial capsule of 1st metatarso-phalangeal (MTP) joint. (C) The status of articular cartilage of the 1st MTP joint was checked and the entire articular cartilage was covered by the chalky white materials.
jkfas-22-156f2.tif
Figure 3.
For shortening the 1st metatarsal, we cut the 1st metatarsal on both ends of scarf osteotomy fragments (plantar and dorsal fragments). (A) Plantar fragment. The distance between the two arrows shows the length of shortening. (B) Dorsal fragment. The distance between the two arrows shows the length of shortening.
jkfas-22-156f3.tif
Figure 4.
After shortening scarf was done, we could achieve sufficient joint space (A; double-headed arrow) and improved range of motion of 1st metatarso-phalangeal joint compared to that of preoperative state. Passive dorsiflexion was improved after shortening at operation field (C) and follow-up (D) compared to that before shortening (B). Passive plantar flexion was improved after shortening at operation field (F) and follow-up (G) compared to that before shortening (E).
jkfas-22-156f4.tif
Figure 5.
Radiograph (A) and clinical photograph (B) at 4-year followup.
jkfas-22-156f5.tif
Table 1.
Size of Tophi Mass, Length of Shortened 1st Metatarsal (MT) Bone, Preoperative and Final Follow-up Range of Motion of Metatarso-Phalangeal Joint
Patient no. Side Age (yr) Sex Size of tophi mass (mm) Length of shortened MT (mm) Range of motion (°)
Preoperative Final follow-up
1 Right 64 Male 43 6 25 53
Left Male 38 5 25 50
2 Right 48 Male 34 4 25 60
Left Male 23 4 30 73
3 Right 64 Male 35 6 25 70
Left Male 47 6 28 65
4 Right 59 Male 19 4 40 65
Left Male 24 5 35 70
5 Right 64 Male 42 7 25 65
Left Male 32 4 30 65
6 Right 42 Male 32 5 25 55
7 Right 66 Male 12 4 40 75
8 Right 66 Male 39 6 35 70
9 Left 54 Male 16 4 35 53
10 Left 65 Male 39 5 20 45
11 Right 66 Male 39 5 35 65
12 Left 61 Male 36 5 30 65
13 Left 63 Male 24 4 40 70
14 Right 52 Male 34 4 30 50
Mean 59.6 32 4.9 30.4 62.3
Table 2.
Preoperative and Final Follow-up VAS of Pain and AOFAS Score
Patient no. Side VAS AOFAS forefoot score
Preoperative F/U Preoperative F/U
1 R 5 0 42 97
L 5 0 48 81
2 R 5 0 37 87
L 4 0 58 94
3 R 3 0 62 86
L 3 0 70 100
4 R 6 1 44 75
L 3 0 80 98
5 R 4 1 78 83
L 6 2 52 73
6 R 6 0 35 81
7 R 5 0 62 93
8 R 5 0 37 95
9 L 4 0 55 83
10 L 5 0 41 93
11 R 6 0 35 87
12 L 5 2 32 70
13 L 4 0 52 89
14 R 3 0 56 81
Mean 4.6 0.3 51.4 86.6

VAS: visual analogue scale, AOFAS: American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society, F/U: follow-up, R: right, L: left.

TOOLS
Similar articles